Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

why the switch?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

why the switch?

Old 11-19-07, 03:21 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
why the switch?

Man, I can't believe I want through all that registration for one silly question, but this has been bothering me. Does anyone know why road bikes switched from 27" to 700c? Anyone that works as a mechanic long enough accidentally grabs a 27 and when installation is attempted one finds that it is significantly larger than a 700c.
With all this hoopla about 29ers and bigger being better, why not the 27? Was it due to the quicker acceleration of the smaller wheel? Some kind of industry induced standard? The rest of the world snubbing the U.S. for its rejection of the metric system?
hatshepsut is offline  
Old 11-19-07, 04:01 PM
  #2  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times in 353 Posts
A 700c clincher wheel is interchangeable with a tubular wheel. Better bikes have always been built this size.

The switch to 700c clinchers in the U.S. coincided with the introduction of better lightweight bikes.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 11-19-07, 04:02 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Probably best to start with Sheldon Brown on Tire Sizes
Smorgasbord42 is offline  
Old 11-19-07, 04:04 PM
  #4  
Black La Lane
 
GeoLes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Maplewood, NJ
Posts: 317

Bikes: EPX 303 (You probably never heard of it)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
A 700c clincher wheel is interchangeable with a tubular wheel. Better bikes have always been built this size.

The switch to 700c clinchers in the U.S. coincided with the introduction of better lightweight bikes.
Now can anyone tell me why the switch from 8-track sound systems?
GeoLes is offline  
Old 11-19-07, 04:51 PM
  #5  
30 YR Wrench
 
BikeWise1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,006

Bikes: Waterford R-33, Madone 6.5, Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by GeoLes
Now can anyone tell me why the switch from 8-track sound systems?
Simple! Can't rewind 'em!!!!
BikeWise1 is offline  
Old 11-19-07, 04:58 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
27" was a British/Imperial size. 700c is a French size.

This time around the French sizing system won out. Back in the day when I started racing I was using 27" tires for clinchers and the tubular/single tires were all French (700c) sized. You generaly could use either sized wheels/tires in most frames although there is a 4 mm diameter difference. Using 700c clinchers AND 700c singles is way more convenient so I guess it won out.

Regards, Anthony

Last edited by AnthonyG; 11-19-07 at 07:43 PM.
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 11-19-07, 05:21 PM
  #7  
5
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killadelphia
Posts: 1,229

Bikes: 2007 Fuji Roubaix LTD, 2005 Bianchi Pista

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
FWIW, 29ers and 700c have the same diameter (622 mm). The only difference is that 29ers are wider. In contrast, 27" has a 630 mm diameter.
michaelmc is offline  
Old 11-19-07, 07:47 PM
  #8  
going roundy round
 
wanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 6,086
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 decreed that everything would be converted to metric by 1985. It was only after it was discovered that The New Math taught in the early 70's had failed to equip children to multiply and divide by ten that the whole idea was abandoned. You youngsters won't remember these.

wanders is offline  
Old 11-20-07, 06:43 PM
  #9  
Member
 
uMP2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth in the sunny west (of Australia...)
Posts: 28

Bikes: Masil with Chorus/Centaur

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hatshepsut
... The rest of the world snubbing the U.S. for its rejection of the metric system?
I think that would the one
uMP2k is offline  
Old 11-20-07, 07:04 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Avalanche325's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,162

Bikes: Litespeed Firenze / GT Avalanche

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
[QUOTE=wanders;5662833]The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 decreed that everything would be converted to metric by 1985. It was only after it was discovered that The New Math taught in the early 70's had failed to equip children to multiply and divide by ten that the whole idea was abandoned.[QUOTE]

Here is my theory. Young people picked up the metric system with out much trouble. The real culprit was the older people. They were not in school, so were never "forced" to learn metric. I remember my Mother griping about not understanding the metric system. Older people just also happen to be the same group that are the lawmakers. So instead of learning, they changed the law.

Also the idea of putting both measurements on everything sounds good on the surface, but it is nothing but failure built in. Why learn how far 6 kms is when 4 miles is posted right there? If we put Chinese and English on everything are you going to learn Chinese?
Avalanche325 is offline  
Old 11-20-07, 11:22 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dumb question...how is 700c prononced? and what does it mean?
bailcash09 is offline  
Old 11-20-07, 11:27 PM
  #12  
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 11,590

Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Surly Straggler

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by bailcash09
Dumb question...how is 700c prononced? and what does it mean?
A) "seven hundred see" is how I say it.

B) It was a French size. There was also a 700A, B, and D size. See the link to the sheldon brown website in the first reply for details.
cuda2k is offline  
Old 11-20-07, 11:51 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I blame the failure of the metric system in the US on the attempt to use the inferior celsius scale.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 12:42 AM
  #14  
Spit out the back
 
tinrobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Silverlake, CA
Posts: 1,116
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I blame the failure of the metric system on The Captain and Tennille

But I could be wrong.
tinrobot is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 01:20 AM
  #15  
WNG
Spin Forest! Spin!
 
WNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arrid Zone-a
Posts: 5,964

Bikes: I used to have many. And I Will again.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
I blame it on The Count on Sesame Street....stupid immigrant.
WNG is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 03:43 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by halfspeed
I blame the failure of the metric system in the US on the attempt to use the inferior celsius scale.
Yeah, heaven forbid that the temperature scale makes any sense

700c or 650c ect aren't metric sizes actualy. 700c is ISO (or metric I suppose) 622 mm BSD (bead seat diameter)

Regards, Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 03:57 AM
  #17  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
700c is ISO (or metric I suppose) 622 mm BSD (bead seat diameter)
All rim dimensions for everything from aeroplanes to wheelbarrows are set by E.T.R.T.O. ISO has nothing to do with it.

622 is a figure that is calculated and not actually measured, according to the procedures and using the specific tools described, in detail, within the E.T.R.T.O. book. I have the latest edition sitting on a shelf next to my desk. It is a mind numbing read but something I need to be very familiar with in my work.

Again, for those who haven't picked up on this the first 20 times I mentioned it, ISO has nothing to do with setting these standards.

I know there are old rims with ISO written on them and I know ISO is listed on Sheldon's site but trust me, it's E.T.R.T.O. all the way.
Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 07:59 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by AnthonyG
Yeah, heaven forbid that the temperature scale makes any sense
Perish the thought that it have a useful resolution.

Originally Posted by AnthonyG
700c or 650c ect aren't metric sizes actualy. 700c is ISO (or metric I suppose) 622 mm BSD (bead seat diameter)
Their origin =is= metric, but that's just quibbling.
halfspeed is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 09:41 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by WNG
I blame it on The Count on Sesame Street....stupid immigrant.
No, EVERYTHING is George W. Bush's fault.
DieselDan is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 11:03 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cuda2k
A) "seven hundred see" is how I say it.

B) It was a French size. There was also a 700A, B, and D size. See the link to the sheldon brown website in the first reply for details.
thanks....that makes it clear. I wanted to make sure it didn't stand for something other than "C" to differentiate from "A" and "B". I felt stupid walking into the LBS talking to them thiniking the whole time I was saying it wrong and waiting for them to correct me
bailcash09 is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 11:11 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 642 Times in 363 Posts
Originally Posted by DieselDan
No, EVERYTHING is George W. Bush's fault.
Exactly! And George W. Bush is the other George Bush's fault.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 04:33 PM
  #22  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Thanks to the mods for deleting my posts without telling me. Good job! Great forum!
 
Old 11-21-07, 05:03 PM
  #23  
World's slowest cyclist.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 1,353

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD5 and Cannondale Rush

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A real noobie question:

What's a "clincher" wheel versus a "tubular"?

Originally Posted by AnthonyG
Yeah, heaven forbid that the temperature scale makes any sense
Setting temperatures relative to the freezing and boiling points of water are just slightly less arbitrary than those used by Farenheit (0 set a the lowest temperature achiveable in the lab at that time, a mixture of ice, salt and water, and 12 set at body temperature, later sub divided by 8 to become 96, and later still adjusted to 98.6 as accuracy improved). The Celcius scale, as anyone who's traveled to Europe knows, lacks the resolution of the Farenheit scale so it's more difficult to tell if you need a sweater or jacket outside.

If we want to get technical they both suck. Kelvin and Rankin are the only two REAL temperature scales.
Chris_F is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:50 PM
  #24  
Killing Rabbits
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,697
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times in 102 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris_F
The Celcius scale, as anyone who's traveled to Europe knows, lacks the resolution of the Farenheit scale so it's more difficult to tell if you need a sweater or jacket outside.


Originally Posted by Chris_F
If we want to get technical they both suck. Kelvin and Rankin are the only two REAL temperature scales.
Hmm I wonder if Kelvin and Celsius have any similarities?
Enthalpic is offline  
Old 11-21-07, 05:53 PM
  #25  
World's slowest cyclist.
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 1,353

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD5 and Cannondale Rush

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Enthalpic




Hmm I wonder if Kelvin and Celsius have any similarities?
Well, I'd rather get stuck in 0 Celsius weather than 0 Kelvin.
Chris_F is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.