Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    20" wheel efficiency vs. 26"

    I just bought my first bent, a Bacchetta Giro. It just felt right, ergonomically. I know that inherently a larger wheel must be more efficient once rolling. I wanted to like the Strada better, but I did not. The bottom bracket was just too high for a beginner benter like myself. My question is, are there some solid studies on the relative effieciencies of the 20" vs. the 26" wheel? What did I give up?

  2. #2
    'Bent Brian
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Wellington Ohio
    My Bikes
    Trek 1000, Rans Tailwind
    Posts
    560
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It all depends on your goal in cycling. If you are out for fun, fresh air, running errands, etc. the small difference in speed between an large wheel and a small wheel is insignificant and immaterial. If you are riding timed events, competions, then you want all you can get from your bike. A bigger wheel with lower rolling resistance is what you would need. Have you checked Sheldon Brown for any info? He is a pretty complete resource on cycling.

  3. #3
    Senior Member ChiliDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Clermont County, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Fuji Absolute 2.1, Electra Townie 21D, Fuji Saratoga 1.0
    Posts
    734
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This topic comes up every once in a while, the ol' 20" vs 26" wheel question: which is "faster", etc.? Usually the V-Rex or Rocket are the subjects of this question, for example. My opinion, coming from riding both wheel configurations is that this is little difference attributed solely to the wheel size. It is also the gearing of the bike and the engine. Comparing the V-Rex and the Rocket, for example, I could see no difference. The Rocket is geared a little higher than the Rex. The Rex has a 26" rear wheel. Personally, I considered the Rocket a faster accelerator and easy to maintain speed over distance. Rex traveled fast over distance, slower to start off. Go figure.

    I think a few years ago this topic got going in fine detail over on BROL. If I remember correctly, after all the measuring and calculating, no definitive conclusion was reached. But it sure was a fine topic! Ride what you enjoy, what fits you and your style, and don't put so much stock in it as it probably doesn't matter all that much.
    The bike for you is the one you will ride!

  4. #4
    sch
    sch is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Birmingham. AL
    Posts
    2,599
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Roll down tests have been done to check out tire rolling resistance with some
    validity, mostly in the European literature. The decreased 'resistance' of larger
    wheels would be difficult to evaluate in the real world because it is swamped by
    tire variances and the rarity of similar tires in 20 and 26" sizes though there are
    a few that are available in both sizes. An even bigger problem would be air resistance
    variances in the bikes themselves between frames for 20 and 26" wheels. Testing
    would have to be done 'off the bike'.
    Steve

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    portland or
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If the surface is bumpy then the 20" wheel slows you down. I had a good test where a bike path and road ran side by side. the bikepath is wash boardy. it knocked off 2 miles a hour compared to the road.
    this path didn to seem to slow me much on my road biek though it would give me a headache (G)

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    portland or
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you can get 1" or 1.8" tires should speed you along.

  7. #7
    Ride it, don't fondle it! Wheel Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Grand Junction, CO
    My Bikes
    Raleigh M80, Bacchetta AERO, Bacchetta GIRO, BikeE, 83' TREK 970, Catrike Speed, IRO Fixie/SS
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get a copy of Bicycle Science it has a very informative section on this sublect.

    Jude

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've read test results on wheel efficiency a while back, but can't find it anymore.

    In any case, suppose the difference between 26" and 20" wheels is 5-percent. However, on a 20/26 SWB, only about 40-percent of the rider's weight is on the smaller front wheel, so the overall efficiency loss is probably less than 5-percent. Maybe about 2-percent?

    I suspect that these are very conservative figures and the actual efficiency losses are far less, so you likely won't notice the difference under normal riding conditions. In fact, if you aren't comfortable on a high BB 26/26 recumbent, then you won't go faster on it anyway. This is especially true for climbing hills.

    NR
    Last edited by NazcaRider; 03-05-05 at 01:56 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •