Carbon fork lifespan
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Carbon fork lifespan
Greetings.
I've got a 2009 Lynskey R330 that I've had for 7 years (and 2 days). I've been fortunate enough to put 39,230 miles on it to date.
I'm pretty sure that the frame won't give me any issues down the road as I continue to put miles on it - especially since I'm newly retired and significantly increasing my miles to 8,000 per year. (My goal is 100,000 miles by the time I'm 65.)
My question is with the Alpha Q GS10 fork that came stock on the bike. I hate to think about a catastrophic failure of a fork!
Do carbon forks have a typical "lifespan?" Is it based on time?...miles??
I don't ride gravel or cyclocross trails, have never crashed it and I'm a small-ish guy. I'm 54, 5'8 and 155 on a heavy day.
Thanks.
I've got a 2009 Lynskey R330 that I've had for 7 years (and 2 days). I've been fortunate enough to put 39,230 miles on it to date.
I'm pretty sure that the frame won't give me any issues down the road as I continue to put miles on it - especially since I'm newly retired and significantly increasing my miles to 8,000 per year. (My goal is 100,000 miles by the time I'm 65.)
My question is with the Alpha Q GS10 fork that came stock on the bike. I hate to think about a catastrophic failure of a fork!
Do carbon forks have a typical "lifespan?" Is it based on time?...miles??
I don't ride gravel or cyclocross trails, have never crashed it and I'm a small-ish guy. I'm 54, 5'8 and 155 on a heavy day.
Thanks.
#2
wears long socks
“Composites do not behave like metals,” explained Chuck Texiera. “In fact, they don’t actually fatigue like metals in the same classic sense of the word. The fatigue life of the fibre itself is just about infinite.”
#3
Full Member
Thread Starter
Thanks. Do the "ride characteristics" of the carbon fork change over time?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,217
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18398 Post(s)
Liked 15,494 Times
in
7,317 Posts
And they're off!
#5
Its Freakin HammerTime!!!
in before lock.lol
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
You might check in over on the "Carbon Fiber Sucks" thread. If anything, you will get a laugh or two out of it.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
https://velonews.competitor.com/2002/...n-forks-2_3270
Last edited by seypat; 11-02-16 at 11:39 AM.
#9
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,032
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22578 Post(s)
Liked 8,919 Times
in
4,153 Posts
I posted something about this a couple years ago. My friend has a Lynskey and he said his contact at Lynskey told him to change the fork every 5 years.
Personally, I think that's BS and if not crashed or abused, it should last indefinitely.
Personally, I think that's BS and if not crashed or abused, it should last indefinitely.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,217
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18398 Post(s)
Liked 15,494 Times
in
7,317 Posts
#15
Bonafide N00bs
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 442
Bikes: 2015 Cannondale Quick CX 4, 2014 Fuji Sportif 1.3C Disc, 2012 Fuji SST 2.0 Ultegra Di2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Infinite fatigue life sounds like a good amount of time.
If ride quality was altered by a change in resin and carbon shifts and/or delamination, then that would fly in the face of an "infinite fatigue life". Therefore, a change in ride quality and infinite fatigue life is impossible. Unless there's already minor cracks caused by blunt forces, I wouldn't be too worried. Looks like you're getting your money's worth out of the Lynskey.
If ride quality was altered by a change in resin and carbon shifts and/or delamination, then that would fly in the face of an "infinite fatigue life". Therefore, a change in ride quality and infinite fatigue life is impossible. Unless there's already minor cracks caused by blunt forces, I wouldn't be too worried. Looks like you're getting your money's worth out of the Lynskey.
#16
Senior Member
I would be more worried about the installation of your Alpha Q fork than the fatigue characteristics.
These are great forks; I've owned one. However, many of them were installed incorrectly, with potentially catastrophic consequences.
Listen up: these forks have a very thin wall carbon steerer tube. The steerer must be reinforced with the originally-supplied 4" long alu insert, which must be properly epoxied in place before use. The depth of the insert must be below the level of the top headset bearings.
So you cannot install the insert and then cut the steerer to size.
Most of the used Alpha Q forks I've seen are dangerously compromised due to original install problems, or that they were cut afterwards.
These are great forks; I've owned one. However, many of them were installed incorrectly, with potentially catastrophic consequences.
Listen up: these forks have a very thin wall carbon steerer tube. The steerer must be reinforced with the originally-supplied 4" long alu insert, which must be properly epoxied in place before use. The depth of the insert must be below the level of the top headset bearings.
So you cannot install the insert and then cut the steerer to size.
Most of the used Alpha Q forks I've seen are dangerously compromised due to original install problems, or that they were cut afterwards.
#17
Senior Member
Unlike TI & AL which have a finite life and for all practical purposes are unrepairable.
#18
Senior Member
Carbon fiber may delaminate. This is different from "fatigue", but may have very similar catastrophic failure effects.
Many bike producers still offer lower warranty periods for carbon forks, compared with the carbon frame (e.g.: 6 years for frame and 2 years for forks). They probably know something...
The association of composite carbon fiber bikes with "infinite life" just because the fiber itself does not fatigue looks to me as an obvious marketing bs. If the fork delaminates and puts me down, there is no relief in knowing that, in fact, the fibers of the cracked fork did not fatigue...
Many bike producers still offer lower warranty periods for carbon forks, compared with the carbon frame (e.g.: 6 years for frame and 2 years for forks). They probably know something...
The association of composite carbon fiber bikes with "infinite life" just because the fiber itself does not fatigue looks to me as an obvious marketing bs. If the fork delaminates and puts me down, there is no relief in knowing that, in fact, the fibers of the cracked fork did not fatigue...
Last edited by BillyD; 11-03-16 at 07:23 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 195
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Greetings.
I've got a 2009 Lynskey R330 that I've had for 7 years (and 2 days). I've been fortunate enough to put 39,230 miles on it to date.
I'm pretty sure that the frame won't give me any issues down the road as I continue to put miles on it - especially since I'm newly retired and significantly increasing my miles to 8,000 per year. (My goal is 100,000 miles by the time I'm 65.)
My question is with the Alpha Q GS10 fork that came stock on the bike. I hate to think about a catastrophic failure of a fork!
Do carbon forks have a typical "lifespan?" Is it based on time?...miles??
I don't ride gravel or cyclocross trails, have never crashed it and I'm a small-ish guy. I'm 54, 5'8 and 155 on a heavy day.
Thanks.
I've got a 2009 Lynskey R330 that I've had for 7 years (and 2 days). I've been fortunate enough to put 39,230 miles on it to date.
I'm pretty sure that the frame won't give me any issues down the road as I continue to put miles on it - especially since I'm newly retired and significantly increasing my miles to 8,000 per year. (My goal is 100,000 miles by the time I'm 65.)
My question is with the Alpha Q GS10 fork that came stock on the bike. I hate to think about a catastrophic failure of a fork!
Do carbon forks have a typical "lifespan?" Is it based on time?...miles??
I don't ride gravel or cyclocross trails, have never crashed it and I'm a small-ish guy. I'm 54, 5'8 and 155 on a heavy day.
Thanks.
In your post, you ask about a specific model fork from a single manufacturer. Yet your title is general.
As some others have suggested, in your specific case, the place to start is your manufacturer. Get their opinion based on your riding conditions. They should be able to provide the best answer because they will be familiar with the problems their customers have reported.
However, some readers will read this thread looking for a general answer about "carbon fork lifespans" and there is no single answer. A well-designed, well-made composite fork can serve a rider well for a very long time---many decades. But there is a lot of variation in design goals for the fork, the skill of the designer and the manufacturing quality. These factors have a larger bearing on lifespan than the material used. I think composites probably require a higher skill level on the part of the designer than forks made from other materials.
I'm a larger, heavier cyclist so my fork is under more stress than yours. I'm 6'2" tall and used to be a body-builder. An injury to an Achilles tendon forced me to return to cycling. I was a muscle-bound 240 lbs when I started. Now I'm down to 185 lbs and have a more typical cycling build (small muscles up top but I still have big legs). The fork of my 2008 Team Fuji (composite frame and fork) is going strong and is showing zero problems or defects. The same is true for my wife's 2008 Specialized Ruby Elite (composite frame and fork). I expect our forks to last indefinitely and the only reason we'll replace them is because we decide to upgrade to road bikes with different features.
Kind regards, RoadLight
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
11 Posts
Have had an Alpha Q c/f fork (without alu insert) on our custom Zona tandem for well over 40,000 miles. So far so good,
Oh, for you anti -carbon folks: broke a steel fork on one of our other tandems after 13,000 miles . . .
Anything eventually can fatigue/break.
Pedal on TWOgether!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
Oh, for you anti -carbon folks: broke a steel fork on one of our other tandems after 13,000 miles . . .
Anything eventually can fatigue/break.
Pedal on TWOgether!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,670
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,539 Times
in
1,405 Posts
This is one of those good news/bad news kind of things.
The bad news is that manufacturers are becoming concerned about failures and potential failures, and many are joining the "limited useful life" bandwagon. Very little is actually known, and in theory, without the effects of various insults, properly built CF components should last forever.
However we are seeing some failures, and it's difficult to know if they're the result of quality control, poor underbuilt designs, or the cumulative effects of hard use. So we (or at least I) don't know if there's something there or if makers are simply covering their rears while at the same time creating more business through fear.
On the bright side, if there were serious issues relating to useful life, we should be seeing steadily increasing numbers of failures, as more and more forks are coming into "middle age". And we're not seeing a pattern of older forks failing.
So, so far, it's a question of "you pays your money, and you takes your chances".
The bad news is that manufacturers are becoming concerned about failures and potential failures, and many are joining the "limited useful life" bandwagon. Very little is actually known, and in theory, without the effects of various insults, properly built CF components should last forever.
However we are seeing some failures, and it's difficult to know if they're the result of quality control, poor underbuilt designs, or the cumulative effects of hard use. So we (or at least I) don't know if there's something there or if makers are simply covering their rears while at the same time creating more business through fear.
On the bright side, if there were serious issues relating to useful life, we should be seeing steadily increasing numbers of failures, as more and more forks are coming into "middle age". And we're not seeing a pattern of older forks failing.
So, so far, it's a question of "you pays your money, and you takes your chances".
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#22
Senior Member
Carbon fiber may delaminate. This is different from "fatigue", but may have very similar catastrophic failure effects.
Many bike producers still offer lower warranty periods for carbon forks, compared with the carbon frame (e.g.: 6 years for frame and 2 years for forks). They probably know something...
The association of composite carbon fiber bikes with "infinite life" just because the fiber itself does not fatigue looks to me as an obvious marketing bs. If the fork delaminates and puts me down, there is no relief in knowing that, in fact, the fibers of the cracked fork did not fatigue...
Many bike producers still offer lower warranty periods for carbon forks, compared with the carbon frame (e.g.: 6 years for frame and 2 years for forks). They probably know something...
The association of composite carbon fiber bikes with "infinite life" just because the fiber itself does not fatigue looks to me as an obvious marketing bs. If the fork delaminates and puts me down, there is no relief in knowing that, in fact, the fibers of the cracked fork did not fatigue...
Last edited by BillyD; 11-03-16 at 07:22 AM.
#23
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,527
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3885 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Carbon fork on my '99 Trek still perfect, maybe 60,000 miles. Carbon fork on our '03 tandem still perfect. Maybe only 30,000 miles. The only dangerous failure I've had has been an aluminum stem. Fortunately I was able to baby it back to the parking lot.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#24
Senior Member
Airplanes and bikes technologies are very different. One should not expect the expensive research and testing from aircraft industry to be applied to bikes. And the insane race toward continuous lightening of bikes frames / forks worse the problem, while aircraft industry still place safety standards way above the lightening of the device.
#25
Senior Member
P.S.: The "BS" does not stay in using of carbon fibers, but in the stupid marketing claim that try to make the users believe that CF bikes will last forever.