Carbon vs. Alloy wheels - at the same weight
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Carbon vs. Alloy wheels - at the same weight
I've never really ridden anything other than stock wheels. Let's you have to sets of wheels that are the same weight with the same hubs and spokes, around 1500g. If one has a carbon rim vs. alloy on the other, in broad terms can you expect a difference in how they ride? Would the carbon be more compliant? Some other differing characteristic?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
Some people say that carbon rims are more comfortable, but I have no idea what the reasoning is. Same with carbon seatposts. Carbon is not known to be more dampening than aluminum. The only other comfort factor I can think of is flex. But stiffness depends on how thick the material is, so I don't think you can say one way or the other without comparing actual specific rims.
#4
Optically Corrected
If these wheels were to be used with rim brakes, I would go with alloy rims just for the benifits of the brake track.
#5
Senior Member
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
In low profile clinchers you can find metal lighter than carbon. @noodle soup said that was old news.
https://www.amclassicsales.com/amclas...less-road-rims
Last edited by noodle soup; 05-10-17 at 09:43 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I learned it about 1-2 years ago, but I regularly read "upgrade" to carbon when dealing with low profile clinchers.
I'm not really a clincher guy, so my experience is with just a few.
I do not think it is accepted metal low profile rims may be superior to carbon.
Carbon is viewed as lighter / better than alloy.
FWIW - the lightest stuff I do is alloy. The Extralite seat post, stems, hubs - alloy are way lighter than any carbon equivalent.
Last edited by Doge; 05-10-17 at 11:12 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
To the OP...
More personal logic, but if you want performance go tubular.
If you want to just ride, find a nice alloy - Ultegra and ride.
More personal logic, but if you want performance go tubular.
If you want to just ride, find a nice alloy - Ultegra and ride.
#13
Senior Member
In low profile clinchers you can find metal lighter than carbon. @noodle soup said that was old news.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
What is news to me - is that it is common knowledge / "old news".
I learned it about 1-2 years ago, but I regularly read "upgrade" to carbon when dealing with low profile clinchers.
I'm not really a clincher guy, so my experience is with just a few.
I do not think it is accepted metal low profile rims may be superior to carbon.
Carbon is viewed as lighter / better than alloy.
I learned it about 1-2 years ago, but I regularly read "upgrade" to carbon when dealing with low profile clinchers.
I'm not really a clincher guy, so my experience is with just a few.
I do not think it is accepted metal low profile rims may be superior to carbon.
Carbon is viewed as lighter / better than alloy.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
After a lot of debate, I prefer Alloy.. simply for the braking surface. The RS81's I'm currently riding are a great combination of both, however. Call me weird, but I just don't trust carbon braking surfaces. (For rim brakes of course.)
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
It has been argued by others on this forum that metal is a better material for clinchers than carbon. I agree with that having seen both in use from the same mfg, same time, same team in use.
I think the main reason folks go carbon is aesthetics. As that is what the highest end rims are made of, this creates the impression carbon is always an upgrade. But in that middle ground if the focus is just on function there are pros an cons to each.
If I were buying now for function in the 1500g range, I'd go metal for rim brakes, or metal track and carbon for disc brakes.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
I've never really ridden anything other than stock wheels. Let's you have to sets of wheels that are the same weight with the same hubs and spokes, around 1500g. If one has a carbon rim vs. alloy on the other, in broad terms can you expect a difference in how they ride? Would the carbon be more compliant? Some other differing characteristic?
The only real difference that I notice is that the 38mm deep carbon wheels handle crosswinds better than the 28mm aluminum wheelset.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,922
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Liked 1,882 Times
in
998 Posts
FWIW, you won't find many CF w/aluminum brake track hoops that will build up to 1500g.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Shimano C35 Carbon Road 1550g
I don't know if that is with/without skewer.
I've not weighed the all alloy Ultegra (which I have) but they are light and I've seen pretty cheap.
Last edited by Doge; 05-11-17 at 08:33 AM.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Sure it is. That's one reason photographers prefer carbon fiber tripods over aluminum. Weight is another obvious consideration and heat transfer can be an issue too, but it's long been known that you get sharper photos from a carbon 'pod than an alu one because of the dampening property vs wind and any slight motion from walking near the legs. "A tripod is your sharpest lens."
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
Sure it is. That's one reason photographers prefer carbon fiber tripods over aluminum. Weight is another obvious consideration and heat transfer can be an issue too, but it's long been known that you get sharper photos from a carbon 'pod than an alu one because of the dampening property vs wind and any slight motion from walking near the legs. "A tripod is your sharpest lens."
Check out this 2001 article from the Journal of Materials Sciences. Specifically section 5, where the authors compare different structural materials' damping abilities. The gist is that carbon-fiber/epoxy matrices performed worse than aluminum in damping tests. If a filament "interlayer" is added to the carbon fiber to increase damping, the damping numbers are comparable to aluminum.
Last edited by TenGrainBread; 05-11-17 at 10:14 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I trust my own eyes.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
What the hell do I know about tripods and sharp pictures anyway?