Noticible difference in bike weight
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Noticible difference in bike weight
For an average rider how much weight difference is noticeable. My current bike weighs in at 20#, and I'm looking at a 17# bike. Will I notice a significant difference?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Suppose a 180 pound cyclist switches from a 24 pound bike to a 20 pound bike. So, now he is pushing 200 pounds down the road instead of 204 pounds. A 2% difference in weight. A couple bottles of water, or one good lock.
If both bikes have wheels of equal weight and quality, and tires of equal weight and quality, the weight difference would have zero effect on effort or speed on a level road.
But, suppose you were racing for an hour up a steep mountain. That 2% would add several seconds to your race time...dump the lock or the water bottles...if you are among the five or ten guys in American who get paid to race a bike up mountains.
If both bikes have wheels of equal weight and quality, and tires of equal weight and quality, the weight difference would have zero effect on effort or speed on a level road.
But, suppose you were racing for an hour up a steep mountain. That 2% would add several seconds to your race time...dump the lock or the water bottles...if you are among the five or ten guys in American who get paid to race a bike up mountains.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It depends where the weight savings comes from. When I upgraded to a lighter wheel set, I did notice the difference in effort. Since it gets dark earlier, I do some evening rides with a light. My battery is pretty heavy ~2lbs NiH. I don't notice a difference in my effort/speed when I strap the sucker on to my frame.
#5
Senior Member
My current bike is about 5 pounds lighter than the bike I was riding a year ago. My light bike is much more fun to ride because of all the money and time I've put into it and it "feels" faster, but when it comes down to it, the results on my computer are still similar. Perhaps I am slightly faster, but not enough to notice, so for the "average" rider, whats the difference?
Rotating weight may matter more than other bike weight, but only when accelerating or decelerating. At any rate, adding or subtracting a few hundred grams from your wheels still isn't going to do much more for you than dropping an equivalent amount of non-rotating weight. Just because a person "notices" a difference in effort or whatever, that does not mean that lighter wheels make one significantly faster. There is a strong placebo effect associated with bike upgrades. The percieved difference between two wheelsets may have to do with new tires, better spoke tension, freshly lubed chain, or other factors and may actually have nothing to do with weight differences. At any rate, weight weeniism is a hobby unto its own and if you have the money to spend it can be satisfactory, but don't expect it to make you significantly faster.
Rotating weight may matter more than other bike weight, but only when accelerating or decelerating. At any rate, adding or subtracting a few hundred grams from your wheels still isn't going to do much more for you than dropping an equivalent amount of non-rotating weight. Just because a person "notices" a difference in effort or whatever, that does not mean that lighter wheels make one significantly faster. There is a strong placebo effect associated with bike upgrades. The percieved difference between two wheelsets may have to do with new tires, better spoke tension, freshly lubed chain, or other factors and may actually have nothing to do with weight differences. At any rate, weight weeniism is a hobby unto its own and if you have the money to spend it can be satisfactory, but don't expect it to make you significantly faster.
Last edited by mihlbach; 12-04-07 at 09:10 AM.
#6
Professional Fuss-Budget
In terms of performance, 3 lbs of frame weight is barely noticeable, even on hills. Wheels, you might notice.
3 lbs = 2 full water bottles. Do you notice a difference between your 20 lb bike at the start of the ride, and at the end when the bottles are empty...?
#7
slow up hills
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,931
Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My current bike is about 5 pounds lighter than the bike I was riding a year ago. My light bike is much more fun to ride because of all the money and time I've put into it and it "feels" faster, but when it comes down to it, the results on my computer are still similar. Perhaps I am slightly faster, but not enough to notice, so for the "average" rider, whats the difference?
Rotating weight may matter more than other bike weight, but only when accelerating or decelerating. At any rate, adding or subtracting a few hundred grams from your wheels still isn't going to do much more for you than dropping an equivalent amount of non-rotating weight. Just because a person "notices" a difference in effort or whatever, that does not mean that lighter wheels make one significantly faster. There is a strong placebo effect associated with bike upgrades. The percieved difference between two wheelsets may have to do with new tires, better spoke tension, freshly lubed chain, or other factors and may actually have nothing to do with weight differences. At any rate, weight weeniism is a hobby unto its own and if you have the money to spend it can be satisfactory, but don't expect it to make you significantly faster.
