Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Are 90 mm Stems Really the Devil?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Are 90 mm Stems Really the Devil?

Old 01-05-06, 03:05 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Are 90 mm Stems Really the Devil?

yo, I've heard a lot of people kind of bad-mouth 90 mm road stems. Some people think that you might be fit wrong on the bike if you require one. Anyone else share this sentiment?
sirshane13 is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 03:09 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Derry, NH
Posts: 1,608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ROFL, the devil! good one.
DRLski is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 03:11 PM
  #3  
more ape than man
 
timmhaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
i use one and i don't think i'm going to hell. i had a 70mm on my old bike
timmhaan is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 03:18 PM
  #4  
Somewhere in CA
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
typically 110 appear to be the sweet spot for stem sizing... but who knows. If the frame doesn't feel to big then its probably ok. if however your seapost only has 1" showing and your standover in non-existant then the frame is too big.
Jim Bonnet is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 03:21 PM
  #5  
contrarian
 
lala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO Springs
Posts: 2,848

Bikes: 80's ross road bike/commuter, 80's team miyata, 90's haro mtb xtracycle conversion, koga mitaya world traveler

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Some peoples have no choice: long legs, short torso.
__________________
Higher ground for the apocalypse!
lala is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 03:28 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
so is the stem size maxim the handlebar-disappearing hub rule? that is, when you look down, the hub should disappear behind the handlebar as one general rule of fit.
sirshane13 is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 03:37 PM
  #7  
Go Titans!!
 
sunninho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 2,489

Bikes: '04 Eddy Merckx Team SC - Record - Rolf Prima Vigor; Andy Hampsten Cinghiale - Dura Ace 7800 - Rolf Elan Aero

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sirshane13
so is the stem size maxim the handlebar-disappearing hub rule? that is, when you look down, the hub should disappear behind the handlebar as one general rule of fit.
Generally, yes, but you should schedule a fitting session at the LBS where they can experiment with different stem sizes to analyze your position while you ride with your bike attached to a trainer.
__________________
One must live the way one thinks or end up thinking the way one has lived.
--Paul Bourget
sunninho is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 03:37 PM
  #8  
Somewhere in CA
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
I asked the guy that fit me about that last year. He said that would "rougly" get you in the right spot. After I was fitted and my palms on the brake hoods the skewer was pretty much hidden.

It really is going to depend on your flexibility as well. That was taken into consideration as well during my fit and that did determin that since Im flexible I could use a longer stem.

-jim
Jim Bonnet is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 04:01 PM
  #9  
Faith-Vigilance-Service
 
Patriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 8,330

Bikes: Trinity, Paradisus, Centurion, Mongoose, Trek

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If 90mm is so bad, why do they readily use 60-70mm stems on MTB's?
__________________
President, OCP
--"Will you have some tea... at the theatre with me?"--
Patriot is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 04:28 PM
  #10  
OMG! i'm a DURT gurl!!!!
 
caligurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: HOT, sunny socal desert
Posts: 4,939

Bikes: 2007 specialized stumpjumper FSR expert, 2006 specialized ruby pro, 2004 specialized dolce elite, 2005 specialized hardrock

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sirshane13
so is the stem size maxim the handlebar-disappearing hub rule? that is, when you look down, the hub should disappear behind the handlebar as one general rule of fit.
when i went to get my first bike fit (at a serrota certified fit guy's shop) he told me that was an "old wives tale"....
__________________
OCP and PROUD!
"OCP is not just about attitude, it's a way of life!"
life's too short to ride a crummy bike..........
caligurl is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 04:32 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Patriot
If 90mm is so bad, why do they readily use 60-70mm stems on MTB's?
you know, I guess I've always heard that fit on a road bike is a lot more specific and finicky than that of an mtb.

oh yeah, and the hand position on the hb probably makes a difference too ... different geometries also must contribute.

Last edited by sirshane13; 01-05-06 at 04:40 PM.
sirshane13 is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 04:33 PM
  #12  
Jacko nose historian
 
theshoemaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City!
Posts: 671

Bikes: 2006 52cm Trek 2200, Specialized Rockhopper (gets infrequent use unfortunately)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Whoa, yeah! I’d better respond to this one. But let me also start out with the standard disclosure. What feels best is best and everyone is proportionally different. So you should listen to your senses more than other’s mouths.

