Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Buying a leftover '14 SS Evo. Need crankset advice.

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Buying a leftover '14 SS Evo. Need crankset advice.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-15, 03:23 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jdip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Buying a leftover '14 SS Evo. Need crankset advice.

Buying one of these: SuperSix EVO 3 Ultegra - SUPERSIX EVO - Elite Race - ROAD - BIKES - 2014

It's equipped with a standard crank and was told I could get it swapped out for a compact instead (which I want). The LBS thought they had one lying around but turns out its 165mm instead of 170mm that the bike came with (it's a 50cm). So they gave me the following options:

1-install a Sram force carbon 170mm 34/50 no extra charge
2-install a SLK light bb386 with an adaptor no extra charge
3-install SLK light BB30 165mm crank 34/50 no extra charge
4-leave the bike as is (53/39 SLK Light 170mm)

First of all, how is the SL-K Light? I wasn't really a fan of FSA cranksets, and that seems to be a popular opinion but I looked this one up and it looks pretty good and isn't as cheap as I thought it was. It's seemingly really light and stiff. How does it measure up to the SRAM Force crank? It seems to sell for $500+ which is more expensive than even the SRAM Red cranks. And how would front shifting be on Force, seeing as the rest of the drivetrain is Ultegra?

I don't think I want to use an adapter and I really need the compact chainrings to get up steeper hills so I think options 2 and 4 are out. FWIW my old bike is a 54cm Synapse Alloy with what I believe is 172.5mm cranks (FSA Gossamer). I don't know about the 165mm crank arms and but am leaning towards staying with 170mm that comes with the bike by default. What would you guys do? I mainly wanted to know what people's experiences with the SL-K Light vs Force cranksets are.

Last edited by jdip; 04-09-15 at 03:42 PM.
jdip is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 03:45 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,770
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 630 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 369 Times in 206 Posts
Force Carbon because the rings are slightly better
Elvo is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 03:53 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
The upper end FSA cranks are good. BB386 EVO is a great system with the combination of the 30 mm diameter, 86.5 mm long aluminum spindle.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 04:27 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jdip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Elvo
Force Carbon because the rings are slightly better
The Force crankset looks to be 1/2 the price of the SL-K Light. I prefer the way it looks but it seems like worse value (I don't really know how they stack up against each other in the real world. I probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference)? I guess I want to get the best value for my money.

I have read about the SL-K Light coming undone but that's probably due to user-error when installing it.

Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
The upper end FSA cranks are good. BB386 EVO is a great system with the combination of the 30 mm diameter, 86.5 mm long aluminum spindle.
Is that the option you would choose? I don't know much about BB386 EVO but it seemed a little counter productive to me to get a brand new BB30 frame only to use an adapter.

Last edited by jdip; 04-09-15 at 04:33 PM.
jdip is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 08:05 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
loimpact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,337

Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Supersix Evo 3; 2014 Cannondale Quick 4; 2014 Cannondale Crash 4 hi-mod

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I have this exact bike. (Mine's a 60cm so 175 length cranks)

EDIT: And mine's 50/34 compact.

I have no complaints about the FSA SL-K Light. I don't have much to compare it to but it's been "goldilocks" for me which I consider good. I just don't think about it cuz it's been reliable.

I, too, saw great reviews on it while FSA has taken bruises on cranksets like Gossamer & such. (I know some have had zero problems with those too, however).

But I don't know what I'd take as an alternative if it blew up tomorrow. Ultegra comes to mind, but then, of course you need an adapter & while Praxis is ready, I really wouldn't want to use an adapter either.

(shrug)
loimpact is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by jdip
The Force crankset looks to be 1/2 the price of the SL-K Light. I prefer the way it looks but it seems like worse value (I don't really know how they stack up against each other in the real world. I probably wouldn't be able to tell the difference)? I guess I want to get the best value for my money.

I have read about the SL-K Light coming undone but that's probably due to user-error when installing it.



Is that the option you would choose? I don't know much about BB386 EVO but it seemed a little counter productive to me to get a brand new BB30 frame only to use an adapter.
No adapter. Just a BB30 set of bearings and spacers to take the width out to fit the long spindle. Pretty simple. Besides it's free for you, right. So the higher price is no issue.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 08:49 PM
  #7  
Old Fart
 
Stucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348

Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I have an FSA SL-K Light w/ BB30 and Ultegra. No complaints....BUT, the previous owner of the bike had replaced the OEM chainrings with Praxis- for what reason, I do not know....but it's a stiff, quiet and silky-smooth-shifting set-up.
Stucky is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 09:41 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jdip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by loimpact
I have this exact bike. (Mine's a 60cm so 175 length cranks)

EDIT: And mine's 50/34 compact.

I have no complaints about the FSA SL-K Light. I don't have much to compare it to but it's been "goldilocks" for me which I consider good. I just don't think about it cuz it's been reliable.

I, too, saw great reviews on it while FSA has taken bruises on cranksets like Gossamer & such. (I know some have had zero problems with those too, however).

But I don't know what I'd take as an alternative if it blew up tomorrow. Ultegra comes to mind, but then, of course you need an adapter & while Praxis is ready, I really wouldn't want to use an adapter either.

(shrug)
Nice, did you get it in blue or black? I really like the blue. It seems really unique in Cannondale's set of colourways.

It would be nice to have a matching Ultegra crank, but right now Force looks like the easiest route... I know it will work but it's kind of weird having a full Ultegra drivetrain and then a Force crank. But that's just the 'OCD' in me.

Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
No adapter. Just a BB30 set of bearings and spacers to take the width out to fit the long spindle. Pretty simple. Besides it's free for you, right. So the higher price is no issue.
Good to know... thanks for that bit of info. Do you think that SL-K is nicer than the Force crankset?

