Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

CAAD10 Ultegra 3 vs Trek Émonda SL 5

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

CAAD10 Ultegra 3 vs Trek Émonda SL 5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-15, 06:05 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CAAD10 Ultegra 3 vs Trek Émonda SL 5

Pros and cons for each of the following?

Cannondale CAAD10 = Aluminium with Ultegra

Trek Emonda = full carbon with 105

The prices I have been quoted see the Trek coming in at about $200 more expensive.

CAAD10 Ultegra 3 2015

Trek Émonda SL 5

Advice/tips/etc all welcome!
Dark Mark is offline  
Old 04-28-15, 06:21 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Shuffleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296

Bikes: Colnago CLX,GT Karakoram,Giant Revel, Kona Honk_ Tonk

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dark Mark
Pros and cons for each of the following?

Cannondale CAAD10 = Aluminium with Ultegra

Trek Emonda = full carbon with 105

The prices I have been quoted see the Trek coming in at about $200 more expensive.

CAAD10 Ultegra 3 2015

Trek Émonda SL 5

Advice/tips/etc all welcome!
Disregard the components and figure out which frame you like better. Personally, I would base my decision off of that as long as they are both within budget.
I would go with the Emonda simply because it is a high quality carbon frame. The Caad is a great aluminum frame but I like carbon better. I can change out the components over time if necessary. 105 is a solid groupset. It is not as good as Ultegra but the drop off is not massive. In my opinion the frame difference over rides the groupset difference.
Shuffleman is offline  
Old 04-28-15, 11:15 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 465

Bikes: Trek Emonda SL build, CAAD10, Bianchi Pista '13, Litespeed Antares '03

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
I'm lucky to own both of these frames and I think they are both great! I have a CAAD10 build with Ultegra and an Emonda SL build with Ultegra. I use the CAAD10 as a backup / rain / commuter bike.


You should ride both bikes and focus on the differences in the geometry first. The CAAD10 is a more race specific frame with quite short head-tube. BUT you can probably achieve the same fit on the emonda too, except you want a real big saddle-to-bar drop. I had some problem to go as low as I wanted, but using a different headset top spacer helped and I can still use a -10/-17 degree stem to go lower. If you want a bike that's more comfortable, I think the emonda has a better all-around geometry for almost everyone.


If we focus on the frameset, then the Emonda is a clear winner. At least for me. It's a smoother, stiffer and lighter frameset. It's not a top-level frame (the SLR is), but it's one of the best mid-level carbon frames you can get now. (I still think that CAAD10 is the best frameset sub $2000.)


On the groupset, I have to agree with @Shuffleman. It doesn't really matter at this point. The 11sp 105 is a great groupset. Probably the two bikes currently are at the same weight, but with the emonda you will have a better frameset.

I think the emonda is worth the $200 extra, except you want something really race specific.
nemeseri is offline  
Old 04-28-15, 05:15 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shuffleman
Disregard the components .....


Originally Posted by nemeseri
I'm lucky to own both of these frames ......
Thanks guys, appreciate it!

I could also get my hands on a CAAD8 with 11sp 105 components for around $400 cheaper than the CAAD10. Worth the difference?
Dark Mark is offline  
Old 04-28-15, 06:01 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
link0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 794

Bikes: '11 Merlin Extralight, '98 Dean Castanza, '89 Schwinn Prologue

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Emonda, no question.
link0 is offline  
Old 04-28-15, 07:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Shuffleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296

Bikes: Colnago CLX,GT Karakoram,Giant Revel, Kona Honk_ Tonk

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dark Mark
Thanks guys, appreciate it!

I could also get my hands on a CAAD8 with 11sp 105 components for around $400 cheaper than the CAAD10. Worth the difference?
Truthfully, nobody can answer that but you. Your skill set and ability will not be held back by any of the bikes. You will not be any faster or slower on any of them. You may find more comfort on one versus the other. They will all shift really well. 105 and Ultegra are both awesome. 105 is heavier than Ultegra but there is no WOW difference in shifting quality.
It should boil down to your budget. I am not a Trek fan or a Cannondale by any stretch but they make good bikes. The Emonda, in my opinion, is a better frame than the CAAD.
If it were my first bike, I would buy the least expensive one because you really never know what you like and do not like until you have ridden for awhile. If this were my second bike, I would go with the Emonda because the frame is better and you can always upgrade the components down the road. If budget is not important than there is no reason not to go with the Emonda from the start. Don't stress out about the purchase though. All 3 of those bikes are awesome and you will have made a quality decision either way as long as you are comfortable on the saddle.
Good luck with your choice and let us know which one you buy and why.
Shuffleman is offline  
Old 04-28-15, 08:34 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 465