I recently went through a fit ordeal with a new bike. I bought a 54cm and began, after a few miles, to feel too stretched out over the top bar (have a shorter than average torso). I determined that because my knee-over-pedal relationship (KOPS) was good and that my saddle was as forward as it could go, that the next step was to go with a different stem. I took it back to the LBS and they switched the 100mm to a 90mm. After more miles in the saddle I then felt that my steering felt too twitchy, especially at about 35mph, and much more so when pedaling above 35.

Assuming that this new problem was based off of the new stem, I queried the forum here about the possibility of ebaying the bike and buying a 52cm. …Seems about 75% of the responses were, “no, there is a way to make your bike fit” or “you’ll just be trading one problem for another, don’t do it”. All of the feedback was however, very helpful in helping me to understand my problem thoroughly.

Ultimately my new thorough understanding of the situation lead me to the choice of ebaying and buying again. RIGHT CHOICE!!! My new 52cm feels great and has me all the more addicted! The 110 definitely hits the sweet spot for me. Where the old stem was twitchy and overly responsive, the new one is rock steady and gives me more control freedom. In fact, I hit 40 2 days ago while pedaling like a madman and had no problems with stability or steering. I’m sure some will argue that I’m just getting better and that I’d have experienced the same results with the 90 eventually. But you’re gonna have to trust me on this though – I am thoroughly conscious of the differences in my two experiences now and why the new bike is better. I’m sure though that some will have setups that will benefit more from a 90 stem.

Part of the lesson I learned is that, at the time it feels like it fits, your bike should fit you such that you have a bit of room to adjust the stem and seat both forward or back (i.e. seat and stem aren’t at any limit of adjustment). Your body will adapt and change with your riding habits and you’ll need the room and it’s amazing what 1 centimeter can do. I would go beyond the standard bar/hub-view rule and say, when you’ve pedaled comfortably for 1 minute in a standard pace with your hands in the hoods, look down naturally (bend your neck in a relaxed and comfortable way). The handlebar should then hide the hub. If this is the case and you are comfortable, the seat has room to move either forward or back, and the stem is a 110 (allowing you in the future to stay in the range of 100 - 120), and you have a good KOPS. Then IT’S A FIT!

The End

Last edited by theshoemaker; 01-05-06 at 06:17 PM.
theshoemaker is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 04:39 PM
  #13  
Jacko nose historian
 
theshoemaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City!
Posts: 671

Bikes: 2006 52cm Trek 2200, Specialized Rockhopper (gets infrequent use unfortunately)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Patriot
If 90mm is so bad, why do they readily use 60-70mm stems on MTB's?
I'm not sure if you are serious or not, but I'll answer just in case.

shorter stem = tighter the arc = less effort/movement to turn sharply = good for slow speeds and steering around multiple objects, but worse for gradual steering at higher speeds.
theshoemaker is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 04:40 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Behind enemy lines
Posts: 311

Bikes: Kestrel Talon, Trek 1200, Specialized Rockhopper FSR, Specialized Enduro Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think the top tube on my Kestrel is too long. I've scaled back from a 100mm to a 90mm, and have considered going to an 80mm. Still feeling too stretched out even with the 90mm.

It sucks, the Talon is so pretty too!
WD_40 is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 04:49 PM
  #15  
Overacting because I can
 
SpongeDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
Posts: 4,552

Bikes: Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sirshane13
so is the stem size maxim the handlebar-disappearing hub rule? that is, when you look down, the hub should disappear behind the handlebar as one general rule of fit.
Big grain of salt on that one. I have 2 bikes with nearly identical setups, except one has an 80mm stem and one a 110. The difference is that the one with the shorter stem has much deeper reach in the drops, consequently my position in the drops and on the hoods is exactly the same for both bikes.
__________________
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)

"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
SpongeDad is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 05:06 PM
  #16  
DNPAIMFB
 
pinkrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Posts: 4,655

Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you're hooked on a 110 mm stem, and you need to go shorter, you could always go with a handlebar that has a shorter reach to it. Yes, it's a giant pain in the ass, but it achieves the same end.

theshoemaker, was there any difference in head angle between the 52 and the 54 on the bike you were riding? I've noted a difference in handling going from 73 to 72.5 degrees, so perhaps a different head tube length, head angle or fork rake contributed to the twitch as well...
pinkrobe is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 05:26 PM
  #17  
cycles per second
 
