Cat 1, 2, 3, 4 hill climb? How do you determine what catagory a climb is?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 437
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cat 1, 2, 3, 4 hill climb? How do you determine what catagory a climb is?
Here in Phoenix there is a hill climb South Mountain. I want to see if it would be considered a Cat 4 climb or maybee even a Cat 3 climb. Does anyone know exactly what the numbers are for figuring out a climb catagory. I know it has to do with the length of the climb and how much altitude is gained.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There aren't any hard and fast "rules," I don't think. There are many variables like length, steepness, where it occurs in a stage (a climb that occurs early in a tough mountain stage would likely be categorized easier than if the exact same climb occurred late in the stage, after a lot of other climbing). Also, I think it varies from race to race with no real exact consistency.
But I'm no expert...let's see how they weigh in on this...
But I'm no expert...let's see how they weigh in on this...
#3
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,275
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
here's a link with some info for the TDF. https://www.torelli.com/kom/tdf/rating_climbs.htm
It's up to the organizers, and it does vary with factors such as road quality, placement in the race, history etc. Typically a category 4 climb would be 1 to 2k, and 4-5% grade.
It's up to the organizers, and it does vary with factors such as road quality, placement in the race, history etc. Typically a category 4 climb would be 1 to 2k, and 4-5% grade.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Laramie Wyoming
Posts: 2,970
Bikes: Merlin Extralight Topolino Wheels Campy Record
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
here's a link with some info for the TDF. https://www.torelli.com/kom/tdf/rating_climbs.htm
It's up to the organizers, and it does vary with factors such as road quality, placement in the race, history etc. Typically a category 4 climb would be 1 to 2k, and 4-5% grade.
It's up to the organizers, and it does vary with factors such as road quality, placement in the race, history etc. Typically a category 4 climb would be 1 to 2k, and 4-5% grade.
#5
Batüwü Griekgriek
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just curious - aren't the mountain roads in south america (colombia in paticular) considered the hardest in the world? I recall reading a few articles about some of the race courses there (one in particular sounded insanely steep and long, as well as high in altitude) and I was getting sick just thinking about it....basically the writer claimed the climbs there put the european courses to shame.
any truth to this, or info on these climbs?
any truth to this, or info on these climbs?
#6
Emondafied
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have an easy rating system. I go by feel. Thus, anything I'm climbing, at that moment, instantly becomes an "HC", regardless of grade.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
One more to add, lack of breaks in the climb. If there is a flatish of low percent section, E.g. a place to recover a bit, then the rating is not as high as a climb where there is no such recovery chance.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Laramie Wyoming
Posts: 2,970
Bikes: Merlin Extralight Topolino Wheels Campy Record
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pgoat
Just curious - aren't the mountain roads in south america (colombia in paticular) considered the hardest in the world? I recall reading a few articles about some of the race courses there (one in particular sounded insanely steep and long, as well as high in altitude) and I was getting sick just thinking about it....basically the writer claimed the climbs there put the european courses to shame.
any truth to this, or info on these climbs?
any truth to this, or info on these climbs?
#9
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,007
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3342 Post(s)
Liked 3,443 Times
in
1,741 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
here's a link with some info for the TDF. https://www.torelli.com/kom/tdf/rating_climbs.htm
"I am often asked how climbs in the United States compare to those in Europe. Most of the US climbs are either steep enough by European standards (6-8% grade), but are short (5-10km) so they fall into the 3rd Category or 2nd possibly; or the climbs gain enough altitude, but are too long (they average <5%) so again they would fail to break the 1st Category barrier and end up most likely a 2nd or 3rd Category."
There are several climbs in the US that are 1st categorie -- and a few are definitely hors categorie. The biggest climbs in the US put the biggest climbs in the Alps to shame. The real killer climbs are in the Eastern Sierra, starting around 4000' and topping out over 10,000' -- over a vertical mile of climbing.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
#10
Lanterne Rouge
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Time VX Edge
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragonflybikes
Here in Phoenix there is a hill climb South Mountain. I want to see if it would be considered a Cat 4 climb or maybee even a Cat 3 climb. Does anyone know exactly what the numbers are for figuring out a climb catagory. I know it has to do with the length of the climb and how much altitude is gained.
Have Fun!
-Peter
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 437
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by simplyred
Hmm... my suggestion is try climbing it. Why bother intimidating yourself by finding out it's a HC climb?
Have Fun!
-Peter
Have Fun!
-Peter
I have/do climb it. That is why I want to know what it would be. I am mentally prepared for it not to be even ranked, but would be stoked if it were a Cat 3 climb. Mostly I want to have some basis to know what the climbs in the tours are.
#12
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
From that link:
"I am often asked how climbs in the United States compare to those in Europe. Most of the US climbs are either steep enough by European standards (6-8% grade), but are short (5-10km) so they fall into the 3rd Category or 2nd possibly; or the climbs gain enough altitude, but are too long (they average <5%) so again they would fail to break the 1st Category barrier and end up most likely a 2nd or 3rd Category."
There are several climbs in the US that are 1st categorie -- and a few are definitely hors categorie. The biggest climbs in the US put the biggest climbs in the Alps to shame. The real killer climbs are in the Eastern Sierra, starting around 4000' and topping out over 10,000' -- over a vertical mile of climbing.
"I am often asked how climbs in the United States compare to those in Europe. Most of the US climbs are either steep enough by European standards (6-8% grade), but are short (5-10km) so they fall into the 3rd Category or 2nd possibly; or the climbs gain enough altitude, but are too long (they average <5%) so again they would fail to break the 1st Category barrier and end up most likely a 2nd or 3rd Category."
There are several climbs in the US that are 1st categorie -- and a few are definitely hors categorie. The biggest climbs in the US put the biggest climbs in the Alps to shame. The real killer climbs are in the Eastern Sierra, starting around 4000' and topping out over 10,000' -- over a vertical mile of climbing.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by 'nother
Somebody was telling me the other day that "they" (whoever rates the climbs) came up with 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc. by the lowest gear of a Citroën needed to climb the hill. So if it could make it all the way in 3rd gear, it's a 3rd category . I listened to the story rather skeptically, but by the end I was curious to know where this fantasy may have started, and how many people actually believe and perpetuate it.
#14
Bicycle Luge Racer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 379
Bikes: Modern, old, fixed, mountain.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In the early years of European cycling they indeed traveled the course by car as they selected the routes. If they used 1st gear it became a cat 1. HC came about because reverse was even lower than 1st in the vehicles of the day and was used for extremely steep sections. It was mentioned during coverage of the tour this year by the team on Eurosport.
#15
'Mizer Cats are INSANE
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 808
Bikes: C-dale T800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
a humorous explanation that I heard was that they would have a cat 5 rider ride it. If he got all the way up, it was a 5th catagory, if he got 80% up before dying, it was a cat 4, 60%=3rd categor, and so on. If he looked at it and said "FU", then it was an HC.
Steve W
Steve W
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Mentor58
a humorous explanation that I heard was that they would have a cat 5 rider ride it. If he got all the way up, it was a 5th catagory, if he got 80% up before dying, it was a cat 4, 60%=3rd categor, and so on. If he looked at it and said "FU", then it was an HC.
#17
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by khackney
In the early years of European cycling they indeed traveled the course by car as they selected the routes. If they used 1st gear it became a cat 1. HC came about because reverse was even lower than 1st in the vehicles of the day and was used for extremely steep sections.
It was mentioned during coverage of the tour this year by the team on Eurosport.
#18
Lanterne Rouge
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,993
Bikes: Time VX Edge
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dragonflybikes
I have/do climb it. That is why I want to know what it would be. I am mentally prepared for it not to be even ranked, but would be stoked if it were a Cat 3 climb. Mostly I want to have some basis to know what the climbs in the tours are.
You gotta get those topo programs - I have no idea how they work.
Or you could try borrowing an altimeter [speeling?] to find out how high you've climbed.
If you have a power meter - is there a mathematical way of calculating how much the gradient is with data of watts, velocity & distance?
Just throwing some ideas in your head - for an approximation approach.
Good Luck!
-Peter
#19
CAT6 UTP 568B
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bellingham / Vancouver
Posts: 2,548
Bikes: 2005 Allez Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
examples of gradients and lengths, from tdf2005.
I think it's pretty obvious what 1 and HC climbs are, but 3rd categories can vary a lot..
Some 3rd category are, for example, 5.8k at 4.1% (from stage 14). Other 3rd cat. climbs could be much shorter than 5.8k, but with a steeper grade like 6.0 to 7.0%.
stages 11, 14 and 15
I think it's pretty obvious what 1 and HC climbs are, but 3rd categories can vary a lot..
Some 3rd category are, for example, 5.8k at 4.1% (from stage 14). Other 3rd cat. climbs could be much shorter than 5.8k, but with a steeper grade like 6.0 to 7.0%.
stages 11, 14 and 15
#20
Batüwü Griekgriek
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#21
Batüwü Griekgriek
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by cydewaze
I have an easy rating system. I go by feel. Thus, anything I'm climbing, at that moment, instantly becomes an "HC", regardless of grade.
#22
Batüwü Griekgriek
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC - for the moment...
Posts: 2,911
Bikes: 1986 Trek 500 Tri Series, 2005 Cannondale R1000
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RockyMtnMerlin
Paul, Phil and Bob are always talkking about how tough the climbs are in Colombia (and hence why some of the best climbers in the peloton are from there). Not much about it on the web though. There is a site for the Vuelta a Colombia but it does not seems to show profiles of the stages.
I goofed - the article I rememebered (just dug it out, alf asleep as I am) referred to the Angliru in the Vuelta (spain). Racers using triple cranksets and whatnot.
I do recalling hearing about the south american climbs elsewhere but i'll need more time and braincells to recall......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz