high cadence
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
high cadence
This is a novice question I'm sure, but what should I do if I find myself "bouncing" on my saddle at high cadence? Thanks!
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Practice practice practice.
A huge visualization technique that I use with a higher cadence is to think of bringing your knees up to your handlebars with each pedal stroke. This lets you use your abs to stabilize.
A huge visualization technique that I use with a higher cadence is to think of bringing your knees up to your handlebars with each pedal stroke. This lets you use your abs to stabilize.
#4
Enjoy
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle metro
Posts: 6,165
Bikes: Trek 5200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Work on your stroke. You should be able to pedal smoothly in the lower gears at a high cadence.
If you are bouncing, practice pedaling smoothly with just one leg so you can get the feel of the correct ankle position as you spin
If you are bouncing, practice pedaling smoothly with just one leg so you can get the feel of the correct ankle position as you spin
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 205
Bikes: Trek 2300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bouncing is bad. Try smoothly "pulling" up at the top of your stroke with your thighs instead of ramrodding down.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
does anyone know where I can find a more detailed training guide on my stroke? ie. pros and cons and what to pay attention to?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For the love of all that is holy, please, determine what your "natural" cadence is instead of trying to push 110rpm. Anyone who has told you that a higher cadence will make you better, faster, etc. is almost certainly misinformed.
Almost everyone will fall into the 85-95rpm range. You're robbing yourself of power trying to pull off the high cadence.
Almost everyone will fall into the 85-95rpm range. You're robbing yourself of power trying to pull off the high cadence.
#9
Keep on climbing
Originally Posted by eysnala
does anyone know where I can find a more detailed training guide on my stroke? ie. pros and cons and what to pay attention to?
Or you can just do one-leg pedal drills. Take one foot off the pedals and just ride.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride 100-110 all the time and enjoy it. you really just need to find what is right to you. I am not very strong so I need to have that fast of a cadence to ride fast.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Peg
Posts: 663
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Duke of Kent
For the love of all that is holy, please, determine what your "natural" cadence is instead of trying to push 110rpm. Anyone who has told you that a higher cadence will make you better, faster, etc. is almost certainly misinformed.
Almost everyone will fall into the 85-95rpm range. You're robbing yourself of power trying to pull off the high cadence.
Almost everyone will fall into the 85-95rpm range. You're robbing yourself of power trying to pull off the high cadence.
#12
Bike Dork
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Duke of Kent
For the love of all that is holy, please, determine what your "natural" cadence is instead of trying to push 110rpm. Anyone who has told you that a higher cadence will make you better, faster, etc. is almost certainly misinformed.
Almost everyone will fall into the 85-95rpm range. You're robbing yourself of power trying to pull off the high cadence.
Almost everyone will fall into the 85-95rpm range. You're robbing yourself of power trying to pull off the high cadence.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't have the links on hand, but studies have shown that high of a cadence to be inefficient and that lower cadences provide more power. Lance Armstrong being an exception (not everyone gets a chance to rebuild their body post-cancer), damn near every professional cyclist will spin 90-95rpm. Why? Because it's not wasting any movement and produces the most power. Unless you have a rather inhuman aerobic system upon which to place the load of pushing 110rpm, you'll be better off at the "normal" range.
#14
Bike Dork
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ask because on my ride today, I was spinning at 100-110 for a large portion when on the flats, and while I don't have a very smooth stroke yet (I'm a relative newbie), it felt pretty good.
This was my first ride with a computer, so I was interested to see what different cadences felt like.
This was my first ride with a computer, so I was interested to see what different cadences felt like.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay Gloab
I ask because on my ride today, I was spinning at 100-110 for a large portion when on the flats, and while I don't have a very smooth stroke yet (I'm a relative newbie), it felt pretty good.
This was my first ride with a computer, so I was interested to see what different cadences felt like.
This was my first ride with a computer, so I was interested to see what different cadences felt like.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Duke of Kent
For the love of all that is holy, please, determine what your "natural" cadence is instead of trying to push 110rpm. Anyone who has told you that a higher cadence will make you better, faster, etc. is almost certainly misinformed.
Almost everyone will fall into the 85-95rpm range. You're robbing yourself of power trying to pull off the high cadence.
Almost everyone will fall into the 85-95rpm range. You're robbing yourself of power trying to pull off the high cadence.
#17
Dude wheres my guads?
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guess
Posts: 2,680
Bikes: Not enough
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
around 110-120ish is sorta your body's resonant frequency (read it some place got no equations to back it up) so it might seem like you are bouncing more than what you might otherwise.. try either pushing higher or backing down..
#18
Behind EVERYone!!!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Burlington ON, Canada
Posts: 6,020
Bikes: 2010 Specialized Tricross Comp 105 Double
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 96 Times
in
29 Posts
I just got my first computer with cadence, and while I always thought spinning at a high cadence just wasn't for me, actually seeing it made me sure. I seem to feel best around 80-90rpm...not that I am any sort of an expert or strong rider. High cadence being touted as the best thing in cycling since sliced bread always bothered me. If LA had finished 2nd in the TdF behind Ullrich all of those years we would have a bunch of big gear mashers saying that IT was the only way to ride .
__________________
A good teacher protects his pupils from his own influence.
― Bruce Lee
A good teacher protects his pupils from his own influence.
― Bruce Lee
#19
New! With Self Loathing!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairfield, California
Posts: 1,618
Bikes: 2013 Jamis Xenith T time trial bike, 2013 Jamis Xenith Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
buy rollers.
Yes.
#20
base training heretic
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 716
Bikes: Cervelo P3C, many Litespeeds
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/en...ubmed_RVDocSum
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jun;39(6):991-5.
Effect of pedaling technique on mechanical effectiveness and efficiency in cyclists.
Korff T, Romer LM, Mayhew I, Martin JC.
Brunel University, Centre for Sports Medicine and Human Performance, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK. thomas.korff@brunel.ac.uk
PURPOSE: To optimize endurance cycling performance, it is important to maximize efficiency. Power-measuring cranks and force-sensing pedals can be used to determine the mechanical effectiveness of cycling. From both a coaching and basic science perspective, it is of interest if a mechanically effective pedaling technique leads to greater efficiency. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different pedaling techniques on mechanical effectiveness and gross efficiency during steady-state cycling. METHODS: Eight male cyclists exercised on a cycle ergometer at 90 rpm and 200 W using four different pedaling techniques: preferred pedaling; pedaling in circles; emphasizing the pull during the upstroke; and emphasizing the push during the downstroke. Each exercise bout lasted 6 min and was interspersed with 6 min of passive rest. We obtained mechanical effectiveness and gross efficiency using pedal-reaction forces and respiratory measures, respectively. RESULTS: When the participants were instructed to pull on the pedal during the upstroke, mechanical effectiveness was greater (index of force effectiveness=62.4+/-9.8%) and gross efficiency was lower (gross efficiency=19.0+/-0.7%) compared with the other pedaling conditions (index of force effectiveness=48.2+/-5.1% and gross efficiency=20.2+/-0.6%; means and standard deviations collapsed across preferred, circling, and pushing conditions). Mechanical effectiveness and gross efficiency during the circling and pushing conditions did not differ significantly from the preferred pedaling condition. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical effectiveness is not indicative of gross efficiency across pedaling techniques. These results thereby provide coaches and athletes with useful information for interpreting measures of mechanical effectiveness.
Effect of pedaling technique on mechanical effectiveness and efficiency in cyclists.
Korff T, Romer LM, Mayhew I, Martin JC.
Brunel University, Centre for Sports Medicine and Human Performance, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK. thomas.korff@brunel.ac.uk
PURPOSE: To optimize endurance cycling performance, it is important to maximize efficiency. Power-measuring cranks and force-sensing pedals can be used to determine the mechanical effectiveness of cycling. From both a coaching and basic science perspective, it is of interest if a mechanically effective pedaling technique leads to greater efficiency. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different pedaling techniques on mechanical effectiveness and gross efficiency during steady-state cycling. METHODS: Eight male cyclists exercised on a cycle ergometer at 90 rpm and 200 W using four different pedaling techniques: preferred pedaling; pedaling in circles; emphasizing the pull during the upstroke; and emphasizing the push during the downstroke. Each exercise bout lasted 6 min and was interspersed with 6 min of passive rest. We obtained mechanical effectiveness and gross efficiency using pedal-reaction forces and respiratory measures, respectively. RESULTS: When the participants were instructed to pull on the pedal during the upstroke, mechanical effectiveness was greater (index of force effectiveness=62.4+/-9.8%) and gross efficiency was lower (gross efficiency=19.0+/-0.7%) compared with the other pedaling conditions (index of force effectiveness=48.2+/-5.1% and gross efficiency=20.2+/-0.6%; means and standard deviations collapsed across preferred, circling, and pushing conditions). Mechanical effectiveness and gross efficiency during the circling and pushing conditions did not differ significantly from the preferred pedaling condition. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical effectiveness is not indicative of gross efficiency across pedaling techniques. These results thereby provide coaches and athletes with useful information for interpreting measures of mechanical effectiveness.