What road bike do you have?
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,468
Bikes: 2011 Cervelo S2, 2001Trek USPS 5200, 06 Cervelo P3 Alum, 1999 Schwinn Pro Stock BMX, 1987 Schwinn Traveler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,334
Bikes: Road - Lynskey. Mountain - Trek Fuel EX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 6,404
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
WV is not flat..
Not my first or only road bike, but I just picked this up for a great price. It is a 2004 Trek 1500 56cm. It has been sitting on a trainer since it was new and only has 60 miles on the computer. This thing is practically brand new. I didn't really need it, but couldn't turn it down. I found it kind of curious that Trek mismatched the components. 105 shifters, Tiagra front derailleur, and an Ultegra rear derailleur. The spec sheet even said that was stock. Pretty nice ride..
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,468
Bikes: 2011 Cervelo S2, 2001Trek USPS 5200, 06 Cervelo P3 Alum, 1999 Schwinn Pro Stock BMX, 1987 Schwinn Traveler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's FSA, he will find out sooner or later when it falls off of his bike. FSA cranks are usually pretty good about doing that. You should really have a S-Works crank on there however. A S-Works bike w/o an S-Works crank should be illegal.
Senior Member
Senior Member
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Paducah KY
Posts: 754
Bikes: 2013 Tarmac Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i have a 2011 trek 2.1, i think it has an FSA crank, ive considered puting a 105 crank on it because all the other components are 105. that would be an upgrade wouldnt it? sorry for my ignorance on the subject, im a newb and havent messed with switching stuff around. (also sorry for being off topic)
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,468
Bikes: 2011 Cervelo S2, 2001Trek USPS 5200, 06 Cervelo P3 Alum, 1999 Schwinn Pro Stock BMX, 1987 Schwinn Traveler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i have a 2011 trek 2.1, i think it has an FSA crank, ive considered puting a 105 crank on it because all the other components are 105. that would be an upgrade wouldnt it? sorry for my ignorance on the subject, im a newb and havent messed with switching stuff around. (also sorry for being off topic)
It would be an upgrade only for the frustration it will save you when it fails. My friend has a Bianchi 928 with full 105, and it had a FSA crank. two weeks ago the pedal fell off. Crank threads were shot. He bought a 105 crank, and I installed it for him. He is very happy with it. It looks a lot better too. Normally I don't advise in buying Shimano stuff, but in this case it would be a cost effective upgrade. Just don't buy a current model Ultegra or Dura Ace crank. Those things look horrid, I don't care how stiff they are.
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It would be an upgrade only for the frustration it will save you when it fails. My friend has a Bianchi 928 with full 105, and it had a FSA crank. two weeks ago the pedal fell off. Crank threads were shot. He bought a 105 crank, and I installed it for him. He is very happy with it. It looks a lot better too. Normally I don't advise in buying Shimano stuff, but in this case it would be a cost effective upgrade. Just don't buy a current model Ultegra or Dura Ace crank. Those things look horrid, I don't care how stiff they are.
I have one on my P2 and can't wait to swap it out with a Force or Red crank. They look like someone just threw a dead octopus on your bike (aka like they do at hockey games). Just got to be patient to catch a great deal in the used market.
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Paducah KY
Posts: 754
Bikes: 2013 Tarmac Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It would be an upgrade only for the frustration it will save you when it fails. My friend has a Bianchi 928 with full 105, and it had a FSA crank. two weeks ago the pedal fell off. Crank threads were shot. He bought a 105 crank, and I installed it for him. He is very happy with it. It looks a lot better too. Normally I don't advise in buying Shimano stuff, but in this case it would be a cost effective upgrade. Just don't buy a current model Ultegra or Dura Ace crank. Those things look horrid, I don't care how stiff they are.
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,468
Bikes: 2011 Cervelo S2, 2001Trek USPS 5200, 06 Cervelo P3 Alum, 1999 Schwinn Pro Stock BMX, 1987 Schwinn Traveler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Finally someone gets it. You are alright in my book. I really like the dead octopus analogy as well. I am going to use that in the future.
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not my first or only road bike, but I just picked this up for a great price. It is a 2004 Trek 1500 56cm. It has been sitting on a trainer since it was new and only has 60 miles on the computer. This thing is practically brand new. I didn't really need it, but couldn't turn it down. I found it kind of curious that Trek mismatched the components. 105 shifters, Tiagra front derailleur, and an Ultegra rear derailleur. The spec sheet even said that was stock. Pretty nice ride..
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
i have a 2011 trek 2.1, i think it has an FSA crank, ive considered puting a 105 crank on it because all the other components are 105. that would be an upgrade wouldnt it? sorry for my ignorance on the subject, im a newb and havent messed with switching stuff around. (also sorry for being off topic)
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
A lot of Treks lately. Let me post new pictures of my '89 660:
It's been my fixed gear rain bike for a few years. The powder coating was getting pretty ragged so I decided to strip it and repaint it. But after I got it stripped I liked the look of the bare metal so much I decided to just wax it with some automotive wax and build it up. I'll probably eventually paint it -- the wax probably won't protect the steel very well during the rainy season, but for now, I really like the industrial look.
It's been my fixed gear rain bike for a few years. The powder coating was getting pretty ragged so I decided to strip it and repaint it. But after I got it stripped I liked the look of the bare metal so much I decided to just wax it with some automotive wax and build it up. I'll probably eventually paint it -- the wax probably won't protect the steel very well during the rainy season, but for now, I really like the industrial look.
Luddite
(Still working my way through a couple weeks' worth of ungazed-at bikeporn here ) VERY NICE. I'm a hidebound traditionalist at heart, and I love the classic looks. The silver and neon green combo is striking. Curious how much the full-up bike weighs.
Concur 110% and then some. Shimano used to design solid stuff that was pretty. Those new Ultegra cranks look like they were machined out of manhole covers or pie plates or something. Ugh.
Concur 110% and then some. Shimano used to design solid stuff that was pretty. Those new Ultegra cranks look like they were machined out of manhole covers or pie plates or something. Ugh.