Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    largest front gear for EZ-1

    I have a EZ-1 sc bent, what would be the largest gear I could use to replace the 52T chainring without changing anything else. I want a little more top end on the flats. thanks Rogermo it an't all that bad

  2. #2
    sch
    sch is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Birmingham. AL
    Posts
    2,591
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I presume the front der is a clampon type. If so you
    could probably go up to a 56T ring with only a little
    strain, especially if you didn't use the larger two
    cassette rings. Shifting might be a bit marginal but
    there are a number of Rans bikes with chainring triples
    from 22T on the inside to 60-62T on the large ring.
    Larger than 56T would mean a longer chain and increased risk of problems but I have only anecdotal
    information in that regard. I just know it has been
    done on a lot of bents. Steve

  3. #3
    My own worst nightmare
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Madison, WI USA
    Posts
    1,237
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Pardon me exhuming this thread...

    ...but I've got an opportunity to get a 32/48/58 (yes, that's fifty-eight teeth!) set of chainrings for my EZ-1 SC (steel), and was wondering if the front der could handle it. They come, BTW, from a crankset for a tandem BikeE. Yeah, I know, that span between the 32 and 48 rings is a big climb. To be honest, I'm not worried about that. I have little occasion to use the "granny ring" (or, in this case, since it's not that small, the "auntie ring"). I just wanna know if I can position the cage so that it'll throw the chain between the 48 and 58 rings properly. I know this will gear up my 'bent considerably, but that's exactly what I want to do.

    I don't have the bike in front of me, so I'm not even sure how you physically position the front derailleur (or if it's even possible).

    And yeah, I'll probably have to add links to my chain. How many?

  4. #4
    sch
    sch is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Birmingham. AL
    Posts
    2,591
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    58 should be no big deal. As I said Rans uses 60-62T cw with inner cw in the
    low 20s without problems. As long as the Fr der can be lifted high enough for
    clearance of the 58t cw it will work. Chain may drag on the bottom of the
    cage in the 32 but you probably won't be in that CW for very long. If the
    chain length is correct now, then add the difference in CW teeth: 52 to 58 is
    6t, or 3" of chain (6 links). Might not be necessary to add any chain.
    Cycle through the rear cassette and see what the R der does on the larger
    two cassette cogs, if it straightens out the cage and pulls the cage forward
    add chain. Bents have a lot longer chain line and chain slack so are less
    sensitive to chain length. Chain flop is sometimes a problem as the R der
    can't wrap up all the chain, so some bents have intermediate chain idlers
    or even auxiliary R der chain cages to wrap chain. Steve

  5. #5
    'Bent Brian
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Wellington Ohio
    My Bikes
    Trek 1000, Rans Tailwind
    Posts
    560
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, you are correct. I just got a Rans Tailwind and it has a HUGE chainring. The sizes are 42/52/62T If I recall the datasheet correctly. The cassette runs from 28T down to 11T. The idler cage on the derailleur is VERY long and misses the ground by only a couple of inces. There are two frame mounted idlers to conrol the chain as well. The whole thing works very smoothly. If you do the math and can do 120 crank RPM the speed comes out to around 40MPH. On the low end of things the lowes gear feels like a granny on an mountain bike. I have no difficulty in climbing moderate grades, just sit and spin. It all comes down to the throw on the front derailleur and how much slack the rear derailleur can take up. Good Luck!

    'bent Brian

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •