Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Helium in tires?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Helium in tires?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-06, 01:57 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Helium in tires?

How much do you think that would reduce the weight of a bike? ....

***DISCLAIMER*** I'm at work and _VERY_ bored...

Soooo.... I went to CC's website and did their extra stupendous configurator thingamabob and put in _exactly_ all my pieces parts and low and behold:

C-50/Record -> 6784.8g (14.9#)
on my scale it weighs 18.1#

Marcelo/Chorus -> 7471.8g (16.4#)
on my scale it weighs 19.25#

Gotta be helium....

Mind you, I couldn't care less... Bikes are for riding, not weighing, I just find it curious that the're _that_ far off...
dsb137 is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 02:00 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Trogon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: central rio grande valley
Posts: 801

Bikes: 14 road, 1 SS, 2 MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You're not suggesting that the bike part weights used in online configurators are incorrect, are you?

Because if you are, I'd have to say you might be on to something.
Trogon is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 02:04 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trogon
You're not suggesting that the bike part weights used in online configurators are incorrect, are you?

Because if you are, I'd have to say you might be on to something.
I know... I know... Just call me Captian Obvious...
dsb137 is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 02:06 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Trogon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: central rio grande valley
Posts: 801

Bikes: 14 road, 1 SS, 2 MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think you and I should work together to report this to someone. But who?
Trogon is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 02:10 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trogon
I think you and I should work together to report this to someone. But who?
Can't you just hear the phone call?

Hello CC?
-Yes...
You sent me the wrong bike...
-Really? let me check...
-It says we sent you yada yada yada, isn't that right?
No, I ordered the 15# yada yada yada, you sent me an 18# yada yada yada... I'd like to exchange it for the 15# yada yada yada...
- <crickets>
dsb137 is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 02:16 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Trogon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: central rio grande valley
Posts: 801

Bikes: 14 road, 1 SS, 2 MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I had a huge disagreement with a guy on line over the CC calculator. We both had the same lugged steel bike with identical builds. His was one size larger I think. He was going on and on about his 18 lbs. lugged bike and I'd actually weighed mine in at 20.2 lbs. I wasn't trying to be a porker, but I pointed that out. He printed out the entire CC work up to prove I was wrong. In the end, I let him go away happy in the knowledge that he had the lightest 58cm lugged steel bike in the US.
Trogon is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 02:52 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trogon
I had a huge disagreement with a guy on line over the CC calculator. We both had the same lugged steel bike with identical builds. His was one size larger I think. He was going on and on about his 18 lbs. lugged bike and I'd actually weighed mine in at 20.2 lbs. I wasn't trying to be a porker, but I pointed that out. He printed out the entire CC work up to prove I was wrong. In the end, I let him go away happy in the knowledge that he had the lightest 58cm lugged steel bike in the US.
Let's hope for his sake that he never puts it on a scale... It's hard to dispute imperical evidence...
dsb137 is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 03:09 PM
  #8  
Every day a winding road
 
spinnaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,538

Bikes: 2005 Cannondale SR500, 2008 Trek 7.3 FX, Jamis Aurora

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3394 Post(s)
Liked 63 Times in 46 Posts
You're assuming that your scale is correct. If you are using a standard bathroom scale, they can be very inaccurate. There is a 2-3 pound difference between my scale an the one at the gym.

If it is another type of scale then when was the last time it was calibrated?
spinnaker is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 03:16 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Every bike has three weights: What the manufacturer says that it weighs, what the person who owns it thinks that it weighs, and what the scale says that it weighs. That last one is almost always greater than the other two.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 03:17 PM
  #10  
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234

Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
One thing to note is that weight does not necessarily equal mass. You are decreasing the weight slightly because helium atoms are less massive (4 gm/mole) than the atoms of other molecules that make up air (28 gm/mol) but the volume is small so the actual amount of mass reduction is not all that great. However, you are decreasing bouyancy which is partially what's being measured by a weight scale.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 03:28 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
And decreased bouyancy can have a negative impact on cornering-traction as well. You'll lose traction at a faster rate than you lose mass...
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 03:56 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spinnaker
You're assuming that your scale is correct. If you are using a standard bathroom scale, they can be very inaccurate. There is a 2-3 pound difference between my scale an the one at the gym.

If it is another type of scale then when was the last time it was calibrated?
Good point... I like that... I just got one of these Ultimate scales, which is what started all of this mess... You should never ask a question you don't _really_ want to know the answer to...

dsb137 is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 04:14 PM
  #13  
Emondafied
 
cydewaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939

Bikes: See sig

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Maybe you're forgetting to weight each component, then round down to the nearest pound.
__________________

my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 - AlpineStars Al Mega
cydewaze is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 04:35 PM
  #14  
Well, duh, Mr Obvious.
 
dekalbSTEEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NIU town
Posts: 2,271

Bikes: see sig, and others

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Grease......you forgot about the grease. That $hit weighs a ton.
dekalbSTEEL is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 04:42 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cydewaze
Maybe you're forgetting to weight each component, then round down to the nearest pound.
Sort of like 'the whole is greater than the sum of the parts'?


Originally Posted by dekalbSTEEL
Grease......you forgot about the grease. That $hit weighs a ton.
Nah, I use lithium grease... cuz lithium is 3rd on the periodic table, only helium and hydrogen are lighter...
dsb137 is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 08:42 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Leandro
Posts: 2,900

Bikes: Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Basso Loto, Pinarello Stelvio, Redline Cyclocross

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 336 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by dsb137
Good point... I like that... I just got one of these Ultimate scales, which is what started all of this mess... You should never ask a question you don't _really_ want to know the answer to...

EXACTLY.

My C40 with all carbon parts, Lance saddle, Kysriums SSLs and carbon bar and stem weighs in at 17.9 lbs.