Originally Posted by Stucky
I have an FSA SL-K Light w/ BB30 and Ultegra. No complaints....BUT, the previous owner of the bike had replaced the OEM chainrings with Praxis- for what reason, I do not know....but it's a stiff, quiet and silky-smooth-shifting set-up.
That sounds cool... Do you have pics? Unfortunately that wouldn't work for me though because the crank spider that comes with the bike is 130 BCD. For compact chainrings, it needs to be 110 BCD.
jdip is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 09:58 PM
  #9  
Old Fart
 
Stucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348

Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by jdip
That sounds cool... Do you have pics? Unfortunately that wouldn't work for me though because the crank spider that comes with the bike is 130 BCD. For compact chainrings, it needs to be 110 BCD.
Mine's a "mid-compact" 52/36, I think- with 110BCD.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
SANY2729.jpg (98.6 KB, 15 views)
Stucky is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 10:12 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
loimpact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,337

Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Supersix Evo 3; 2014 Cannondale Quick 4; 2014 Cannondale Crash 4 hi-mod

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Stucky
I have an FSA SL-K Light w/ BB30 and Ultegra. No complaints....BUT, the previous owner of the bike had replaced the OEM chainrings with Praxis- for what reason, I do not know....but it's a stiff, quiet and silky-smooth-shifting set-up.
FWIW, I was recently reading on this and some feel that the FSA chain rings are too light weight & wear out fast. I've tried to keep my entire drive train rather clean so I'm not seeing any excessive wear but I do like the machined look of the FSA rings. I might try the Praxis if/when I wear the FSA's out. (the Praxis are typically black so a change in appearance would be different)
loimpact is offline  
Old 04-09-15, 10:18 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
loimpact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,337

Bikes: 2014 Cannondale Supersix Evo 3; 2014 Cannondale Quick 4; 2014 Cannondale Crash 4 hi-mod

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by jdip
Nice, did you get it in blue or black? I really like the blue. It seems really unique in Cannondale's set of colourways.

It would be nice to have a matching Ultegra crank, but right now Force looks like the easiest route... I know it will work but it's kind of weird having a full Ultegra drivetrain and then a Force crank. But that's just the 'OCD' in me.
I went with the black. (Mine was a price mistake so I'd have taken the thing in pink if I had to) I do like the black, though. I saw another size in blue and it did look good, but I'm not big on the whole scheme of bike w/ the white trim......HOWEVER......I'm a sucker for "Gulf" colorway. (a la 2012 CAAD 10)

loimpact is offline  
Old 04-10-15, 05:29 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by jdip
Good to know... thanks for that bit of info. Do you think that SL-K is nicer than the Force crankset?
Hard to say. My guess is they are "intended" to compete with each other, i.e. occupy the same spot in their respective product lines. I ride Red and Rival on three bikes, but have used FSA (SL-K and K-Force) on all three. I did have one Red crank, but sold it to get the weight savings of the K-Force Light BB386EVO. At the moment I have two K-Force lights and one SL-K. They are fine for me.
__________________
Robert

Originally Posted by LAJ
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 04-10-15, 12:12 PM
  #13  
Old Fart
 
Stucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348

Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by loimpact
FWIW, I was recently reading on this and some feel that the FSA chain rings are too light weight & wear out fast. I've tried to keep my entire drive train rather clean so I'm not seeing any excessive wear but I do like the machined look of the FSA rings. I might try the Praxis if/when I wear the FSA's out. (the Praxis are typically black so a change in appearance would be different)
Ah, thanks! I thought it might be something like that. These Praxis rings aren't pretty...but they seem really beefy. I really love the way the FD shifts on this bike. And so far, no noise from the BB30. (I've only put 800 miles on the bike so far...but it was formerly owned by a bike mechanic...)
Stucky is offline  
Old 04-10-15, 05:51 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Apopka, Florida
Posts: 1,476

Bikes: Santa Cruz Stigmata

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 20 Posts
I have the SL-K light bb30 on my caad10 and it's still going strong after a year and a half of my 225lbs giving it my all. My setup is full Ultegra di2 which is known to test weak chain rings. I have considered swapping the rings from my current 53/39 down to a 52/36 using praxis, rotor, DA7800, or another set of the FSA's because they've performed flawlessly? I'm still 10 speed with a 130bcd.
dvdslw is offline  
Old 04-10-15, 07:12 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,866

Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,720 Times in 1,004 Posts
I've had both in a BB30 50/34 configuration and I don't think you will have issues either way. I have the SLK Light now on my Synapse and I had a SRAM Force on my SuperSix.
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Originally Posted by AEO
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.



jaxgtr is offline  
Old 04-10-15, 08:36 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
macca33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: West Gippy, Australia
Posts: 607

Bikes: 2017 Ridley Noah SL - Candy Apple DA9000, 2011 CAAD10 Berzerker Ult6800, 2013 FOCUS Mares CX Ult6800

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had FSA SL-K Light with my CAAD10 and the crank was fine enough - until the bond between crankset and threaded pedal insert became loose - then, the crankarm is a throwaway. It is not an uncommon occurrence.

FSA Gossamer (aluminium) is a more sturdy, but heavier option.

cheers
macca33 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bike4fun12
Road Cycling
18
11-19-12 10:06 AM
jasandalb
Road Cycling
6
06-18-12 07:22 PM
M_Wales
Road Cycling
15
11-29-11 08:11 PM
chadteck
Road Cycling
15
01-06-11 11:14 PM
bassic wilson
Road Cycling
6
01-12-10 04:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.