Best Bang For The Buck Trainer
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 419
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Best Bang For The Buck Trainer
I have a Trek Emonda SL-5 and haven't ridden it much because of health issues.
Looking for a good trainer so I can build some strength back into my legs.
Suggestions?
Looking for a good trainer so I can build some strength back into my legs.
Suggestions?
Last edited by SundayNiagara; 02-05-17 at 12:43 PM.
#2
klondike300
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Looking for my lung on Green Mountain or flowing the trails at Port Gamble
Posts: 297
Bikes: Cannondale(x3). Synapse, cyclocross and 29er Scalpel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like the Elite quobo fluid. Simple and quiet rubber type roller.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340
Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times
in
299 Posts
Ascent Fluid Trainer CPC-_-Dynamic Searc I have the Ascent trainer from Bike Nashbar. It is well made and should provide years of service. As can be seen in the illustration, the flywheel is very small, 4" in diameter, so that pedaling the bike is not as smooth as pedaling on the road. This week I'm going to remove that flywheel from the trainer and have a machine shop turn a heavier custom one. I'm guessing a 6" flywheel will do what I want. Can't really comlplain much as the price was quite low.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,435
Bikes: Colnago, Cervelo, Scott
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 191 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
If that's what you're looking for, best bang for the buck is probably a Kurt Kinetic Road Machine if you just want something reliable to spin your legs and get a workout. Best trainer period is the Tacx Neo.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Geneva, IL
Posts: 361
Bikes: 2015 Storck Scenero G3 (Force 22)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cycleops or Kurt fluid. Can be had for about $150-200 lightly used on CL or ebay. Definitely fluid over magnetic.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Oakmont, PA
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
With the addition of a $50 Kurt InRide module, a KK road machine gives usable power figures, albeit Bluetooth only. Mine reads about 5W higher than my stages PM which I consider usable, and there's no need to add a speed/cadence sensor to the bike to use, say, Zwift.
#13
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
This. I've burned through the bearings on two cheap trainers before I finally went for the KKRM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,509
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20801 Post(s)
Liked 9,448 Times
in
4,666 Posts
In addition to being reliable in terms of build quality/robustness, the KKRM is also pretty uniform/predictable in terms of resistance curve, which is valuable from a training standpoint, if you want to sign up for Zwift, TrainerRoad or the like (which you should consider, as it makes the most of your time on the trainer). I haven't looked at new 'dumb' trainers since getting my KK, so maybe others have closed the gap in this regard, but it certainly something to keep in mind.
#15
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
In addition to being reliable in terms of build quality/robustness, the KKRM is also pretty uniform/predictable in terms of resistance curve, which is valuable from a training standpoint, if you want to sign up for Zwift, TrainerRoad or the like (which you should consider, as it makes the most of your time on the trainer). I haven't looked at new 'dumb' trainers since getting my KK, so maybe others have closed the gap in this regard, but it certainly something to keep in mind.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,509
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20801 Post(s)
Liked 9,448 Times
in
4,666 Posts
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Antioch, IL
Posts: 2,330
Bikes: 2013 Synapse 4
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
depends on budget of course. my budget was LOW and I ended up with a very nice CycleOps Wind trainer and I'm content with it given the price (I got it for $50 and it was practically new). sure wind trainers are a bit noisier but I have a stereo playing while I ride it in the pain cave so its not much of a distraction. YMMV, obviously. if I had a bigger budget I would have gotten the Kurt though at that time. now?? it would be a smart trainer if I could afford it, but those cost almost as much as the bike I use on it, tough pill to swallow for me.
#21
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 230
Bikes: 87 Raleigh 531C Team Replica, 96 Litespeed Classic, 01 Lemond Tete-De-Course, 99 Mongoose RX10.9, 03 Lemond Wayzata, 00 Litespeed Appalachian, 99 Bianchi XL Boron, 98 Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times
in
27 Posts
Only two rides so far, but I am happy with my Ascent fluid trainer from Nashbar, around $100 with discounts. I just wanted a simple, inexpensive trainer for rainy day indoor training occasionally.
#22
Full Member
Kurt Kinetic trainers use a proprietary Bluetooth protocol. While some third party Apps will support this now (such as Zwift) the future is uncertain. KK could close off their protocol so non-KK software is excluded or Zwift could choose to stop supporting non standard protocols. At least with open standards for power and trainer control you are not tied to the whims of the manufacturer or developer closing off support.
#23
Port
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,640
Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 979 Post(s)
Liked 1,840 Times
in
1,052 Posts
For a basic, no frills trainer, I like 1Up
https://www.1upusa.com/product-trainer.html
SMOOTH. Big heavy flywheel so it coasts nicely. Nearly silent.
https://www.1upusa.com/product-trainer.html
SMOOTH. Big heavy flywheel so it coasts nicely. Nearly silent.
__________________
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 1,258
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Last fall their software lead took a very hard-line "ANT+ is technically inferior and supporting it is beneath us" position on the DC Rainmaker review. He basically dismissed any desire to use your Garmin (or any ANT+ sensors) when on the trainer as "nonsense".
I love my old KK Road Machine, but the biggest advantage of the legacy machines was the leak-proof fluid unit with a relatively stable and carefully road-tuned power curve. The new KK trainers have neither (reliant on electronic resistance and software to provide the resistance curve). Combine that with an outrageous upgrade price and complete unit prices that are no better than other smart trainers and the company's "only a moron would still use a 3.5mm headphone jack" attitude and it's hard to make a case in favor of the new KK machines.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 246
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
There's no need to buy any KK software (Inride) to use the Road Mach (non-smart) with Zwift. Zwift supports the KK Road Mach and your choice of a wheel sensor (Ant+ or BT) so the reference to KK software (Inride?) is irrelevant.. don't buy it. Zwift calcs the virtual power which is what a good portion of riders are doing anyway with Zwift.
Zwift supports other fluid trainers and they're are all good value. KK Road mach has shown to be among the most popular so there's zero worries with Zwift suddenly not supporting it. After you get bored stand-alone riding, you can add a wheel sensor of your choice and you're able to take advantage of virtual rides using Zwift.
It took me all of 5 minutes from first time Zwift startup to recognize my HR, Cad, Wheel (all Wahoo) using BT and start riding with virtual power. As an fyi; all Wahoo sensors are BT/Ant+ capable so I could hook it up with an Ant+ dongle also. Again, I am not boxed in with any KK software.
Zwift supports other fluid trainers and they're are all good value. KK Road mach has shown to be among the most popular so there's zero worries with Zwift suddenly not supporting it. After you get bored stand-alone riding, you can add a wheel sensor of your choice and you're able to take advantage of virtual rides using Zwift.
It took me all of 5 minutes from first time Zwift startup to recognize my HR, Cad, Wheel (all Wahoo) using BT and start riding with virtual power. As an fyi; all Wahoo sensors are BT/Ant+ capable so I could hook it up with an Ant+ dongle also. Again, I am not boxed in with any KK software.