Are 90 mm Stems Really the Devil?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are 90 mm Stems Really the Devil?
yo, I've heard a lot of people kind of bad-mouth 90 mm road stems. Some people think that you might be fit wrong on the bike if you require one. Anyone else share this sentiment?
#4
Somewhere in CA
typically 110 appear to be the sweet spot for stem sizing... but who knows. If the frame doesn't feel to big then its probably ok. if however your seapost only has 1" showing and your standover in non-existant then the frame is too big.
#5
contrarian
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO Springs
Posts: 2,848
Bikes: 80's ross road bike/commuter, 80's team miyata, 90's haro mtb xtracycle conversion, koga mitaya world traveler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some peoples have no choice: long legs, short torso.
__________________
Higher ground for the apocalypse!
Higher ground for the apocalypse!
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
so is the stem size maxim the handlebar-disappearing hub rule? that is, when you look down, the hub should disappear behind the handlebar as one general rule of fit.
#7
Go Titans!!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 2,489
Bikes: '04 Eddy Merckx Team SC - Record - Rolf Prima Vigor; Andy Hampsten Cinghiale - Dura Ace 7800 - Rolf Elan Aero
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sirshane13
so is the stem size maxim the handlebar-disappearing hub rule? that is, when you look down, the hub should disappear behind the handlebar as one general rule of fit.
__________________
One must live the way one thinks or end up thinking the way one has lived.
--Paul Bourget
One must live the way one thinks or end up thinking the way one has lived.
--Paul Bourget
#8
Somewhere in CA
I asked the guy that fit me about that last year. He said that would "rougly" get you in the right spot. After I was fitted and my palms on the brake hoods the skewer was pretty much hidden.
It really is going to depend on your flexibility as well. That was taken into consideration as well during my fit and that did determin that since Im flexible I could use a longer stem.
-jim
It really is going to depend on your flexibility as well. That was taken into consideration as well during my fit and that did determin that since Im flexible I could use a longer stem.
-jim
#9
Faith-Vigilance-Service
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 8,330
Bikes: Trinity, Paradisus, Centurion, Mongoose, Trek
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If 90mm is so bad, why do they readily use 60-70mm stems on MTB's?
__________________
President, OCP
--"Will you have some tea... at the theatre with me?"--
President, OCP
--"Will you have some tea... at the theatre with me?"--
#10
OMG! i'm a DURT gurl!!!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: HOT, sunny socal desert
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: 2007 specialized stumpjumper FSR expert, 2006 specialized ruby pro, 2004 specialized dolce elite, 2005 specialized hardrock
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sirshane13
so is the stem size maxim the handlebar-disappearing hub rule? that is, when you look down, the hub should disappear behind the handlebar as one general rule of fit.
__________________
OCP and PROUD!
"OCP is not just about attitude, it's a way of life!"
life's too short to ride a crummy bike..........
OCP and PROUD!
"OCP is not just about attitude, it's a way of life!"
life's too short to ride a crummy bike..........
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Patriot
If 90mm is so bad, why do they readily use 60-70mm stems on MTB's?
oh yeah, and the hand position on the hb probably makes a difference too ... different geometries also must contribute.
Last edited by sirshane13; 01-05-06 at 04:40 PM.
#12
Jacko nose historian
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City!
Posts: 671
Bikes: 2006 52cm Trek 2200, Specialized Rockhopper (gets infrequent use unfortunately)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Whoa, yeah! I’d better respond to this one. But let me also start out with the standard disclosure. What feels best is best and everyone is proportionally different. So you should listen to your senses more than other’s mouths.
I recently went through a fit ordeal with a new bike. I bought a 54cm and began, after a few miles, to feel too stretched out over the top bar (have a shorter than average torso). I determined that because my knee-over-pedal relationship (KOPS) was good and that my saddle was as forward as it could go, that the next step was to go with a different stem. I took it back to the LBS and they switched the 100mm to a 90mm. After more miles in the saddle I then felt that my steering felt too twitchy, especially at about 35mph, and much more so when pedaling above 35.
Assuming that this new problem was based off of the new stem, I queried the forum here about the possibility of ebaying the bike and buying a 52cm. …Seems about 75% of the responses were, “no, there is a way to make your bike fit” or “you’ll just be trading one problem for another, don’t do it”. All of the feedback was however, very helpful in helping me to understand my problem thoroughly.
