Why have a triple?
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern San Diego
Posts: 1,726
Bikes: mid 1980s De Rosa SL, 1985 Tommasini Super Prestige all Campy SR, 1992 Paramount PDG Series 7, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1998 Trek Y-foil, 2006 Schwinn Super Sport GS, 2006 Specialized Hardrock Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you look at the crank and cassette, I think the companies are driving for a goal of one crankset and one cassette that will cover it all. Each time you add a gear in back that's one step closer to a universal cassette/crankset combo. We can come on here and debate what combo we like/dislike but eventually it will be one cassette/crankset for everything. I didn't think CVT would ever get here either. But it will probably take over sometime in the future as well. We have electronic shifting now, so CVT might not be very far behind. When that gets here there will be no need for choice. At least that is what the manufacturers will think.
A 16 speed cassette would get you a 11-26 range with 1 tooth "jumps." A 20 speed cassette would get you a 11-30 range.
A 16 speed cassette would get you a 11-26 range with 1 tooth "jumps." A 20 speed cassette would get you a 11-30 range.
#77
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
You are assuming this is a competitive market. It's not. Shimano is for all intents and purposes a monopoly supplier in the moderately priced segment of consumer bicycle components. They have been driving the market through a cycle of planned obsolescence for a couple of decades now, and the move to 11 speed, and getting rid of road triples is just the latest cycle of that strategy.
They make this stuff because people buy it. If people din't find value in it they wouldn't buy it, and Shimano wouldn't make it.
And the fact that you are able to still source a full 9 speed groupset at a cheap price disproves your point. As current standards have changed, and improvements made, older stuff is still available. As you point out 9 speed is available and cheap, and this is 10 plus years after the advent of 10 speed, and the arrival of at least 4 subsequent generations of 10 and 11 speed groups.
Heck you can still buy a new 5 speed 14-28 freewheel if you want to.
So if Shimano's grand conspiracy was render all this old stuff obsolete, and banish it, they're failing miserably.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#78
wears long socks
Thread Starter
It sounds like the OP is a masher, and might never appreciate the advantages of a triple. I avoided triples for years under the misguided view that they didn't shift as well as doubles. I first put a compact crank on my touring bike and really liked the gearing, particularly since I was using it for commuting and carrying loads most of the time. Then I found a great deal on a Dura-Ace triple and installed that on my sport touring bike. My preconceptions about triples were wrong, and I found that the DA triple shifted as well as the doubles on my other bikes. I now have triples on three bikes, my two touring bikes and my sport tourer. My other bikes have a traditional double and a compact.
I like triples better than compact or traditional cranks. Here is why. First, I'm a spinner and tend to maintain a high cadence (90-100+). I bike commute almost every work day and ride several bike tours a year, so I am often carrying loads. I live in an area with hilly terrain and make good use of my lower gears. Although I don't often use the small ring on my triples, it is nice to have when needed, particularly near the ends of long rides when my legs are tired. Finally, I'm in my early 60s and climbing seems to get tougher every year as I age.
I like triples better than compact or traditional cranks. Here is why. First, I'm a spinner and tend to maintain a high cadence (90-100+). I bike commute almost every work day and ride several bike tours a year, so I am often carrying loads. I live in an area with hilly terrain and make good use of my lower gears. Although I don't often use the small ring on my triples, it is nice to have when needed, particularly near the ends of long rides when my legs are tired. Finally, I'm in my early 60s and climbing seems to get tougher every year as I age.
I am also a minimalist when it comes to gizmos. I don't have a cadence meter or a genuine cycling computer. I mount my phone to my bars and an app does my speed/distance. I figure if I need my phone anyhow, I may as well use it as a computer.
I don't care so much about my cadence as I maybe should, but as I teach my kids to road bike, I have stressed that keeping cadence and climbing slower will keep you riding longer than trying to mash it up the hill fast.
Regardless of all of that. I have climbed a hill so steep, every pedal stroke in granny/granny lifted the front tire. I made it up, but also made my peace with my creator just in case.
Even after that, I felt like the gears I have covered every scenario. What I didn't think of was towing, riding loaded, or looooong moderate grades.
#79
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
Some pretty far out ideas on how economics and manufacturing work in this thread. Very entertaining.
#80
Portland Fred
I suspect the reason that triples have largely disappeared is that in practice, you only need two rings for any ride. If you're in hilly terrain, the middle is useless, if you're on flats, the little one is useless, and if you're working against significant wind, the big ring is useless. If you have only two rings, you can have the right gears for any ride if you just choose the right cassette. Most people aren't that picky, so they're happy enough with a wide cassette on a compact.
Triples and doubles have similar ranges, but triples give you great selectivity across the entire range without swapping cassettes. This allows less shifting between rings. I personally believe that 9 speed provides the best balance of function, durability, and price, and that's what I run on my 'bents. I would run it on my road bikes, but I like the ergonomics of the 10 speed too much better. For all the racket people make about adding cogs, the only thing 10 speed has over 9 is that one of the 2 tooth gaps is changed to 1 tooth. 11 speed shrinks one more of those gaps or gives you some sort of bail out. It's hardly make or break stuff and it's not much to get excited about when you consider the tradeoffs.
#81
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 530
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I have two road bikes: one with a triple (52/39/30), the other with compact (50/34.) Most of the time, I have a tight (11-23) cassette on the triple, so the lower end is no lower than the compact. But, a triple's advantages are not just about range. On rolling terrain (and I ride lots of it), I find myself making far fewer shifts on the triple than the compact. I can often keep the chain somewhere near the middle of the cassette and shift among the 3 rings. Meanwhile, with the compact, frequent/multiple shifts, front and rear, are necessary. Multiplied over a 3- or 4-hour ride, the difference is significant.
Now, if you ride in, say, Florida, the requirements are drastically reduced.
Now, if you ride in, say, Florida, the requirements are drastically reduced.
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Minneapols, Minnesota
Posts: 538
Bikes: 89 Raleigh Technium PRE, 92 SP 1000 ti, '09 Team Pro, 72 International, 63 Hercules 3-spd, '81 Vitus 979, 2 Kabuki Submariners, 2 C. Itoh Submariners, Gary Fisher Big Sur, Skyway 3-spd, Robin Hood w/ S-A IGH 5 speed.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You could say the same for the different sizes on bicycle frames these days. Limit the sizes available and fit the people with stems and seatposts. Or interior color options on cars these days. I think they are taking an idea from Henry Ford.
In Henry Ford΄s 1923 autobiography "Henry Ford - My life and work" he quotes himself as saying "Any customer can have a car painted any colour he wants so long as it is black.".
In Henry Ford΄s 1923 autobiography "Henry Ford - My life and work" he quotes himself as saying "Any customer can have a car painted any colour he wants so long as it is black.".
Think for yourself and get what you want!
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern San Diego
Posts: 1,726
Bikes: mid 1980s De Rosa SL, 1985 Tommasini Super Prestige all Campy SR, 1992 Paramount PDG Series 7, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1998 Trek Y-foil, 2006 Schwinn Super Sport GS, 2006 Specialized Hardrock Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Does Grant Peterson have a sock puppet? SIS (indexed shifting) was a conspiracy to render friction shifting obsolete. STI (integrated shifting) was a conspiracy to render SIS obsolete. 6 speed was a conspiracy to render 5 speed obsolete, 7 speed was a consipiracy to render 6 speed obsolete, etc. Di2 is a conspiracy to render mechanical obsolete. Discs are a conspiracy to render calipers obsolete.
They make this stuff because people buy it. If people din't find value in it they wouldn't buy it, and Shimano wouldn't make it.
And the fact that you are able to still source a full 9 speed groupset at a cheap price disproves your point. As current standards have changed, and improvements made, older stuff is still available. As you point out 9 speed is available and cheap, and this is 10 plus years after the advent of 10 speed, and the arrival of at least 4 subsequent generations of 10 and 11 speed groups.
Heck you can still buy a new 5 speed 14-28 freewheel if you want to.
So if Shimano's grand conspiracy was render all this old stuff obsolete, and banish it, they're failing miserably.
They make this stuff because people buy it. If people din't find value in it they wouldn't buy it, and Shimano wouldn't make it.
And the fact that you are able to still source a full 9 speed groupset at a cheap price disproves your point. As current standards have changed, and improvements made, older stuff is still available. As you point out 9 speed is available and cheap, and this is 10 plus years after the advent of 10 speed, and the arrival of at least 4 subsequent generations of 10 and 11 speed groups.
Heck you can still buy a new 5 speed 14-28 freewheel if you want to.
So if Shimano's grand conspiracy was render all this old stuff obsolete, and banish it, they're failing miserably.
And actually people buy what the stores stock, and the stores stock what the manufacturers make. Obviously, nobody is buying 11x3 gearing, because you can't.
Do you think there would be a market for a 12 pound bike that had continuous gearing across a 5-1 range and cost $1000? Of course there would be. But nobody produces such a bike. It's not due to lack of demand, it's due to lack of supply.
And the only reason Shimano is failing to obsolete older stuff is that plenty of folks recognize that a lot of used gear is very functional. But drivetrain components wear out, and New Old Stock stuff in many of these situations is not easy to find, and scarce.. Right now- 9-speed drivetrain components are cheap and plentiful and highly functional, but 8-speed stuff is quite scarce and sells at a premium. And while it's easy to buy an old freewheel - it's NOT so easy to buy an old wheel that has a really good rim and hub to put it on. The fact is, the window for buying 9-speed and getting it for a bargain price is a finite window in time, that will likely close in a few years - unless someone like Microshift forces it to stay open by taking low to midrange market share from Shimano.
If you don't think that someone with the dominant market presence of Shimano can force the market to largely buy what they wish to sell, you don't understand marketing. A perfect analogy, which I lived through professionally in the mid 1990s, was Intel forcing the bottom tier of the PC market from lower cost faster-clocked 386 and 486 architectures to Pentiums, by bypassing the branding of the PC vendors themselves and branding chips to the end-user, and simply withholding supply of leading edge chips to PC manufacturers who wouldn't play ball with them.
#86
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
Whatever Intel and Microsoft we're doing in the 90's isn't instructive of today cycling market. Campy and Shimano have been fighting tooth and nail to one up each other for at least 30 years. With first Suntour, and now SRAM offerrimg a third option.
If triples offered a better option for a significant segment, and Shimano was conspiring to withhold that option, there would be every incentive for campy, sram, microshift, sugino, fsa, strong light, etc. to swoop in and take the profit.
Or perhaps the answer is that with changing technology, triples just don't make that much sense anymore for most people.
If triples offered a better option for a significant segment, and Shimano was conspiring to withhold that option, there would be every incentive for campy, sram, microshift, sugino, fsa, strong light, etc. to swoop in and take the profit.
Or perhaps the answer is that with changing technology, triples just don't make that much sense anymore for most people.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#87
Senior Member
For me (age 70) it helps me spin on very steep grades keeping me out of the anaerobic zone thereby extending my endurance by keeping the lactate at bay and conserving muscle fuel (glycogen). It makes a BIG difference.
#88
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,177 Times
in
1,468 Posts
Whatever Intel and Microsoft we're doing in the 90's isn't instructive of today cycling market. Campy and Shimano have been fighting tooth and nail to one up each other for at least 30 years. With first Suntour, and now SRAM offerrimg a third option.
If triples offered a better option for a significant segment, and Shimano was conspiring to withhold that option, there would be every incentive for campy, sram, microshift, sugino, fsa, strong light, etc. to swoop in and take the profit.
Or perhaps the answer is that with changing technology, triples just don't make that much sense anymore for most people.
If triples offered a better option for a significant segment, and Shimano was conspiring to withhold that option, there would be every incentive for campy, sram, microshift, sugino, fsa, strong light, etc. to swoop in and take the profit.
Or perhaps the answer is that with changing technology, triples just don't make that much sense anymore for most people.
In a marketplace like cycling, a company like Shimano can't dictate anything. Rather companies make what customers want. In this case, it's not triples.
What's funny in this and other threads is the constant posting that marketing takes a new product and makes customers believe they want it. Anybody that truly believes that how companies operate need to enroll in a freshman marketing course in their local community college.
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,053
Bikes: Gunnar, Shogun, Concorde, F Moser, Pete Tansley, Rocky Mtn, Diamant, Krapf, Marin, Avanti, Winora, Emmelle, Ken Evans
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Liked 417 Times
in
218 Posts
This pretty much says everything I planned on saying.
In a marketplace like cycling, a company like Shimano can't dictate anything. Rather companies make what customers want. In this case, it's not triples.
What's funny in this and other threads is the constant posting that marketing takes a new product and makes customers believe they want it. Anybody that truly believes that how companies operate need to enroll in a freshman marketing course in their local community college.
In a marketplace like cycling, a company like Shimano can't dictate anything. Rather companies make what customers want. In this case, it's not triples.
What's funny in this and other threads is the constant posting that marketing takes a new product and makes customers believe they want it. Anybody that truly believes that how companies operate need to enroll in a freshman marketing course in their local community college.
They've been clever this time, and gone from Win 8 to Win 10 so the inbetween quality OS has been skipped.
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern San Diego
Posts: 1,726
Bikes: mid 1980s De Rosa SL, 1985 Tommasini Super Prestige all Campy SR, 1992 Paramount PDG Series 7, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1998 Trek Y-foil, 2006 Schwinn Super Sport GS, 2006 Specialized Hardrock Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Whatever Intel and Microsoft we're doing in the 90's isn't instructive of today cycling market. Campy and Shimano have been fighting tooth and nail to one up each other for at least 30 years. With first Suntour, and now SRAM offerrimg a third option.
If triples offered a better option for a significant segment, and Shimano was conspiring to withhold that option, there would be every incentive for campy, sram, microshift, sugino, fsa, strong light, etc. to swoop in and take the profit.
Or perhaps the answer is that with changing technology, triples just don't make that much sense anymore for most people.
If triples offered a better option for a significant segment, and Shimano was conspiring to withhold that option, there would be every incentive for campy, sram, microshift, sugino, fsa, strong light, etc. to swoop in and take the profit.
Or perhaps the answer is that with changing technology, triples just don't make that much sense anymore for most people.
This pretty much says everything I planned on saying.
In a marketplace like cycling, a company like Shimano can't dictate anything. Rather companies make what customers want. In this case, it's not triples.
What's funny in this and other threads is the constant posting that marketing takes a new product and makes customers believe they want it. Anybody that truly believes that how companies operate need to enroll in a freshman marketing course in their local community college.
In a marketplace like cycling, a company like Shimano can't dictate anything. Rather companies make what customers want. In this case, it's not triples.
What's funny in this and other threads is the constant posting that marketing takes a new product and makes customers believe they want it. Anybody that truly believes that how companies operate need to enroll in a freshman marketing course in their local community college.
What do you mean by "a market like bicycling? Shimano is BY FAR the dominant presence in the industry. They are every bit as dominant as Intel was in PC components, and Microsoft was in System software. All of their competition is individual niche producers. Good luck finding a sub $1500 new road bike with Campy or SRAM on it. Good luck finding a $3000 + high end racing bike with Microshift on it.
Last edited by D1andonlyDman; 07-15-15 at 09:28 PM.
#92
Senior Member
Whatever Intel and Microsoft we're doing in the 90's isn't instructive of today cycling market. Campy and Shimano have been fighting tooth and nail to one up each other for at least 30 years. With first Suntour, and now SRAM offerrimg a third option.
If triples offered a better option for a significant segment, and Shimano was conspiring to withhold that option, there would be every incentive for campy, sram, microshift, sugino, fsa, strong light, etc. to swoop in and take the profit.
Or perhaps the answer is that with changing technology, triples just don't make that much sense anymore for most people.
If triples offered a better option for a significant segment, and Shimano was conspiring to withhold that option, there would be every incentive for campy, sram, microshift, sugino, fsa, strong light, etc. to swoop in and take the profit.
Or perhaps the answer is that with changing technology, triples just don't make that much sense anymore for most people.
#93
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
Beautiful bike, but it illustrates my point. 7 speed cassette, triple works nicely to get a low gear, and tight spacing.
2x11 with a compact crank will get you a wider range than the setup pictured while maintaining tight spacing.
And none of this is meant to denigrate your 3x7 setup, or other's 3x9 setup. They obviously work for you.
My only point over the last 4 pages is that with 11 cogs in the back, there's a whole lot less need for triples than there used to be.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
Tight spacing with one tooth jumps through the 19 limits you to 11-23 or 12-25.
If you want to match the range on 53-39-26 x 13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23 9 cogs (with the drop to the 26 bail-out gear about like shifting from 50 to 34) you need 50-34 x 12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-25-27-30 13 cogs;
Accepting a more limited range like you'd have with the factory 30 small ring you still have a lot more front shifting, where the 13 cog on the double has the same chainline as a triple starting cog but works like 39x15 when paired with the 34 so there's a lot more front shifting. The next gear is also 5 cogs away not 3-4when you change rings, although electronic shifting could be programmed to make the right compensating shift when you hit buttons on both sides simultaneously.
With no middle age spread and decent training plan two rings are fine, although that was the case once we hit 10 cogs with 39x26 low enough to get over the Colorado Rockies and eschewing small-small 39x14 OK for cruising at over 21 MPH on flat ground with 30 MPH small-ring sprints. 50-34x13-23 9 cogs had good range an spacing, but 10X more double shifts that were tiresome.
My only point over the last 4 pages is that with 11 cogs in the back, there's a whole lot less need for triples than there used to be.
Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 07-17-15 at 07:33 AM.
#95
~>~
"Back when" we fitted out experienced club riders w/ triples as a matter of course for century riding in hilly terrain.
The Schwinn Deluxe Paramount P-15 w/ a Campag 54/45/36 and a 5 cog 14-30 is a famous example, and quite useful today.
A low/low of 32GI is the same as today's 34/28 and quite adequate for fit riders at pace going long distances in varied terrain.
Bicycle gearing is highly personal and varies w/ fitness, wind conditions and terrain.
Our rough, narrow, rolling and quite steep Hill Country roads put a premium on fast solid chainring shifts and minimum but positive rear shifting in the company I keep.
My compact 50/34 lacks the crispness/speed of 53/39 and the post chainring change three cog shifting w/ the compact is fiddly, fussy and annoying.
Not what I'm looking for going onto Chain Drop Hill at 35mph with the lads on my wheel.
Electronic shifting may be making perfect shifts on double/11 cog reliably but I'm going 52/39/30 12-25/27/28 10 cog with the benefit of a bailout for when I feel my age in Vanderpool.
-Bandera
#96
Mostly harmless
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
3x8 with gearing:
28-39-50
with
13-14-15-17-19-21-24-28
will cover the needs of steepest climbs and fastest straights with the wind at one's back. With tight enough gearing.
28-39-50
with
13-14-15-17-19-21-24-28
will cover the needs of steepest climbs and fastest straights with the wind at one's back. With tight enough gearing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DaveLeeNC
Bicycle Mechanics
7
05-22-14 09:50 PM
hotcore
Road Cycling
72
04-17-14 02:26 PM