Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

The New Domane SLR or Is Carbon Comfortable Enough Yet?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

The New Domane SLR or Is Carbon Comfortable Enough Yet?

Old 04-04-16, 11:50 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The New Domane SLR or Is Carbon Comfortable Enough Yet?

I have to admit, this made me laugh:

Trek Domane SLR with front and rear IsoSpeed launched - BikeRadar

2017 Trek Domane SLR: full tech details and first impressions | CyclingTips

So carbon fiber replaces steel bikes. Then people ride them for a few years and figured out they are too uncomfortable as they are. So manufacturers add vibration dampeners and vertically compliant seat posts, but that's not enough. Finally Trek creates the Domane with a seat tube that actually flexes a little. Hmm, that sounds familiar.

But then the front end is too stiff, so they make a new Domane where the seat tube flexes a little bit AND the steerer tube flexes some as well. Hmm, a frame designed so that it has some compliance built into it. That sounds familiar again. Not only that, they made the tire clearance great so you can also run bigger, more cushy tires on it.

So for between $5,000 - $11,000, Trek has made a carbon bike that *might* be as comfortable as a $500 steel road bike. Hmm
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 12:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,770
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 630 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 369 Times in 206 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
I have to admit, this made me laugh:

Trek Domane SLR with front and rear IsoSpeed launched - BikeRadar

2017 Trek Domane SLR: full tech details and first impressions | CyclingTips

So carbon fiber replaces steel bikes. Then people ride them for a few years and figured out they are too uncomfortable as they are. So manufacturers add vibration dampeners and vertically compliant seat posts, but that's not enough. Finally Trek creates the Domane with a seat tube that actually flexes a little. Hmm, that sounds familiar.

But then the front end is too stiff, so they make a new Domane where the seat tube flexes a little bit AND the steerer tube flexes some as well. Hmm, a frame designed so that it has some compliance built into it. That sounds familiar again. Not only that, they made the tire clearance great so you can also run bigger, more cushy tires on it.

So for between $5,000 - $11,000, Trek has made a carbon bike that *might* be as comfortable as a $500 steel road bike. Hmm
You should contact Trek's engineering team and tell them
Elvo is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:05 PM
  #3  
Vain, But Lacking Talent
 
WalksOn2Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 5,510

Bikes: Trek Domane 5.9 DA 9000, Trek Crockett Pink Frosting w/105 5700

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1525 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Elvo
You should contact Trek's engineering team and tell them
I have to admit, this made me laugh.
WalksOn2Wheels is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:07 PM
  #4  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 30

Bikes: 2014 Wilier Zero 7, 2015 Trek Émonda S4, 2015 Trek Domane 5.2, 1980 Peugeot PNSM 40, 2015 Trek X-Caliber 7

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I never had the chance to own a steel road bike as I was always into BMX and mountain biking up until a few years ago so I never was able to appreciate a good steel frame. (I would still love to own a columbus tubed bike, however, as I think they are beautiful)
Had the chance to test the new Domane SLR out last week and was really amazed at how it works. The control to change the stiffness is really cool. You can make it absorb so much or stiffen it up so it does not feel as "lazy" in the bends.

I know a lot of people who said the previous domane felt dead to them and I can understand. Definitely think the new design is way better and will allow you to have the best of both worlds. You can ride a stiffer frame for when you are on normal pavement or smooth trails and adjust the dampening for when the roads go south in quality or you are on a vacation in Belgium.

Really enjoyed it for the little time I had with it and look forward to going on a longer ride with one now that is released officially.
Reality33 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:07 PM
  #5  
Vain, But Lacking Talent
 
WalksOn2Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 5,510

Bikes: Trek Domane 5.9 DA 9000, Trek Crockett Pink Frosting w/105 5700

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1525 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
I have to admit, this made me laugh:

Trek Domane SLR with front and rear IsoSpeed launched - BikeRadar

2017 Trek Domane SLR: full tech details and first impressions | CyclingTips

So carbon fiber replaces steel bikes. Then people ride them for a few years and figured out they are too uncomfortable as they are. So manufacturers add vibration dampeners and vertically compliant seat posts, but that's not enough. Finally Trek creates the Domane with a seat tube that actually flexes a little. Hmm, that sounds familiar.

