SRAM eTap
#26
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,299
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 712 Times
in
366 Posts
Anybody else think the RD looks weird with no cable or wire between it and the frame?
Looks like a bike being built up, with the cables not installed yet. Somehow unfinished. I'm sure I'll get used to it. But looking at bikes for 40 years with some sort of loop between RD and frame it looks odd for now.
Looks like a bike being built up, with the cables not installed yet. Somehow unfinished. I'm sure I'll get used to it. But looking at bikes for 40 years with some sort of loop between RD and frame it looks odd for now.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#27
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,299
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 712 Times
in
366 Posts
As well as 50 people in a room all using their cell phones simultaneously. Do you find other cell phones interfering with yours?
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#28
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#29
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,299
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1443 Post(s)
Liked 712 Times
in
366 Posts
Point is wireless technology has gotten pretty good at encryption, and avoiding interference.
I'd be more concerned about the connection just dropping out from some interference, and it not shifting or a shift being delayed, than of someone else shifting for me, which I think is likely a completely unfounded worry.
I'd be more concerned about the connection just dropping out from some interference, and it not shifting or a shift being delayed, than of someone else shifting for me, which I think is likely a completely unfounded worry.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#30
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Point is wireless technology has gotten pretty good at encryption, and avoiding interference.
I'd be more concerned about the connection just dropping out from some interference, and it not shifting or a shift being delayed, than of someone else shifting for me, which I think is likely a completely unfounded worry.
I'd be more concerned about the connection just dropping out from some interference, and it not shifting or a shift being delayed, than of someone else shifting for me, which I think is likely a completely unfounded worry.
#31
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Point is wireless technology has gotten pretty good at encryption, and avoiding interference.
I'd be more concerned about the connection just dropping out from some interference, and it not shifting or a shift being delayed, than of someone else shifting for me, which I think is likely a completely unfounded worry.
I'd be more concerned about the connection just dropping out from some interference, and it not shifting or a shift being delayed, than of someone else shifting for me, which I think is likely a completely unfounded worry.
#33
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#34
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,102 Times
in
1,366 Posts
#35
wears long socks
They are also virtually impossible to hack and will not pick up any interference.
#36
wears long socks
It looks like its using Blueooth PAN to make the connection. There's no security in it as far as I'm aware and the technology is still new so that may change. The only way to sync a device is by having physical access to it. So yes, my concern would be more about interference.
#37
Senior Member
One nice advantage is the easier shifting interface. Right harder; left easier.
Shimano should take note. Electronic shifting systems don't need to mimic cables. Once manufacturers get that, then the shifting interface can be improved.
SRAM's eTap: Shifting finally makes sense - VeloNews.com
Shimano should take note. Electronic shifting systems don't need to mimic cables. Once manufacturers get that, then the shifting interface can be improved.
SRAM's eTap: Shifting finally makes sense - VeloNews.com
That was my thought too. I have a Di2 bike and a mech bike. I like the Di2 so much, I had thought about converting the mech frame over but the conversion if it isn't set up for is ugly - ugly enough to not do it. This has me looking at that as a project again.
With Di2, and a frame designed for it, you can route the wires so the only exposed parts are a junction box, the size of a small cycle computer, typically obscured under the stem, a wire from the junction box to the frame, which runs with the rear brake cable, so no additional clutter, and a wire out the frame to the RD about a foot long.
So you're trading easier setup, and avoiding 18" of wire exposed, and a junction box, for keeping up with 4 batteries.
unless you're retrofitting an old frame I don't see that to be terribly compelling either way.
Question will be how well it shifts, and how reliable.
Also aesthetically, Dura Ace Di2, with a seatpost battery is sleeker than having batteries on each derailleur.
So you're trading easier setup, and avoiding 18" of wire exposed, and a junction box, for keeping up with 4 batteries.
unless you're retrofitting an old frame I don't see that to be terribly compelling either way.
Question will be how well it shifts, and how reliable.
Also aesthetically, Dura Ace Di2, with a seatpost battery is sleeker than having batteries on each derailleur.
J.
#38
Senior Member
It looks like its using Blueooth PAN to make the connection. There's no security in it as far as I'm aware and the technology is still new so that may change. The only way to sync a device is by having physical access to it. So yes, my concern would be more about interference.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126
Bikes: Steel 1x's
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
For those worried about security:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanc...ption_Standard
"As for now, there are no known practical attacks that would allow anyone to read correctly implemented AES encrypted data."
I work with cryptography some so when they said that "AES 128" was used to encrypt the connection, I knew it would be fine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanc...ption_Standard
"As for now, there are no known practical attacks that would allow anyone to read correctly implemented AES encrypted data."
I work with cryptography some so when they said that "AES 128" was used to encrypt the connection, I knew it would be fine.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Let's cut to the chase. It is a phenomenal accomplishment and development. This will give SRAM a huge boost in market share. Wireless is the only sensible appraoch. The DI2 control box and wire connections are a frequent source of malfunction. Managing the multiple batteries will surely turn out to be a non-issue. I'm watching prices.
Props to SRAM. They have done a great job and deserve the credit.
Props to SRAM. They have done a great job and deserve the credit.
#42
SuperGimp
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
Completely OT, but it's fun to see a friend's disbelief when her hubby, who is reasonably prominent in cryptography, is given the semi-rock-star treatment at conferences and whatnot. She thinks that it's totally weird that many geeks look up to him.
#44
Emondafied
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I really like this. Very F1-style. If I was kitting out a new bike, it would be hard to resist going with this group.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#45
Senior Member
Let's cut to the chase. It is a phenomenal accomplishment and development. This will give SRAM a huge boost in market share. Wireless is the only sensible appraoch. The DI2 control box and wire connections are a frequent source of malfunction. Managing the multiple batteries will surely turn out to be a non-issue. I'm watching prices.
Props to SRAM. They have done a great job and deserve the credit.
Props to SRAM. They have done a great job and deserve the credit.
We just don't know the "job" they've done so far. It's going to take a lot of units in the field to make that point. I do agree that it looks interesting, especially as a retrofit on mech bikes.
I heard somewhere that Shimano had a wireless design too. Be great if they popped that out for competition to help drive prices down. Isn't the FSA system partially wireless- wireless shifters but the FD and RD wired together with a single battery? That might have a more reliable architecture.
J.
#46
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Let's cut to the chase. It is a phenomenal accomplishment and development. This will give SRAM a huge boost in market share. Wireless is the only sensible appraoch. The DI2 control box and wire connections are a frequent source of malfunction. Managing the multiple batteries will surely turn out to be a non-issue. I'm watching prices.
Props to SRAM. They have done a great job and deserve the credit.
Props to SRAM. They have done a great job and deserve the credit.
I'll wait for the Shimano offering.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
My prediction is that the SRAM approach will work fine and drive the entire market to wireless. If FSA makes the mistake of including any wires at all (not entirely clear at this time), they will be bringing up the rear. And that would be a shame. Another viable competitor would be a good thing.
Last edited by rpenmanparker; 08-26-15 at 11:48 AM.
#48
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,664
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My prediction is that the SRAM approach will work fine and drive the entire market to wireless. If FSA makes the mistake of including any wires at all (not entirely clear at this time), they will be bringing up the rear. And that woukd be a shame. Another viable competitor would be a good thing.
all the numerous batteries will muzzle sales.
#49
Super Modest
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,465
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,618 Times
in
2,122 Posts
Robert, considering my own experiences with SRAM, I'm not betting on its reliability.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#50
On Your Left
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373
Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times
in
1,187 Posts
My prediction is that the SRAM approach will work fine and drive the entire market to wireless. If FSA makes the mistake of including any wires at all (not entirely clear at this time), they will be bringing up the rear. And that woukd be a shame. Another viable competitor would be a good thing.