Tubular flats...
#26
RacingBear
Honestly I have no idea how people say changing tubular is faster then a clincher. I was riding in Everest Challenge using my tubular rims (not the smartest thing to do in retrospect) on second climb my front flatted! It took me and a guy from support car at least fifteen minutes to pry that damn tire off the rim! To think I was afraid of rolling it.
#27
Burning Matches.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 9,714
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4077 Post(s)
Liked 1,002 Times
in
676 Posts
Originally Posted by Dial_tone
2. At least half the time I cause a new hole getting the tire back on, probably from my tire lever at which point I'm out of CO2 if step 1.
__________________
ElJamoquio didn't hate the world, per se; he was just constantly disappointed by humanity.
#28
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
Originally Posted by dgasmd
I have never done this, but a LBS told me that I could pre-glue the spare and let the glue dry. The fold it and stowe it away. When I get a flat I change tires and the glue on the rim from my previous tire and the glue from the new tire will act as contact cement and be more than plenty. Anyone do this********************???
#29
road curmudgeon, FG rider
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 677
Bikes: 1973 Nishiki Professional, 1990 Serotta Colorado II, 2002 Waterford Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by kyledr
Aging is a myth.
The same is true of bicyle tires but you don't want everthing to stick to the tubular. Ageing allows the rubber to lose some softness for more durabilty.
I first started riding sew-ups in the early 1970's and over 30 years of riding I can tell you that my tubular to clincher flat ratio is like 5 or 6 : 1 . I don't bother to age clinchers as they are not expensive enough to warrant the time.
Even Lance Armstrong is reputed to age his tires; so the practice has disciples in modern times.
Gerry
#30
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by GeraldChan
As an auto enthusiast and on-track driving instructor I can tell you that ageing is no myth. With car tires you want the newest, freshest rubber you can get as it is the stickiest for good traction. As the rubber ages (even after a few months or a few heat cycles ) the grip drops off.
The same is true of bicyle tires but you don't want everthing to stick to the tubular. Ageing allows the rubber to lose some softness for more durabilty.
I first started riding sew-ups in the early 1970's and over 30 years of riding I can tell you that my tubular to clincher flat ratio is like 5 or 6 : 1 . I don't bother to age clinchers as they are not expensive enough to warrant the time.
Even Lance Armstrong is reputed to age his tires; so the practice has disciples in modern times.
Gerry
The same is true of bicyle tires but you don't want everthing to stick to the tubular. Ageing allows the rubber to lose some softness for more durabilty.
I first started riding sew-ups in the early 1970's and over 30 years of riding I can tell you that my tubular to clincher flat ratio is like 5 or 6 : 1 . I don't bother to age clinchers as they are not expensive enough to warrant the time.
Even Lance Armstrong is reputed to age his tires; so the practice has disciples in modern times.
Gerry
What exactly do you think is making your aged tires more durable?
Your contention that you don't want grippy rubber is pretty strange.
#31
Burning Matches.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 9,714
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4077 Post(s)
Liked 1,002 Times
in
676 Posts
Originally Posted by GeraldChan
I first started riding sew-ups in the early 1970's and over 30 years of riding I can tell you that my tubular to clincher flat ratio is like 5 or 6 : 1 .
__________________
ElJamoquio didn't hate the world, per se; he was just constantly disappointed by humanity.
#32
Burning Matches.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 9,714
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4077 Post(s)
Liked 1,002 Times
in
676 Posts
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
Your contention that you don't want grippy rubber is pretty strange.
__________________
ElJamoquio didn't hate the world, per se; he was just constantly disappointed by humanity.
#33
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by ElJamoquio
Grippy = more resistance in a straight line.
Last edited by DiabloScott; 03-07-07 at 10:31 AM.
#34
Senior Member
Originally Posted by UmneyDurak
Honestly I have no idea how people say changing tubular is faster then a clincher. I was riding in Everest Challenge using my tubular rims (not the smartest thing to do in retrospect) on second climb my front flatted! It took me and a guy from support car at least fifteen minutes to pry that damn tire off the rim! To think I was afraid of rolling it.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by Bop Gun
Excelllent question. Tubulars seem definitely more flat resistant. On long >2 hr rides I'll take my spare pre-glued folded in a large saddlebag. If it is a shorter ride I'll take a can of the latex sealant. I probably have had 6 or 8 clincher flats on my first 1200 mi on my new Paris. 2 flats in 1400 mi on tubulars.
#36
road curmudgeon, FG rider
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 677
Bikes: 1973 Nishiki Professional, 1990 Serotta Colorado II, 2002 Waterford Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by ElJamoquio
Do you have that right - 5 tubular flats to every clincher flat?
As to the statement "your casing or sidewall will never be more supple when new" is incorrect. The sidewall or casing of my Vittoria are made of cotton and as such remain supple with age and as long as the latex is re-applied periodically it remains fairly durable to abrasion.
The superiority of sew-ups in cornering has to do with the ability of the casing to conform to the road surface so ultra sticky rubber is not needed. When you buy new tires feel the softness using your fingernail. A properly aged tire will be somewhat harder. I believe that the older rubber picks up fewer debris items and so they do get driven into and through the casing. However, I have not performed any labortatory controlled studies and thus cannot cite or reference any articles. When I was new to tubulars I got many flats as I could not afford to keep the inventory needed for aging. Just my own experience. Gerry
#37
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by GeraldChan
As to the statement "your casing or sidewall will never be more supple <than> when new" is incorrect. The sidewall or casing of my Vittoria are made of cotton and as such remain supple with age and as long as the latex is re-applied periodically it remains fairly durable to abrasion.
#38
road curmudgeon, FG rider
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 677
Bikes: 1973 Nishiki Professional, 1990 Serotta Colorado II, 2002 Waterford Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
Now you're stating that you can delay the effects of aging - that's a big difference from saying aging makes it better. BTW, nothing in this first statement is unique to tubulars so you must also believe that aging cotton clinchers is a good idea (it's not).
There IS a reason why this practice has been done for the past 30+ years.
Gerry
#39
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by GeraldChan
Aging tubulars is a good idea and the slight loss of stick is made up for by the lower tendency to pick up debris and thus flat.
There IS a reason why this practice has been done for the past 30+ years.
Gerry
There IS a reason why this practice has been done for the past 30+ years.
Gerry
Aging does make the rubber harder, softer rubber will get more tread cuts, tread cuts are not exactly the same as flats, and harder rubber is not the reason usually cited for aging.
I note again that your logic seems to apply equally to clinchers, yet you're only endorsing aged tubulars... how come?
I'm not here to argue, I'm here to educate.
#40
road curmudgeon, FG rider
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 677
Bikes: 1973 Nishiki Professional, 1990 Serotta Colorado II, 2002 Waterford Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
There sure is, but it has no basis in fact.
Aging does make the rubber harder, softer rubber will get more tread cuts, tread cuts are not exactly the same as flats, and harder rubber is not the reason usually cited for aging.
I note again that your logic seems to apply equally to clinchers, yet you're only endorsing aged tubulars... how come?
.
Aging does make the rubber harder, softer rubber will get more tread cuts, tread cuts are not exactly the same as flats, and harder rubber is not the reason usually cited for aging.
I note again that your logic seems to apply equally to clinchers, yet you're only endorsing aged tubulars... how come?
.
Do you have any evidence that the time honored practice of aging tubulars is without merit? I have only my own experience to show that it does reduce punctures and I have used tubulars for over 30 years.
Gerry
#41
Permanent Refugee .......
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Okanagan Valley, BC.
Posts: 1,256
Bikes: Steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dgasmd
I have never done this, but a LBS told me that I could pre-glue the spare and let the glue dry. The fold it and stowe it away. When I get a flat I change tires and the glue on the rim from my previous tire and the glue from the new tire will act as contact cement and be more than plenty. Anyone do this********************???
My spare is always glued.
#42
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by GeraldChan
Do you have any direct experience using tubulars? I don't age clinchers b/c since it is so easy to repair a flat and b/c clinchers are so much cheaper than tubulars I don't advocate aging them. I use clinchers as my bad weather or bad condition tires. I don't use cotton clinchers as their prices are approaching a good tubular and while their rolling resistance may be equiv clinchers don't corner nearly as well.
Do you have any evidence that the time honored practice of aging tubulars is without merit? I have only my own experience to show that it does reduce punctures and I have used tubulars for over 30 years.
Gerry
Do you have any evidence that the time honored practice of aging tubulars is without merit? I have only my own experience to show that it does reduce punctures and I have used tubulars for over 30 years.
Gerry
So if that's enough of a credential, let me ask you to really evaluate what you are contending. Forget the tubular vs clincher debate (cornering, pinch flats, rolling resistance, rim weight, etc) and stick to the subtopic we've created here about aging. It appears your only claim is that aging reduces punctures because the rubber gets harder and therefore sharp debris is less likely to get embedded in the tire; please correct me if I've misrepresented your point.
I'm sure you've seen tires where the rubber is so old that it is cracking and flaking off the casing (I've seen this in unused tires 3-4 years old). Do you believe that the tires keep getting better and better until this final condition where they are completely unusable?
Most proponents of aging do not make the "tough rubber" claim - instead they believe that somehow the casing becomes more supple with age and that the tire deforms around rocks and potholes more easily and with less damage. I could disprove that notion as well but it doesn't seem necessary.
Some Googling or Forum searching will bring up a zillion of debates like this - some quite a bit less cordial than ours; some even include my screen name. When you read through them though, note which side has the anecdotal experience posts and which side has the engineers and scientists.
R.
Scott
#43
Large Member
the tires you get in the LBS are all pre-aged anyway from sitting around in warehouses, ships, etc. you don't think they made them yesterday just for you?
aging is a myth, just like the existence of gods. but some people love to believe in unprovable and unwarranted things, for many unrealistic reasons, or perhaps just because they were told so by someone when they were a kid.
and if lance armstrong does/did age his tires, it just proves he's just as susceptible to the same hype. i bet he didn't know when the mechanics on his team gave him fresh tires instead because they couldn't be arsed changing their methods just for him.
aging is a myth, just like the existence of gods. but some people love to believe in unprovable and unwarranted things, for many unrealistic reasons, or perhaps just because they were told so by someone when they were a kid.
and if lance armstrong does/did age his tires, it just proves he's just as susceptible to the same hype. i bet he didn't know when the mechanics on his team gave him fresh tires instead because they couldn't be arsed changing their methods just for him.
#44
road curmudgeon, FG rider
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 677
Bikes: 1973 Nishiki Professional, 1990 Serotta Colorado II, 2002 Waterford Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
R. Scott: So what we have is 2 riders with different results from aging tubulars. I do not see where the rubber or cotton will deteriorate much over time if it is kept in a cool, dry environment free from proximity to electric motors. The cracking of the rubber you speak of is most likely due either from UV or ozone damage. I have had 10 year old Vittoria Corsa CX/CG which look brand new with no cracking. I also store my race rubber (Track slicks for my race car) in my basement in black garbage bags with most of the air pulled out using a vacuum cleaner.
I don't see any way to resolve this difference of opinion short of conducting an experiment usuing many riders of the same weight over the same course and using the same bikes. I just don't have the time or $$ to do this, so we might have to agree to disagree.
Gerry
PS It has been easy to age my sew-up stash as I buy 4-5 at a time when someone has a blow out sale on the high-end ones (Vittorias Corsa, Veloflex Criterium or Conti Comps). My biggest cache was from a former Cat-4 racer who was getting out of racing and thus also wanted out of tubulars. Since they rarely flatted for me the unused tires aged a good few years. The latex tubes always held air the the rubber was never cracked.
I don't see any way to resolve this difference of opinion short of conducting an experiment usuing many riders of the same weight over the same course and using the same bikes. I just don't have the time or $$ to do this, so we might have to agree to disagree.
Gerry
PS It has been easy to age my sew-up stash as I buy 4-5 at a time when someone has a blow out sale on the high-end ones (Vittorias Corsa, Veloflex Criterium or Conti Comps). My biggest cache was from a former Cat-4 racer who was getting out of racing and thus also wanted out of tubulars. Since they rarely flatted for me the unused tires aged a good few years. The latex tubes always held air the the rubber was never cracked.
#45
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by GeraldChan
I have had 10 year old Vittoria Corsa CX/CG which look brand new with no cracking. I also store my race rubber (Track slicks for my race car) in my basement in black garbage bags with most of the air pulled out using a vacuum cleaner.
What do you really think is happening to your rubber inside a cold, dark, oxygen-depleted garbage bag? What chemical or biological process do you think occurs to make rubber stored in such conditions more cut-resistant?
I propose that your perceived results are a psychological trick your brain is playing on itself. It's possible that your perception of your flat frequency is being skewed by your beliefs about aging tires, and it's possible that you actually do get fewer flats because you believe you will get fewer flats and somehow behave differently while riding.
#46
road curmudgeon, FG rider
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 677
Bikes: 1973 Nishiki Professional, 1990 Serotta Colorado II, 2002 Waterford Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's my understanding that the vulcanization process continues in the rubber tread even in a cool dark, ozone depleted environment. Once the vulcanization process is complete then the tread is less cut prone. Aging:
Gerry
Gerry
#47
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by GeraldChan
It's my understanding that the vulcanization process continues in the rubber tread even in a cool dark, ozone depleted environment. Once the vulcanization process is complete then the tread is less cut prone. Aging:
Gerry
Gerry
#48
Señor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
I have no idea what affect aging has on the stickiness of the tire, but I have noticed that my tubulars tend to have road debris stick to them more than my clinchers do. When debris clings to the tires, it gets run over more times, increasing the chances that it will get pushed into the tire and cause a puncture.
That said, I put about twice as many miles on tubulars as clinchers last year, got zero flats on tubulars, and about 12 on clinchers (not counting my bad luck with goathead thorns on vacation out west, it was only 5 flats). I find using tubulars is worth it for me.
That said, I put about twice as many miles on tubulars as clinchers last year, got zero flats on tubulars, and about 12 on clinchers (not counting my bad luck with goathead thorns on vacation out west, it was only 5 flats). I find using tubulars is worth it for me.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#49
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4338 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by USAZorro
I have no idea what affect aging has on the stickiness of the tire, but I have noticed that my tubulars tend to have road debris stick to them more than my clinchers do. When debris clings to the tires, it gets run over more times, increasing the chances that it will get pushed into the tire and cause a puncture.
That said, I put about twice as many miles on tubulars as clinchers last year, got zero flats on tubulars, and about 12 on clinchers (not counting my bad luck with goathead thorns on vacation out west, it was only 5 flats). I find using tubulars is worth it for me.
That said, I put about twice as many miles on tubulars as clinchers last year, got zero flats on tubulars, and about 12 on clinchers (not counting my bad luck with goathead thorns on vacation out west, it was only 5 flats). I find using tubulars is worth it for me.
So your first paragraph is completely contradictory: the chance of flats is higher with tubulars, yet you get fewer with them. Do you ride your clinchers in the rain and your tubulars mostly in the dry? Gerald says his rain wheels are clinchers; mine are too. Wet tires are much more likely to get flats from glass shards and metallic bits because the water acts as a lubricant. So you're more likely to get flats on whatever tires you use in the wet weather; tub or clinch.
#50
road curmudgeon, FG rider
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 677
Bikes: 1973 Nishiki Professional, 1990 Serotta Colorado II, 2002 Waterford Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Actually vulcanization is activated by both heat and chemically, sulfur, if my memory seves me. So the process can continue in the absence of heat. But it has been 32 years since my freshman chemistry class at CAL.
Gerry
Gerry