I have compatible rims -- convince me on-road tubeless is (or isn't) worth it
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094
Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you currently get lots of puncture flats from goatheads or similar?
If yes -> tubeless would be good for you.
If no -> don't bother.
If yes -> tubeless would be good for you.
If no -> don't bother.
#27
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Pros as I understand it:
- Fewer flats that self-repair due to sealant (I don't get many flats and changing a tube is easy)
hard to say. but i dont puncture from pinches anymore
- Something "magical" about the ride quality (not seen in rolling resistance tests)
impossible to say. not compared to the clinchers i ran, anyway
- Some seriously praised new tubeless road tires (see Schwalbe S-One article, above).
theres a new One out now?!?!?
Cons:
- Dealing with messy sealant: Topping off, wiping out old stuff, recommendations by some sealant-makers to rotate your tires weekly when not riding (!), etc
err, nope. maybe install new tires outside, but you neednt encounter any mess during its life. as for rotating tires weekly... you dont ride weekly, anyway?
- Typically need a compressor (or CO2 cartridges) to seat tires, though sealant folks don't recommend CO2 b/c it can harden the sealant or crystallize it.
co2 cartridges are less than a buck a pop. only need to use it ONCE to install a tire. still cheaper than an innertube. doesnt ruin my sealant
- Very expensive tires for the tubeless ones that reviewers say are actually better than their clincher counterparts
not at all. top rated tubeless same price as top rated clinchers
- Typically harder to mount onto rims (tighter bead) than clinchers
absolutely not at all.
- Fewer flats that self-repair due to sealant (I don't get many flats and changing a tube is easy)
hard to say. but i dont puncture from pinches anymore
- Something "magical" about the ride quality (not seen in rolling resistance tests)
impossible to say. not compared to the clinchers i ran, anyway
- Some seriously praised new tubeless road tires (see Schwalbe S-One article, above).
theres a new One out now?!?!?
Cons:
- Dealing with messy sealant: Topping off, wiping out old stuff, recommendations by some sealant-makers to rotate your tires weekly when not riding (!), etc
err, nope. maybe install new tires outside, but you neednt encounter any mess during its life. as for rotating tires weekly... you dont ride weekly, anyway?
- Typically need a compressor (or CO2 cartridges) to seat tires, though sealant folks don't recommend CO2 b/c it can harden the sealant or crystallize it.
co2 cartridges are less than a buck a pop. only need to use it ONCE to install a tire. still cheaper than an innertube. doesnt ruin my sealant
- Very expensive tires for the tubeless ones that reviewers say are actually better than their clincher counterparts
not at all. top rated tubeless same price as top rated clinchers
- Typically harder to mount onto rims (tighter bead) than clinchers
absolutely not at all.
#28
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 372
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times
in
15 Posts
Originally Posted by TrackSmart View Post
Pros as I understand it:
- Fewer flats that self-repair due to sealant (I don't get many flats and changing a tube is easy)
hard to say. but i dont puncture from pinches anymore
- Something "magical" about the ride quality (not seen in rolling resistance tests)
impossible to say. not compared to the clinchers i ran, anyway
- Some seriously praised new tubeless road tires (see Schwalbe S-One article, above).
theres a new One out now?!?!?
Cons:
- Dealing with messy sealant: Topping off, wiping out old stuff, recommendations by some sealant-makers to rotate your tires weekly when not riding (!), etc
err, nope. maybe install new tires outside, but you neednt encounter any mess during its life. as for rotating tires weekly... you dont ride weekly, anyway?
- Typically need a compressor (or CO2 cartridges) to seat tires, though sealant folks don't recommend CO2 b/c it can harden the sealant or crystallize it.
co2 cartridges are less than a buck a pop. only need to use it ONCE to install a tire. still cheaper than an innertube. doesnt ruin my sealant
- Very expensive tires for the tubeless ones that reviewers say are actually better than their clincher counterparts
not at all. top rated tubeless same price as top rated clinchers
- Typically harder to mount onto rims (tighter bead) than clinchers
absolutely not at all.
theres my opinion from experience
Pros as I understand it:
- Fewer flats that self-repair due to sealant (I don't get many flats and changing a tube is easy)
hard to say. but i dont puncture from pinches anymore
- Something "magical" about the ride quality (not seen in rolling resistance tests)
impossible to say. not compared to the clinchers i ran, anyway
- Some seriously praised new tubeless road tires (see Schwalbe S-One article, above).
theres a new One out now?!?!?
