Gearing Question for steep climbing
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Gearing Question for steep climbing
I'm riding in a race w/ 12% average grade later this summer and I'm trying to dial in my gearing setup.
I'm currently running the following:
Dura-Ace components on a 9-speed
12-27 Cassette
53/39 Chainrings
It's my understanding through lots of discussion with folks that I'll need closer to a 1:1 ratio in my lowest gear. Obviously, the 39/27 ratio isn't going to cut it. I'm very aware that I could go to a compact crankset but I've only found that this gets me to a 50/34 chainring or a 34/27 ratio.
Since this is a once-a-year race, I don't want to drop lots of cash on a fancy setup that gets me to this ratio.
I've heard some creative thoughts around putting a mountain bike cassette on...not sure how to identify MB cassettes that fit a road hub. I've heard ideas about finding a creative way to put a small chainring on my current crankset. But with that bolt pattern it seems I would have to find a different crankset.
How do I get myself to a 34/32 (closest to ideal) or 34/29 (not-as-ideal) ratio without throwing on a triple?
I'm currently running the following:
Dura-Ace components on a 9-speed
12-27 Cassette
53/39 Chainrings
It's my understanding through lots of discussion with folks that I'll need closer to a 1:1 ratio in my lowest gear. Obviously, the 39/27 ratio isn't going to cut it. I'm very aware that I could go to a compact crankset but I've only found that this gets me to a 50/34 chainring or a 34/27 ratio.
Since this is a once-a-year race, I don't want to drop lots of cash on a fancy setup that gets me to this ratio.
I've heard some creative thoughts around putting a mountain bike cassette on...not sure how to identify MB cassettes that fit a road hub. I've heard ideas about finding a creative way to put a small chainring on my current crankset. But with that bolt pattern it seems I would have to find a different crankset.
How do I get myself to a 34/32 (closest to ideal) or 34/29 (not-as-ideal) ratio without throwing on a triple?
#2
214/13
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SW Pdx
Posts: 844
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I believe standard road derailers accomodate 27 tooth cog at most. You would need a long cage derailer to go higher.
With a 12% AVERAGE grade you are looking at a killer climb and most likely need a triple or put a mountain bike cassette and derailer on so you could at least get 39/34. Any shimano 9 speed mountain bike cassette will fit a 9 speed shimano compatible road hub/shifter. The spacing is identical, so it's just a matter of swapping cassettes. You could try it w/ a standard derailer to see how it shifts but I'm almost positive it's not recomended.
I did torture 10,000 with a 39/34 and was managable. It was 13000 feet climbing over 100 miles.
With a 12% AVERAGE grade you are looking at a killer climb and most likely need a triple or put a mountain bike cassette and derailer on so you could at least get 39/34. Any shimano 9 speed mountain bike cassette will fit a 9 speed shimano compatible road hub/shifter. The spacing is identical, so it's just a matter of swapping cassettes. You could try it w/ a standard derailer to see how it shifts but I'm almost positive it's not recomended.
I did torture 10,000 with a 39/34 and was managable. It was 13000 feet climbing over 100 miles.
Last edited by PedalMasher; 06-13-06 at 05:29 PM.
#3
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,007
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3340 Post(s)
Liked 3,438 Times
in
1,738 Posts
Gearing choices, in decreasing size order:
1. Compact crankset
2. MTB cassette (12-34) + MTB derailleur
3. Compact crankset + MTB cassette + MTB derailleur
12% average is pretty tough. If the course is fairly short, you may be able to get away with a 34/27 or a 39/34 ratio. But if it's long, I suggest the 34/34.
At 60 rpm up a 12% grade, here's the climbing rate:
34/27: 3738 ft/hr
39/34: 3421
34/34: 2978
Determine the climbing rate you think you can sustain, and select your gearing accordingly.
1. Compact crankset
2. MTB cassette (12-34) + MTB derailleur
3. Compact crankset + MTB cassette + MTB derailleur
12% average is pretty tough. If the course is fairly short, you may be able to get away with a 34/27 or a 39/34 ratio. But if it's long, I suggest the 34/34.
At 60 rpm up a 12% grade, here's the climbing rate:
34/27: 3738 ft/hr
39/34: 3421
34/34: 2978
Determine the climbing rate you think you can sustain, and select your gearing accordingly.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
#4
Keep on climbing
Would this race by any chance be the Mt. Washington Hill Climb?
I've gotten an Ultegra long-cage rear derailleur to shift into a 32-tooth MTB cassette. It isn't recommended, and it's not exactly quiet. You have to screw in the B-limit screw all the way to get the pulleys to clear, but it does work. I did it for the Mt. Washington Hill Climb; with a triple up front, I had a 30x32 low that I saved for the obscenely steep sections (i.e., 18%+).
One possibility is to scour E-Bay for an old MTB triple crankset / bottom-bracket combo. Strip the outer two chainrings off -- you sure won't be needing them on a 12% average grade. Keep your current front derailleur -- it can help keep the chain on. That would get you into the vicinity of a 24x27 low. You'll get smoother rear shifting, and you'll have some bailout gears should the weather be attrocious (assuming that this is Mt. Washington, it probably will be).
I've gotten an Ultegra long-cage rear derailleur to shift into a 32-tooth MTB cassette. It isn't recommended, and it's not exactly quiet. You have to screw in the B-limit screw all the way to get the pulleys to clear, but it does work. I did it for the Mt. Washington Hill Climb; with a triple up front, I had a 30x32 low that I saved for the obscenely steep sections (i.e., 18%+).
One possibility is to scour E-Bay for an old MTB triple crankset / bottom-bracket combo. Strip the outer two chainrings off -- you sure won't be needing them on a 12% average grade. Keep your current front derailleur -- it can help keep the chain on. That would get you into the vicinity of a 24x27 low. You'll get smoother rear shifting, and you'll have some bailout gears should the weather be attrocious (assuming that this is Mt. Washington, it probably will be).
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,937
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12172 Post(s)
Liked 1,481 Times
in
1,094 Posts
https://www.jensonusa.com/store/produ...erailleur.aspx
You have lots of choices when it comes to gearing. You can go to 34t, or get better ratios with 32 or 30t. You pays your money and takes yer chances....
https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/k7.html#9
You have lots of choices when it comes to gearing. You can go to 34t, or get better ratios with 32 or 30t. You pays your money and takes yer chances....
https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/k7.html#9
#6
Feed me your soul!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 3,018
Bikes: Torelli 20th Anniversary, Trek 2000, Kona NuNu
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a 39x26. I think its the biggest rear combo you can have on campy and still use a short cage derailer. Sometimes I wish I could go bigger...or is that smaller? Whatever.
#7
Overacting because I can
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
Posts: 4,552
Bikes: Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
+1 on the mtb crankset. You can get down to a 22 ring with those. Sheldon Brown also claims that you can mount a special 22 or 24 ring on a normal road triple, but I've never seen it done.
Here's a good website on major hill climbing (incl. Mt Washington) and gearing. Go to the climb central part. Short answer - I don't think 39x27 is gonna do it for you.
https://northeastcycling.com/
Here's a good website on major hill climbing (incl. Mt Washington) and gearing. Go to the climb central part. Short answer - I don't think 39x27 is gonna do it for you.
https://northeastcycling.com/
__________________
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)
"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)
"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: northern California
Posts: 5,603
Bikes: Bruce Gordon BLT, Cannondale parts bike, Ecodyne recumbent trike, Counterpoint Opus 2, miyata 1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just build up your legs. I have seen a racer go up a 35% grade with a 53/27. That was Fargo Street in LA and it was OK to do switchbacks.