But then the front end is too stiff, so they make a new Domane where the seat tube flexes a little bit AND the steerer tube flexes some as well. Hmm, a frame designed so that it has some compliance built into it. That sounds familiar again. Not only that, they made the tire clearance great so you can also run bigger, more cushy tires on it.

So for between $5,000 - $11,000, Trek has made a carbon bike that *might* be as comfortable as a $500 steel road bike. Hmm
So you exclusively ride $500 steel bikes? Nothing more, because that would be a waste, right?

Also, I love a good steel frame as much as the next guy, but I've never seen a steel road bike that could be set up for rider weight/preference. Come to think of it, I guess I've never seen any road bike that could be set up for rider weight until now.
WalksOn2Wheels is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:13 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Elvo
You should contact Trek's engineering team and tell them
Nah, the marketing team is pushing this deal. Very smart of them as well.

Nothing sexy about another steel bike, but a new carbon layup, omgeees!!! Where do I throw my money?
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:14 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by WalksOn2Wheels
Also, I love a good steel frame as much as the next guy, but I've never seen a steel road bike that could be set up for rider weight/preference. Come to think of it, I guess I've never seen any road bike that could be set up for rider weight until now.
Have you felt that feature was missing up until now?

Knowledgeable builders have been building for rider weight/preference for decades.

Last edited by Jarrett2; 04-04-16 at 01:18 PM.
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:17 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Stamford, CT; Pownal, VT
Posts: 1,140

Bikes: 2015 Trek Domane 6 disk, 2016 Scott Big Jon Fat Bike

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
Nah, the marketing team is pushing this deal. Very smart of them as well.

Nothing sexy about another steel bike, but a new carbon layup, omgeees!!! Where do I throw my money?
Here! Throw your money here! <opens up pocket> I want one of those new SLRs!
Wheever is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:17 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,644 Times in 6,053 Posts
The zeal of True Believers...
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:24 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 2,076
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Steel structure's properties can't be manipulated the way carbon structure's properties can. Thats not marketing. Thats fact.
therhodeo is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:27 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,963
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18269 Post(s)
Liked 15,185 Times in 7,172 Posts


Extra butter anyone?
indyfabz is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:37 PM
  #12  
Vain, But Lacking Talent
 
WalksOn2Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 5,510

Bikes: Trek Domane 5.9 DA 9000, Trek Crockett Pink Frosting w/105 5700

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1525 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
Have you felt that feature was missing up until now?

Knowledgeable builders have been building for rider weight/preference for decades.
Obviously. For a custom built frame for a specific rider. If you want a very specific feel on a frame, you have to somehow manage to ride all materials possible on all different types of builds. Here is a road bike that will work well for basically any rider right off the rack. Not just in terms of size, but in terms of comfort and road feel. On ONE bike.

I'm not disagreeing with the fact that a $500 dollar steel frame isn't awesome. I'm just saying that specific frame is going to work for a pretty narrow range in terms of rider weight and preference. Which is fine if you've got 10+ years of experience riding numerous frames and tubesets to find what you like. Or, you know, you could get a Domane, turn a bolt and move a slider up and down until it feels awesome and then keep riding. It may not be for you, but you can't sit and laugh as if it's not something customers will find to be an attractive and useful feature.
WalksOn2Wheels is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:43 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 465

Bikes: Trek Emonda SL build, CAAD10, Bianchi Pista '13, Litespeed Antares '03

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 52 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
I have to admit, this made me laugh:

Trek Domane SLR with front and rear IsoSpeed launched - BikeRadar

2017 Trek Domane SLR: full tech details and first impressions | CyclingTips

So carbon fiber replaces steel bikes. Then people ride them for a few years and figured out they are too uncomfortable as they are. So manufacturers add vibration dampeners and vertically compliant seat posts, but that's not enough. Finally Trek creates the Domane with a seat tube that actually flexes a little. Hmm, that sounds familiar.

But then the front end is too stiff, so they make a new Domane where the seat tube flexes a little bit AND the steerer tube flexes some as well. Hmm, a frame designed so that it has some compliance built into it. That sounds familiar again. Not only that, they made the tire clearance great so you can also run bigger, more cushy tires on it.

So for between $5,000 - $11,000, Trek has made a carbon bike that *might* be as comfortable as a $500 steel road bike. Hmm
To be honest I don't really think that this tech is going to change the bikes in the future. I'd say probably the 80% of this is marketing and I think it's hard to justify to buy a bike just for this feature. On the other hand I have no idea how you found any connections in this article to steel frames or comparing the comfort of the domane to them. Also I do believe that any of Trek's mid level carbon offering will offer superior comfort and ride compared to a $500 steel bike (I owned and rode both). Obviously the earlier costs more, but it's up to you if it's worth it.
nemeseri is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:43 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by WalksOn2Wheels
you can't sit and laugh as if it's not something customers will find to be an attractive and useful feature.
Oh, I can sit and laugh Especially when they have to use wacky engineering to solve a problem inherent in the material that they've repeatedly told customers was the best of the best in years past.

I'm sure customers will find it attractive. They've been trained by marketing to find new carbon things attractive.

Find it useful? Eh. Might check back with owners after a few months to see how many times they've touched that 4mm screw
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:48 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
topslop1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,466
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1531 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
There's some serious pro-steel agenda and I can't tell if it's just old people who can't let go or if it belongs to the person that is just dollar conscious. I mean, yeah, of course, $11,000 bicycles are stupid for everyone out there except the man who has everything else already. But to say a $500 steel frame from yester-years competes with it is kinda hokey.
topslop1 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 01:55 PM
  #16  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
I have to admit, this made me laugh:

Trek Domane SLR with front and rear IsoSpeed launched - BikeRadar

2017 Trek Domane SLR: full tech details and first impressions | CyclingTips

So carbon fiber replaces steel bikes. Then people ride them for a few years and figured out they are too uncomfortable as they are. So manufacturers add vibration dampeners and vertically compliant seat posts, but that's not enough. Finally Trek creates the Domane with a seat tube that actually flexes a little. Hmm, that sounds familiar.

But then the front end is too stiff, so they make a new Domane where the seat tube flexes a little bit AND the steerer tube flexes some as well. Hmm, a frame designed so that it has some compliance built into it. That sounds familiar again. Not only that, they made the tire clearance great so you can also run bigger, more cushy tires on it.

So for between $5,000 - $11,000, Trek has made a carbon bike that *might* be as comfortable as a $500 steel road bike. Hmm
Lots of carbon bikes are just as comfortable as a good steel bike with the added benefits of being lighter and quicker feeling (stiffer in the drivetrain).

My Emonda is just as nice as a riding road bike as my many steel bikes, but it's lighter and faster....and surprisingly cheaper to buy.

I really love steel bikes, but a good carbon bike is great too. There is room for both materials in bike-dom. But honestly, a $500 steel bike is still a pile compared to a $2000 or more steel bike.

Trek, with this new Domane, is making a bike that can be setup to be very compliant (for long efforts like a century or beyond) or setup stiffer for the hour long club ride. Sounds fine to me. I can see certain riders wanting a feature like that.


When I was shopping for a new road bike I test rode the Domane 5.9 and I honestly felt that bike was not only as smooth riding as my Rivendell Roadeo, but was lighter and quicker up hills.

Last edited by RJM; 04-04-16 at 02:00 PM.
RJM is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:01 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RJM
My Emonda is just as nice as a riding road bike as my many steel bikes
I can only assume when someone makes this type of statement that they are blessed with some really smooth roads in their area.

My time on a Emonda didn't yield the same belief. I couldn't get off of it quickly enough once the road became less than smooth.

I spoke with a woman at a cycling event yesterday that said she had sold her old steel bike and got a new aluminum bike with a carbon fork recently. She thought that something was wrong with her new bike because when she started going fast on it, the front end would rattle and shake on chip seal roads and her old bike didn't do that.
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:05 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
If the Emonda is so smooth, why would Trek need to revamp this Domane to be even more comfortable?
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:10 PM
  #19  
Vain, But Lacking Talent
 
WalksOn2Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 5,510

Bikes: Trek Domane 5.9 DA 9000, Trek Crockett Pink Frosting w/105 5700

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1525 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
If the Emonda is so smooth, why would Trek need to revamp this Domane to be even more comfortable?
If you have one friend who eats only real, non processed food and another friend who is a vegan, who is the better person? The one who isn't constantly an a-hole about it and has to constantly tell you why everything you're eating is awful and you should feel awful.

