Which bike???
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Which bike???
Ok.... I usually do not like asking opinions about which bike, frame set, group or etc.. to buy because I think the buyer needs to get what THEY like and not what someone else likes. With that being said I have reached a crossroad and I have researched until I can't see straight anymore. I had a Cervelo R3 and sold it to get a Bianchi Infinito CV. While the CV is a nice frame I find it a bit heavy and sluggish on acceleration and going up hill. It does ride smoother but the harshness of a ride never really bothered me. Now I have found 2 frame sets that I initially was looking at... Boardman SLR 9.8 and a Diamondback Podium Optum. I know both of these are pure racing and the Bianchi is an Endurance Race which will make them ride differently. Question is can I make the Bianchi lighter (without going to tubular tires) and without breaking the bank. I have super record and Reynolds Assault wheels with Zipp cockpit. Would you sell the Bianchi and go with the Boardman or Diamondback? May be a stupid question to some but thought I would enlist the help of people that have been riding longer than me (2 years) and someone that has experience on the listed frames. Thanks for your time.
#2
blah blah blah
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lose excess body fat, do more climbing training, ride nicer tires, and if you have them maybe sub in lighter wheels when climbing. Make sure your fit is dialed in on current bike.
Climbing is about power to weight ratio and grinding it out, so there's no substitute for grinding out the training. I bet the choice of bicycle may actually be more important in descending fast than climbing fast.
Climbing is about power to weight ratio and grinding it out, so there's no substitute for grinding out the training. I bet the choice of bicycle may actually be more important in descending fast than climbing fast.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 526
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times
in
12 Posts
Those are all amazing bikes, good enough to handle anything anyone could ask them for. You could make any of them lighter with all kinds of carbon goodies, but what will you really loose in the end? taking a 15 lbs bike and making it a 14 lbs bike, will you really notice that? doubt it. cheaper and more effective to take 10-15 lbs off you, you will also notice the change a lot more. I'm 45 and ride a 10 year old 18 lbs bike with really no upgrades over the years besides a saddle and tires, I hold many local strava segment trophy's against dudes riding much nicer bikes and 20 years younger than me. Time on the saddle is worth a million times more than time at a bike shop. If you have the money to spend, spend it on a coach, changing your training will make a bigger difference than a frame.
#4
Senior Member
BTW, If you think milkbaby is saying you are too fat for the sport, you are correct. Don't be insulted though, we all are.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,794
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 459 Post(s)
Liked 181 Times
in
117 Posts
Why are you restricting yourself to two specific brands and models? What is the weight of your current bike? Like me, you will likely have to climb hills and bike more to get stronger. That is a painful process and makes a much bigger difference, though bikes/wheels make a small difference for sure. I have a Roubaix SL4 and just picked up a Tarmac S-Works that I will build up soon. On the Roubaix there is a specific route I can do in 1:05. I bet with enough riding through the winter, I can do it in 55 mins. However, with a 2-kb lighter Tarmac, I will be lucky to shave 2 mins off that time right now.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296
Bikes: Colnago CLX,GT Karakoram,Giant Revel, Kona Honk_ Tonk
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Lose excess body fat, do more climbing training, ride nicer tires, and if you have them maybe sub in lighter wheels when climbing. Make sure your fit is dialed in on current bike.
Climbing is about power to weight ratio and grinding it out, so there's no substitute for grinding out the training. I bet the choice of bicycle may actually be more important in descending fast than climbing fast.
Climbing is about power to weight ratio and grinding it out, so there's no substitute for grinding out the training. I bet the choice of bicycle may actually be more important in descending fast than climbing fast.
Logic, at least mine, would think that cardio would matter more than the bike. Thus, I agree with your first line.
OP. all 3 are nice bikes. It is doubtful that any of them will ever hold you back. Stick with the Bianchi but if you just have an itch to scratch, than go with the Boardman. They make awesome bikes.
#7
Flyin' under the radar
I test rode the Infinito CV and found it to have a nice, smooth ride. I also noticed that it felt heavy. Sounds like you've already got a *****in' group, wheels, and cockpit, so not a lot of opportunity to lighten things up without dropping tons of money. So why don't you sell your frame and buy Bianchi's new Specialissima? It's got the same countervail tech for a smooth ride, but is lighter than the Infinito. Just a thought.
I personally don't have any experience with the other two frames you mentioned, but can say that if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't be getting rid of that Bianchi for either of those two bikes.
For what it's worth, I've got two bikes: a 15-pound Emonda SL8 Red and a ~21 lb. steel Trek 420 I converted to fixed gear. For moderate sustained climbs, I tend to have the same average speed and in some instances am faster on my 420. On any given day, I tend to have a slightly higher average speed on my 420. That could be due to it being fixed gear and I'm pushing myself harder.
The point is, though, that the 6 pound difference between the two bikes doesn't negatively impact my performance. To be frank, you're simply not going to get a bike that's 6 pounds lighter than your Bianchi, unless you drop $15k on an Emonda SLR10. So what you're talking about is a weight savings that will be significantly less than 6 pounds. And if 6 pounds doesn't make a difference, you can bet something less than that won't either.
If you want a lighter bike just to have a lighter bike, that's totally fine. I just think you're fooling yourself if you think a lighter bike is going to improve your performance any.
I personally don't have any experience with the other two frames you mentioned, but can say that if I were in your shoes, I wouldn't be getting rid of that Bianchi for either of those two bikes.
For what it's worth, I've got two bikes: a 15-pound Emonda SL8 Red and a ~21 lb. steel Trek 420 I converted to fixed gear. For moderate sustained climbs, I tend to have the same average speed and in some instances am faster on my 420. On any given day, I tend to have a slightly higher average speed on my 420. That could be due to it being fixed gear and I'm pushing myself harder.
The point is, though, that the 6 pound difference between the two bikes doesn't negatively impact my performance. To be frank, you're simply not going to get a bike that's 6 pounds lighter than your Bianchi, unless you drop $15k on an Emonda SLR10. So what you're talking about is a weight savings that will be significantly less than 6 pounds. And if 6 pounds doesn't make a difference, you can bet something less than that won't either.
If you want a lighter bike just to have a lighter bike, that's totally fine. I just think you're fooling yourself if you think a lighter bike is going to improve your performance any.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,451 Times
in
1,823 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4,286
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1096 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I test rode the Infinito CV and found it to have a nice, smooth ride. I also noticed that it felt heavy. Sounds like you've already got a *****in' group, wheels, and cockpit, so not a lot of opportunity to lighten things up without dropping tons of money. So why don't you sell your frame and buy Bianchi's new Specialissima? It's got the same countervail tech for a smooth ride, but is lighter than the Infinito. Just a thought.
...
I just think you're fooling yourself if you think a lighter bike is going to improve your performance any.
...
I just think you're fooling yourself if you think a lighter bike is going to improve your performance any.
That said, @RNAV , I'd second your recommendation on the Specialissima. Though he said he didn't want to break the bank, you're probably right about it being unlikely given his starting point.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
All---thank you for your replies. My wife said she would by me the Specialissima or the Oltre XR.2 frame set. I think I will keep the Infinito CV and build the new frame with some more Campy SR. I will have a good endurance race and pure race bike.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,453
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7628 Post(s)
Liked 3,451 Times
in
1,823 Posts
You are one lucky dude, is all I can say at this point. Ride on!
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,892
Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.3 C - 2014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
However, getting a bike with good aero capabilities that match the rider's ability to use that, and also provides a good base, so that the rider doesn't feel wobbly on the descent is a more challenging fit for riders.
GH
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,296
Bikes: Colnago CLX,GT Karakoram,Giant Revel, Kona Honk_ Tonk
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
My thought on this, is that many companies make light bikes, which is important for the ascent.
However, getting a bike with good aero capabilities that match the rider's ability to use that, and also provides a good base, so that the rider doesn't feel wobbly on the descent is a more challenging fit for riders.
GH
However, getting a bike with good aero capabilities that match the rider's ability to use that, and also provides a good base, so that the rider doesn't feel wobbly on the descent is a more challenging fit for riders.
GH
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,892
Bikes: Fuji Sportif 1.3 C - 2014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sunnycyclist
Road Cycling
8
06-06-10 08:11 PM