I could make it a little bit lighter but not without starting to use parts too light for my 200 lb body which I do have rather high regard for.

I suppose that using all the right components - the latest Look frame and fork, Record components save for the Zero Gravity Brakes, CARBON BARS (which are a little heavier than Aluminum bars but a bit safer), that silly carbon-only saddle, those silly wheels with kevlar spokes that break spokes all the time, and some other really expensive and not very reliable but ultralight parts - and you could probably make a 15 lb bike.

And it would cost at least twice as much as my C40. And truth be known, the FASTEST bike I have is the steel Merckx Corsa 0.1 which weighs in at 24 lbs. And when you're coming down a superfast, twisting, bumpy hill on the Merckx you don't have that nagging doubt in the back of your mind. Same with the steel Basso Loto which comes in at 21 lbs.

Don't be fooled by weight. After building that light bike you still put another 5 lbs of water bottles, pump, saddle pack and speedometer on it don't you? I'm betting that you buy COMFORTABLE shoes and not light ones. Do you second guess the weight of your clothes - especially on a cold day?

And I don't know about you but I LIKE a donut and cup of coffee in the morning. My weight swings from 200 in the Winter to 190 in the best of Summertime dreams. And my best climbing weight is below 188 so I haven't seen a good climb in 10 years.

When weight weenies start talking about the weight of their stuff just smile and nod.
cyclintom is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 08:58 PM
  #17  
You got Madoned!
 
munkyv22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 1,728

Bikes: 2006 Trek Madone 5.2 SL

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OK, so I checked it out.

My bike weighs 16.9 Lbs with air and 16.9 Lbs with helium.

What a waste of helium.
munkyv22 is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 09:15 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 756

Bikes: custom built roadie

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my bike weighs 17.3 lbs with air and -1.2 lbs with helium. gotta say that helium really does make my bike lift off the ground. am i still uci legal?
stea1thviper is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 10:08 PM
  #19  
Elite Fred
 
mollusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Posts: 10,945

Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 19 Posts
You gotta ride with the tires absolutely flat so that you minimize weight. Instead of a floor pump I use a vacuum pump.
mollusk is offline  
Old 10-28-06, 11:45 PM
  #20  
Member
 
The G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 32

Bikes: 06 Masi Ultegra 10, 99 GT ZR 1000 DA 9, 00 GT U.S. National Team Track Bike, Boss 26' Single Speed, Boss MTB XTR, Revtec ProXL Saint

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
100% Nitrogen is a far better gas for tires. The tubes as less permeable to it's molecular size, and it has less temperature variabilties. We've used this for years in Stock Eliminator drag racing. It maintains more stable pressures throughout the day mainly because it's usually a drier gas, without humidity. However, it's no better than watching your tire pressures and not worth the effort. The gas weight differences even in a 30"x9" drag slick on a 15" rim aren't even measurable.

Don't forget, Sea Level pressure ambient air is about 78% N. About 2-4% of the total weight of this air is water vapor depending on where you live.

5 more pulls per group ride = burning more kj
The G is offline  
Old 10-29-06, 08:34 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cental New Jersey
Posts: 469

Bikes: Klein Quantum Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cyclintom
Zero Gravity Brakes, CARBON BARS (which are a little heavier than Aluminum bars but a bit safer),
WHAT? Since when are carbon bars "safer" than aluminum? Have you uncovered some safety data that none of us are aware of?
NJWheelBuilder is offline  
Old 10-29-06, 08:40 AM
  #22  
Call me The Breeze
 
I_bRAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cooper Ontario
Posts: 3,702

Bikes: 2004 Litespeed Siena, 1996 Litespeed Obed, 1992 Miele (unknown model), 1982 Meile Uno LS.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dsb137
How much do you think that would reduce the weight of a bike? ....

***DISCLAIMER*** I'm at work and _VERY_ bored...

Soooo.... I went to CC's website and did their extra stupendous configurator thingamabob and put in _exactly_ all my pieces parts and low and behold:

C-50/Record -> 6784.8g (14.9#)
on my scale it weighs 18.1#

Marcelo/Chorus -> 7471.8g (16.4#)
on my scale it weighs 19.25#

Gotta be helium....

Mind you, I couldn't care less... Bikes are for riding, not weighing, I just find it curious that the're _that_ far off...
Did you include fasteners in your calculation?

My bike weighs less in Mexico city than it does in San Fransisco.
I_bRAD is offline  
Old 10-29-06, 09:05 AM
  #23  
Every day a winding road
 
spinnaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,538

Bikes: 2005 Cannondale SR500, 2008 Trek 7.3 FX, Jamis Aurora

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3394 Post(s)
Liked 63 Times in 46 Posts
Originally Posted by I_bRAD

My bike weighs less in Mexico city than it does in San Fransisco.
????

Grams vs. pounds????

Altitude**********

Cheap Mexican scales???
spinnaker is offline  
Old 10-29-06, 09:43 AM
  #24  
Call me The Breeze
 
I_bRAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cooper Ontario
Posts: 3,702

Bikes: 2004 Litespeed Siena, 1996 Litespeed Obed, 1992 Miele (unknown model), 1982 Meile Uno LS.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Gravity gets weaker as you get farther from the center of the Earth
I_bRAD is offline  
Old 10-29-06, 10:52 AM
  #25  
5
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killadelphia
Posts: 1,229

Bikes: 2007 Fuji Roubaix LTD, 2005 Bianchi Pista

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I_bRAD
Gravity gets weaker as you get farther from the center of the Earth
There would only be a 6g difference in measured weight of a nominal 9072g (20 lb) bicycle between San Francisco (60 ft elevation) and Mexico City (7240 ft elevation).
michaelmc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.