Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Recumbent
Reload this Page >

Recumbent Muscles

Search
Notices
Recumbent What IS that thing?! Recumbents may be odd looking, but they have many advantages over a "wedgie" bicycle. Discuss the in's and out's recumbent lifestyle in the recumbent forum.

Recumbent Muscles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-08, 03:15 PM
  #1  
The Recycled Cycler
Thread Starter
 
markwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,399

Bikes: Real Steel. Really. Ti is cool, too !

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Recumbent Muscles

My back is shot and riding a traditional road frame has become painful. I'm looking at recumebents, but not necessarily growing the requisite white beard

Anyway, I am looking at a traditional LWB like the Tour Easy with a diamond sorta geometry.

Question - I am really concerned about losing ability to climb hills on a recumbent. In spite of my back problems I am still an excellent hill climber and better than 90% of folks out there on road bikes.

I have severe atrophy in my calves because of the nerve damage in my spine, but my quads stay in pretty good cycling shape.

So here is my question - on a recumebnt like a Tour Easy - what muscles are most important on 1) flats and 2) climbing? If calves were most important, then I'd lose any advantage I get standing and climbing or pushing on my traditional frame, and I'd be walking up most hills.
markwebb is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 03:37 PM
  #2  
Licensed Bike Geek
 
Davet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Barriles, Baja Sur, Mexico
Posts: 1,360

Bikes: Look 585, Kirk Terraplane, Serotta Ottrott, Spectrum Super Custom, Hampsten Carbon Leger Tournesol

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times in 48 Posts
My wife bought a Rans V2 last month and after several hundred miles she's reporting that her quads suffer more, riding the same routes, than riding her Calfee.
Davet is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 04:05 PM
  #3  
The Recycled Cycler
Thread Starter
 
markwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,399

Bikes: Real Steel. Really. Ti is cool, too !

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I wonder if that means she's working out her quads more than on her standard roadbike - which would be good for me. Maybe she uses fewer muscles (less calves etc)?

Originally Posted by Davet
My wife bought a Rans V2 last month and after several hundred miles she's reporting that her quads suffer more, riding the same routes, than riding her Calfee.
markwebb is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 04:46 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Buckhorn, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 217

Bikes: Rans Screamer, Catrike Expedition, Specialized Montain Bike, Cannondale Quick SL1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmmm. I feel like a bit of a rookie responding here as I've only been riding bent for 6 years, and about 11,000 km. For me, and we're all different, my legs seem to be getting a more complete "workout" on the bent. My quads, calves and hamstrings ached for a long time when I started, but not anymore. Yes, I'm slower up hill, but I don't care. I can hold my own with the DF's on the flat and I'm faster downhill. But it's all about comfort. Ten years ago I herniated two discs and carpel tunnel and neck and butt pain made long distance riding impossible. I can't count the number of stem extensions, saddle positions, etc., I tried but nothing seemed to work. The recumbent has solved all of that. I'm having fun once again and enjoying the distance without pain. I don't really care how fast I am. I have been managing 2-3000 km in our 6 month cycling season so I'm happy.

Mike
mchell is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 05:30 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
charly17201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 582

Bikes: RANS Formula LE, Giant Escape 1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As a fairly new bent rider (since Feb), I've found that my calves don't get near the workout that my quads do.
charly17201 is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 06:23 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,483

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1513 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
I'd say that bents isolate the quads rather than the calves. Calves are worked more while standing, and obviously you can't stand on a bent. On the hilliest days on RAGBRAI this year, only my quads got sore.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 06:29 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You should be fine. I ride a TE, the trick to climbing on any recumbent is to spin. Make sure you have your gearing low enough for the steepest hills that you ride. Don't worry about the speed at first that will come as you develop bent legs. Put a fairing on the bike that will make it more aero and help with the speed you want.
jab1362 is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 06:34 PM
  #8  
Bikes are good
 
El Julioso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 111

Bikes: 2000 Schwinn Moab 1, heavily modified

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you have limited use of your calves, the best thing for you to do is likely to move your cleats (assuming you ride with clipless pedals) as close to your ankle as possible. The whole purpose of the calf muscles is to use the foot as a lever to give one that extra "kick" in, say, running or jumping (although their function in cycling is mostly just to prevent the foot from rotating towards the patella under power). The end of that lever is the ball of the foot, which is normally where the cleat should be for optimum power; however, with limited calf function, it would be best to move the cleat back on the foot to improve the leverage of the calves and decrease the amount of work they have to do.

Having said that, if your feet don't have any trouble staying in their proper position while pedaling, your calves are probably strong enough. Fiddle with your setup to find what works for you. And keep in mind that you will definitely be slower at first on a recumbent regardless of your setup, because you won't be adapted to the motions yet. I'm sure it would be the same story if you rode a recumbent your whole life and then switched to a DF.
El Julioso is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 08:36 PM
  #9  
The Recycled Cycler
Thread Starter
 
markwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,399

Bikes: Real Steel. Really. Ti is cool, too !

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That's a great independent evaluation for a phenomena that I discovered several years ago, although I did not know enough to attribute ity to the calf muscles. I use toe clips on my road bike, and I use larger than normal toe clips so I can move the middle of foot over pedals and thus push more with the middle of my foot than the ball/toe area. I get more power that way. You substantiated what I found. Thanks !!!

Originally Posted by El Julioso
If you have limited use of your calves, the best thing for you to do is likely to move your cleats (assuming you ride with clipless pedals) as close to your ankle as possible. The whole purpose of the calf muscles is to use the foot as a lever to give one that extra "kick" in, say, running or jumping (although their function in cycling is mostly just to prevent the foot from rotating towards the patella under power). The end of that lever is the ball of the foot, which is normally where the cleat should be for optimum power; however, with limited calf function, it would be best to move the cleat back on the foot to improve the leverage of the calves and decrease the amount of work they have to do.

Having said that, if your feet don't have any trouble staying in their proper position while pedaling, your calves are probably strong enough. Fiddle with your setup to find what works for you. And keep in mind that you will definitely be slower at first on a recumbent regardless of your setup, because you won't be adapted to the motions yet. I'm sure it would be the same story if you rode a recumbent your whole life and then switched to a DF.
markwebb is offline  
Old 08-24-08, 08:38 PM
  #10  
The Recycled Cycler
Thread Starter
 
markwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,399

Bikes: Real Steel. Really. Ti is cool, too !

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yup - it's that excruitating butt pain that makes it so difficult to ride a road bike anymore.

Originally Posted by mchell
Hmmm. I feel like a bit of a rookie responding here as I've only been riding bent for 6 years, and about 11,000 km. For me, and we're all different, my legs seem to be getting a more complete "workout" on the bent. My quads, calves and hamstrings ached for a long time when I started, but not anymore. Yes, I'm slower up hill, but I don't care. I can hold my own with the DF's on the flat and I'm faster downhill. But it's all about comfort. Ten years ago I herniated two discs and carpel tunnel and neck and butt pain made long distance riding impossible. I can't count the number of stem extensions, saddle positions, etc., I tried but nothing seemed to work. The recumbent has solved all of that. I'm having fun once again and enjoying the distance without pain. I don't really care how fast I am. I have been managing 2-3000 km in our 6 month cycling season so I'm happy.

Mike
markwebb is offline  
Old 08-25-08, 05:31 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by markwebb
... on a recumebnt like a Tour Easy - what muscles are most important on 1) flats and 2) climbing? If calves were most important, then I'd lose any advantage I get standing and climbing or pushing on my traditional frame, and I'd be walking up most hills.
I think there are some articles in the human powered vehicle literature. The one paper I have read did not show striking differences recumbent vs upright. However, the "recumbent" position studied was not very recumbent because the bottom bracket was well below the seat. This would make the results more relevant to the Tour Easy versus a typical high- or low-racer where the BB bracket is at or above the seat height.

Reference: J Biomech Eng. 2005 Apr;127(2):301-10. Functional roles of the leg muscles when pedaling in the recumbent versus the upright position. Hakansson NA, Hull ML.
Abstract
Giro is offline  
Old 08-25-08, 06:38 PM
  #12  
Bikes are good
 
El Julioso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 111

Bikes: 2000 Schwinn Moab 1, heavily modified

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by markwebb
That's a great independent evaluation for a phenomena that I discovered several years ago, although I did not know enough to attribute ity to the calf muscles. I use toe clips on my road bike, and I use larger than normal toe clips so I can move the middle of foot over pedals and thus push more with the middle of my foot than the ball/toe area. I get more power that way. You substantiated what I found. Thanks !!!
You're welcome. Enjoy the 'bent!
El Julioso is offline  
Old 08-26-08, 01:46 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Because i put crank shorteners on my HiRacer i also lowered the gearing to compensate and put a mtb crank on. My ride climbs like a mountain goat now. Just spin like a fiend and as you probably know, as your 'bent legs get stronger you'll be able to spin in higher gear

+1 with the moving the cleats back.
Myqul is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.