Shimano 105 5800 or Ultegra 6800
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Shimano 105 5800 or Ultegra 6800
I'm retiring next month, and my first retirement project is to build a new bike. I'm building a steel framed disc road bike that I can ride on dirt and gravel as well as pavement. There are so many scenic dirt and gravel roads here in Oregon that are rideable with a road bike, but are too rough for skinny tires. I've already bought or picked out everything I need except the groupset. I'm going with Shimano 11 speed, but I can't make up my mind between 105 and Ultegra. I haven't the best of luck over the years with 105, but I haven't used it since the 8 speed days. People are saying that the new 105 5800 has closed the gap with Ultegra, that it's mechanically the same but with different materials, the main difference being a few ounces of weight. I'm not a racer, and it doesn't seem worth $300 to shave off a few ounces. Durability is a bigger issue with me than weight. Does anybody have experience with these groups?
#3
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
My 6800 has been great. I'm on my second year and I haven't really touched it since the first couple of weeks after installation to tighten the cable slack. Super smooth, responsive shifting and has a great feel to the hoods.
I personally think the Ultegra is a good looking group too.
I personally think the Ultegra is a good looking group too.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,410
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm primarily a Campy guy but I built up a bike for my dad with 5800 this spring. I'm pretty impressed by it. If I didn't hate the brake lever to shift mechanism so much I'd consider Shimano again.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have the 5800. Great group. Haven't tried the 6800 but the 6800 will shave seconds off on certain stages of the Tour.
Very light group and easy to install...crisp shifting and the all black look is nice.
Very light group and easy to install...crisp shifting and the all black look is nice.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,496
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
5800 and 6800 are nearly identical in performance and looks. The only real difference is weigth and price. Since you are building a steel bike with discs it makes no sense to spend extra to shave a few grams.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 415
Bikes: Wheelbarrow
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm retiring next month, and my first retirement project is to build a new bike. I'm building a steel framed disc road bike that I can ride on dirt and gravel as well as pavement. There are so many scenic dirt and gravel roads here in Oregon that are rideable with a road bike, but are too rough for skinny tires. I've already bought or picked out everything I need except the groupset. I'm going with Shimano 11 speed, but I can't make up my mind between 105 and Ultegra. I haven't the best of luck over the years with 105, but I haven't used it since the 8 speed days. People are saying that the new 105 5800 has closed the gap with Ultegra, that it's mechanically the same but with different materials, the main difference being a few ounces of weight. I'm not a racer, and it doesn't seem worth $300 to shave off a few ounces. Durability is a bigger issue with me than weight. Does anybody have experience with these groups?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,078
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You can't feel a difference riding them back-to-back (or at least I couldn't.) That said, it's not a huge price difference so buy Ultegra if that's what your heart desires. I couldn't justify it myself so I ended up with 5800 on both bikes.
#10
L-I-V-I-N
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stafford, OR
Posts: 4,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Not the smartest way to ride a bike.
__________________
"The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson
'14 carbon Synapse - '12 CAAD 10 5 - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur
"The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson
'14 carbon Synapse - '12 CAAD 10 5 - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 415
Bikes: Wheelbarrow
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,527
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3661 Post(s)
Liked 5,408 Times
in
2,747 Posts
I think the 105 in either shiny black or silver looks nicer than the matte gray Ultegra.
#14
Senior Member
#15
Ride First, Work Later!!!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,492
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Trek Superfly, Raleigh Rush Hour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What kind of disc brakes are you planning to use? I had 6800 on my Emonda and have 5800 on my CruX and don't notice any significant difference at all. I went with the 5800 because eventually I would like to go full Shimano Hydro and I'll need the same shifters for either set that way and can change the other bits if I find any reason to. I also had my own saddle and was upgrading wheels so the cost difference between the two models didn't make sense to me. Good luck!
#16
Senior Member
Actually, I'm curious on specific components within the families.......like.....
What's the difference between:
5800 & 6800 cassette (Maybe nickel plate on the 6800? But 5800's still shiny too so what...zinc?)
5800 & 6800 chain (really......what could be different here?)
5800 & 6800 shifters (Maybe carbon fiber bits vs plastic?)
5800 & 6800 derailers (I guess I see some carbon fiber on my 6800 but does a derailer need CF?)
I know 9000 uses mostly CF/Alum/Ti and thus the lighter bits tend to wear faster and I have no interest in 9000 anyway, but the 5800 vs 6800 stuff really has me baffled since they're so friggin' similar.
(shrug)
What's the difference between:
5800 & 6800 cassette (Maybe nickel plate on the 6800? But 5800's still shiny too so what...zinc?)
5800 & 6800 chain (really......what could be different here?)
5800 & 6800 shifters (Maybe carbon fiber bits vs plastic?)
5800 & 6800 derailers (I guess I see some carbon fiber on my 6800 but does a derailer need CF?)
I know 9000 uses mostly CF/Alum/Ti and thus the lighter bits tend to wear faster and I have no interest in 9000 anyway, but the 5800 vs 6800 stuff really has me baffled since they're so friggin' similar.
(shrug)
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 261
Bikes: 2015 Ridley Fenix Ultegra, 2016 Ridley X-Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have Ultegra 6800 on my road bike and love it. Very smooth and quick shifting and haven't had any problems with it so far. That being said, I've heard from many many people that 5800 is one of the best bang for the bucks groupsets available among Shimano. If you have extra money for it, I'd go with the 6800 but I'm sure you'll be content with 5800 if you want to save the money for other gear.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,496
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
Actually, I'm curious on specific components within the families.......like.....
What's the difference between:
5800 & 6800 cassette (Maybe nickel plate on the 6800? But 5800's still shiny too so what...zinc?)
5800 & 6800 chain (really......what could be different here?)
5800 & 6800 shifters (Maybe carbon fiber bits vs plastic?)
5800 & 6800 derailers (I guess I see some carbon fiber on my 6800 but does a derailer need CF?)
I know 9000 uses mostly CF/Alum/Ti and thus the lighter bits tend to wear faster and I have no interest in 9000 anyway, but the 5800 vs 6800 stuff really has me baffled since they're so friggin' similar.
(shrug)
What's the difference between:
5800 & 6800 cassette (Maybe nickel plate on the 6800? But 5800's still shiny too so what...zinc?)
5800 & 6800 chain (really......what could be different here?)
5800 & 6800 shifters (Maybe carbon fiber bits vs plastic?)
5800 & 6800 derailers (I guess I see some carbon fiber on my 6800 but does a derailer need CF?)
I know 9000 uses mostly CF/Alum/Ti and thus the lighter bits tend to wear faster and I have no interest in 9000 anyway, but the 5800 vs 6800 stuff really has me baffled since they're so friggin' similar.
(shrug)
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What kind of disc brakes are you planning to use? I had 6800 on my Emonda and have 5800 on my CruX and don't notice any significant difference at all. I went with the 5800 because eventually I would like to go full Shimano Hydro and I'll need the same shifters for either set that way and can change the other bits if I find any reason to. I also had my own saddle and was upgrading wheels so the cost difference between the two models didn't make sense to me. Good luck!
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm a Campy guy too, but the new shimano 11 speed groups offer an 11x32 cassette. If I match that with a compact crank, I should be able to climb most anything on gravel roads. If I went with Campy I'd probably have to get a triple. I've learned the hard way you have to have enough gearing to stay in the saddle when you're going up on grave.
#22
Ride First, Work Later!!!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,492
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Trek Superfly, Raleigh Rush Hour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was going to go with Avid BB7, but the mechanic at my local shop talked me out of it, convinced me to get TRP Spyres. He says they're easier to keep adjusted, and have more sensitive touch. I couldn't really tell the difference on a test ride at the shop, but I have 0 experience with disc brakes, so I took his advice. Another option is the TRP HY/RD, which is a cable actuated hydraulic brake. It's a true hydraulic brake, but the master cylinder is in the brake itself, and it works with any regular road shifters. Apparently it's a step up from mechanical discs, not quite as good a full hydraulic setup, but it allows you to run any road group you like. It sounds like a cool idea, but they're about twice the price of mechanicals.
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Actually, I'm curious on specific components within the families.......like.....
What's the difference between:
5800 & 6800 cassette (Maybe nickel plate on the 6800? But 5800's still shiny too so what...zinc?)
5800 & 6800 chain (really......what could be different here?)
5800 & 6800 shifters (Maybe carbon fiber bits vs plastic?)
5800 & 6800 derailers (I guess I see some carbon fiber on my 6800 but does a derailer need CF?)
I know 9000 uses mostly CF/Alum/Ti and thus the lighter bits tend to wear faster and I have no interest in 9000 anyway, but the 5800 vs 6800 stuff really has me baffled since they're so friggin' similar.
(shrug)
What's the difference between:
5800 & 6800 cassette (Maybe nickel plate on the 6800? But 5800's still shiny too so what...zinc?)
5800 & 6800 chain (really......what could be different here?)
5800 & 6800 shifters (Maybe carbon fiber bits vs plastic?)
5800 & 6800 derailers (I guess I see some carbon fiber on my 6800 but does a derailer need CF?)
I know 9000 uses mostly CF/Alum/Ti and thus the lighter bits tend to wear faster and I have no interest in 9000 anyway, but the 5800 vs 6800 stuff really has me baffled since they're so friggin' similar.
(shrug)
The mix and match idea sounds good, but you get much better prices on a group set than on individual components. Right now I'm leaning toward 105.
#24
Senior Member
I ran across this video on Velonews that talks a little bit about this: Ask a Mechanic: Mixing Shimano components
The mix and match idea sounds good, but you get much better prices on a group set than on individual components. Right now I'm leaning toward 105.
The mix and match idea sounds good, but you get much better prices on a group set than on individual components. Right now I'm leaning toward 105.
Also interesting that they consider the shifters a 105 or Dura-Ace "either/or" situation. I'd have to do a lot of testing myself to trust all of this, of course.
And, then again, you have folks like bt who own both ends of the spectrum & can't tell the difference anyway so who knows.
(shrug)