Look, we're all very happy that you like your steel bikes and find no need for a carbon bike. That's awesome, really. We're glad that you're glad. Take a moment to embrace the philosophy of "Live and let live" and just walk away from this silliness.
WalksOn2Wheels is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:13 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by topslop1
There's some serious pro-steel agenda and I can't tell if it's just old people who can't let go or if it belongs to the person that is just dollar conscious. I mean, yeah, of course, $11,000 bicycles are stupid for everyone out there except the man who has everything else already. But to say a $500 steel frame from yester-years competes with it is kinda hokey.
It is amazing, isn't it? I think certain people just love telling themselves that they know better.
PepeM is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:14 PM
  #21  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
If the Emonda is so smooth, why would Trek need to revamp this Domane to be even more comfortable?
The Emonda has a different geometry and purpose compared to the Domane...the Madone has another different purpose (aero).

The majority of riding on my new bike is to hammer two hour club rides or solo interval puke fests, which the Emonda is suited greatly for. To tell you the truth, when I am riding like that I don't have the time or the inclination to think about road surfaces and how uncomfortable they are. (The Emonda is better at this than my last bike...it's quicker) If I was going to be going cruising on 5 hour long rides at a more moderate tempo I would be more inclined to purchase the Domane. It's still a fine bike with a more relaxed geometry and it is more comfortable over rougher roads.


So far, the Emonda has been fine for the roads where I ride (which aren't glass smooth, but they aren't busted up either), but I'm not riding gravel stuff with it, nor have I taken it down any cobbled streets.

Last edited by RJM; 04-04-16 at 02:19 PM.
RJM is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:15 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jarrett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,126

Bikes: Steel 1x's

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 632 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by WalksOn2Wheels
Take a moment to embrace the philosophy of "Live and let live" and just walk away from this silliness.
lol, it's a discussion forum about road bikes. This is the newest announced road bike that I'm aware of. We're having a discussion about it, its engineering, its cost, relevance, how it compares to other road bikes, etc.

If this is a discussion you do not wish to read or continue to participate in, are you sure that I am the one that needs to walk away?
Jarrett2 is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:17 PM
  #23  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
I can only assume when someone makes this type of statement that they are blessed with some really smooth roads in their area.

My time on a Emonda didn't yield the same belief. I couldn't get off of it quickly enough once the road became less than smooth.

I spoke with a woman at a cycling event yesterday that said she had sold her old steel bike and got a new aluminum bike with a carbon fork recently. She thought that something was wrong with her new bike because when she started going fast on it, the front end would rattle and shake on chip seal roads and her old bike didn't do that.
Why didn't she test ride her bike before purchasing it?

I honestly don't find the Emonda harsh at all and I'm coming from a Rivendell Roadeo, so if there were some huge difference in jarring ride quality, I think I would be feeling it.
RJM is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:18 PM
  #24  
Vain, But Lacking Talent
 
WalksOn2Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 5,510

Bikes: Trek Domane 5.9 DA 9000, Trek Crockett Pink Frosting w/105 5700

Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1525 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
lol, it's a discussion forum about road bikes. This is the newest announced road bike that I'm aware of. We're having a discussion about it, its engineering, its cost, relevance, how it compares to other road bikes, etc.

If this is a discussion you do not wish to read or continue to participate in, are you sure that I am the one that needs to walk away?
No, I tried having a conversation about it, but after each time I tried to engage in a discussion you came back with a variation of "It's stupid and people who want it are stupid." So I don't get the impression that you're looking for a discussion as much as you are looking for someone to unequivocally agree with you.
WalksOn2Wheels is offline  
Old 04-04-16, 02:20 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,644 Times in 6,053 Posts
Originally Posted by Jarrett2
If the Emonda is so smooth, why would Trek need to revamp this Domane to be even more comfortable?
Because there's a range and different people fall in different places along that range. You didn't know that?
Seattle Forrest is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.