Why are there so many cyclists with potbellies?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
It is so easy to over eat.... and so darn hard to body sculpt. For many (if not most) of us it requires a herculean effort. Even if someone is making the effort you don't see the finished results until after weeks or months of effort. For me (when I am lucky) I look pretty fit in parts of August and September. But the weather just turned warm enough here...and the jacket came off.
I look like a pig and it's pretty embarrassing. But I rode 3 of the last 4 days. I am back to yogurt for breakfast and salad for lunch.
I look like a pig and it's pretty embarrassing. But I rode 3 of the last 4 days. I am back to yogurt for breakfast and salad for lunch.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
For the majority of people you're talking about, yeah. They just eat too much after rides. I don't think calorie counting apps that dramatically overestimate your burn do people much good either. Oh, your 16 mile ride where you didn't exceed 130 bpm burned 900 calories? Ok.
#31
meh
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 4,704
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,013 Times
in
519 Posts
Cycling really isn't that hard. It can be, if you make it, but you can soft pedal and coast a lot too and you don't have to be very fast. Also, you get to sit down while you do it. You see more heavy cyclists than heavy runners because of all that.
Plus, all kinds of phone apps say you burned 30 million calories on your ride to McDonalds.
Plus, all kinds of phone apps say you burned 30 million calories on your ride to McDonalds.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3374 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I have easy 100K miles in my legs. I was never a super fast racer, but I did those kind of miles. More of the guys that were super fast 80s racers are large now, than not. Some - remain lean (thinking Wayne Stetina - very lean, John Howard, Thurlow Rogers). But most these old big mileage / big racer guys that I periodically ride with are 30-40# heavier than they were - and can still break legs on a group ride, and most don't group ride.
The types that are very good stage cyclists are also the types that have an efficient metabolism. Many ex-pros gain a lot after becoming non-pro.
Here are two guys that have swung 40# Merckx et Hinault, un tandem... à l'heure | SONUMA
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,078
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I didn't lose any weight riding a very consistent 100 miles per week for a year. Even in Southern California it takes some persistence to ride during the week when daylight savings time ends and it's cold and dark out. Many recreational riders will only ride if it's relatively warm and sunny. The number of road cyclists I see on a cool/cloudy day are much, much lower. If you take half the year olf, or scale it way back in the fall/winter, forget about keeping the weight off without a pretty strict diet.
I was climbing next to a guy who told me he was about 230 lbs. He didn't look that fit (and was wearing baggy clothes) but he had no problem keeping up with me until the very end. I did that math using my w/kg and figured out he was doing over 400 watts for a good 5-10 minutes to keep up with me.
I was climbing next to a guy who told me he was about 230 lbs. He didn't look that fit (and was wearing baggy clothes) but he had no problem keeping up with me until the very end. I did that math using my w/kg and figured out he was doing over 400 watts for a good 5-10 minutes to keep up with me.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,668
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
89 Posts
This thread is going to be full of "offend"...
Cycling is easy. You have to try if you want to get a workout on the bike. Ever see those same potbelly dudes in the drops hammering on the flats, or crushing it in the hills? I don't. Most of the fat riders I see are soft pedaling (with legs akimbo) on non-hilly roads. Don't get me wrong, there definitely are some bigger riders who try hard and want to lose weight, but cycling is something you can do for an hour or so and make yourself feel like you are exercising.
Cycling is easy. You have to try if you want to get a workout on the bike. Ever see those same potbelly dudes in the drops hammering on the flats, or crushing it in the hills? I don't. Most of the fat riders I see are soft pedaling (with legs akimbo) on non-hilly roads. Don't get me wrong, there definitely are some bigger riders who try hard and want to lose weight, but cycling is something you can do for an hour or so and make yourself feel like you are exercising.
#37
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
206 Posts
I'm not fat. I'm big boned.
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,825
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 401 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#41
• —
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,230
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10165 Post(s)
Liked 5,856 Times
in
3,153 Posts
At 59 with a demanding job, there but for the grace of God, an "air-a-tarian" diet, and resistance training between rides, go I. Cycling appeals to a guy who needs some exercise, has disposable income, likes slick kit, and enjoys being outdoors, even one with a gut. Personally, I give them credit for getting out there and suffering a bit. Who knows? They might even save Medicare a few bucks that way and I might even afford them half a wave, if I'm feeling generous and not too elite.
#42
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times
in
1,464 Posts
#43
Senior Member
Well I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed.
Time consuming job or family obligations that keep me off the bike and therefore pot belly for most. But enough riding time to complete a century.
I'm not in my 20s anymore doesn't help. Metabolic stuff.
Unlike running you have a gravitational device, the bike. So your body doesn't see a reason to shed the weight. Physiological stuff.
But the number one for me is when I get through riding I am ravenous. I get so hungry. When I get through running I don't have an appetite. I think it's just nature's way.
Time consuming job or family obligations that keep me off the bike and therefore pot belly for most. But enough riding time to complete a century.
I'm not in my 20s anymore doesn't help. Metabolic stuff.
Unlike running you have a gravitational device, the bike. So your body doesn't see a reason to shed the weight. Physiological stuff.
But the number one for me is when I get through riding I am ravenous. I get so hungry. When I get through running I don't have an appetite. I think it's just nature's way.
Last edited by texaspandj; 04-20-16 at 04:07 PM.
#44
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times
in
1,464 Posts
I do lots of activities including running, cycling, swimming, weight lifting, and some less strenuous things like golf and tennis. Weight lifting doesn't burn all that much. It takes about 3500 calories to get rid of a pound of fat. So if you run that's about 30-35 miles just to get rid of a pound. For many cyclists that's a week of riding. The problem is not eating more t compensate.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
You've been riding 2 centuries a month for about a year. Ride an organized century and report back.
I'd be shocked if you didn't finish well under 6 hours.
Last edited by noodle soup; 04-20-16 at 04:14 PM.
#47
Senior Member
Not everyone has the same metabolism. I'm 6'2" and 205# give or take. While I'm down 70# over the last 16 years I still have a bit of a gut, and I've never been truly skinny in my life.
For reference, I rode 6200 miles last year with 275,000 feet of climbing. I did 3 centuries, one with 9800 feet of climbing. I'll typically do a couple of metric length rides each month and ride 20-40 miles during the week in addition to weekends. I'm reasonably quick in my club (most recent metric 2 weeks ago averaged 18.1 mph with 3300 feet of ascent), though the skinny guys obviously beat me up hills.
My diet is "OK", but not perfect. I limit high glycemic carbs, try to eat lean protein, don't drink soda (diet or regular) and my drinking is about 1 six pack of beer per year. I'd love to drop another 15#, I think I can get there, but it isn't easy. Others I know are 30-40# less than me and they eat and drink more than me. Clearly I need to consume fewer calories, but then there's Mexican food!
Such is life, I'm not complaining as it wouldn't do any good!
For reference, I rode 6200 miles last year with 275,000 feet of climbing. I did 3 centuries, one with 9800 feet of climbing. I'll typically do a couple of metric length rides each month and ride 20-40 miles during the week in addition to weekends. I'm reasonably quick in my club (most recent metric 2 weeks ago averaged 18.1 mph with 3300 feet of ascent), though the skinny guys obviously beat me up hills.
My diet is "OK", but not perfect. I limit high glycemic carbs, try to eat lean protein, don't drink soda (diet or regular) and my drinking is about 1 six pack of beer per year. I'd love to drop another 15#, I think I can get there, but it isn't easy. Others I know are 30-40# less than me and they eat and drink more than me. Clearly I need to consume fewer calories, but then there's Mexican food!
Such is life, I'm not complaining as it wouldn't do any good!
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,284
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8278 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
I'm about your size and I have over 180K miles on road bikes. I always have a gut, even when I am riding a lot. I work outside and am on my feet at least 8 hours a day but I never try to control my diet.
#49
Senior Member
Good that your work keeps you moving. My work is with phone/computer/desk/chair - and since last summer I work from home. If I didn't work to control my diet I'd be in a world of hurt.