Difference btw Assos FI Uno and the FI.13 S2 Bibs?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Okanagan Valley, BC CANADA
Posts: 1,049
Bikes: Trek 7300FX, Lemond Sarthe
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Difference btw Assos FI Uno and the FI.13 S2 Bibs?
I'm planning to get a pair of Assos bibs and am looking at the FI UNO bibs. How do they compair to the FI.13 S2 or FI Mile bibs? I've got a pair of FI Mile 1/2 shorts with the EI chamois. From the description of the FI UNO, it sounds like the chamois is different, maybe thinner? Does anyone have a pair of these?
#2
Baby it's cold outside...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 7,310
Bikes: Trek 5000, Rocky Mountain Wedge, GT Karakoram K2, Litespeed Tuscany
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have all 3 bibs...
If you have the F1 Mille, go for the F1.3 S2. I find them slightly more comfortable for the long haul over the Mille's. The Mille's are suppose to be the long distance shorts, however I fit the opposite between those 2.
The Uno, I only wear if I'm MTBing or other, I find I don't like them as much as some of my other brand name shorts. The chamois isn't really thinner (that I can tell), just different.
If you have the F1 Mille, go for the F1.3 S2. I find them slightly more comfortable for the long haul over the Mille's. The Mille's are suppose to be the long distance shorts, however I fit the opposite between those 2.
The Uno, I only wear if I'm MTBing or other, I find I don't like them as much as some of my other brand name shorts. The chamois isn't really thinner (that I can tell), just different.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have the Uno bibshort and F1 Mile knicker. F1 Mile is definitely more comfortable for me.
FI.13 S2 insert is supposed to be better and improved compared to F1 Mile. Personally, I have no experience the FI.
FI.13 S2 insert is supposed to be better and improved compared to F1 Mile. Personally, I have no experience the FI.
I'm planning to get a pair of Assos bibs and am looking at the FI UNO bibs. How do they compair to the FI.13 S2 or FI Mile bibs? I've got a pair of FI Mile 1/2 shorts with the EI chamois. From the description of the FI UNO, it sounds like the chamois is different, maybe thinner? Does anyone have a pair of these?
#4
.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times
in
12 Posts
seek and ye shall find.
here's an old post, that should answer your question:
F1:13 S2 - the best of the best.
the fabric is much better..more elasticity, more power, and of course more expensive.
leg seams and also the special V shaped flat stitching which "anchors" the chamois in place at the front.
chamois is amazing, less of it, but super shaping and work in the foam.
_________________________
F1: equipes - the next best.
same as above but with the thicker Mille chamois.
_________________________
Mille: shorter leg, thicker chamois, made for the long haul
_________________________
F1: Uno - short leg, about 3 inches shorter (in Mediums) than the F1:13. Great short, but compared to the F1:13, a tad low tech.
here's an old post, that should answer your question:
F1:13 S2 - the best of the best.
the fabric is much better..more elasticity, more power, and of course more expensive.
leg seams and also the special V shaped flat stitching which "anchors" the chamois in place at the front.
chamois is amazing, less of it, but super shaping and work in the foam.
_________________________
F1: equipes - the next best.
same as above but with the thicker Mille chamois.
_________________________
Mille: shorter leg, thicker chamois, made for the long haul
_________________________
F1: Uno - short leg, about 3 inches shorter (in Mediums) than the F1:13. Great short, but compared to the F1:13, a tad low tech.