Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    steezin' CR1Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cr1 Team 06' Vs. Tarmac Expert 06'

    ive got my bike search down to these two. i have ridden both and like the scott a little more as of right now. both bikes are brand new from the last model year. the cr1 has all shimano 105 comp. vs. the tarmac with full ultegra. i will not be using the bike for racing the componentry does not bug me. i love the feel of the cr1 frame. i was hoping i could get some more insight from you all instead of some salesman. thanks

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lake Stevens, WA
    Posts
    1,166
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the '06 Tarmac Expert and couldn't be more pleased with it. I suspect the Scott *might* be a little bit lighter weight (I hear their frames are, at least), but every time I ride my Tarmac I do so with a silly grin on my face. It's simply too much fun to be legal. It's incredibly comfy over rough pavement, uber-stiff on steep climbs and sprints, and awfully stable on high-speed descents. My top speed on it is only 45mph, but I suspect it'd still inspire tons of confidence when I ever break the 50mph barrier on a descent.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA
    Posts
    71
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Anyone know the weight for the Tarmac?

  4. #4
    Senior Member garysol1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Avon , Ohio
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    with a name like CR1Ryan I think you have already made up your mind.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a tarmac and dig it a lot. Granted it's my first carbon frame, but it is a lot smoother than my aluminum Trek. Whoever saus Carbon is not smoother has never ridden carbon is my guess....at least in VT.

    I love my Tarmac. Know nothing about the Scott except they look like Giants to me.

  6. #6
    It's not about the engine S_DOG34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palatine, IL
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Grand Prix '03, Scott CR1 Team Issue '06
    Posts
    204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a Scott CR1 Team Issue ('05) and I absolutely love it. It gives you a nice cushy ride and people go gaga over the carbon weave pattern it has. If they are the same price though it would be hard not to go with the full Ultegra. I noticed quite a difference between 105 and Ultegra.
    Come join the Great Lakes forum here.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,085
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The CR1 is a much racier frame with a steeper headtube angle and less trail.

    Honestly if your not racing and just doing recreational riding and dont need to sitffest lightest bike I would go with the tarmac.
    Cat 1 o-meter 33%

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lake Stevens, WA
    Posts
    1,166
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My 56cm Tarmac weighed in at something like 18.7 lbs at the shop, stock, with cheap shop platform pedals for test rides. After changing out the Alias saddle for a Toupe and selling off the Zertz seatpost for an alloy U.S.E. Alien post I cut out over 1/2lb alone. I plan on keeping the Ksyrium Equipe wheels for training, but want to upgrade to some Ritchey WCS Protocols at the earliest opportunity. That ought to bring the weight close to the 17lb mark. In a way though, the "extra" weight compared to a Scott or some other bike really shouldn't be much of a factor for me. If I'm stressing over a few grams on the bike but still haven't kicked the 10-15lbs flab around my midsection, my priorities are way off. Once I ditch the extra weight I'm carrying then I think I'll reward myself with some killer wheels. Until then, the weight of the bike shouldn't be an issue - getting more fit should be.

  9. #9
    Spandex Disaster velomedieval's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Hillsville
    My Bikes
    Scott Contessa CR1 (2006); Kona Dew Deluxe (2005); Roadmaster Little 500 SS (1997); Peugeot UO10 (1980)
    Posts
    554
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the the WSD version of the '06 CR1. I must say, I can't stay away from it. Since I got this bike, my addiction to riding has grown exponentially. The fit, the stiffness, the responsiveness, the lightness of the bike all make for an exceptional ride. I don't have any experience with the Tarmac, but I love my Scott in an almost improper way.

  10. #10
    steezin' CR1Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the tarmac costs 2300, and the cr1 team is 1799. so that may be the deciding factor. i rode both and am used to an older bike with downtube shifters so even the shimano 105 seems great to me.

  11. #11
    You rode how far??? GamecockTaco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    My Bikes
    '96 Trek 830; 06 Cervelo Soloist, 06 Scott Scale 70, 2013 Cervelo S2
    Posts
    575
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    heck, at $500 difference, you could probably get the shop to switch the 105 for ultegra and have the best of both worlds.

    Otherwise, if it were my money I'd go the 105 route and be very happy.

    (of course, I may be biased as I'm riding a Speedster S20 with 105 and enjoy every minute on it).

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Lake Stevens, WA
    Posts
    1,166
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't believe I'm saying this, but...

    That Scott looks like a great deal for $1800. Truth is, you could actually spend the $500 you saved on several upgrades and drop a very noticeable amount of weight from the bike without even blinking. Upgrade some of the Ritchey Comp parts (bar and seatpost) to Pro or WCS and you've just dropped probably a combined 1/4lb between the two parts. Upgrade the wheels to even the Ksyrium Equippes or Elites (or Ritchey Pro/WCS) and drop probably another 1.5lb. You probably couldn't save a terribly noteworthy amount of weight by switching to Ultegra, but with just those upgrades I listed above, you'd easily be in the 16lb bracket. Possibly even lighter.

    Makes me wish there was a Scott dealer near me last year when I was looking at my Tarmac!

  13. #13
    Senior Member pogoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    My Bikes
    Specialized Carbon Fiber w/Dura Ace
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Scott CR1

  14. #14
    Senior Member pogoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    My Bikes
    Specialized Carbon Fiber w/Dura Ace
    Posts
    246
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  15. #15
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was looking very hard at a Tarmac when I came upon the CR1 I actually bought.
    Price and equipment not withstanding (it was a draw when I was shopping) The CR1 came out on top. A bit lighter, plenty stiff, and with the right tire pressure it's very comfy. Lastly, the bike is remarkable for it's high speed stability while still handling well, so don't let those racy frame angles misguide you.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  16. #16
    I ride a plastic bike!
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    My Bikes
    Wilier Zero 7, Scott CR1 Team Issue, Santa Cruz Bronson
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have the `06 Scott CR1 Team Issue. I've been very happy. I'm sure you can't go wrong with either so the $500 in savings would be a deciding factor for me. As someone else said, upgrades, upgrades, upgrades.

  17. #17
    steezin' CR1Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I BOUGHT THE CR1 TODAY!!! and it does have ksyrium equippes that the 07' models unfortanately do not have, so im exstatic. i unfortunately will not be making any upgrades to this bike because every cent that comes to my pocket goes straight to my mountain bike, which i race. but im sure i will be happy with this beast. thanks for all of your help.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •