Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Trek Emonda Alr thoughts...

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Trek Emonda Alr thoughts...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-15, 10:22 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
therh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Houston, Texas
Posts: 536

Bikes: 2011 Fuji Roubaix 2.0 (Tiagra)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Trek Emonda Alr thoughts...

Hello,

Has anyone looked at the Trek Emonda ALR series? In particular the 5 ALR? What are thoughts and or opinions?

Thanks
therh is offline  
Old 08-30-15, 10:43 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: MI
Posts: 265

Bikes: '14 Trek Madone 2.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I purchased and have been riding the Madone 2.1 for two seasons, which the Emonda ALR 5 is basically replacing/upgrading. If the ALR5 is indeed a bit nicer, it's a hell of a ride. I'd love to have my Madone, or the Emobda in mid level carbon, but I just didn't have the budget.

105 is a nice setup and the 11 speed will be even nicer. The aluminum frame is a bit stiff, but the carbon forks help quite a bit and fitted properly I've had zero comfort issues on my bike.
jrossbeck is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 07:10 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 227

Bikes: 2016 Emonda ALR 5, 2014 Trek 7.2 FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm in love with my ALR 5. My wife is a little jealous.

Very smooth shifting from the 105 5800, awesome braking, and a nice geometry (for me). It's a pretty solid bike, but the carbon fork does help a bit. There really isn't much to complain about with a well made, lightweight alu bike that has a full 105 gruppo. I did not like the stock tires and the wheels weren't that great, so I put on some Vuelta Corsa Lites with Conti GP4000s IIs.
cicatrize is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 07:16 AM
  #4  
wears long socks
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,614
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by therh
Hello,

Has anyone looked at the Trek Emonda ALR series? In particular the 5 ALR? What are thoughts and or opinions?

Thanks
I debated a while on buying one. I still might.

Very nice alloy bike.

My only nit to pick is the H2 fit.

If you are used to, or want to ride an agressive position, it requires a low profile headset cap and a -17 stem.

Want lower bars then that? I'd buy a more agressive frameset.
69chevy is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 07:22 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
why not ask dreamrider85, he claimed he bought one a few months ago lol!

Last edited by mawashi; 08-31-15 at 07:41 AM.
mawashi is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 07:35 AM
  #6  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 29

Bikes: 2016 Trek Emonda ALR 5, 2015 Trek 8.4 DS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I love my ALR 5!
As mentioned above, I also needed to swap out the bars and stem to get a little more aggressive, but shifting is excellent and the ride quality is incredible.
Ragriz is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 08:26 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: TN
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
It looks nice to me but for the price I'd go with Emonda S5 or maybe even S4. Give em a test ride and see which you like.
Adonis72 is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 08:31 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Southern California
Posts: 14

Bikes: Trek Emonda ALR 5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i really like mine, its completely 105 groupset so everything works smoothly on the bike. the only upgrade that i made was changing out the stock tires to gp4000 II's. i'm not crazy about the wheelset either, but they are ok for now.
ato316 is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 09:53 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 227

Bikes: 2016 Emonda ALR 5, 2014 Trek 7.2 FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adonis72
It looks nice to me but for the price I'd go with Emonda S5 or maybe even S4. Give em a test ride and see which you like.
The S5 is $400 more and has Trek's low end carbon. I'd go with an ALR5 over that bike any day.
cicatrize is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 10:02 AM
  #10  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 29

Bikes: 2016 Trek Emonda ALR 5, 2015 Trek 8.4 DS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For what it's worth, the two LBS I visited both recommend the ALR over the S-series, despite the fact that the ALR will net them less money. They said that when you consider the "high-quality aluminum" compared to the "low-quality carbon", then Trek might as well stop making the S-series. If you want carbon, then you want the SL.
Ragriz is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 10:13 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: TN
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
I respect that, I've ridden both and prefer the ride of the so called "low end" carbon. Weight wise not much difference.
Adonis72 is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 10:15 AM
  #12  
On Your Left
 
GlennR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373

Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times in 1,187 Posts
Originally Posted by cicatrize
The S5 is $400 more and has Trek's low end carbon. I'd go with an ALR5 over that bike any day.
I totally agree, the S5 is just not work it.

I had a 2012 Madone 4.6 (400 level carbon) and it was heads and shoulders better than a S5 (300 level carbon).
GlennR is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 10:35 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 227

Bikes: 2016 Emonda ALR 5, 2014 Trek 7.2 FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adonis72
I respect that, I've ridden both and prefer the ride of the so called "low end" carbon. Weight wise not much difference.
Interestingly enough, the S frame weighs 1200g compared to the ALR frame weight of 1050g, matching the weight of the SL frame. The one you REALLY want is the SLR frame, which is under 700g.
cicatrize is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 10:41 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: TN
Posts: 122
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by cicatrize
Interestingly enough, the S frame weighs 1200g compared to the ALR frame weight of 1050g, matching the weight of the SL frame. The one you REALLY want is the SLR frame, which is under 700g.
Agreed, I just don't like the SL price tag lol. Honestly my bones prefer the ride of carbon so I'd probably even take the S4 over the AL5. I realize most probably wouldn't though.
Adonis72 is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 10:57 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 227

Bikes: 2016 Emonda ALR 5, 2014 Trek 7.2 FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adonis72
Agreed, I just don't like the SL price tag lol. Honestly my bones prefer the ride of carbon so I'd probably even take the S4 over the AL5. I realize most probably wouldn't though.
I totally understand. It's all about rider preference!

OP, now that I'm thinking about it, as much as I love the ALR 5, I probably should have opted for the ALR 6. Sure, it's $500 more, but it has 6800 gruppo, a carbon seat post, and better wheels than the 5, which I already swapped, lol. While the wheels I got are lighter than the stock ALR 6 wheels, I think I could've appreciated them for at least a couple years before upgrading.

If it's in your budget, you may want to opt for the 6. That being said, there's pretty much zero discernible difference between the 5800 and 6800 groups (unlike the 5700 and 6700), but you'd get the cool brake levers that say ULTEGRA on them.
cicatrize is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 11:56 AM
  #16  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 29

Bikes: 2016 Trek Emonda ALR 5, 2015 Trek 8.4 DS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adonis72
I've ridden both and prefer the ride of the so called "low end" carbon.
This is the right answer. Ride what feels best!
Ragriz is offline  
Old 08-31-15, 08:30 PM
  #17  
RDB
Senior Member
 
RDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Western NY
Posts: 91

Bikes: 96 Stumpjumper M2, Fisher Montare hybrid, Trek Emonda ALR5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have the alr5 and have no complaints. The 105 gruppo is a winner and the bike is as agressive as I want it to be. New tires are coming for sure(Conti gp 4 season or gatorskins)and possibly new wheels and a carbon seatpost.
RDB is offline  
Old 09-01-15, 08:04 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 1,010 Posts
I just bought the ALR5 in Red and moved my Ultegra drive train from my Synapse over to it. I am just waiting on the Ultegra crank to arrive in the next day or so. Looking forward to a post surgery ride on it. On the ride I took on it, I was surprised by the ride quality, it had a Carbon feel without the Carbon price. I'm putting FSA SL-K handle bars and seatpost on it, to smooth it out even more. I also moved over my Boyd Altamont's and it should get the bike very close to 16 lbs when all is complete.
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Originally Posted by AEO
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.



jaxgtr is offline  
Old 09-01-15, 11:16 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 227

Bikes: 2016 Emonda ALR 5, 2014 Trek 7.2 FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jaxgtr
I also moved over my Boyd Altamont's and it should get the bike very close to 16 lbs when all is complete.
Sheesh, what frame size are you on?

I swapped wheels and tires on mine and I'm still at a little over 18lb (60cm).
cicatrize is offline  
Old 09-01-15, 02:31 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
therh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Houston, Texas
Posts: 536

Bikes: 2011 Fuji Roubaix 2.0 (Tiagra)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am currently riding a 52 cm 2011 Fuji Roubaix 2.0 (9 Speed Tiagra crank and shiffter's) which is not exactly relaxed setup, carbon bladded forks as well, but I love that way it rides. Sounds like the ALR 5 would a nice upgrade. Anyone else agree?
therh is offline  
Old 09-01-15, 07:35 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 1,010 Posts
Originally Posted by cicatrize
Sheesh, what frame size are you on? I swapped wheels and tires on mine and I'm still at a little over 18lb (60cm).

54cm. the base bike was 18.4 lbs, but just changing the wheels and tires, it went to 17.2. These weights are not including pedals, but I will be putting on Ulltegra road pedals. Changing out the Seatpost and Handlebars to the FSA SL-K models will eliminate almost 180 grams.
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Originally Posted by AEO
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.



jaxgtr is offline  
Old 09-01-15, 07:38 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 1,010 Posts
Originally Posted by therh
I am currently riding a 52 cm 2011 Fuji Roubaix 2.0 (9 Speed Tiagra crank and shiffter's) which is not exactly relaxed setup, carbon bladded forks as well, but I love that way it rides. Sounds like the ALR 5 would a nice upgrade. Anyone else agree?
If you like the ride of the bike, I would just pick up an 11 speed grouppo from PBK or Wiggle and go that route for less than $500 or so. In my case, I just did not like my Synapse....it was too relaxed for me. I guess I just like a more aggressive approach.

Brian
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Originally Posted by AEO
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.




Last edited by jaxgtr; 09-01-15 at 07:41 PM.
jaxgtr is offline  
Old 09-01-15, 07:49 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 227

Bikes: 2016 Emonda ALR 5, 2014 Trek 7.2 FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jaxgtr
54cm. the base bike was 18.4 lbs, but just changing the wheels and tires, it went to 17.2. These weights are not including pedals, but I will be putting on Ulltegra road pedals. Changing out the Seatpost and Handlebars to the FSA SL-K models will eliminate almost 180 grams.
Man, my stock ALR5 was around 20lbs. Your sig says ALR 6. Do you have both the 5 and 6?

Edit: Ah, without pedals. I see. Mine was with, and my pedals weigh .81 lbs.
cicatrize is offline  
Old 09-01-15, 07:56 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 1,734 Times in 1,010 Posts
Well...the Trek Factory Racing Viper Red frames only come as a 5, but I moved all my Ultegra over from my Synapse to this bike and moved the 105 stuff to replace the 10 speed Ultegra\105 mix on my CrossRip. The frames are all the same though, just different colors, so technically it specs out as a 6 now.
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Originally Posted by AEO
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.




Last edited by jaxgtr; 09-01-15 at 07:59 PM.
jaxgtr is offline  
Old 09-01-15, 09:53 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
therh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Houston, Texas
Posts: 536

Bikes: 2011 Fuji Roubaix 2.0 (Tiagra)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I like my bike, yes, but I would rather have a new bike that has a braze on derailer. Something that does not have "learning" marks, or have to change out my wheels. I have priced out how much it would cost more to do a full 5800 105 series groupo.
therh is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.