top brake levers
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 43
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
top brake levers
I am trying to get into road biking. I see some bikes have a brake lever on the top of the handle and some do not. Advantages/disadvantages? Can I add top brakes later on if I wanted to?
Last edited by vman1; 10-08-06 at 10:45 AM.
#2
Mitcholo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The "suicide levers" were for casual riders, which were people who didn't want to go into the drops every time they had to brake, the shifters were also on the stem on those instead of the down tube. Most all of the bikes that had these "amenities" were pretty junky and didn't have very good components, and, like said before, were for casual riders in kacki shorts.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cyclo Cross bikes usually come standard with them. I own a Kona Jake the Snake which has them. They are convenient, especially if your just tooling around, or in heavy traffic and want to sit up higher.
#4
L-I-V-I-N
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stafford, OR
Posts: 4,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21
The "suicide levers" were for casual riders, which were people who didn't want to go into the drops every time they had to brake, the shifters were also on the stem on those instead of the down tube. Most all of the bikes that had these "amenities" were pretty junky and didn't have very good components, and, like said before, were for casual riders in kacki shorts.
__________________
"The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson
'14 carbon Synapse - '12 CAAD 10 5 - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur
"The older you do get, the more rules they're gonna try to get you to follow. You just gotta keep livin', man, L-I-V-I-N." - Wooderson
'14 carbon Synapse - '12 CAAD 10 5 - '99 Gary Fisher Big Sur
#6
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Kind of makes you wonder, why bother with STI levers at all. Why not just get grip shifters and inline brake levers?
I can definitley see this trend happening, along with a switch from drops to flat bars or bullhorns. The vast majority of rec riders are spending most of their time on the hoods anyways. And if you're not going to be braking from the hoods, why have the brake levers or even shift levers there?
I can definitley see this trend happening, along with a switch from drops to flat bars or bullhorns. The vast majority of rec riders are spending most of their time on the hoods anyways. And if you're not going to be braking from the hoods, why have the brake levers or even shift levers there?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521
Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by operator
Kind of makes you wonder, why bother with STI levers at all. Why not just get grip shifters and inline brake levers?
I can definitley see this trend happening, along with a switch from drops to flat bars or bullhorns. The vast majority of rec riders are spending most of their time on the hoods anyways. And if you're not going to be braking from the hoods, why have the brake levers or even shift levers there?
I can definitley see this trend happening, along with a switch from drops to flat bars or bullhorns. The vast majority of rec riders are spending most of their time on the hoods anyways. And if you're not going to be braking from the hoods, why have the brake levers or even shift levers there?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I think they make sense for cyclocross racing, since those folks are often using the top of the bar for more power and need to brake quickly to navigate around obsticals.
For recreational riding, however, most people who think they need them probably have a bike that is too big.
For recreational riding, however, most people who think they need them probably have a bike that is too big.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnny99
I think they make sense for cyclocross racing, since those folks are often using the top of the bar for more power and need to brake quickly to navigate around obsticals.
For recreational riding, however, most people who think they need them probably have a bike that is too big.
For recreational riding, however, most people who think they need them probably have a bike that is too big.
If you aren't a WW or racing, I see no downside to having them.
-D
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by derath
Or people who simply like using the tops as another hand position, yet are concerned about having to react quickly and switch to the hoods in a braking situation.
If you aren't a WW or racing, I see no downside to having them.
-D
If you aren't a WW or racing, I see no downside to having them.
-D
This isn't a problem for cyclocross racers, since they train for those situations and are generally going uphill when their hands are on the bars, which makes a face plant much more difficult.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnny99
Downside is that your center of gravity is very high when your hands are on the top of the bar, so braking hard can cause a face plant (aka kissing concrete).
This isn't a problem for cyclocross racers, since they train for those situations and are generally going uphill when their hands are on the bars, which makes a face plant much more difficult.
This isn't a problem for cyclocross racers, since they train for those situations and are generally going uphill when their hands are on the bars, which makes a face plant much more difficult.
Oh please, have you looked closely at the position of your body on the top of the bar vs resting on the hoods? My head is maybe a few inches lower. And if it this was that big of a concern, what about all the people riding hybrids and the like. I hear of few of those types face planting.
For the most part I have seen people interested in those brakes being the type that wanted the options of drop bars but are not agressive riders. At least outside the Cyclocross racing scene.
Plus for those people, which do you think could cause a greater panic stop. Using the top bar brakes or freaking and quickly grasping for the hoods?
-D
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
If face planting was uncommon, why was the word invented in the first place? It has been widely used by bicyclists, probably dating back to the 1970s-style suicide levers.
I have a hard time believing that your center of gravity is lower when your hands are on the tops. How can moving your hands farther forward and lower (from the tops to the brake hoods) cause your center of gravity to go up?
Hybrid bike riders don't face plant much because they generally ride more slowly than road bikers. Also, their center of gravity is farther back and the wider handlebars stabalize the upper body. Still, I am sure they do face plant from time to time, especially when going downhill.
I have a hard time believing that your center of gravity is lower when your hands are on the tops. How can moving your hands farther forward and lower (from the tops to the brake hoods) cause your center of gravity to go up?
Hybrid bike riders don't face plant much because they generally ride more slowly than road bikers. Also, their center of gravity is farther back and the wider handlebars stabalize the upper body. Still, I am sure they do face plant from time to time, especially when going downhill.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somewhere hot
Posts: 493
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i used a pair when i borrowed a buddies OCR3. i found the modulation poor when using those levers. (or it could have been the rather weak generic calipers)
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnny99
If face planting was uncommon, why was the word invented in the first place? It has been widely used by bicyclists, probably dating back to the 1970s-style suicide levers.
Originally Posted by johnny99
I have a hard time believing that your center of gravity is lower when your hands are on the tops. How can moving your hands farther forward and lower (from the tops to the brake hoods) cause your center of gravity to go up?
Where did you read that? Let me rephrase my last post. You may have a lower center of gravity when in the hoods vs the tops, but it will be so minor that it wouldn't be a significant factor in a "face plant" situation. Your center of gravity is generally somewhere in your torso. Make a note of how much lower your torso is when on the tops vs the hoods.. We are talking about a negligable change in the center of gravity.
Originally Posted by johnny99
Hybrid bike riders don't face plant much because they generally ride more slowly than road bikers. Also, their center of gravity is farther back and the wider handlebars stabalize the upper body. Still, I am sure they do face plant from time to time, especially when going downhill.
The bottom line, on a road bike, is that your are no more likely to faceplant from the use of inline brakes due to your higher center of gravity (which was your contention). Most of the time a "face plant" is caused by improper use of the front brake.
So answer me this. Say you have a rider who wanted inline brakes because they ride on the tops alot. Now say this rider encounters a panic brake situation, say a dog runs in their path). Which scenario do you think is more likely to cause them to overbrake and face plant?
a. They immediately use their inline brakes, which are available at their fingertips without havin to move their hands?
b. They have to quickly move their hands from the tops to the hoods and then grab the brakes?
I would contend that situation B is more likely to cause them to faceplant. Why? Because they are going to lose maybe a second at best in reaction time relocating their hands, which will panic them more, and cause them to have to brake harder than A since they lost the time having to move their hands.
Now also a point of mention, while your center of gravity is negligably lower in the hoods, it also moves you farther forward over the front wheel. I would content that forward movement negates the lower center of gravity.
-D
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
Hands closer to the stem = less control than if they were further out on the hoods. That is a fact.
That it is.
-D
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by derath
The bottom line, on a road bike, is that your are no more likely to faceplant from the use of inline brakes due to your higher center of gravity (which was your contention). Most of the time a "face plant" is caused by improper use of the front brake.
So answer me this. Say you have a rider who wanted inline brakes because they ride on the tops alot. Now say this rider encounters a panic brake situation, say a dog runs in their path). Which scenario do you think is more likely to cause them to overbrake and face plant?
So answer me this. Say you have a rider who wanted inline brakes because they ride on the tops alot. Now say this rider encounters a panic brake situation, say a dog runs in their path). Which scenario do you think is more likely to cause them to overbrake and face plant?
Regarding using the tops a lot on flat terrain, as I said the first time, that is usually an indication that your bike is the wrong size.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Inline brakes added to a bike does not mean you remove the main ones, its in addition to.
Look back at any poll/survey on this forum at where people place their hands. If i recall its about 80-95% on the hoods and tops. Adding a second set of brakes that can be reached when someos hands are on the tops is a benefit, not a hinderance.
The lessened control of braking closer to the stem is more than offset by being able to slow immediatly instead of having to move your hands and then brake, which means youve lost time so have to brake even harder.
Is there a dissadvantage? The only disadvantage I can see is slightly added weight, slightly added moving parts to wear/break, and the same stigma that is put on someone who has a triple instead of a double. For someone starting in cycling, they are a great idea.
Look back at any poll/survey on this forum at where people place their hands. If i recall its about 80-95% on the hoods and tops. Adding a second set of brakes that can be reached when someos hands are on the tops is a benefit, not a hinderance.
The lessened control of braking closer to the stem is more than offset by being able to slow immediatly instead of having to move your hands and then brake, which means youve lost time so have to brake even harder.
Is there a dissadvantage? The only disadvantage I can see is slightly added weight, slightly added moving parts to wear/break, and the same stigma that is put on someone who has a triple instead of a double. For someone starting in cycling, they are a great idea.
#19
Faster but still slow
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Kind of makes you wonder, why bother with STI levers at all. Why not just get grip shifters and inline brake levers?
I can definitley see this trend happening, along with a switch from drops to flat bars or bullhorns. The vast majority of rec riders are spending most of their time on the hoods anyways. And if you're not going to be braking from the hoods, why have the brake levers or even shift levers there?
I can definitley see this trend happening, along with a switch from drops to flat bars or bullhorns. The vast majority of rec riders are spending most of their time on the hoods anyways. And if you're not going to be braking from the hoods, why have the brake levers or even shift levers there?
Who says you can't brake from the hoods? And STI brifters are so superior to grip shifters that they shouldn't be in the same sentence.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnny99
I agree that face plants are often caused by improper use of the front brake, but a top-mounted front brake is much easier to misuse.
Basically I was only trying to refute your original statement, which was that the likelyhood of a faceplant would be higher due to a higher center of gravity, which is completely wrong.
-D
#21
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
I often ride a CX bike with inline levers mainly for club rides, but I used to ride it on singletrack quite a bit as well.
I find much greater control using the brifter levers due to hands being further apart on bars.
The only time I use the inline levers is when I want to sit up to coast into a stop during a club ride and use the inline levers for a casual slow stop.
Interestingly when I rode single track (quite rough and hilly) I found I used the drops far more than I do on road (where I often use hoods, but never tops). That is because I found the most control and abilty to navigate obsticals in the drops, plus the most effective breaking. I could get back behind seat for steep downhills in drops just as easy as on the tops and had the advantage of more steering leverage.
I am sure though if I practiced I could get more comfortable on the tops, but my instinct when approachig difficult terrain is to move arms to hoods or drops.
Al
I find much greater control using the brifter levers due to hands being further apart on bars.
The only time I use the inline levers is when I want to sit up to coast into a stop during a club ride and use the inline levers for a casual slow stop.
Interestingly when I rode single track (quite rough and hilly) I found I used the drops far more than I do on road (where I often use hoods, but never tops). That is because I found the most control and abilty to navigate obsticals in the drops, plus the most effective breaking. I could get back behind seat for steep downhills in drops just as easy as on the tops and had the advantage of more steering leverage.
I am sure though if I practiced I could get more comfortable on the tops, but my instinct when approachig difficult terrain is to move arms to hoods or drops.
Al
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cerritos, Ca.
Posts: 562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by derath
So answer me this. Say you have a rider who wanted inline brakes because they ride on the tops alot. Now say this rider encounters a panic brake situation, say a dog runs in their path). Which scenario do you think is more likely to cause them to overbrake and face plant?
a. They immediately use their inline brakes, which are available at their fingertips without havin to move their hands?
b. They have to quickly move their hands from the tops to the hoods and then grab the brakes?
I would contend that situation B is more likely to cause them to faceplant. Why? Because they are going to lose maybe a second at best in reaction time relocating their hands, which will panic them more, and cause them to have to brake harder than A since they lost the time having to move their hands.
-D
a. They immediately use their inline brakes, which are available at their fingertips without havin to move their hands?
b. They have to quickly move their hands from the tops to the hoods and then grab the brakes?
I would contend that situation B is more likely to cause them to faceplant. Why? Because they are going to lose maybe a second at best in reaction time relocating their hands, which will panic them more, and cause them to have to brake harder than A since they lost the time having to move their hands.
-D
#23
Faster but still slow
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 5,978
Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Basically I was only trying to refute your original statement, which was that the likelyhood of a faceplant would be higher due to a higher center of gravity, which is completely wrong.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Murray, KY
Posts: 783
Bikes: Trek 7500 FX (2005)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by johnny99
If face planting was uncommon, why was the word invented in the first place? It has been widely used by bicyclists, probably dating back to the 1970s-style suicide levers.
No way you'd do a face plant (unless you hit something that stopped the bike but not the rider), the problem was the physics of the design and the bendiness in the levers themselves (they made a right angle and actually pulled down on the brake lever - they weren't inline at all - they pivoted at the brake lever) put so little force on the brake cables that stopping was problematic. On mine, I recall, you could pull them up above the bar and still not slow down much. This was partly from the levers layout, partly from the poorer quality brakes on the low end model plus ineffective pads. I got another bike real fast after a non-stopping incident with them, no injury fortunately.
The other thing I liked (NOT) were the stem mounted shift levers - loved the thought of coming off the saddle, sliding down the top tube into one of those things pulled back horizontal so it was pointing you know where.
__________________
His: Trek 7500FX
Specialized Roubaix
Spouse: Trek 7.5FX
His: Trek 7500FX
Specialized Roubaix
Spouse: Trek 7.5FX
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Posts: 3,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by slowandsteady
Really?? Ever hear of a faceplant from a recumbent rider? Center of gravity has everything to do with it. Of course you will have to slam on the front brakes and have bad form, but the fact that there is a high center of gravity on a road frame is the reason people go head over heels.
Grr. This is why forums are sometimes annoying. Slowandsteady, do me a favor and READ the conversation before simply replying. I am not saying that center of gravity has nothing to do with it.
I was simply refuting Johnny99's statement:
Downside is that your center of gravity is very high when your hands are on the top of the bar
-D