Gonzo Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930

Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Patriot
If 90mm is so bad, why do they readily use 60-70mm stems on MTB's?
Early MTBs had shorter top tubes and longer stems. Mine from 1987 is a "medium" and it has a 130mm stem!!! Somewhere along the line, someone realized that if you lengthened the top tube and shortened the stem, you'd have the handlebars in the same position but you'd also have a bike that would not endo as easily since the rider's weight is a bit further behind the front wheel.
Gonzo Bob is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 05:27 PM
  #18  
Jacko nose historian
 
theshoemaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City!
Posts: 671

Bikes: 2006 52cm Trek 2200, Specialized Rockhopper (gets infrequent use unfortunately)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pinkrobe
If you're hooked on a 110 mm stem, and you need to go shorter, you could always go with a handlebar that has a shorter reach to it. Yes, it's a giant pain in the ass, but it achieves the same end.

theshoemaker, was there any difference in head angle between the 52 and the 54 on the bike you were riding? I've noted a difference in handling going from 73 to 72.5 degrees, so perhaps a different head tube length, head angle or fork rake contributed to the twitch as well...
No difference. ...Frame geometry and fork are identical. they're both 06 Treks. The old is a 2100 and the new is a 2200. The diff is with the components. I should say that I tested several bikes during the process before I really started to understand the situation fully.

Last edited by theshoemaker; 01-05-06 at 05:33 PM.
theshoemaker is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 05:34 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
wagathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,728
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sirshane13
yo, I've heard a lot of people kind of bad-mouth 90 mm road stems. Some people think that you might be fit wrong on the bike if you require one. Anyone else share this sentiment?
Do you mean a 90-degree stem, i.e., one that has some rise when installed? Stems of old always were about minus 17 degrees or less so that they were flat or even below the riser part of the stem.

A stem that provides some rise probably offends the sensibilities of some traditionalists. They probably equate a flat or downward-sloping stem with an aggressive riding posture.

A 90 mm stem comes standard on bikes with smaller frames, e.g., a '01 catalog shows that a 49 cm Lemond road bike came with a downward-sloping 90 mm stem whereas the same frame in the 59 cm size came with a 120 mm stem.


Last edited by wagathon; 01-06-06 at 04:05 PM.
wagathon is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 05:38 PM
  #20  
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Yes, if you install a 90mm stem you are the devil-spawn incarnate. God help you.
patentcad is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 06:58 PM
  #21  
Jacko nose historian
 
theshoemaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City!
Posts: 671

Bikes: 2006 52cm Trek 2200, Specialized Rockhopper (gets infrequent use unfortunately)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Yes, if you install a 90mm stem you are the devil-spawn incarnate. God help you.
Come to think of it, while I had that 90 stem my wife had frequently been telling me, "you are so mean." That, and there was a strange hankerin' for some delicious puppy heads every night.
theshoemaker is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 09:10 PM
  #22  
I hate hate crimes
 
alxra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by theshoemaker
Come to think of it, while I had that 90 stem my wife had frequently been telling me, "you are so mean." That, and there was a strange hankerin' for some delicious puppy heads every night.
Do you have two kids named Jack and Kelly, and a wife name Sharon?

BTW, what were the main reasons for recommendations against going to a smaller frame? I have a theory that men try to force fit oversized frames, like women try to force fit undersized shoes.
alxra is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 09:20 PM
  #23  
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
The fact that anyone would even CONSIDER a 90mm stem means they probably are a prime candiate for a cycling exorcism. We'll send EURO right over....
patentcad is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 09:21 PM
  #24  
OMG! i'm a DURT gurl!!!!
 
caligurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: HOT, sunny socal desert
Posts: 4,939

Bikes: 2007 specialized stumpjumper FSR expert, 2006 specialized ruby pro, 2004 specialized dolce elite, 2005 specialized hardrock

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Yes, if you install a 90mm stem you are the devil-spawn incarnate. God help you.
so THAT's what's wrong with me!
__________________
OCP and PROUD!
"OCP is not just about attitude, it's a way of life!"
life's too short to ride a crummy bike..........
caligurl is offline  
Old 01-05-06, 09:21 PM
  #25  
.
 
Namenda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: "The Woo", MA
Posts: 4,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I use a 90mm stem...and I have the most interesting birthmark on the back of my head...
Namenda is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.