Cons:
- Dealing with messy sealant: Topping off, wiping out old stuff, recommendations by some sealant-makers to rotate your tires weekly when not riding (!), etc
err, nope. maybe install new tires outside, but you neednt encounter any mess during its life. as for rotating tires weekly... you dont ride weekly, anyway?
- Typically need a compressor (or CO2 cartridges) to seat tires, though sealant folks don't recommend CO2 b/c it can harden the sealant or crystallize it.
co2 cartridges are less than a buck a pop. only need to use it ONCE to install a tire. still cheaper than an innertube. doesnt ruin my sealant
- Very expensive tires for the tubeless ones that reviewers say are actually better than their clincher counterparts
not at all. top rated tubeless same price as top rated clinchers
- Typically harder to mount onto rims (tighter bead) than clinchers
absolutely not at all.
theres my opinion from experience
EDIT: I just spoke to a friend who purchased a bike last year that came with road tubeless: He got a moderate-size tire gash out on the road, which caused small amounts of sealant to spray out as he rode -- the leak refused to fully seal. He tried to put a tube in the tire, but could not remove the tire -- the sealant had clogged the valve stem. It was a slow-enough leak, due to the sealant, that it would probably take hours before getting low enough to unseat the tire (slowing as pressure got lower) so he topped-off every few miles until he could get back home. He was annoyed (brand new bike on second ride), so he brought the bike to the shop after the ride and asked for normal "tubed" tires. They didn't believe his story -- until they tried to get the air out of the tire. They couldn't do it either! They did eventually sort it out, but it was this rider's first and last experience with tubeless. I did not realize that he had tried tubeless tires. He probably forgot about it, too, until I mentioned that I was going to buy some tubeless tires... He recommended that I avoid them based on his short experience with them.
I'm still going to give it a try, but that is a mishap that is *not* listed in any of the articles I've read. I can see why there is such a love/hate relationship with tubeless tires. Things usually don't go wrong, but when they do, it can be a major pain.
#29
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times
in
999 Posts
I've definitely tested it with Shimano/Schwalbe and I needed to use a lever to unseat the bead. There's a major difference in rim wall shapes between something like a Shimano/Stan's/AC rim and a standard rim. That's why mounting the tires is a bear. The rim needs to have the little shelf to keep the bead in place.
Zinn actually rode down a mountain on a flat tire just to test it. Also shows a good image of the bead lock.
Technical FAQ: Road tubeless, ceramics for carbon, and more - VeloNews.com
The weight of the bike pushes the tire down, it doesn't push bead off the rim. Cornering forces can apply a small side load, but its typically a small fraction compared to downforce. This is why clinchers don't instantly pop loose and crash massive crashes all the time.
Zinn actually rode down a mountain on a flat tire just to test it. Also shows a good image of the bead lock.
Technical FAQ: Road tubeless, ceramics for carbon, and more - VeloNews.com
The weight of the bike pushes the tire down, it doesn't push bead off the rim. Cornering forces can apply a small side load, but its typically a small fraction compared to downforce. This is why clinchers don't instantly pop loose and crash massive crashes all the time.
If I recall, Sinn said he rode 2km on flat before the bead came loose, which is pretty good! It would be kind of nice to have that security, but I'm not sure it's all that relevant to most of us, as the odds of a catastrophic cut to cause near instantaneous air loss are pretty low, and the odds of getting a dead flat on tubeless much lower than tubed.
Anyway, I didn't specify the terms of the wager, so I get to avoid paying out on a technicality, right?! Thanks for the article link and putting me straight on that.
#30
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times
in
999 Posts
Thanks for the opinion. You are probably right that it will not be a major difference in my ride experience, given the rarity with which I get flats.
Indeed, it sounds like there aren't many obstacles aside for learning something new. If it doesn't work out, I can always clean-out the messy sealant and run the tire with tubes until it is worn out.