#9
riding once again
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 7,359
Bikes: '06 Cervelo R3, '05 Specialized Allez
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ken cummings
Just build up your legs. I have seen a racer go up a 35% grade with a 53/27. That was Fargo Street in LA and it was OK to do switchbacks.
In a race, on the other hand, time/speed presumably does matter. I assume the racer could have been faster in a more appropriate gear.
__________________
If you notice this notice then you will notice that this notice is not worth noticing.
#10
Keep on climbing
Originally Posted by vampares
A goofy compact could do it but you need to mix and match some rear sprokets and the chainrings.
That's why I was suggesting getting a cheap MTB crankset off E-Bay. The OP already needs a new crankset anyway as he currently has a standard double. If you're going to get a new crankset for extremely low gears, then you might as well get a triple. If this race is what I think it is, you're not going to be shifting the front -- ever.
#11
.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
12 Posts
you don't write how fit you are, what you weigh, how tall you are, how long the climb is, etc.
based on your equipment, I wouldn't have much of a problem racing with a 39/27 on a 12% grade for 3-4 kms. I wouldn't be winning, that's for sure , but I think i'd be able to manage.
If it's longer, say 10+ kms, then that would of course be something different.
based on your equipment, I wouldn't have much of a problem racing with a 39/27 on a 12% grade for 3-4 kms. I wouldn't be winning, that's for sure , but I think i'd be able to manage.
If it's longer, say 10+ kms, then that would of course be something different.
Originally Posted by jqstanley
I'm riding in a race w/ 12% average grade later this summer and I'm trying to dial in my gearing setup.
I'm currently running the following:
Dura-Ace components on a 9-speed
12-27 Cassette
53/39 Chainrings
It's my understanding through lots of discussion with folks that I'll need closer to a 1:1 ratio in my lowest gear. Obviously, the 39/27 ratio isn't going to cut it. I'm very aware that I could go to a compact crankset but I've only found that this gets me to a 50/34 chainring or a 34/27 ratio.
Since this is a once-a-year race, I don't want to drop lots of cash on a fancy setup that gets me to this ratio.
I've heard some creative thoughts around putting a mountain bike cassette on...not sure how to identify MB cassettes that fit a road hub. I've heard ideas about finding a creative way to put a small chainring on my current crankset. But with that bolt pattern it seems I would have to find a different crankset.
How do I get myself to a 34/32 (closest to ideal) or 34/29 (not-as-ideal) ratio without throwing on a triple?
I'm currently running the following:
Dura-Ace components on a 9-speed
12-27 Cassette
53/39 Chainrings
It's my understanding through lots of discussion with folks that I'll need closer to a 1:1 ratio in my lowest gear. Obviously, the 39/27 ratio isn't going to cut it. I'm very aware that I could go to a compact crankset but I've only found that this gets me to a 50/34 chainring or a 34/27 ratio.
Since this is a once-a-year race, I don't want to drop lots of cash on a fancy setup that gets me to this ratio.
I've heard some creative thoughts around putting a mountain bike cassette on...not sure how to identify MB cassettes that fit a road hub. I've heard ideas about finding a creative way to put a small chainring on my current crankset. But with that bolt pattern it seems I would have to find a different crankset.
How do I get myself to a 34/32 (closest to ideal) or 34/29 (not-as-ideal) ratio without throwing on a triple?
Last edited by botto; 06-14-06 at 06:37 AM.
#12
部門ニ/自転車オタク
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 3,173
Bikes: 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, 2012 Blue Norcross CX, 2016 Blue Axino SL, 2016 Scott Scale, Fixie, Fetish Cycles Road Bike (on the trainer)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We here in Japan are routinely on 9-10km climbs averaging 10-12% grades with no less than 39x27. I've only got 12x25 10sp and just not having the 27 to shift in to will routinely let me outpace my ride buddy that has the 27 in the back. Does it hurt more? Probably, but we both spin 80ish, and I get to the top first almost always.
