Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Power Meter Woes

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Power Meter Woes

Old 06-29-16, 03:40 AM
  #51  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 375

Bikes: 2021 Trek Emonda SL7, 2019 Trek Checkpoint ALR4, 2020 Trek P1 Domane SLR7

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 165 Post(s)
Liked 80 Times in 43 Posts
I have the exact same experience as the OP. I use a Stages II power meter transmitting to a Garmin Edge 520 while I also use the Virtual Power available in Trainerroad for a KK Roadmachine. I find that due to electromagnetic interference in my basement with a ton of WiFi and Bluetooth flying around, I get too many dropouts to rely on the Stages/Garmin for my indoor training sessions. Therefore, I use virtual power exclusively for my training baselines/FTP etc.

I can report that at power above around 150W, the power reported by Stages begins to lag considerably behind what trainer road is reporting. Below 150W, the stages mat report higher power. As I approach 300W, this divergence increases anywhere from 25-50W.

Recognizing that Stages is left leg only, I gave consideration to left-right asymmetries, but I can conclude after enough experimentation, that the reported divergence is not a physiological artifact but a misalignment in the virtual power curve relative to what my Stages is actually measuring.

As stated above, what is most important is that you decide on one method, and stick to it while in a training program. For this reason, I am more than happy with the virtual power method even if it is not accurate in absolute terms - it is simple and robust. Just don't expect to be able to compare FTPs with your friends. Or if you do, be careful about bragging because you may find your FTP is over-estimated by trainer road by a substantial margin.
SkepticalOne is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 04:58 AM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by SkepticalOne
Recognizing that Stages is left leg only, I gave consideration to left-right asymmetries, but I can conclude after enough experimentation, that the reported divergence is not a physiological artifact but a misalignment in the virtual power curve relative to what my Stages is actually measuring.
I figured that would be pretty easy to test (just pedal with one leg and compare) but since the OP didn't seem to come back I didn't bother posting.

The dropout thing when indoors does get annoying. I wish they came up with a way to avoid interference issues.
PepeM is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 09:06 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 58

Bikes: 2015 Wilier Cento 1 Air, 2014 Trek Remedy 8 27.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PepeM
I figured that would be pretty easy to test (just pedal with one leg and compare) but since the OP didn't seem to come back I didn't bother posting.

The dropout thing when indoors does get annoying. I wish they came up with a way to avoid interference issues.
If using a PC, get a USB powered extension cable and place near the source (Stages, KICKR, etc). Worked great for me. No more dropouts.
linsdog is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 10:31 AM
  #54  
Has a magic bike
 
Heathpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,590

Bikes: 2018 Scott Spark, 2015 Fuji Norcom Straight, 2014 BMC GF01, 2013 Trek Madone

Mentioned: 699 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4456 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times in 157 Posts
Originally Posted by TMonk
Also, I could have been more graceful with what I was trying to communicate here:

Many cyclists in competitive circles, like rev. and myself, use the term "over training" somewhat loosely. True overtraining is quite rare and does have some physiological significance, I agree. If one tends to overreach for a few rides, say, a couple weeks' worth, when you're already fatigued in the first place, it can take a while to recover out of that TSB hole and actually be counter-productive to your long term fitness. Really it's just "fatigue", but we like to refer to it as "over training", potentially because the term has some clinical and prescriptive connotation to it. Many of the symptoms of true over training like chronic injury, illness, irritability can start to rear their ugly heads in this medium-term time view.

This is why we have felt that you are being so pedantic - because we chose to misuse the term .
Interesting food for thought: what are the definitions of these terms?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...8111434406.pdf
Heathpack is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 01:00 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 128

Bikes: Holland Exogrid Jet

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by RChung
Which trainer?


I feel your pain. People buy power meters to resolve uncertainty, not to increase uncertainty. Many people are convinced that accuracy and the ability to check it is unimportant -- they're convinced that consistency is all that matters. Here's a case where your Stages appears to be consistently lower than your trainer but you don't know which is right, which is causing you more uncertainty about your training.

Many (but not all) power meters allow you to check their accuracy fairly easily. Sadly, the Stages isn't one of them, so you don't know whether the problem is you, your trainer, or your Stages. There are ways to check the Stages but they're considerably more trouble -- or they require a calibration rig or another power meter that is known to be accurate.

Fans of the Stages often point to Team Sky and say if it's good enough for Sky it's good enough for them. Team Sky has enough other equipment to check their Stages. Most people don't. If you really want to know, you'll have to find someone with a known accurate power meter who is willing to help you determine whether it's the Stages or your trainer. If both are okay, then it's you: you have a huge left-right discrepancy.
I used to have a PowerTap G3 wheelset, which would have been ideal under the circumstances. Unfortunately, I sold that wheelset last year. Who needs two power meters, right? I'm planning on reaching out to my local cycling community to see whether anyone has something I can borrow.
babyboomer is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 01:37 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 128

Bikes: Holland Exogrid Jet

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
Here is the latest…

Yesterday I performed a threshold test on my indoor trainer (rollers, actually). While doing so, I recorded the pertinent data from my Stages power meter on my Garmin Edge bicycle computer. I used TrainerRoad's VirtualPower feature as a second data generator/recorder. It was the power data estimated by TrainerRoad that I used to calculate my FTP. When I finished, TrainerRoad calculated my FTP at 255! My previous threshold test, using data from my Stages power meter, resulted in an FTP of 145. That's quite a discrepancy! My guess is that the truth lies somewhere in between.