EDIT: I just spoke to a friend who purchased a bike last year that came with road tubeless: He got a moderate-size tire gash out on the road, which caused small amounts of sealant to spray out as he rode -- the leak refused to fully seal. He tried to put a tube in the tire, but could not remove the tire -- the sealant had clogged the valve stem. It was a slow-enough leak, due to the sealant, that it would probably take hours before getting low enough to unseat the tire (slowing as pressure got lower) so he topped-off every few miles until he could get back home. He was annoyed (brand new bike on second ride), so he brought the bike to the shop after the ride and asked for normal "tubed" tires. They didn't believe his story -- until they tried to get the air out of the tire. They couldn't do it either! They did eventually sort it out, but it was this rider's first and last experience with tubeless. I did not realize that he had tried tubeless tires. He probably forgot about it, too, until I mentioned that I was going to buy some tubeless tires... He recommended that I avoid them based on his short experience with them.
I'm still going to give it a try, but that is a mishap that is *not* listed in any of the articles I've read. I can see why there is such a love/hate relationship with tubeless tires. Things usually don't go wrong, but when they do, it can be a major pain.
Indeed, it sounds like there aren't many obstacles aside for learning something new. If it doesn't work out, I can always clean-out the messy sealant and run the tire with tubes until it is worn out.
EDIT: I just spoke to a friend who purchased a bike last year that came with road tubeless: He got a moderate-size tire gash out on the road, which caused small amounts of sealant to spray out as he rode -- the leak refused to fully seal. He tried to put a tube in the tire, but could not remove the tire -- the sealant had clogged the valve stem. It was a slow-enough leak, due to the sealant, that it would probably take hours before getting low enough to unseat the tire (slowing as pressure got lower) so he topped-off every few miles until he could get back home. He was annoyed (brand new bike on second ride), so he brought the bike to the shop after the ride and asked for normal "tubed" tires. They didn't believe his story -- until they tried to get the air out of the tire. They couldn't do it either! They did eventually sort it out, but it was this rider's first and last experience with tubeless. I did not realize that he had tried tubeless tires. He probably forgot about it, too, until I mentioned that I was going to buy some tubeless tires... He recommended that I avoid them based on his short experience with them.
I'm still going to give it a try, but that is a mishap that is *not* listed in any of the articles I've read. I can see why there is such a love/hate relationship with tubeless tires. Things usually don't go wrong, but when they do, it can be a major pain.
#31
Senior Member
I just spoke to a friend who purchased a bike last year that came with road tubeless: He got a moderate-size tire gash out on the road, which caused small amounts of sealant to spray out as he rode -- the leak refused to fully seal. He tried to put a tube in the tire, but could not remove the tire -- the sealant had clogged the valve stem. It was a slow-enough leak, due to the sealant, that it would probably take hours before getting low enough to unseat the tire (slowing as pressure got lower) so he topped-off every few miles until he could get back home. He was annoyed (brand new bike on second ride), so he brought the bike to the shop after the ride and asked for normal "tubed" tires. They didn't believe his story -- until they tried to get the air out of the tire. They couldn't do it either!
#32
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times
in
999 Posts
I could see where someone without knowledge could have ended up in this situation out on the road but the bike shop not able to let the air out? Sealant can certainly clog a valve stem but there's a few things to do that will get the air out. First of all, do you know if he had valve stems with removable cores? Some are not removable and should be avoided in your search for stems when it comes time to buy some for your setup because removing the core usually gets the tire deflated. If that doesn't work or you didn't pack the tiny core removal tool in your flat kit, you would simply remove the nut that holds the valve stem on the wheel and push the stem in as if you're removing it and it will push any built up latex out of the way and allow air to escape. The only extreme situation I could see making this impossible would be if someone put a quart of sealant in the tire, had the bike parked with the stem at 6 o'clock for a year and never moved it.
The crazy stuff that gets blamed as "the problem with tubeless..."!
#33
Senior Member
Come to find out it ended up being those defective carbon wheels, not the stem that was leaking. Now, because of that ride I always carry a spare tube, co2, and lever just in case. Plus, I like helping others stranded out on the road so having the supplies to do so makes me feel good.
#34
Senior Member
It might just out of curiosity but I'm more interested in trying tubular tires than going tubeless.
If you have to mess with sealant and cleaning that out of the tires you lose the advantages of clinchers simplicity and ease of Maintenance anyway.
As for improvements in designs moving forward I think the glue tape available for tubular is likely easier than any sealant maintenance improvements we are likely to see.
If you have to mess with sealant and cleaning that out of the tires you lose the advantages of clinchers simplicity and ease of Maintenance anyway.
