Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Sometimes those only velocity predictors are DEAD ON...

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Sometimes those only velocity predictors are DEAD ON...

Old 10-04-06, 10:00 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sometimes those online velocity predictors are DEAD ON...

I did a 10-mile time trial tonight at Lowe's Motor Speedway in Charlotte, NC. In the days prior to the event I used my power meter and this online velocity predictor to predict my time based on how much power I figured I could produce in the aero position for around 20 minutes.

It's essentially a flat track, and I assumed negligible wind, so I plugged the following into the velocity predictor:

Average power: 310 watts
Rider weight: 163 pounds
Bike weight: 18 pounds
Tire type: clincher
Position: aerobars (I have clip on bars)
Grade: 0.0%
Distance: 10 miles
Temperature: 70 degrees
Elevation: 675 feet
Trans effect: 95.0

The predicted time based on that calculation was 22:02.04.

Anyway, so I ended up averaging 308 watts instead of 310. The temperature was about 70 degrees and there was essentially no wind. According to the velocity predictor, my finishing time should have been 22:05.28. My actual time was 22:05.52. That's pretty amazing if you ask me...

Admittedly, there's a lot of "hand-waving" going on with the predictor (ie. what exactly constitutes an aerodynamic position, and where does the trans effect of 95.0 come from, etc), but still it's pretty cool to see that I can potentially predict future improvement with accuracy if I can increase my wattage or decrease my rolling resistance (i.e. tubular tires or a full TT bike).

--Steve
zimbo is offline  
Old 10-05-06, 06:02 AM
  #2  
5
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killadelphia
Posts: 1,229

Bikes: 2007 Fuji Roubaix LTD, 2005 Bianchi Pista

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In the (I believe) September issue of Bicycling, the MIT cycling team talked about how they predicted a team time trial result (College Nationals?) within a few minutes or seconds based on similar information. FYI.
michaelmc is offline  
Old 10-05-06, 07:19 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by michaelmc
In the (I believe) September issue of Bicycling, the MIT cycling team talked about how they predicted a team time trial result (College Nationals?) within a few minutes or seconds based on similar information. FYI.
Yeah, I read that article. The science of the team time trial is pretty fascinating, IMO, given that not everyone has the same power output.

--Steve
zimbo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.