Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Finally got a HRM!

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Finally got a HRM!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-06, 12:28 AM
  #1  
bought a new car
Thread Starter
 
$0.00/Gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bucktown, Chicago
Posts: 1,346

Bikes: 01 Pista and 99 Lemond Chambery

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Finally got a HRM!

Picked up a Polar S150 at Performance Bike in Chicago today. On sale for $79 down from $150 (I think)

It's a bit confusing and took me a couple of hours to get a handle on navigating the menus. There are 3 timers, 3 heart rate limits, and a recovery setting. Can someone explain this to me? Is it so I can try to train in 1 of 3 different zones and the HRM will beep at me if I am out of the zone?

Ah technology.
$0.00/Gal is offline  
Old 01-29-06, 06:39 AM
  #2  
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
Congrats on the new toy.

If it has three zones you can actually use it so that it is all five of your zones. Set the first zone on it to what your zone 2 is, second zone to zone 3, third zone to zone 4. Now whatever is under the first zone (on the watch) is your true zone 1. Whatever is over the third zone (on the watch) is your zone 5.

Hope this makes sense.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 01-29-06, 01:06 PM
  #3  
bought a new car
Thread Starter
 
$0.00/Gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bucktown, Chicago
Posts: 1,346

Bikes: 01 Pista and 99 Lemond Chambery

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kind of made sense. My max HR is 196 based on my age, so...would it look like this?

Zone 1: 80-100 (resting/light recovery)
Zone 2: 100-120 (warm up/recovery)
Zone 3: 120-140 (light to moderate intensity zone)
Zone 4: 140-160 (moderate to heavy intesity zone)
Zone 5: 160-196 (heavy to maximal intensity zone)

I got the wording from the Polar manual. Not sure if it's common lingo.
$0.00/Gal is offline  
Old 01-30-06, 01:17 PM
  #4  
bought a new car
Thread Starter
 
$0.00/Gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bucktown, Chicago
Posts: 1,346

Bikes: 01 Pista and 99 Lemond Chambery

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So, looks like I didn't know what I was talking about when I made that last post. Here are my real zones:

1: 88-105
2: 105-123
3: 123-140
4: 140-158
4: 158-177

From what I've researched most base training should be done in zone 3 at a high cadence. True?
$0.00/Gal is offline  
Old 01-30-06, 01:51 PM
  #5  
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
Depends on what you read, most of my base training is upper zone 1 and zone 2. Zone 3 is my tempo work. Your zones still sound a little weird though, your zone three is huge.

Here are my zones, granted they are not supposed to be same as yours.

zone 1: <136
zone 2: 136 - 149
zone 3: 150 - 155
zone 4: 156 - 166
zone 5: 167 - 177 (or I just fall over, it does go above 177 though.)
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 01-30-06, 01:56 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
demoncyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Medway, MA
Posts: 2,727

Bikes: 2011 Lynskey Sportive, 1988 Cannondale SM400

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Remember that age predicted HR can be off of your actual by +/- 20 beats or more. I had myself sub-max tested a few years ago, and my age predicted AT was off by 21 beats. If you have to use a formula, try googling the Karvonen formula. It is a little more accurate than the straight 220 (226 for women) minus your age to get your max HR.
demoncyclist is offline  
Old 01-30-06, 02:02 PM
  #7  
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 176 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 31 Posts
Another way to determine it is to do a 30 minute time trial on relatively flat land. Take your average heart rate for the last 20 minutes of the time trial, this will give you your lactic threshold. From that you can get a very close guestimate on your heart rate zones.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 01-30-06, 02:40 PM
  #8  
bought a new car
Thread Starter
 
$0.00/Gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bucktown, Chicago
Posts: 1,346

Bikes: 01 Pista and 99 Lemond Chambery

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I did a home sub-max test that I found online. It had me stepping up and down some stairs and another test with a chair to determine mine. I ended up with 177 being my max HR and a chart on timex website gave me the different zones.

I'm meeting with my team tonight so I'll ask the coach what he thinks.
$0.00/Gal is offline  
Old 01-30-06, 05:08 PM
  #9  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by demoncyclist
Remember that age predicted HR can be off of your actual by +/- 20 beats or more. I had myself sub-max tested a few years ago, and my age predicted AT was off by 21 beats. If you have to use a formula, try googling the Karvonen formula. It is a little more accurate than the straight 220 (226 for women) minus your age to get your max HR.

It's here:

https://pages.zdnet.com/bodybuilder/id27.html

Formulas fall apart once you reach above normal fitness levels.
 
Old 01-30-06, 05:46 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Bontrager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 2,339

Bikes: Road, MTB, Folding, Commuting bikes...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by DocRay
Formulas fall apart once you reach above normal fitness levels.
Unless the formulas are based on above normal fitness level subjects
Bontrager is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.