As for improvements in designs moving forward I think the glue tape available for tubular is likely easier than any sealant maintenance improvements we are likely to see.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,794
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 459 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
117 Posts
I think it is obvious that road tubeless is going through some of the same pains that MTB tubeless did back in the early 2000s when I started trying tubeless. I think one of the problems is rim design. Especially since road tires have to be relatively thin/light and the sidewalls are supple, I think the rims need to be designed better. Most rims are designed with basically a "shelf" where the bead sits so there is nothing really locking it in better. Road tires are also narrow when compared to the newer wide rims noways. So when deflated, they fall away quite easily. I found one rim (sold only as wheelset) that has a bead "barb" or raised area to hold the tire bead close to the sidewall, as opposed to a raised "shelf". It is the American Classic Argent Tubeless. The Easton R90 SL may have a similar design but I can't really tell definitively because the close-up pictures are not very clear.
For me, tubeless has a really high ride quality and some safety features. It is the safely part that can be greatly enhanced by a solid bead-lock. So tubeless is definitely worth trying and will become better down the road. I just ordered the Argent Tubeless Disc rims to try on my Tarmac. I ordered a a set of 25mm (already have 23s) Schwalbe Pro Ones and a set of IRC Pro RBCC 23 tubeless (they measure 25-26, depending on rim width) and will see how this rim works. I just hope the Am Classic hubs are durable.
For me, tubeless has a really high ride quality and some safety features. It is the safely part that can be greatly enhanced by a solid bead-lock. So tubeless is definitely worth trying and will become better down the road. I just ordered the Argent Tubeless Disc rims to try on my Tarmac. I ordered a a set of 25mm (already have 23s) Schwalbe Pro Ones and a set of IRC Pro RBCC 23 tubeless (they measure 25-26, depending on rim width) and will see how this rim works. I just hope the Am Classic hubs are durable.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: ?
Posts: 2,300
Bikes: i may have bike(s)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Holes that are a bit too big for sealant to coagulate can be remedied with a spot of superglue and then a slef adhesive tube patch on the tire. This gives the sealant a foundation so that it can solidify.
@ahanulec: I run sealant in my tubulars as well. Saved a race for me last year.
@ahanulec: I run sealant in my tubulars as well. Saved a race for me last year.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lewisburg, TN
Posts: 1,356
Bikes: Mikkelsen custom steel, Santa Cruz Chameleon SS, old trek trainer bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
I didn't read everything in the thread, but will toss in my experience. I haven't used a tube in... 6 or 7 years I believe, and have only had one flat, road or MTB. I won't consider running a wheelset with tubes agai, period.
#38
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 372
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times
in
15 Posts
I could see where someone without knowledge could have ended up in this situation out on the road but the bike shop not able to let the air out? Sealant can certainly clog a valve stem but there's a few things to do that will get the air out. First of all, do you know if he had valve stems with removable cores? Some are not removable and should be avoided in your search for stems when it comes time to buy some for your setup because removing the core usually gets the tire deflated. If that doesn't work or you didn't pack the tiny core removal tool in your flat kit, you would simply remove the nut that holds the valve stem on the wheel and push the stem in as if you're removing it and it will push any built up latex out of the way and allow air to escape. The only extreme situation I could see making this impossible would be if someone put a quart of sealant in the tire, had the bike parked with the stem at 6 o'clock for a year and never moved it.
I'm guessing that basic info about tubeless tires was given, but the person in question had never had a tubeless tire before and had not actually installed one before hitting the road.
When folks at a bike shop say the technology is fool-proof, but if you do get a flat, just put a tube in the tire -- they are unfortunately creating the potential for bad experiences. In this case, that simple advice -- just put a tube in the tire -- was clearly not enough.
They should have installed the tires when the customer was present and showed him how it all works and potential failure points. That would include the fact that the valve-stem is removable. However, that is problematic for shops, since as I've read, some tires don't completely seal immediately and shops don't want customers leaving and coming back when their tire doesn't hold air. That would also be a bad experience for the customer.
There are clearly some lessons for bike shops to learn when sending riders off on tubeless setups. And even for regular tubeless riders to learn when recommending tubeless tires to friends for the first time.
[By the way, thanks for the info given by folks here. I feel quite ready to deal with challenges that may arise.]
#39
Senior Member
In this case the person was "sold" on the idea of tubeless by the shop when buying a high-end race bike. The tires were installed on the bike at the shop.
I'm guessing that basic info about tubeless tires was given, but the person in question had never had a tubeless tire before and had not actually installed one before hitting the road.
When folks at a bike shop say the technology is fool-proof, but if you do get a flat, just put a tube in the tire -- they are unfortunately creating the potential for bad experiences. In this case, that simple advice -- just put a tube in the tire -- was clearly not enough.
They should have installed the tires when the customer was present and showed him how it all works and potential failure points. That would include the fact that the valve-stem is removable. However, that is problematic for shops, since as I've read, some tires don't completely seal immediately and shops don't want customers leaving and coming back when their tire doesn't hold air. That would also be a bad experience for the customer.
There are clearly some lessons for bike shops to learn when sending riders off on tubeless setups. And even for regular tubeless riders to learn when recommending tubeless tires to friends for the first time.
[By the way, thanks for the info given by folks here. I feel quite ready to deal with challenges that may arise.]
I'm guessing that basic info about tubeless tires was given, but the person in question had never had a tubeless tire before and had not actually installed one before hitting the road.
When folks at a bike shop say the technology is fool-proof, but if you do get a flat, just put a tube in the tire -- they are unfortunately creating the potential for bad experiences. In this case, that simple advice -- just put a tube in the tire -- was clearly not enough.
They should have installed the tires when the customer was present and showed him how it all works and potential failure points. That would include the fact that the valve-stem is removable. However, that is problematic for shops, since as I've read, some tires don't completely seal immediately and shops don't want customers leaving and coming back when their tire doesn't hold air. That would also be a bad experience for the customer.
There are clearly some lessons for bike shops to learn when sending riders off on tubeless setups. And even for regular tubeless riders to learn when recommending tubeless tires to friends for the first time.
[By the way, thanks for the info given by folks here. I feel quite ready to deal with challenges that may arise.]
Last edited by dvdslw; 07-17-16 at 04:15 AM.
#40
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times
in
999 Posts
Oh, come on! Bike shops never taught people how to fix a flat on a regular tubed tire, so why this new, higher standard? No one gets taught anything about how to fix a car when they buy one; why is this different? I think blaming the shop for consumers' ignorance is misguided, and it strikes me as exactly the line of reasoning which has created this litigious culture wherein we get sold the "dumbed down" versions of everything, and ugly stickers plastered all over our bikes remind us, essentially, to use our brain, because someone is going to do something stupid and want to pin the blame on someone else. Maybe it is a fine line between industry run amok and consumer protection, but this seems a pretty clear example of where following precedent does no harm; so you get a flat and can't figure it out? Big deal, take it to the shop to get fixed.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
A couple questions that this thread has got me curious about.
1. Why can't a tubeless tire come of a rim if it flats? From reading the above, is it for the same reason one poster had to cut his tube in half to remove it from the wheel?
2. When running the lower pressures these tires allow, is this solely for comfort and because there's no risk of pinch flatting? What does it do to performance. Ie. if you run a clincher at 100psi, and can run a tubeless at 80, is the performance going to be the same as running the clincher at 80 (at obviously greater flat risk)?
1. Why can't a tubeless tire come of a rim if it flats? From reading the above, is it for the same reason one poster had to cut his tube in half to remove it from the wheel?
2. When running the lower pressures these tires allow, is this solely for comfort and because there's no risk of pinch flatting? What does it do to performance. Ie. if you run a clincher at 100psi, and can run a tubeless at 80, is the performance going to be the same as running the clincher at 80 (at obviously greater flat risk)?
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
It might just out of curiosity but I'm more interested in trying tubular tires than going tubeless.
If you have to mess with sealant and cleaning that out of the tires you lose the advantages of clinchers simplicity and ease of Maintenance anyway.
As for improvements in designs moving forward I think the glue tape available for tubular is likely easier than any sealant maintenance improvements we are likely to see.
If you have to mess with sealant and cleaning that out of the tires you lose the advantages of clinchers simplicity and ease of Maintenance anyway.
As for improvements in designs moving forward I think the glue tape available for tubular is likely easier than any sealant maintenance improvements we are likely to see.
#43
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just picked up a new 2017 bike and it came tubeless from factory. First two ride impression are it definitely improves the ride quality on chatter/cracked roads. Running at 95/100PSI currently 200lbs rider. I have been running tubeless for MTB for years and love it. I say give it a try if you need new tires.
#44
Senior Member
For me, tubeless has a really high ride quality and some safety features. It is the safely part that can be greatly enhanced by a solid bead-lock. So tubeless is definitely worth trying and will become better down the road. I just ordered the Argent Tubeless Disc rims to try on my Tarmac. I ordered a a set of 25mm (already have 23s) Schwalbe Pro Ones and a set of IRC Pro RBCC 23 tubeless (they measure 25-26, depending on rim width) and will see how this rim works. I just hope the Am Classic hubs are durable.
I agree about all tubeless rims needing bead lock technology for safety and anyone not including this feature on a wheelset sold as tubeless is simply throwing some rim tape on a wheel and calling it tubeless. With a solid bead lock a tubeless tire will stay in place when deflated and be somewhat tough to break loose, even a narrow tire. I'm running 23mm Pro One's on a 28mm/19mm rim and they measure 27mm wide mounted up. It takes all I got to break them loose by hand and Id consider myself a pretty strong guy.
#45
Senior Member
Also, check with American Classic about which tires they suggest to use with those wheels, they told me not to use anything with a carbon reinforced bead. They seem to be in bed with IRC.
#46
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times
in
999 Posts
I almost bought a set of Argent's last year but decided to go carbon instead. American Classic makes some great products and were made famous for their hub quality in the mtb scene years ago. Those Argent rims are quite wide on the inside, I want to say 20.5mm? I think you'll be surprised how wide the Pro One's are going to measure once you get them aired up. I'm going to guess that the 25's will be at least 28mm wide inflated. Chaadster has a set on his bike he's been riding tubeless for quite some time so you could pm him to ask for some real world impressions.
I agree about all tubeless rims needing bead lock technology for safety and anyone not including this feature on a wheelset sold as tubeless is simply throwing some rim tape on a wheel and calling it tubeless. With a solid bead lock a tubeless tire will stay in place when deflated and be somewhat tough to break loose, even a narrow tire. I'm running 23mm Pro One's on a 28mm/19mm rim and they measure 27mm wide mounted up. It takes all I got to break them loose by hand and Id consider myself a pretty strong guy.
I agree about all tubeless rims needing bead lock technology for safety and anyone not including this feature on a wheelset sold as tubeless is simply throwing some rim tape on a wheel and calling it tubeless. With a solid bead lock a tubeless tire will stay in place when deflated and be somewhat tough to break loose, even a narrow tire. I'm running 23mm Pro One's on a 28mm/19mm rim and they measure 27mm wide mounted up. It takes all I got to break them loose by hand and Id consider myself a pretty strong guy.
#47
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My answer is... not worth it... I just came back from my "scheduled maintenance", after wrestling with the tire for over 1 hour, breaking two tire levers and cutting my hand, I decide to literally cut the f'ing tire out.
It was brand new, ~200 miles on it, but I prefer to carry a spare tube, a repair kit and a couple of co2 with me than having to deal with this.
I've 3 more tubeless tires, and guess what, I wouldn't feel bad for cutting all 3 into pieces so I can move to back to tubes.
It was brand new, ~200 miles on it, but I prefer to carry a spare tube, a repair kit and a couple of co2 with me than having to deal with this.
I've 3 more tubeless tires, and guess what, I wouldn't feel bad for cutting all 3 into pieces so I can move to back to tubes.
So I'm not contributing anything helpful here but have to say...
Hahaha wow I liked this post a lot, I can identify, and thanks for the hilarious picture!!!
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,794
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 459 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times
in
117 Posts
I'm going to use the Schwalbes on the Pacenti rims and the IRCs on the AM Classics. Let's see how each works. I do cary a tube and am hoping I don't have to deal with a crazy time throwing in a tube, if ever needed.
#49
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,568
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 2,132 Times
in
1,438 Posts
Just picked up a new 2017 bike and it came tubeless from factory. First two ride impression are it definitely improves the ride quality on chatter/cracked roads. Running at 95/100PSI currently 200lbs rider. I have been running tubeless for MTB for years and love it. I say give it a try if you need new tires.
I just tried tubeless after my tubed tires need replacement. I can't tell one bit of difference in feel or ride quality.
#50
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,367
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3071 Post(s)
Liked 1,624 Times
in
999 Posts
After reading a PEZ Cyling interview with Bill Shook, who was using Ones and AC Road Tubeless wheels on his personal ride, I chose Ones. Shook is a smart guy, so one to emulate in this regard.