Ultimately my new thorough understanding of the situation lead me to the choice of ebaying and buying again. RIGHT CHOICE!!! My new 52cm feels great and has me all the more addicted! The 110 definitely hits the sweet spot for me. Where the old stem was twitchy and overly responsive, the new one is rock steady and gives me more control freedom. In fact, I hit 40 2 days ago while pedaling like a madman and had no problems with stability or steering. I’m sure some will argue that I’m just getting better and that I’d have experienced the same results with the 90 eventually. But you’re gonna have to trust me on this though – I am thoroughly conscious of the differences in my two experiences now and why the new bike is better. I’m sure though that some will have setups that will benefit more from a 90 stem.
Part of the lesson I learned is that, at the time it feels like it fits, your bike should fit you such that you have a bit of room to adjust the stem and seat both forward or back (i.e. seat and stem aren’t at any limit of adjustment). Your body will adapt and change with your riding habits and you’ll need the room and it’s amazing what 1 centimeter can do. I would go beyond the standard bar/hub-view rule and say, when you’ve pedaled comfortably for 1 minute in a standard pace with your hands in the hoods, look down naturally (bend your neck in a relaxed and comfortable way). The handlebar should then hide the hub. If this is the case and you are comfortable, the seat has room to move either forward or back, and the stem is a 110 (allowing you in the future to stay in the range of 100 - 120), and you have a good KOPS. Then IT’S A FIT!
The End
I recently went through a fit ordeal with a new bike. I bought a 54cm and began, after a few miles, to feel too stretched out over the top bar (have a shorter than average torso). I determined that because my knee-over-pedal relationship (KOPS) was good and that my saddle was as forward as it could go, that the next step was to go with a different stem. I took it back to the LBS and they switched the 100mm to a 90mm. After more miles in the saddle I then felt that my steering felt too twitchy, especially at about 35mph, and much more so when pedaling above 35.
Assuming that this new problem was based off of the new stem, I queried the forum here about the possibility of ebaying the bike and buying a 52cm. …Seems about 75% of the responses were, “no, there is a way to make your bike fit” or “you’ll just be trading one problem for another, don’t do it”. All of the feedback was however, very helpful in helping me to understand my problem thoroughly.
Ultimately my new thorough understanding of the situation lead me to the choice of ebaying and buying again. RIGHT CHOICE!!! My new 52cm feels great and has me all the more addicted! The 110 definitely hits the sweet spot for me. Where the old stem was twitchy and overly responsive, the new one is rock steady and gives me more control freedom. In fact, I hit 40 2 days ago while pedaling like a madman and had no problems with stability or steering. I’m sure some will argue that I’m just getting better and that I’d have experienced the same results with the 90 eventually. But you’re gonna have to trust me on this though – I am thoroughly conscious of the differences in my two experiences now and why the new bike is better. I’m sure though that some will have setups that will benefit more from a 90 stem.
Part of the lesson I learned is that, at the time it feels like it fits, your bike should fit you such that you have a bit of room to adjust the stem and seat both forward or back (i.e. seat and stem aren’t at any limit of adjustment). Your body will adapt and change with your riding habits and you’ll need the room and it’s amazing what 1 centimeter can do. I would go beyond the standard bar/hub-view rule and say, when you’ve pedaled comfortably for 1 minute in a standard pace with your hands in the hoods, look down naturally (bend your neck in a relaxed and comfortable way). The handlebar should then hide the hub. If this is the case and you are comfortable, the seat has room to move either forward or back, and the stem is a 110 (allowing you in the future to stay in the range of 100 - 120), and you have a good KOPS. Then IT’S A FIT!
The End
Last edited by theshoemaker; 01-05-06 at 06:17 PM.
#13
Jacko nose historian
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City!
Posts: 671
Bikes: 2006 52cm Trek 2200, Specialized Rockhopper (gets infrequent use unfortunately)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Patriot
If 90mm is so bad, why do they readily use 60-70mm stems on MTB's?
shorter stem = tighter the arc = less effort/movement to turn sharply = good for slow speeds and steering around multiple objects, but worse for gradual steering at higher speeds.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Behind enemy lines
Posts: 311
Bikes: Kestrel Talon, Trek 1200, Specialized Rockhopper FSR, Specialized Enduro Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think the top tube on my Kestrel is too long. I've scaled back from a 100mm to a 90mm, and have considered going to an 80mm. Still feeling too stretched out even with the 90mm.
It sucks, the Talon is so pretty too!
It sucks, the Talon is so pretty too!
#15
Overacting because I can
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
Posts: 4,552
Bikes: Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sirshane13
so is the stem size maxim the handlebar-disappearing hub rule? that is, when you look down, the hub should disappear behind the handlebar as one general rule of fit.
__________________
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)
"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)
"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
#16
DNPAIMFB
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Posts: 4,655
Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you're hooked on a 110 mm stem, and you need to go shorter, you could always go with a handlebar that has a shorter reach to it. Yes, it's a giant pain in the ass, but it achieves the same end.
theshoemaker, was there any difference in head angle between the 52 and the 54 on the bike you were riding? I've noted a difference in handling going from 73 to 72.5 degrees, so perhaps a different head tube length, head angle or fork rake contributed to the twitch as well...
theshoemaker, was there any difference in head angle between the 52 and the 54 on the bike you were riding? I've noted a difference in handling going from 73 to 72.5 degrees, so perhaps a different head tube length, head angle or fork rake contributed to the twitch as well...
#17
cycles per second
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930
Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
48 Posts
Originally Posted by Patriot
If 90mm is so bad, why do they readily use 60-70mm stems on MTB's?
#18
Jacko nose historian
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City!
Posts: 671
Bikes: 2006 52cm Trek 2200, Specialized Rockhopper (gets infrequent use unfortunately)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pinkrobe
If you're hooked on a 110 mm stem, and you need to go shorter, you could always go with a handlebar that has a shorter reach to it. Yes, it's a giant pain in the ass, but it achieves the same end.
theshoemaker, was there any difference in head angle between the 52 and the 54 on the bike you were riding? I've noted a difference in handling going from 73 to 72.5 degrees, so perhaps a different head tube length, head angle or fork rake contributed to the twitch as well...
theshoemaker, was there any difference in head angle between the 52 and the 54 on the bike you were riding? I've noted a difference in handling going from 73 to 72.5 degrees, so perhaps a different head tube length, head angle or fork rake contributed to the twitch as well...
Last edited by theshoemaker; 01-05-06 at 05:33 PM.
#19
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,728
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sirshane13
yo, I've heard a lot of people kind of bad-mouth 90 mm road stems. Some people think that you might be fit wrong on the bike if you require one. Anyone else share this sentiment?
A stem that provides some rise probably offends the sensibilities of some traditionalists. They probably equate a flat or downward-sloping stem with an aggressive riding posture.
A 90 mm stem comes standard on bikes with smaller frames, e.g., a '01 catalog shows that a 49 cm Lemond road bike came with a downward-sloping 90 mm stem whereas the same frame in the 59 cm size came with a 120 mm stem.
Last edited by wagathon; 01-06-06 at 04:05 PM.
#20
Peloton Shelter Dog
Yes, if you install a 90mm stem you are the devil-spawn incarnate. God help you.
#21
Jacko nose historian
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City!
Posts: 671
Bikes: 2006 52cm Trek 2200, Specialized Rockhopper (gets infrequent use unfortunately)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Yes, if you install a 90mm stem you are the devil-spawn incarnate. God help you.
#22
I hate hate crimes
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by theshoemaker
Come to think of it, while I had that 90 stem my wife had frequently been telling me, "you are so mean." That, and there was a strange hankerin' for some delicious puppy heads every night.
BTW, what were the main reasons for recommendations against going to a smaller frame? I have a theory that men try to force fit oversized frames, like women try to force fit undersized shoes.
#23
Peloton Shelter Dog
The fact that anyone would even CONSIDER a 90mm stem means they probably are a prime candiate for a cycling exorcism. We'll send EURO right over....
#24
OMG! i'm a DURT gurl!!!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: HOT, sunny socal desert
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: 2007 specialized stumpjumper FSR expert, 2006 specialized ruby pro, 2004 specialized dolce elite, 2005 specialized hardrock
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Yes, if you install a 90mm stem you are the devil-spawn incarnate. God help you.
__________________
OCP and PROUD!
"OCP is not just about attitude, it's a way of life!"
life's too short to ride a crummy bike..........
OCP and PROUD!
"OCP is not just about attitude, it's a way of life!"
life's too short to ride a crummy bike..........