I think the question asked best is dialing in fitness to do the climb. If you're concerned about time, then getting a lower gear won't make you go faster. It'll just let you go slower for longer time. *shrug*
I think the question asked best is dialing in fitness to do the climb. If you're concerned about time, then getting a lower gear won't make you go faster. It'll just let you go slower for longer time. *shrug*
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
Envision, Energize, Enable
#13
Ca-na-da?
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burlington, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,025
Bikes: none at the moment
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
go buy a new climbing bike with some lightweight wheels then you'll fly up the hill anyways.
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KevinF
Would this race by any chance be the Mt. Washington Hill Climb?
I've gotten an Ultegra long-cage rear derailleur to shift into a 32-tooth MTB cassette. It isn't recommended, and it's not exactly quiet. You have to screw in the B-limit screw all the way to get the pulleys to clear, but it does work. I did it for the Mt. Washington Hill Climb; with a triple up front, I had a 30x32 low that I saved for the obscenely steep sections (i.e., 18%+).
One possibility is to scour E-Bay for an old MTB triple crankset / bottom-bracket combo. Strip the outer two chainrings off -- you sure won't be needing them on a 12% average grade. Keep your current front derailleur -- it can help keep the chain on. That would get you into the vicinity of a 24x27 low. You'll get smoother rear shifting, and you'll have some bailout gears should the weather be attrocious (assuming that this is Mt. Washington, it probably will be).
I've gotten an Ultegra long-cage rear derailleur to shift into a 32-tooth MTB cassette. It isn't recommended, and it's not exactly quiet. You have to screw in the B-limit screw all the way to get the pulleys to clear, but it does work. I did it for the Mt. Washington Hill Climb; with a triple up front, I had a 30x32 low that I saved for the obscenely steep sections (i.e., 18%+).
One possibility is to scour E-Bay for an old MTB triple crankset / bottom-bracket combo. Strip the outer two chainrings off -- you sure won't be needing them on a 12% average grade. Keep your current front derailleur -- it can help keep the chain on. That would get you into the vicinity of a 24x27 low. You'll get smoother rear shifting, and you'll have some bailout gears should the weather be attrocious (assuming that this is Mt. Washington, it probably will be).
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vampares
With only 9 speeds a triple seems to me to be the only good option. You still may need a long rear derailleur. Thats a lot less than a new crank though. How long is your crank anyways? A goofy compact could do it but you need to mix and match some rear sprokets and the chainrings. And the front derailleur would have a lot of work to do but you only have to worry about the two rings of course. 54 - 29 Got shift ramps?
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
you don't write how fit you are, what you weigh, how tall you are, how long the climb is, etc.
based on your equipment, I wouldn't have much of a problem racing with a 39/27 on a 12% grade for 3-4 kms. I wouldn't be winning, that's for sure , but I think i'd be able to manage.
If it's longer, say 10+ kms, then that would of course be something different.
based on your equipment, I wouldn't have much of a problem racing with a 39/27 on a 12% grade for 3-4 kms. I wouldn't be winning, that's for sure , but I think i'd be able to manage.
If it's longer, say 10+ kms, then that would of course be something different.
I weigh in at ~175lbs. and I'm 6'3".
The race climb is 7.6 miles (ie. Mt. Washington).
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NomadVW
We here in Japan are routinely on 9-10km climbs averaging 10-12% grades with no less than 39x27. I've only got 12x25 10sp and just not having the 27 to shift in to will routinely let me outpace my ride buddy that has the 27 in the back. Does it hurt more? Probably, but we both spin 80ish, and I get to the top first almost always.
I think the question asked best is dialing in fitness to do the climb. If you're concerned about time, then getting a lower gear won't make you go faster. It'll just let you go slower for longer time. *shrug*
I think the question asked best is dialing in fitness to do the climb. If you're concerned about time, then getting a lower gear won't make you go faster. It'll just let you go slower for longer time. *shrug*
#18
.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
12 Posts
Originally Posted by jqstanley
I'm in Colorado (Ft. Collins area), so training at high altitude, climbing with each ride, 3 times/week, >100 miles/week. This AM --> 30 miles, 3200 ft. of vertical, over 2 hrs., 8% average grade.