Bikes: Trek Emonda SL build, CAAD10, Bianchi Pista '13, Litespeed Antares '03

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Shuffleman
Truthfully, nobody can answer that but you. Your skill set and ability will not be held back by any of the bikes. You will not be any faster or slower on any of them. You may find more comfort on one versus the other. They will all shift really well. 105 and Ultegra are both awesome. 105 is heavier than Ultegra but there is no WOW difference in shifting quality.
It should boil down to your budget. I am not a Trek fan or a Cannondale by any stretch but they make good bikes. The Emonda, in my opinion, is a better frame than the CAAD.
If it were my first bike, I would buy the least expensive one because you really never know what you like and do not like until you have ridden for awhile. If this were my second bike, I would go with the Emonda because the frame is better and you can always upgrade the components down the road. If budget is not important than there is no reason not to go with the Emonda from the start. Don't stress out about the purchase though. All 3 of those bikes are awesome and you will have made a quality decision either way as long as you are comfortable on the saddle.
Good luck with your choice and let us know which one you buy and why.
This.
nemeseri is offline  
Old 04-28-15, 09:16 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
bikejrff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 464

Bikes: No. 22 Bicycle Great Divide, Lynskey R260, Salsa Colossal Ti, Litespeed T5, Lynskey Peloton, Bianchi Vigorelli, CAAD 10, Giant FastRoad CoMax 1, C-Dale Quick 1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 18 Posts
Though I don't own or have I ever ridden an Emonda, I have a number of carbon frame bikes and I don't think ANY of them are better than my CAAD 10.
bikejrff is offline  
Old 04-29-15, 09:25 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Shuffleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296

Bikes: Colnago CLX,GT Karakoram,Giant Revel, Kona Honk_ Tonk

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bikejrff
Though I don't own or have I ever ridden an Emonda, I have a number of carbon frame bikes and I don't think ANY of them are better than my CAAD 10.
My friend, if you have as many bikes as under your avatar, you must have a huge garage and a very understanding spouse. I live in the south, so I have no need for a "winter" bike. I can ride mine year round. I do have a mtb and a hybrid and I ride them all as they have separate purposes. I am not knocking you, I just could not own that many similar purpose bikes. I would feel like I was cheating on my road bike if I were to ride another
Shuffleman is offline  
Old 04-29-15, 04:01 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How would a Giant Propel Advanced compare to the above?
Dark Mark is offline  
Old 04-29-15, 04:06 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
trekmogul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,455

Bikes: Salsa Beargrease XX1, Trek Eqnuinox 9.9 SSL, Trek Madone 6.9 ,Trek District Carbon, Trek Boone7, Trek Fuel EX9.0,Trek Fuel 9.5, Trek Rumblefish Pro, Trek Remedy 9.9, Trek Equinox7, Trek District Belt

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 578 Post(s)
Liked 82 Times in 45 Posts
One more here for the Emonda..Love mine..
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Trek Emonda Resized.jpg (102.4 KB, 31 views)
__________________
Trek Fuel EX9.0 Trek Fuel EX9.5 Trek Equinox 9.9SSL TTX Trek Madone 6.9 Pro Red Project One, Trek Boone 7, Trek Rumblefish Pro, Trek Remedy 9.9, Trek Carbon District
trekmogul is offline  
Old 04-29-15, 05:38 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
bikejrff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 464

Bikes: No. 22 Bicycle Great Divide, Lynskey R260, Salsa Colossal Ti, Litespeed T5, Lynskey Peloton, Bianchi Vigorelli, CAAD 10, Giant FastRoad CoMax 1, C-Dale Quick 1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Shuffleman
My friend, if you have as many bikes as under your avatar, you must have a huge garage and a very understanding spouse. I live in the south, so I have no need for a "winter" bike. I can ride mine year round. I do have a mtb and a hybrid and I ride them all as they have separate purposes. I am not knocking you, I just could not own that many similar purpose bikes. I would feel like I was cheating on my road bike if I were to ride another
lol, I am aware of the overlap. Riding multiple bikes keeps things fresh for me. Ride 9,000 miles plus annually and I do ride each bike similar miles.

ps 36th wedding anniversary in 12 days.
bikejrff is offline  
Old 04-30-15, 12:16 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Shuffleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296

Bikes: Colnago CLX,GT Karakoram,Giant Revel, Kona Honk_ Tonk

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bikejrff
lol, I am aware of the overlap. Riding multiple bikes keeps things fresh for me. Ride 9,000 miles plus annually and I do ride each bike similar miles.

ps 36th wedding anniversary in 12 days.
Congrats on the anniversary. At least your wife knows what to get you for a gift...A new bike.
Shuffleman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sw20
Road Cycling
29
06-04-19 12:09 AM
dallastx
Road Cycling
29
07-26-16 11:47 AM
Akram
Road Cycling
1
12-02-15 04:44 PM
Tri4life
Road Cycling
21
09-06-15 05:51 PM
ttccnn49
Road Cycling
7
06-23-15 08:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.