Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

TT-Do you really need 2 chainrings?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

TT-Do you really need 2 chainrings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-06, 03:31 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
TT-Do you really need 2 chainrings?

Im debating if I should put 2 chainrings on my tt bike or 1. I use the tt bike only on flats to rolling. Please help.
Juklano is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 03:37 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You don't need both but if it's already there - what do you gain by taking it off? and vice versa.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 03:39 PM
  #3  
Mitcholo
 
CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850

Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It depends on what you prefer, a second chainring wouldn't hurt, but it probably wouldn't help much aero-wise. I'm TTist, but once I get the right cluster in the rear, I don't need the small chainring, I can take 20+% grades in the large ring, so if you have enough power, go for it.
CrimsonKarter21 is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 03:52 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
rufvelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dial_tone
You don't need both but if it's already there - what do you gain by taking it off? and vice versa.
+1

More importantly, do you need a 50, 52, 53 or 55?
__________________
rufvelo is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 03:59 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 4,520
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 451 Times in 265 Posts
Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21
I can take 20+% grades in the large ring, so if you have enough power, go for it.
First we go to analyticcycling.com:

Speed For Given Power
Speed For These Parameters 2.65 m/s = 5.9 mph
Power 400 watts
Frontal Area 0.5 m2
Coefficient Wind Drag 0.5 Dimensionless
Air Density 1.226 kg/m3
Weight Rider & Bike 75 kg
Coefficient of Rolling 0.004 Dimensionless
Slope of Hill 0.2 decimal

Then we take 5.9 mph to Sheldon Brown and since I'm lazy, I look up speed at 40 rpm. I see that a 53x25 gives 6.6 mph. So I figure you're turning less than 40 rpm using a totally inappropriate gear, you're monstrously powerful to TT at over 400W, your hills are so short, you're letting momentum carry you over the top (in which case you're not really riding the hill), or just perhaps you misjudge the grade of hills.
asgelle is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 04:03 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens, Ohio
Posts: 5,104

Bikes: Custom Custom Custom

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I guess you really dont need two rings but its a hassle taking off the rings and putting them back on. I'd just leave 'em there.
nitropowered is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 04:15 PM
  #7  
100% USDA certified
 
the beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle -> NYC
Posts: 4,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
The answer is, you might as well.
the beef is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 04:17 PM
  #8  
EdZ
Clinically Insane
 
EdZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 765
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Juklano
Im debating if I should put 2 chainrings on my tt bike or 1. I use the tt bike only on flats to rolling. Please help.
I guess you dont live/race where there are hills. My last time trial had about a 20% grade climb thrown in it.
EdZ is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 05:19 PM
  #9  
Cat WTF
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Flat time trials are NOT about bike wieght. Leave it on.
cat4ever is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 05:20 PM
  #10  
Cat WTF
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21
I can take 20+% grades in the large ring,

I would like to see you do that.
cat4ever is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 06:05 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21
I can take 20+% grades in the large ring
...and what ProTour team do you race for?
DieselDan is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 06:08 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by cat4ever
I would like to see you do that.
I couldn't take a 20% hill on the big ring of a compact.

Keep in mind, if you remove the 2nd ring and accidently knock that front derailleur you're down 20 seconds putting that chain back on...way more than you save by removing it.

Last edited by Dubbayoo; 11-04-06 at 08:47 PM.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 06:48 PM
  #13  
drop you like a potato
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: California
Posts: 593

Bikes: MERCKX, RIDLEY CROSS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21
It depends on what you prefer, a second chainring wouldn't hurt, but it probably wouldn't help much aero-wise. I'm TTist, but once I get the right cluster in the rear, I don't need the small chainring, I can take 20+% grades in the large ring, so if you have enough power, go for it.

and then you wake up.
Socalcycling is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 06:59 PM
  #14  
Aut Vincere Aut Mori
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,166

Bikes: Irish Cycles Tir na Nog, Jack Kane Team Racing, Fuji Aloha 1.0, GT Karakoram, Motobecane Fly Team

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dial_tone
Keep in mind, if you remove the 2nd ring and accidently knock that front derailleur you're down 20 second putting that chain back on...way more than you save by removing it.
Excellent point. I wasn't thinking about that at all...
Snuffleupagus is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 07:02 PM
  #15  
Nonsense
 
TheKillerPenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918

Bikes: Affirmative

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times in 237 Posts
limiter screws could solve the derailler issue, and an upgraded power dial could solve the 20+% grade issue
TheKillerPenguin is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 07:04 PM
  #16  
Aut Vincere Aut Mori
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,166

Bikes: Irish Cycles Tir na Nog, Jack Kane Team Racing, Fuji Aloha 1.0, GT Karakoram, Motobecane Fly Team

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by PenguinDeD
limiter screws could solve the derailler issue, and an upgraded power dial could solve the 20+% grade issue
Everyone is out of the dials that go to 11

I'm still using the outdated dials that go to 9.
Snuffleupagus is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 07:21 PM
  #17  
Wher'd u Get That Jacket?
 
flythebike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Tubes
Posts: 1,317

Bikes: Calfee Dragonfly, Lemond Poprad, Airborne Manhatten Project, Calfee Luna Fixie

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This one goes to eleven: https://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2002...02/?id=results
flythebike is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 07:41 PM
  #18  
the great shark hunt
 
goldfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Manitoba Canada
Posts: 1,334

Bikes: 2005 Cervélo Soloist w/ Campag Chorus (06/07 parts mix), 2001 Cervélo Prodigy w/ Campag Centaur '06, Giant Bowery Fixed-Gear, old steel black '70s bike waiting for FG build, trusty red SS mountain bike waiting for snow-bike build

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if you are taking off the second chainring, what the hell do you need to keep the derailler on for?
goldfish is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 08:14 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by goldfish
if you are taking off the second chainring, what the hell do you need to keep the derailler on for?
To keep the chain from jumping off the chainring. re: David Millar, 2003 Tour de France Prolouge.
DieselDan is offline  
Old 11-04-06, 08:18 PM
  #20  
Overacting because I can
 
SpongeDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
Posts: 4,552

Bikes: Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Now you might want to make the big and little ring closer - I have a 42 on the middle ring of my triple (gasp) and it's great for what I might call rolling ascents. So you could go with a 53/42 and that might cover all you'll ever really see, including headwinds.
__________________
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)

"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
SpongeDad is offline  
Old 11-05-06, 06:36 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 74
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dial_tone
I couldn't take a 20% hill on the big ring of a compact.

Keep in mind, if you remove the 2nd ring and accidently knock that front derailleur you're down 20 seconds putting that chain back on...way more than you save by removing it.
That happened to David Millar in the TdF prologue a few years ago. Only took him 3 seconds to put the chain back on (damned impressive to those mechanically challenged folks like me). Still cost him the yellow jersey though.
sathomasga is offline  
Old 11-05-06, 09:27 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
remorashadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 149
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I see no real reason why you would bother taking off the smaller chainring, pointless pain in the ass. Just don't use it if you don't need it.

Interesting about the dial to 11, my tri club's shirt this year has "This is Purdue Triathlon" in the appropriate font with a big dial set to 11 on the front, and on the back it says "we go to eleven" it's pretty sweet.
remorashadow is offline  
Old 11-05-06, 10:52 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: fogtown...san francisco
Posts: 2,276

Bikes: Ron Cooper, Time VXSR, rock lobster, rock lobster, serotta, ritchey, kestrel, paramount

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sathomasga
That happened to David Millar in the TdF prologue a few years ago. Only took him 3 seconds to put the chain back on (damned impressive to those mechanically challenged folks like me). Still cost him the yellow jersey though.
I was thinking the same thing...I would just leave it alone. but going with a closer chainring is a great idea, you could find a 44.

but if you were to get rid of the small ring, why have to brakes?
fogrider is offline  
Old 11-05-06, 11:32 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by fogrider
I was thinking the same thing...I would just leave it alone. but going with a closer chainring is a great idea, you could find a 44.

but if you were to get rid of the small ring, why have to brakes?
what does one have to do with the other?
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 11-06-06, 06:57 AM
  #25  
部門ニ/自転車オタク
 
NomadVW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sterling, VA
Posts: 3,173

Bikes: 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, 2012 Blue Norcross CX, 2016 Blue Axino SL, 2016 Scott Scale, Fixie, Fetish Cycles Road Bike (on the trainer)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dial_tone
what does one have to do with the other?
I think maybe the thought was if you're losing the small ring, why have a rear brake? If you were going to go for weight savings anyway. Rewire the shifters, (or not if they're european wired), remove a whole brifter/brake set. Leave the front brakes/rear der. set.

I'm still stuck on climbing 20% in the big ring. Maybe he's running 39/30 in the front. Probably not though, probably tell us it's a 55.
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
NomadVW is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.