Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Training value of climbing steep hills

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Training value of climbing steep hills

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-16, 09:00 AM
  #26  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Originally Posted by Scarbo
Wrong. But, you would never understand. Ask your Strava to explain it to you.
Oh no, please tell us more about the hills you've climbed. I bet they're ammaaaaazzzzing.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:01 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times in 1,510 Posts
These cyclists really like climbing.

seypat is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:02 AM
  #28  
Erik the Inveigler
 
Scarbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The California Alps
Posts: 2,303
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1310 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Oh no, please tell us more about the hills you've climbed. I bet they're ammaaaaazzzzing.

Now you're just turning just plain peevish, petulant, and puerile.
Scarbo is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:05 AM
  #29  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Bro, the faux-clever is really not working. Trolling is more art than science.

But hills or no, you can sort of work a thesaurus. As they would say on Strava, kudos!
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:06 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
PepeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 6,861
Mentioned: 180 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2739 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times in 59 Posts
This thread turned a bit weird...

Does steel climb better than carbon?
PepeM is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:07 AM
  #31  
Erik the Inveigler
 
Scarbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The California Alps
Posts: 2,303
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1310 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Bro, the faux-clever is really not working. Trolling is more art than science.

But hills or no, you can sort of work a thesaurus. As they would say on Strava, kudos!
Man, I really got your goat this morning, haven't I? You came in swinging, telling us all we were full of crap. What's that matter, dude? I'm sorry the subject of climbing fills you with such rage. lol

Haha--I can't think of when it was that I last cracked open a thesaurus. Some of us are just . . . literate. You know?

Last edited by Scarbo; 11-03-16 at 09:19 AM.
Scarbo is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:07 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
I think hill-related threads are becoming my favorite, because they are so quintessentially BF. And by that nature, also BS. Nowhere else will you find more humblebragging self-back-pattery than in these sorts of threads. They truly are wondrous.
The local hiking forum has a lot of threads boasting about stuff like "I climbed Mount Rainier in 5 hours" and "Anish just finished the Arizona trail in 19 days 17 hours 9 minutes, smashing the previous record of 21 days 14 hours 16 minutes." It's not a BF thing, it's a human thing.

PS - Congratulations Anish! That trails is 800 miles, she did it on foot carrying her food, clothing, tent, and sleeping bag.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:08 AM
  #33  
Non omnino gravis
 
DrIsotope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: SoCal, USA!
Posts: 8,553

Bikes: Nekobasu, Pandicorn, Lakitu

Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4905 Post(s)
Liked 1,731 Times in 958 Posts
Originally Posted by PepeM
This thread turned a bit weird...

Does steel climb better than carbon?
Depends on whether goodly flex can outpower the tiny micro-asplosions that help propel CF frames up hills.
__________________
DrIsotope is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:09 AM
  #34  
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
The value of the steep hill is that there is no place to hide, no place to recover!

You are forced to work at max all the way to the top. A lot of training hills accomodate your will power being broken. Nevermind this, I'll cruise it in from here. The long steep climb, not so much.

Once you have enough fitness to climb the long steep hill, then it becomes about maintaining the effort, and managing the recovery points. No (or very few) hill is 14% continuously over 1000ft of gain. They ease a little, then they kick up. Learning to manage that give and take, learning to hold the effort to the top, learning what happens when you go to hard, blow up? Are you done? Can you recover and get back up to pace?

Also, there's a "knowing" that comes into play. You get to a new climb, and you "know" what you can do, how it will likely play out, which boosts your confidence, and confidence boosts your mental strength when it gets tough.

Last edited by nycphotography; 11-03-16 at 09:16 AM.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 09:09 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by PepeM
Does steel climb better than carbon?
If there's a giant magnet at the top of the hill.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 10:02 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,351

Bikes: 2015 Jamis Quest Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 270 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by PepeM
Does steel climb better than carbon?
I personally have never completed any climb on a Carbon bike, but I've done many on Aluminum and steel. So I guess the answer has to be yes!
12strings is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 10:32 AM
  #37  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 742

Bikes: Trek

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Doing much steeper grades for shorter distances absolutely does not have the same effect as doing more nominal grades for miles and miles. Long grades genuinely tax different parts of the body. The bigger part of my climbing yesterday was (by BF estimations) a basically flat 6.5% average... for five and a half miles.

Amazing to me that I live near some of the highest paved roads in California and I have climbed 2 of them (out of 10 listed). Some long gradual climbs at about 6% for 60 miles or so with 10,000 ft. But yet forum members continue to claim that they have much steeper roads than those of the highest mountains available. OK so there are a few steep sections along the way that are 20%, but don't you think that we climb those in order to get to the top? They are there but factored into the overall 6%.

What I find funny is that I can do a short steep climb (29%) any day of the week. To do the long gradual climb of 6%, I really have to train. Part of training is doing those short steep climbs as a building block for the long climbs.

I did a ride of about 40 miles with 6000 ft or so. At the top was a section of 22%. The steep section would have been a walk in the park had I not done the long gradual climb first.

I also do 23% climbs on the MTB but again, those are short sections up in dirt roads. Where you guys find 20% grades over 6 miles puzzles me! Not saying anybody claims this, but it they sure make it sound that way.
ClydeTim is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 10:53 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times in 7,324 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
But go deep into your memory box, and think-- at any point during that climb, did you say to yourself, "Man, this is just the best. I hope this hill never ends." No. You did not.
Actually, I did think it was great while it was happening--until I got to hardest parts. And there have been plenty of other times when I have been climbing mountains and thought it was great in the moment. And of course no one never wants it to end because you would never get to where you were going if it never ended.


This was the route for my Montana trip in June of this year:


https://ridewithgps.com/routes/14890942


Loved everyone of those climbs, even when I was getting hailed on for a short bit. I enjoy that sort of challenge as long as I am properly prepared for potential weather conditions so I don't endanger myself. That happened during a 2014 tour in Montana. I got a case of weight weenie fever just before I left for Missoula and decided to take a lame rain shell instead of my real rain jacket. Twice I got caught in storms. Once at nearly 8,000' with hail, rain and even some wet snow. The second hit around 7,000'. Driving, very cold rain. I was quite hypothermic on the way down and ended up having to get a motel room rather than camp. Didn't make that mistake this year.


North Cascades Highway, May, '99. Rained turned to snow at some point during the nearly 30 mile climb:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
LIB.jpg (82.7 KB, 134 views)
indyfabz is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:02 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times in 7,324 Posts
Originally Posted by ClydeTim
Some long gradual climbs at about 6% for 60 miles or so with 10,000 ft.

I was never a math whiz so I could be wrong, but wouldn't 60 miles at an average of 6% give you about 19,000' of climbing?


X feet of climbing/316,800'=.06
X=316,800'*.06
X=19,008
indyfabz is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:05 AM
  #40  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 742

Bikes: Trek

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
I was never a math whiz so I could be wrong, but wouldn't 60 miles at an average of 6% give you about 19,000' of climbing?


X feet of climbing/316,800'=.06
X=316,800'*.06
X=19,008

I don't know, all I know is it's an organized event and after 60 miles, you have a total accumulated of nearly 10,000 ft.

My point is that it's a long gradual climb, not one of those 20% grades.

This is the graph if you want to count the inches.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Capture.JPG (69.2 KB, 125 views)

Last edited by ClydeTim; 11-03-16 at 11:11 AM.
ClydeTim is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:13 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
You always "enjoy" those climbs in retrospect. But go deep into your memory box, and think-- at any point during that climb, did you say to yourself, "Man, this is just the best. I hope this hill never ends." No. You did not. The climb is to get to the top. It is truly not about the journey.
When I did Loup Loup Pass, I made a loop and took some dirt roads back down. I wished I could have met somebody at the top and got a ride back down. Probably would have enjoyed it more if I had just taken the highway back down. Same thing happened with Old Blewett Pass, I enjoyed the ride up, wished I didn't have to ride back down.

Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:16 AM
  #42  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 742

Bikes: Trek

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
, I enjoyed the ride up, wished I didn't have to ride back down.
I feel the same way. On most of my climbing rides I enjoy the climb up. If I had it my way, I'd skip the descent. Waste of time in my book as the climbing is the interesting part.
ClydeTim is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:17 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
North Cascades Highway, May, '99.


North Cascades Highway, Ross Dam Trailhead, spring 2012?



Going to head back this winter with XC skis.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:19 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,520 Times in 7,324 Posts
Originally Posted by ClydeTim
I don't know, all I know is it's an organized event and after 60 miles, you have a total accumulated of nearly 10,000 ft.

Ah. So it's 10,000' of total climbing in 60 miles. That makes sense. I misread your post as saying there is a single, 60 mile climb averaging 6%.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:22 AM
  #45  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 742

Bikes: Trek

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 264 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
Ah. So it's 10,000' of total climbing in 60 miles. That makes sense. I misread your post as saying there is a single, 60 mile climb averaging 6%.
I may have not have worded it clearly at first but you get the idea.
ClydeTim is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:27 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
woodcraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 569 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
When I did Loup Loup Pass, I made a loop and took some dirt roads back down. I wished I could have met somebody at the top and got a ride back down. Probably would have enjoyed it more if I had just taken the highway back down. Same thing happened with Old Blewett Pass, I enjoyed the ride up, wished I didn't have to ride back down.

Between worrying about carbon asplosions, and disk brake fluid vaporization,

I should think not!
woodcraft is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:29 AM
  #47  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
Originally Posted by DrIsotope
Bottom line, any real distance logging over 250ft/mi sucks. Doing much steeper grades for shorter distances absolutely does not have the same effect as doing more nominal grades for miles and miles. Long grades genuinely tax different parts of the body. The bigger part of my climbing yesterday was (by BF estimations) a basically flat 6.5% average... for five and a half miles. I was slow (as per usual) and it was about as fun as it usually is (which is not much.) I climb hills to get to do +40mph on the way back down.

I've got a nice short hill over in my town for all you supermen-- only peaks at 28%. I've ridden it a grand total of one time, and don't really feel the urge to do it again. The notion that any grade above 10% gets easy after awhile... maybe if you weigh 130lbs, I guess.
I would honestly rather ride longer climbs at less steep angles than shorter, steeper stuff. I find it to be better training for road riding and endurance. However, finding a short but steep hill and hitting it over and over again is a great way to do zone WTF? anaerobic intervals.


If people really want to hit steep stuff and be all "dude I'm so awesome because I did that and I'm still here" they should get into mountain biking. Nothing on the road compares to the utter nonsense of single track stuff.
RJM is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:36 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
I have you all beat when it comes to steep.



Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:46 AM
  #49  
RJM
I'm doing it wrong.
 
RJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875

Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9

Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times in 1,664 Posts
That looks more dangerous than riding a bike on the road. lol.
RJM is offline  
Old 11-03-16, 11:47 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Huntington Harbor, CA
Posts: 399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ClydeTim
I feel the same way. On most of my climbing rides I enjoy the climb up. If I had it my way, I'd skip the descent. Waste of time in my book as the climbing is the interesting part.

+1


I don't like any decent >10% AND >1 mile.
hsuehhwa is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.