why the switch?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
why the switch?
Man, I can't believe I want through all that registration for one silly question, but this has been bothering me. Does anyone know why road bikes switched from 27" to 700c? Anyone that works as a mechanic long enough accidentally grabs a 27 and when installation is attempted one finds that it is significantly larger than a 700c.
With all this hoopla about 29ers and bigger being better, why not the 27? Was it due to the quicker acceleration of the smaller wheel? Some kind of industry induced standard? The rest of the world snubbing the U.S. for its rejection of the metric system?
With all this hoopla about 29ers and bigger being better, why not the 27? Was it due to the quicker acceleration of the smaller wheel? Some kind of industry induced standard? The rest of the world snubbing the U.S. for its rejection of the metric system?
#2
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,273
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
A 700c clincher wheel is interchangeable with a tubular wheel. Better bikes have always been built this size.
The switch to 700c clinchers in the U.S. coincided with the introduction of better lightweight bikes.
The switch to 700c clinchers in the U.S. coincided with the introduction of better lightweight bikes.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Probably best to start with Sheldon Brown on Tire Sizes
#4
Black La Lane
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Maplewood, NJ
Posts: 317
Bikes: EPX 303 (You probably never heard of it)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Now can anyone tell me why the switch from 8-track sound systems?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
27" was a British/Imperial size. 700c is a French size.
This time around the French sizing system won out. Back in the day when I started racing I was using 27" tires for clinchers and the tubular/single tires were all French (700c) sized. You generaly could use either sized wheels/tires in most frames although there is a 4 mm diameter difference. Using 700c clinchers AND 700c singles is way more convenient so I guess it won out.
Regards, Anthony
This time around the French sizing system won out. Back in the day when I started racing I was using 27" tires for clinchers and the tubular/single tires were all French (700c) sized. You generaly could use either sized wheels/tires in most frames although there is a 4 mm diameter difference. Using 700c clinchers AND 700c singles is way more convenient so I guess it won out.
Regards, Anthony
Last edited by AnthonyG; 11-19-07 at 07:43 PM.
#7
5
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Killadelphia
Posts: 1,229
Bikes: 2007 Fuji Roubaix LTD, 2005 Bianchi Pista
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
FWIW, 29ers and 700c have the same diameter (622 mm). The only difference is that 29ers are wider. In contrast, 27" has a 630 mm diameter.
#8
going roundy round
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: High Point, NC
Posts: 6,086
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 decreed that everything would be converted to metric by 1985. It was only after it was discovered that The New Math taught in the early 70's had failed to equip children to multiply and divide by ten that the whole idea was abandoned. You youngsters won't remember these.
#9
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Perth in the sunny west (of Australia...)
Posts: 28
Bikes: Masil with Chorus/Centaur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,162
Bikes: Litespeed Firenze / GT Avalanche
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
[QUOTE=wanders;5662833]The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 decreed that everything would be converted to metric by 1985. It was only after it was discovered that The New Math taught in the early 70's had failed to equip children to multiply and divide by ten that the whole idea was abandoned.[QUOTE]
Here is my theory. Young people picked up the metric system with out much trouble. The real culprit was the older people. They were not in school, so were never "forced" to learn metric. I remember my Mother griping about not understanding the metric system. Older people just also happen to be the same group that are the lawmakers. So instead of learning, they changed the law.
Also the idea of putting both measurements on everything sounds good on the surface, but it is nothing but failure built in. Why learn how far 6 kms is when 4 miles is posted right there? If we put Chinese and English on everything are you going to learn Chinese?
Here is my theory. Young people picked up the metric system with out much trouble. The real culprit was the older people. They were not in school, so were never "forced" to learn metric. I remember my Mother griping about not understanding the metric system. Older people just also happen to be the same group that are the lawmakers. So instead of learning, they changed the law.
Also the idea of putting both measurements on everything sounds good on the surface, but it is nothing but failure built in. Why learn how far 6 kms is when 4 miles is posted right there? If we put Chinese and English on everything are you going to learn Chinese?
#12
Unique Vintage Steel
A) "seven hundred see" is how I say it.
B) It was a French size. There was also a 700A, B, and D size. See the link to the sheldon brown website in the first reply for details.
B) It was a French size. There was also a 700A, B, and D size. See the link to the sheldon brown website in the first reply for details.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
700c or 650c ect aren't metric sizes actualy. 700c is ISO (or metric I suppose) 622 mm BSD (bead seat diameter)
Regards, Anthony
#17
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
All rim dimensions for everything from aeroplanes to wheelbarrows are set by E.T.R.T.O. ISO has nothing to do with it.
622 is a figure that is calculated and not actually measured, according to the procedures and using the specific tools described, in detail, within the E.T.R.T.O. book. I have the latest edition sitting on a shelf next to my desk. It is a mind numbing read but something I need to be very familiar with in my work.
Again, for those who haven't picked up on this the first 20 times I mentioned it, ISO has nothing to do with setting these standards.
I know there are old rims with ISO written on them and I know ISO is listed on Sheldon's site but trust me, it's E.T.R.T.O. all the way.
622 is a figure that is calculated and not actually measured, according to the procedures and using the specific tools described, in detail, within the E.T.R.T.O. book. I have the latest edition sitting on a shelf next to my desk. It is a mind numbing read but something I need to be very familiar with in my work.
Again, for those who haven't picked up on this the first 20 times I mentioned it, ISO has nothing to do with setting these standards.
I know there are old rims with ISO written on them and I know ISO is listed on Sheldon's site but trust me, it's E.T.R.T.O. all the way.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Perish the thought that it have a useful resolution.
Their origin =is= metric, but that's just quibbling.
Their origin =is= metric, but that's just quibbling.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks....that makes it clear. I wanted to make sure it didn't stand for something other than "C" to differentiate from "A" and "B". I felt stupid walking into the LBS talking to them thiniking the whole time I was saying it wrong and waiting for them to correct me
#23
World's slowest cyclist.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 1,353
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD5 and Cannondale Rush
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A real noobie question:
What's a "clincher" wheel versus a "tubular"?
Setting temperatures relative to the freezing and boiling points of water are just slightly less arbitrary than those used by Farenheit (0 set a the lowest temperature achiveable in the lab at that time, a mixture of ice, salt and water, and 12 set at body temperature, later sub divided by 8 to become 96, and later still adjusted to 98.6 as accuracy improved). The Celcius scale, as anyone who's traveled to Europe knows, lacks the resolution of the Farenheit scale so it's more difficult to tell if you need a sweater or jacket outside.
If we want to get technical they both suck. Kelvin and Rankin are the only two REAL temperature scales.
What's a "clincher" wheel versus a "tubular"?
Setting temperatures relative to the freezing and boiling points of water are just slightly less arbitrary than those used by Farenheit (0 set a the lowest temperature achiveable in the lab at that time, a mixture of ice, salt and water, and 12 set at body temperature, later sub divided by 8 to become 96, and later still adjusted to 98.6 as accuracy improved). The Celcius scale, as anyone who's traveled to Europe knows, lacks the resolution of the Farenheit scale so it's more difficult to tell if you need a sweater or jacket outside.
If we want to get technical they both suck. Kelvin and Rankin are the only two REAL temperature scales.
#25
World's slowest cyclist.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 1,353
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD5 and Cannondale Rush
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts