Chain Efficiency
#1
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Chain Efficiency
Have been enjoying compact chainrings (50/34). Have been able to stay in large chainring longer than with 53/39 combo. However, in doing so, this causes more bend in the chain than if had used 53/39 and shifted down to the 39 earlier (rather than staying on the 50).
Has anyone figured if some of the efficiencies of having compact chainrings (being able to stay in the large ring for a lower gear than a 53, and lower rotating weight) are offset by more cross chaining?
Had been considering switching from 12-25 to 13-29 (w/ 50/34 up front) for very hilly 127 mile ride coming up. Just got the guts to stay with the 12-25...unless the 13-29 will be more efficicient b/c of less chain bend/cross chaining (I never use the big/big or small/small combos)
Has anyone figured if some of the efficiencies of having compact chainrings (being able to stay in the large ring for a lower gear than a 53, and lower rotating weight) are offset by more cross chaining?
Had been considering switching from 12-25 to 13-29 (w/ 50/34 up front) for very hilly 127 mile ride coming up. Just got the guts to stay with the 12-25...unless the 13-29 will be more efficicient b/c of less chain bend/cross chaining (I never use the big/big or small/small combos)
#2
Vanned.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,244
Bikes: 2006 Motobecane Le Champ SL, 2006 Mercier Kilo TT, 2004 Gary Fisher Tassajara
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
50/34 with 12/25 should suffice for any hills you might have, unless you crawl up at 2mph. Forget about chainline...just ride
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,690
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by worker4youth
50/34 with 12/25 should suffice for any hills you might have, unless you crawl up at 2mph. Forget about chainline...just ride
Richard
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by reef58
Poppycock! Use whatever gearing you need to make the ride comfortable. There are a lot of people that walk their bikes on rides with very steep climbs due to the above logic. Not everyone can or should mash up a 3 mile 15% hill.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,690
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Check out many rides in the mountains of NC. I was in a group of 50 people in the HHH last year, and me and one other guy were the only ones not walking our bikes up Bearwallow Mountain. It was not 3 miles or 15% either. Beech Mountain will get you attention as will Brasstown. The Assualt on Mitchell includes something like 7000 feet of climbing in the last 27 miles. Not everyone wants to do that with a 34-25. Some think they do, and end up walking or bowing out. Unfortunately many are told a 39-25 is fine.
Richard
Richard
#6
Vanned.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,244
Bikes: 2006 Motobecane Le Champ SL, 2006 Mercier Kilo TT, 2004 Gary Fisher Tassajara
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by reef58
Check out many rides in the mountains of NC. I was in a group of 50 people in the HHH last year, and me and one other guy were the only ones not walking our bikes up Bearwallow Mountain. It was not 3 miles or 15% either. Beech Mountain will get you attention as will Brasstown. The Assualt on Mitchell includes something like 7000 feet of climbing in the last 27 miles. Not everyone wants to do that with a 34-25. Some think they do, and end up walking or bowing out. Unfortunately many are told a 39-25 is fine.
Richard
Richard
I do 5% climbs (albeit, never for 27 miles), regularly on my fixie 48-18.
Last edited by worker4youth; 05-05-06 at 12:41 AM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,690
Bikes: Serotta Nove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes it is plenty doable for you. Keep in mind there are people on the forums and on the road with various fitness levels. Since the poster is asking about a large cassette I suspect he may not be the strongest climber out there, but I could be wrong.
Later,
Richard
Later,
Richard
#8
Senior but far from AARP
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 776
Bikes: 2006 Specialized SWorks Tarmac; 2005 Bianchi Giro; 2005 Bianchi Cross Veloce; 1997 Litespeed Catalyst; 1983 Performance Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was primarily asking about the "chainline". Now I confirmed the correct term on Sheldon Brown's site:
This refers to how straight the chain runs between the front and rear sprockets. Ideally, both sprockets should be in the same plane, so that there is no sideward motion or stress to the chain. This constitutes "perfect chainline".
"Chainline" is more crooked with some of the larger sprockets on the cassette when using a 50 chainring (compared to equivalent gear inches when using smaller sprockets on the cassette with the 34 ring.
This difference is accentuated compared to using standard 53/39 b/c you have lower gears on the 50 than the 53. Eg when in an increasingly steep hill you can stay in the 50 longer than the 53 while you move to sequentially larger sprockets on your cassette.
I am doing a long, arduous ride ogf 127 miles w/ >13k ft climbing including 12% average 3 mile climb at the end. So I was wondering if by switching from a 12-25 to a 13-29, I might have a straighter chainline for this ride. If so, does it matter?
Now that I learned the correct term "chainline", I will repost with that name under new thread.
This refers to how straight the chain runs between the front and rear sprockets. Ideally, both sprockets should be in the same plane, so that there is no sideward motion or stress to the chain. This constitutes "perfect chainline".
"Chainline" is more crooked with some of the larger sprockets on the cassette when using a 50 chainring (compared to equivalent gear inches when using smaller sprockets on the cassette with the 34 ring.
This difference is accentuated compared to using standard 53/39 b/c you have lower gears on the 50 than the 53. Eg when in an increasingly steep hill you can stay in the 50 longer than the 53 while you move to sequentially larger sprockets on your cassette.
I am doing a long, arduous ride ogf 127 miles w/ >13k ft climbing including 12% average 3 mile climb at the end. So I was wondering if by switching from a 12-25 to a 13-29, I might have a straighter chainline for this ride. If so, does it matter?
Now that I learned the correct term "chainline", I will repost with that name under new thread.
#9
Senior Member
Originally Posted by TJHOO
Has anyone figured if some of the efficiencies of having compact chainrings (being able to stay in the large ring for a lower gear than a 53, and lower rotating weight) are offset by more cross chaining?
#10
synapses firing
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: leesburg, va.
Posts: 682
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
TJ i think you're needlessly worrying yourself. you're an excellent climber and your 12-25 should do fine. i wouldnt worry about how straight your chain is on the MOM, just ride it.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by reef58
Check out many rides in the mountains of NC. I was in a group of 50 people in the HHH last year, and me and one other guy were the only ones not walking our bikes up Bearwallow Mountain. It was not 3 miles or 15% either. Beech Mountain will get you attention as will Brasstown. The Assualt on Mitchell includes something like 7000 feet of climbing in the last 27 miles. Not everyone wants to do that with a 34-25. Some think they do, and end up walking or bowing out. Unfortunately many are told a 39-25 is fine.
Richard
Richard
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,159
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by worker4youth
Oh please, 7000 ft over 27 miles is 5% average...plenty doable in 39-25, let alone 34-25.
I do 5% climbs (albeit, never for 27 miles), regularly on my fixie 48-18.
I do 5% climbs (albeit, never for 27 miles), regularly on my fixie 48-18.
#13
Scum, Freezebag!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Poway, CA
Posts: 4,546
Bikes: 2007 Leader 796R w/ 10sp DA and 2005 Jamis Dakar XLT FS MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just did the Alpine Challenge in San Diego (72 miles...7000' climbing...pretty much an out and back) with some pretty good sustained climbs. I rode an FSA Compact (50/34) with a Harris Cyclery 'High & Wide' 11/28 cassette. I never made it into the 28 gear, but it was nice to know it was there.
A 50/11 for the downhills was excellent, and I was routinely spinning out of my 50/13. So, it's something to think about if you like going quickly down the hills you just climbed.
I also have an 11/23 as my main training cassette...which is nice.
A 50/11 for the downhills was excellent, and I was routinely spinning out of my 50/13. So, it's something to think about if you like going quickly down the hills you just climbed.
I also have an 11/23 as my main training cassette...which is nice.
#14
hello
But yes, as the OP pointed out, I find myself crosschaining quite frequently with the 50 ring.......and I love it...