Double to Compact Double?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Double to Compact Double?
I've seen lots of threads on converting from a triple to compact double, and even vice-versa, but I couldn't find anything on the best way to convert a regular double to a compact double. One bike I'm looking at getting comes stock in a double (53/39 and 11/23), but that's too tall for me and my terrain. What's the best way to get some lower gears in?
My first thought was to change the rear cassette to a 13/29, but then I have to change the rear derailleur (looking at Campy components). The other way is the change the crankset, and then change the front derailleur. If I did the latter, I suppose I could just change to a triple - right?
Is one method preferable to the other, and if so why?
My first thought was to change the rear cassette to a 13/29, but then I have to change the rear derailleur (looking at Campy components). The other way is the change the crankset, and then change the front derailleur. If I did the latter, I suppose I could just change to a triple - right?
Is one method preferable to the other, and if so why?
#2
Two wheels, two skis...
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dudley, MA
Posts: 647
Bikes: Tarmac SL4, Lemond Victoire, Titus Motolite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To go from classic double to compact double -> new crankset, possibly remove a few chain links, adjust FD.
To go from classic double to triple -> new crankset, new FD, new F brifter, readjust everything.
I'd just try a 12-27 first and see how you like it. That's what I ride with a 53/39 on the hills around here, and I'm not a very good rider, and it suits me just fine.
To go from classic double to triple -> new crankset, new FD, new F brifter, readjust everything.
I'd just try a 12-27 first and see how you like it. That's what I ride with a 53/39 on the hills around here, and I'm not a very good rider, and it suits me just fine.
#3
Curmudgeon
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nausea, New Hamster
Posts: 1,572
Bikes: (see https://wildavis.smugmug.com/Bikes) Bianchi Veloce (2005), Nishiki Cascade (1992), Schwinn Super Sport (1983)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
My Bianchi Veloce came with a Campagnolo Veloce 52/42/30 Triple, on a 111mm spindle and a 13-26 cassette. I've since tried 53/39 and 50/34 crank sets using the same spindle. I changed the FD to compact, although the conventional double FD worked OK, and the triple FD might have worked also. I also changed the RD to a short-cage as I wanted to used all the triple h/w for another project, but the long-cage RD worked perfectly OK with both doubles and the triple. The Campy Veloce front brifter works OK with doubles or triples as there aren't specific positions for the shifter, just a series of clicks, so its behaviour is more like that of a friction shifter.
- Wil
- Wil
#4
Rick Schulze
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 197
Bikes: Colnago LDV, Rolf TdF38s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I shifted my Colnago double to a compact double. Same BB, same Front Drllr (needed to tweak the adjustment), Had to put a very thin spacer (think drivers license thin) behind the front drllr where it bolted onto the frame. Swapped cranks, kept rear cassette 11-23. This worked pretty good.
I kept the spacer in (the frame didn't like doubles) and swapped record road to record compact front drllr, rode it ever since. Love it
I kept the spacer in (the frame didn't like doubles) and swapped record road to record compact front drllr, rode it ever since. Love it
#5
Direct Hit Not Required
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 6,193
Bikes: Leopard DC1, Ridley X-Fire, GT Zaskar 9r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You may need to lengthen the chain, but if it's a new bike, the chain is likely too long anyway.
I haven't seen many shops that take the time to make sure a chain is the correct length on a newly built bike.
*see correction in post #7
Last edited by BlastRadius; 07-24-07 at 12:25 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I do wonder who the target market for the non-compact double bikes is - maybe people who are weight weanies without steep hills? Is that a large target market?
Last edited by Smorgasbord42; 07-24-07 at 04:38 PM.
#7
Direct Hit Not Required
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 6,193
Bikes: Leopard DC1, Ridley X-Fire, GT Zaskar 9r
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I do wonder who the target market for the non-compact double bikes is - maybe people who are weight weanies without steep hills? Is that a large target market?
Originally Posted by https://www.campagnolo.com/qea_search.php?gid=all&cid=1&pid=52&key=comp&rev=1
On a "double" drivetrain, can I use the standard (short cage) 10s Record (or 10s Chorus) rear derailleur with the 13-29 cassette?
No, because the cage is too short to function properly when the chain is crossed. It is necessary to use the dedicated medium cage rear derailleur.
No, because the cage is too short to function properly when the chain is crossed. It is necessary to use the dedicated medium cage rear derailleur.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Jose, ca.
Posts: 1,326
Bikes: 2006 Orbea Volata, 84 Trek 760, 83 Trek 720,
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've seen lots of threads on converting from a triple to compact double, and even vice-versa, but I couldn't find anything on the best way to convert a regular double to a compact double. One bike I'm looking at getting comes stock in a double (53/39 and 11/23), but that's too tall for me and my terrain. What's the best way to get some lower gears in?
My first thought was to change the rear cassette to a 13/29, but then I have to change the rear derailleur (looking at Campy components). The other way is the change the crankset, and then change the front derailleur. If I did the latter, I suppose I could just change to a triple - right?
Is one method preferable to the other, and if so why?
My first thought was to change the rear cassette to a 13/29, but then I have to change the rear derailleur (looking at Campy components). The other way is the change the crankset, and then change the front derailleur. If I did the latter, I suppose I could just change to a triple - right?
Is one method preferable to the other, and if so why?
__________________
They call me "Mr. Mixte"
They call me "Mr. Mixte"