For what it's worth, I have attached a Garmin FIT file generated during that session, which contains power data from the Stages power meter. For comparison, I've included the TCX file from that same session, containing virtual power data from TrainerRoad.
babyboomer is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 01:47 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
What rollers are you using?
PepeM is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 01:47 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 128

Bikes: Holland Exogrid Jet

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
Hmm. I thought I could upload a file, but I don't see any evidence that happened.
babyboomer is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 01:48 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 128

Bikes: Holland Exogrid Jet

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by PepeM
What rollers are you using?
InsideRide's e-motion rollers
babyboomer is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 01:53 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by babyboomer
InsideRide's e-motion rollers
Those are very nice rollers. Do you have the variable resistance thing?
PepeM is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 01:58 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
Also, have you played with their power calculator? It shows how big of a difference variables such as weight can make. I don't know what power curve TrainerRoad uses, but playing with the calculator I can see that in Level 1 resistance, 15mph would equal about 157 watts for a 150lb rider but 192 watts for a 200lb rider. Unless TrainerRoad is asking for your weight and varying the power curve accordingly, there is big room for uncertainty there.
PepeM is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 02:40 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 128

Bikes: Holland Exogrid Jet

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by PepeM
Also, have you played with their power calculator? It shows how big of a difference variables such as weight can make. I don't know what power curve TrainerRoad uses, but playing with the calculator I can see that in Level 1 resistance, 15mph would equal about 157 watts for a 150lb rider but 192 watts for a 200lb rider. Unless TrainerRoad is asking for your weight and varying the power curve accordingly, there is big room for uncertainty there.
I have the resistance level set at 1. On Monday, I weighed 174 pounds. In TrainerRoad, the weight factor for the e-motion rollers profile is fixed at 180 – and I don't know whether that's supposed to represent the rider alone or the rider plus the bicycle.

I have downloaded Inside Ride's Excel spreadsheet tool. That tool allows you to change the weight. I fiddled with the numbers to see how closely they approximated those generated during the threshold test. They seemed to correlate with the numbers generated by the power curve used by TrainerRoad.
babyboomer is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 02:42 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
I'm assuming that 180 is rider's weight, which is pretty close to your weight then. Do you calibrate the power meter on your Garmin before using it?
PepeM is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 02:46 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
What happens when you ride outside? Can you sustain, say, 200 watts per your Stages or does it feel super tough?
PepeM is offline  
Old 06-29-16, 02:51 PM
  #65  
Not actually Tmonk
 
TMonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 13,875

Bikes: road, track, mtb

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2477 Post(s)
Liked 2,899 Times in 1,541 Posts
Originally Posted by Heathpack
Interesting food for thought: what are the definitions of these terms?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...8111434406.pdf
Interesting, thanks for posting that.
__________________
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
TMonk is offline  
Old 07-03-16, 09:34 AM
  #66  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 128

Bikes: Holland Exogrid Jet

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times in 9 Posts
Update…

To their credit, Stages has agreed to replace my power meter. I'm not likely to have the new one for another few days. Once it's installed, I'll give it a spin and publish the results. Either my suspicions will be confirmed, or I'll have egg on my face.
babyboomer is offline  
Old 07-13-16, 04:46 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 58

Bikes: 2015 Wilier Cento 1 Air, 2014 Trek Remedy 8 27.5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
FWIW I just built up my new bike with Power2Max meter on it. Two rides on the Kickr and it tracks pretty much spot on with the Kickr power readings.

In emails with the Stages support so will see what their thoughts on this are.
linsdog is offline  
Old 07-14-16, 01:03 AM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,055

Bikes: Lynskey R230 DA DI2 ENVE 3.4 SES, 6KU Fixie, Cheap Aluminum Slapstick Trainer only bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My experience with stages wasn't good either. At one point I did have 3 different powermeter handy... Stages, Quarq, PowerTap... actually another one was indoor trainer... (direct drive one with FE-C).
Tracking few times for various test... one that always was further out then rest... would be Stages. If it was persistently off by some offset scale, I wouldn't have worried about it. But... it was some what random and I couldn't find pattern... Sometimes off by as much as 10%.
Over the course of 1 hour ride, difference would be only 2-3%. But intervals, etc was hard to count on and I gave up. Maybe there are some Q/C issues. I did return mine and never looked back.
bored117 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colombo357
Road Cycling
6
05-25-18 08:09 PM
BigPoser
Road Cycling
30
08-13-17 10:34 PM
whitemax
Road Cycling
6
06-02-17 09:50 AM
CanadianBiker32
Training & Nutrition
3
05-16-17 05:24 PM
NEUROSPORT
Road Cycling
18
05-31-10 10:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.