I weigh in at ~175lbs. and I'm 6'3".
The race climb is 7.6 miles (ie. Mt. Washington).
I weigh in at ~175lbs. and I'm 6'3".
The race climb is 7.6 miles (ie. Mt. Washington).
#19
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,007
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3340 Post(s)
Liked 3,438 Times
in
1,738 Posts
Originally Posted by NomadVW
We here in Japan are routinely on 9-10km climbs averaging 10-12% grades with no less than 39x27. I've only got 12x25 10sp and just not having the 27 to shift in to will routinely let me outpace my ride buddy that has the 27 in the back. Does it hurt more? Probably, but we both spin 80ish, and I get to the top first almost always.
80 cadence in a 39/25 is 9.8 mph. Either you're Lance Armstrong hanging out in Japan, or your numbers are off. 9.8 mph up a 12% grade would require around 470 watts.
Originally Posted by NomadVW
I think the question asked best is dialing in fitness to do the climb. If you're concerned about time, then getting a lower gear won't make you go faster. It'll just let you go slower for longer time. *shrug*
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Central Massachusetts
Posts: 1,281
Bikes: Cannondale R600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jqstanley
Yes, this is Mt. Washington. I appreciate your experienced opinion.
Good luck!
#22
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Ross
Okay, I'll ask: Why not throw on a triple?
#23
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
I would think a 1:1 would be way too slow a gear for a race. I used to spin easy gears up big climbs but then I found that pushing harder gears works better for me. If I try to go fast in say a 34x30 then I spin like hell and my heart rate goes up too fast. Now I push a 39 x 23 most everywhere except for big climbs where I will use the 27 and I just keep turning over the cranks at low cadence but with a managable heart rate. Also I don't mind standing once and a while in fact I like it to stretch out...
I think it's a matter of personal taste. I've got an uphill time trial coming up and I was tempted to set my fixed gear bike up with like a 40 x 28 or something like that.
I think it's a matter of personal taste. I've got an uphill time trial coming up and I was tempted to set my fixed gear bike up with like a 40 x 28 or something like that.
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Because it's a hillclimb. Therefore 1) weight matters, and 2) you don't need any high gears. Thus a compact would be a better option than a triple.
#25
部門ニ/自転車オタク
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 3,173
Bikes: 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, 2012 Blue Norcross CX, 2016 Blue Axino SL, 2016 Scott Scale, Fixie, Fetish Cycles Road Bike (on the trainer)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
Originally Posted by NomadVW
We here in Japan are routinely on 9-10km climbs averaging 10-12% grades with no less than 39x27. I've only got 12x25 10sp and just not having the 27 to shift in to will routinely let me outpace my ride buddy that has the 27 in the back. Does it hurt more? Probably, but we both spin 80ish, and I get to the top first almost always.
80 cadence in a 39/25 is 9.8 mph. Either you're Lance Armstrong hanging out in Japan, or your numbers are off. 9.8 mph up a 12% grade would require around 470 watts.
Nonsense. Spinning a lower gear will keep him from running out of legs before the finish. Climb for an hour at a 30 cadence, then repeat at the same speed at a 70 cadence. Which one was easier on the legs?
As for the second point, who cares what is easier on the legs? If you're doing 12% grade for 7.6 miles, you're not concerned about "easier on the legs." You're concerned about getting to the top, completely used up. This isnt the middle of a race, or a portion of the race, it is the race, right?
IMO, this compact crank thing is just overrated. Just one more way to downgrade. I still say keep the 12x27 and 53x39. Sounds like you're doing plenty of hill climbing. I would definitely not change things out just for the sake of that ride. Stick to what you know. It'll give you greater confidence when you use it.
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
Envision, Energize, Enable