You Guys Are Fast
#126
Non omnino gravis
Best I can tell, the Garmin lopped off about a second at the start, and a few seconds at the end, which included downhill acceleration at the beginning, and a slight uphill at the end.
It makes it dang hard to beat the KOM, as one has to beat the time by about 5 seconds.
It makes it dang hard to beat the KOM, as one has to beat the time by about 5 seconds.
Three words: Strava Android App
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Yes, the hill I mentioned starts at 200m. It's a little tougher if you start higher. Definitely world class if you go up the Stelvio at 1400VAM in the middle of a 6 1/2 hr stage with three monster climbs.
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
Alpe d'Huez No
https://www.strava.com/segments/12882189
Mont Ventoux No https://www.strava.com/segments/4837629
I know of one - and it is 50+ min.
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
I started looking for the over 30 min 1,400+ VAM climbs. They are hard to find.
Alpe d'Huez No
https://www.strava.com/segments/12882189
Mont Ventoux No https://www.strava.com/segments/4837629
I know of one - and it is 50+ min.
Alpe d'Huez No
https://www.strava.com/segments/12882189
Mont Ventoux No https://www.strava.com/segments/4837629
I know of one - and it is 50+ min.
#130
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
You picked a couple of obscure segments that no one rides. The popular Ventoux (https://www.strava.com/segments/626164) and Alpe d'Huez (https://www.strava.com/segments/652851) segments have over 40,000 riders with many over 1400VAM. Bear in mind the climb I mentioned was 680m or so of elevation so just under 30min. Ventoux (1353m) and Alpe d'Huez (1031m) are both longer than 30 min.
which one is this?
https://www.climbing-records.com/2013...-rides-on.html
Last edited by Doge; 06-25-17 at 09:12 PM.
#131
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Sorry. That could be another Strava pet peeve - or maybe you can find by attempts, but I never know the official one.
which one is this?
Subiendo como una moto: All-time Top 100 fastest rides on the legendary Alpe d'Huez
which one is this?
Subiendo como una moto: All-time Top 100 fastest rides on the legendary Alpe d'Huez
My original point was simply that weak riders can't really 'game' the system to get on the KOM leaderboard for a decent length climb. i.e. tailwinds or riding with a group isn't going to help someone get on the first page of a leaderboard. The ones on the first page all have decent power/weight ratios.
#132
NYC
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times
in
62 Posts
So.....I was feeling pretty good about myself on my commute home. I use strava, and I've been paying attention to some of the segments I routinely hit. I set a personal record on a 1 mile stretch today, placing 31 out of 530. I was feeling pretty good about myself until I realized how far off I was from the leaders.
My time was 3:01 at 21.5 mph. But then I look at the leader and he's a full 46 seconds faster! Christ that's fast! The rest of the top ten is about 15 secs slower.
So I'm kinda getting into the whole roadie thing, and my question is.....and feel free to mock/shame/flame - how do they do it? That's 26.67mph for the leader.
I of course know the engine is an issue. But how much does gear matter? Jersey/lycra shorts/aero bars, etc....how much speed could that conceivably give? I'm wondering where I can pick up 5mph on the flats.
My time was 3:01 at 21.5 mph. But then I look at the leader and he's a full 46 seconds faster! Christ that's fast! The rest of the top ten is about 15 secs slower.
So I'm kinda getting into the whole roadie thing, and my question is.....and feel free to mock/shame/flame - how do they do it? That's 26.67mph for the leader.
I of course know the engine is an issue. But how much does gear matter? Jersey/lycra shorts/aero bars, etc....how much speed could that conceivably give? I'm wondering where I can pick up 5mph on the flats.
2) When you plateau and aren't getting any faster.... structured training, usually in the pain cave, with a power meter.
3) Opportunistic up PR/KOM attempts... one day you notice you have decent tailwind, so you ride fairly easy to get to the segment, then do a power curve effort (ie, power curve says your best ever 2:30 seconds was at xxxW, so you attempt to to xxx + 10% for 2:30. Maybe catch a draft from a car. Learn to save on the downhill / flat and spend it all on the uphill. Get a few guys to lead you out. etc etc etc.
#135
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,475
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 371 Times
in
253 Posts
I used Segment Search and searched for segments with Ventoux or Alpe d'Huez and category 1 or HC. I then picked the first ones in the list. I don't know how the list is sorted but the first entries both had very high numbers of riders so it's reasonable to assume they're sorted based on popularity.
My original point was simply that weak riders can't really 'game' the system to get on the KOM leaderboard for a decent length climb. i.e. tailwinds or riding with a group isn't going to help someone get on the first page of a leaderboard. The ones on the first page all have decent power/weight ratios.
My original point was simply that weak riders can't really 'game' the system to get on the KOM leaderboard for a decent length climb. i.e. tailwinds or riding with a group isn't going to help someone get on the first page of a leaderboard. The ones on the first page all have decent power/weight ratios.
For a while there was this "sporting" thing that pros and very elite cyclist din't go KOM hunting. You just got KOMs as you were going fast. That has changed a bit, and things like Sniping, and KOM specific rides come up. I guess that is OK, but I think there are a lot that could take those KOMs if it mattered to them - or had the time.
#136
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
There are environmental factors such as wind for sure. But, it's the motor and fitness. I have a .8, relatively flat (1% up, 1% down) strava segment near my house. A couple weeks ago I had an absolutely still day...no weather issues...just perfect. I did it at 24.2 mph....2:05...#19 out of 148. The fastest time is 1:35 @ 31.9 mph. I know that guy and he's strong as hell and 30 yrs. younger than me. I'm 71. I think the best way to look at Strava segments is use them to measure your progress. And, if you want to compare yourself, go to your age group.
Last edited by bruce19; 06-26-17 at 11:11 AM.
#138
Senior Member
So, I should flag my own rides if I take a KOM drafting?
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#140
Senior Member
#141
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,592
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1252 Post(s)
Liked 1,284 Times
in
709 Posts
The winner last year did it in 3 minutes.
fml
#142
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Meh, that's nothing. There's a local uphill segment that's 1 mile of ~7% grade, I've been able to do it in around 6-and-a-half minutes when I really want to go into the pain cave. Once a year the race clubs do it as an official time trial.
The winner last year did it in 3 minutes.
fml
The winner last year did it in 3 minutes.
fml
#143
NYC
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times
in
62 Posts
After slogging through all 5 pages of this last night, I was left with one real takeway: A whole lot of people are convinced the rest of world should work according to rules of their personal choosing,
Someone once told me, and over the years I've really come to appreciate the depth and nuance and application of it, to condition yourself such that every time you hear someone use the word "should" your first thought is "I should do what? Who the f died and made you god of me?"
Strava segments are strava segments. Strava has rules. You can flag things that are against their rules Strave rules do not include a whole lot of the angsty crap that I'm seeing here about what should be the rules and how it's not sporting.
I disagree. Sporting is actually bothering to make the effort and sometimes sacrifice to prepare and to execute a plan to take a KOM (or any other competitive "thing") within the rules as implemented. Packs are acceptable. Drafting is acceptable. Wind is acceptable. Easy spin to the segment, then an organized effort may be required.
The fact that it doesn't matter enough to you for you to make that effort does not reflect on strava, nor on the people who do care. It only reflects on you and your values.
Who are you to decide that someone shouldn't be overly ego invested in strava kom's? How much ego investment is the exact right amount, and who are you to decide that it is the exact right amount for everyone? Especially when you probably can't even work out how much is the right amount for yourself!
So much angst and projection and denial, making your own feelings somehow not your own to work out, but somehow the fault of Strava, or those type A competitive jackasses, or the cheaters who actually actually bothered to put together an organized effort at something.
These are the same people who would complain that they bought a new CRF250, showed up at a motocross race, but it's not their fault they sucked because other people set up the suspension, chose tires suitable for conditions, built practice tracks and rode during the week, and none of that SHOULD make a difference. Oh yeah? Who the f died and made you god of how they race motocross?
Someone once told me, and over the years I've really come to appreciate the depth and nuance and application of it, to condition yourself such that every time you hear someone use the word "should" your first thought is "I should do what? Who the f died and made you god of me?"
Strava segments are strava segments. Strava has rules. You can flag things that are against their rules Strave rules do not include a whole lot of the angsty crap that I'm seeing here about what should be the rules and how it's not sporting.
I disagree. Sporting is actually bothering to make the effort and sometimes sacrifice to prepare and to execute a plan to take a KOM (or any other competitive "thing") within the rules as implemented. Packs are acceptable. Drafting is acceptable. Wind is acceptable. Easy spin to the segment, then an organized effort may be required.
The fact that it doesn't matter enough to you for you to make that effort does not reflect on strava, nor on the people who do care. It only reflects on you and your values.
Who are you to decide that someone shouldn't be overly ego invested in strava kom's? How much ego investment is the exact right amount, and who are you to decide that it is the exact right amount for everyone? Especially when you probably can't even work out how much is the right amount for yourself!
So much angst and projection and denial, making your own feelings somehow not your own to work out, but somehow the fault of Strava, or those type A competitive jackasses, or the cheaters who actually actually bothered to put together an organized effort at something.
These are the same people who would complain that they bought a new CRF250, showed up at a motocross race, but it's not their fault they sucked because other people set up the suspension, chose tires suitable for conditions, built practice tracks and rode during the week, and none of that SHOULD make a difference. Oh yeah? Who the f died and made you god of how they race motocross?
Last edited by nycphotography; 06-26-17 at 12:09 PM.
#144
Full Member
Only if shirt is really baggy and flapping in the wind I ride with both mountain bike shorts and regular Lycra and not much different there but tight fitting jersey does help alot verse a baggy one that catches air
#145
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
In my area, many segments have thousands to tens of thousands on the leaderboard, so a KOM is not a realistic goal.
On one climb where I track my times, I looked at the whole list, & while the fastest time is ~15mph, the slowest (of 7,000) is 1.7mph.
Started thinking: I may never get a KOM, but perhaps I could get a POM (Pawn of the Mountain).
On one climb where I track my times, I looked at the whole list, & while the fastest time is ~15mph, the slowest (of 7,000) is 1.7mph.
Started thinking: I may never get a KOM, but perhaps I could get a POM (Pawn of the Mountain).
#146
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southern Appalachians
Posts: 453
Bikes: A hauler, a commuter, and a steamroller.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I've known plenty of people get really bent out of shape about losing a KOM (especially when they lose it to someone 10-15 years younger than they are), and I think that's not very healthy. I don't have any delusions about the likelihood of other people adjusting to how I think they should be living their lives. However, I am free to think less of them for not doing so just the same. This is 'Murica.
#147
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 1980 Koga-Miyata Gentsluxe-S, 1998 Eddy Merckx Corsa 01, 1983 Tommasini Racing, 2012 Gulf Western CAAD10, 1980 Univega Gran Premio
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 600 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Also, when people point out that aero benefits really kick in above 18 mph, remember that that's on a windless day. I regularly ride into headwinds of 10-15 mph, so when I'm doing 18 mph, I'm experiencing the same wind resistance as if I were riding 28-33 mph. In those circumstances, clothing makes an easily noticeable difference. On high wind days, when I'm crawling along at 15-16 mph, I'm still experiencing effect headwinds of maybe 25+ mph.
Of course, riding position is far more important than clothing. Back flat, elbows in, head up.
#148
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times
in
740 Posts
Fixed typo in my previous post FWIW. My segment is .8 not .08 mi. A friend of mine who was a cyclist on the '64 Olympic team said my time/speed was "respectable." We're both 71 so there's that built in.
#149
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,597
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times
in
396 Posts
I'm not fast and never claimed to be. Still I did a sub 5hr century once - that tailwind was really strong!
#150
Keener splendor