Rotating weight may matter more than other bike weight, but only when accelerating or decelerating. At any rate, adding or subtracting a few hundred grams from your wheels still isn't going to do much more for you than dropping an equivalent amount of non-rotating weight. Just because a person "notices" a difference in effort or whatever, that does not mean that lighter wheels make one significantly faster. There is a strong placebo effect associated with bike upgrades. The percieved difference between two wheelsets may have to do with new tires, better spoke tension, freshly lubed chain, or other factors and may actually have nothing to do with weight differences. At any rate, weight weeniism is a hobby unto its own and if you have the money to spend it can be satisfactory, but don't expect it to make you significantly faster.
#8
Senior Member
There's noticeable when picking up the bike and noticeable when riding it.
Picking up the bike - for me, it's about 10-15% weight drop makes the bike feel "a lot lighter". Going from 25 to 22 or so pounds (think a current hard tail mtb) makes the bike "wow" lighter. Or on a road bike, I went from 18 to 16 lbs. Another "wow" level of lighter weight.
When riding it, it all depends.
1 - I've blown up on hills pedaling super light bikes with super light wheels. When I blow up they feel like I'm pedaling a tricycle through wet concrete - it doesn't matter how nice or un-nice the bike is, they all feel heavy and slow. Until then a light bike (10-15% lighter, maybe 2-3 pounds) will have a minor difference in feel to me. Same difference if I eject two full bottles, say in a crit with a steep hill. Takes the edge off but if I'm blown it just buys me a couple minutes.
2 - Light wheels - when I switched wheels at a race to an aero set that weighed about 2 pounds less than my standard non-aero wheels, the bike seemed like it wanted to jump out from under me. There's a noticeable difference in how quickly the bike accelerates when I'm fresh. When I'm tired - see #1.
3 - Light bike - if the bike is lighter overall but not lighter in the wheels (current example - I put the same wheels, bag, light, bottles, and pump I had on my heavier bike onto my lighter bike), then there is virtually no difference in feel at a 10-15% weight loss. The bike feels a little better but it might be because it's stiffer newer etc, i.e. it's in my head.
4 - aero versus light on flatter terrain - if you have a more aero bike that's slightly heavier (i.e. you put on heavier aero wheels instead of your super light box section carbon climbing wheels), the bike will respond differently, but ultimately, at high speeds, the light bike will not feel (or be) as fast. Maybe it'll accelerate quicker. But since aerodynamics counts more than weight, the aero setup feels faster. When I used RevX/440/TriSpokes/original-Vento/CosmicCarbon vs lighter box section 280 gram rimmed wheels, the bikes accelerated slower but went faster at the top end.
Light and aero is where it's at
working on getting light and aero,
cdr
Picking up the bike - for me, it's about 10-15% weight drop makes the bike feel "a lot lighter". Going from 25 to 22 or so pounds (think a current hard tail mtb) makes the bike "wow" lighter. Or on a road bike, I went from 18 to 16 lbs. Another "wow" level of lighter weight.
When riding it, it all depends.
1 - I've blown up on hills pedaling super light bikes with super light wheels. When I blow up they feel like I'm pedaling a tricycle through wet concrete - it doesn't matter how nice or un-nice the bike is, they all feel heavy and slow. Until then a light bike (10-15% lighter, maybe 2-3 pounds) will have a minor difference in feel to me. Same difference if I eject two full bottles, say in a crit with a steep hill. Takes the edge off but if I'm blown it just buys me a couple minutes.
2 - Light wheels - when I switched wheels at a race to an aero set that weighed about 2 pounds less than my standard non-aero wheels, the bike seemed like it wanted to jump out from under me. There's a noticeable difference in how quickly the bike accelerates when I'm fresh. When I'm tired - see #1.
3 - Light bike - if the bike is lighter overall but not lighter in the wheels (current example - I put the same wheels, bag, light, bottles, and pump I had on my heavier bike onto my lighter bike), then there is virtually no difference in feel at a 10-15% weight loss. The bike feels a little better but it might be because it's stiffer newer etc, i.e. it's in my head.
4 - aero versus light on flatter terrain - if you have a more aero bike that's slightly heavier (i.e. you put on heavier aero wheels instead of your super light box section carbon climbing wheels), the bike will respond differently, but ultimately, at high speeds, the light bike will not feel (or be) as fast. Maybe it'll accelerate quicker. But since aerodynamics counts more than weight, the aero setup feels faster. When I used RevX/440/TriSpokes/original-Vento/CosmicCarbon vs lighter box section 280 gram rimmed wheels, the bikes accelerated slower but went faster at the top end.
Light and aero is where it's at
working on getting light and aero,
cdr
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#9
Race to train
Join Date: May 2005
Location: suffering on the back
Posts: 3,115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Slightly off-topic but has anyone of the "take less water" or "take a duce before a ride" guys ever actually ridden a light bike versus a heavy bike back to back? Have you tried to flick a 15 lb bike back and forth on a twisty downhill and then tried the same thing on a bike that is a couple pounds heavier? Hop a curb, jump a pothole/bottle?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 948
Bikes: Bianchi, Ridley, GT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Typically when you go light, the frame is more high end and is stiffer. That can be noticeable.
#11
Senior Member
1 - I've blown up on hills pedaling super light bikes with super light wheels. When I blow up they feel like I'm pedaling a tricycle through wet concrete - it doesn't matter how nice or un-nice the bike is, they all feel heavy and slow. Until then a light bike (10-15% lighter, maybe 2-3 pounds) will have a minor difference in feel to me. Same difference if I eject two full bottles, say in a crit with a steep hill. Takes the edge off but if I'm blown it just buys me a couple minutes.
#12
Senior Member
+1. High end stuff is not only lighter, but generally also better in a other ways (stiffer, more aero, etc.) When people upgrade from low/mid range stuff to high end stuff for the first time, they have a tendency to attribute the differences in how the bike "feels" to weight because its such an easily quantifiable variable.
#14
Raptor Custom Bicycles
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,433
Bikes: Raptor Bicycles... Fully custom carbon bikes... just the way you want them!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, there is a reason Rasmussen never climbs with bottles in his cages... but then he "looks" like he only weighes 100 pounds... heh.
I would imagine on a LONG climb... say, 8-10 miles that the water bottles could make a VERY big difference. Same thing riding a 3-4 pound heavier bike.
I would imagine on a LONG climb... say, 8-10 miles that the water bottles could make a VERY big difference. Same thing riding a 3-4 pound heavier bike.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Yeah, there is a reason Rasmussen never climbs with bottles in his cages... but then he "looks" like he only weighes 100 pounds... heh.
I would imagine on a LONG climb... say, 8-10 miles that the water bottles could make a VERY big difference. Same thing riding a 3-4 pound heavier bike.
I would imagine on a LONG climb... say, 8-10 miles that the water bottles could make a VERY big difference. Same thing riding a 3-4 pound heavier bike.
#16
Raptor Custom Bicycles
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,433
Bikes: Raptor Bicycles... Fully custom carbon bikes... just the way you want them!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh Coyote2, you must have a little "thing" for me. That's so sweet <laughs>.
But don't be mad Just because you look like a little flat chested girl...
Anyways...
Trust me, I know all about "weight reduction"... I lost 57 pounds in 12 months. So what if I have 8-10 more to go? I'm so happy for your concern though!!!
And If you didn't have the reading and comprehension skills of a 5 year old, you'd see the reasoning behind lightening my bike. It has nothing to do with my on bike performance.
What a shmuck!
But don't be mad Just because you look like a little flat chested girl...
Anyways...
Trust me, I know all about "weight reduction"... I lost 57 pounds in 12 months. So what if I have 8-10 more to go? I'm so happy for your concern though!!!
And If you didn't have the reading and comprehension skills of a 5 year old, you'd see the reasoning behind lightening my bike. It has nothing to do with my on bike performance.
What a shmuck!
Last edited by ZXiMan; 12-04-07 at 11:22 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Oh Coyote2, you must have a little "thing" for me. That's so sweet <laughs>.
But don't be mad Just because you look like a little flat chested girl...
Anyways...
Trust me, I know all about "weight reduction"... I lost 57 pounds in 12 months. So what if I have 8-10 more to go? I'm so happy for your concern though!!!
And If you didn't have the reading and comprehension skills of a 5 year old, you'd see the reasoning behind lightening my bike. It has nothing to do with my on bike performance.
What a shmuck!
But don't be mad Just because you look like a little flat chested girl...
Anyways...
Trust me, I know all about "weight reduction"... I lost 57 pounds in 12 months. So what if I have 8-10 more to go? I'm so happy for your concern though!!!
And If you didn't have the reading and comprehension skills of a 5 year old, you'd see the reasoning behind lightening my bike. It has nothing to do with my on bike performance.
What a shmuck!
If it's not about performance, it's about vanity, which is even sadder.
#18
Raptor Custom Bicycles
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,433
Bikes: Raptor Bicycles... Fully custom carbon bikes... just the way you want them!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If I were "vain" I would have bought the 12 pound, $9,000 Litespeed my LBS had on display (or any of the other Serotta, Cervelo, Pinerello, De Rosa, Independent Fabrication.. et al that the same LBS sells. To me, buying one of those brands is pure "vanity" yet poseurs and racers alike buy them.
Sorry, but my fascination with weight-weenie-ing my bike has nothing to do with "vanity"... It's actually alot more simple than that. While subtly upgrading my bike (who doesn't?) I was presented with a challenge. That challenge turned into something that I find fun, which has turned into an offseason hobby. It's just another thing that helps keep me motivated in the sport when I can't be outside riding every day. Like I said, what's the harm in that?
Anyways, for thousands of years people said it would be impossible to visit the moon... said it couldn't be done. Well it has been done (and more than once).
Some so called cycling genius's also said I'd lose my sanity trying to build a sub 15 pound bike for under $10K (especially since I started out with a "cheapy" bike with a supposedly "POS" frame and had no weight weenie experience at all). I've set my budget just a little over half of that. I'm not far off either and I've spent less than $3K (including the cost of the bike). That and I'm not doing everything all at once.
My ex-wife told me I'd never weigh 180 pounds again. She was wrong too. I weigh less than that now.
Personally, I like challenges like that.
If that makes me vain then so be it...
Last edited by ZXiMan; 12-04-07 at 12:39 PM.
#19
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,592
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1252 Post(s)
Liked 1,284 Times
in
709 Posts
Slightly off-topic but has anyone of the "take less water" or "take a duce before a ride" guys ever actually ridden a light bike versus a heavy bike back to back? Have you tried to flick a 15 lb bike back and forth on a twisty downhill and then tried the same thing on a bike that is a couple pounds heavier?
I would never advocate taking less water. Tried that once. Bad idea. But if a "duce" = a steaming fresh bowel movement, I advocate that for every ride, even relaxed casual slow family rides. And I practice what I preach!
Having said that: My two bikes are a modern all-carbon ~17lb Cannondale and a 27 year old lugged steel ~22lb Bridgestone. I've ridden them back to back over the same course a few times. Assuming it's even possible to separate my impressions about how it feels & how it rides from how it operates -- i.e., the difference between brifters & downtube friction shifters has a pronounced affect on how I ride the bikes -- what I notice is that it's much easier to get the lighter bike up to top speed, and to hold it there
...but that top speed isn't any higher than it is on the heavier bike.
#20
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,592
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1252 Post(s)
Liked 1,284 Times
in
709 Posts
I just want to point out that the OP asked whether he would notice a significant difference, not whether he would be faster.
#21
~ Going the Distance ~
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 1,180
Bikes: 2006 Bianchi Carbon 928, 2002 Gary Fisher Utopia
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Absolutely...if you are chucking your bottles directly into the front wheels of the fastest rider.
There is a story about a rider in the Tour de France who had the opposite theory. He thought adding weight would make him faster coming down a mountain. At the top of the mountain, he threw away his empty water bottles and was handed new bottles by his support staff. The new bottles were filled with lead, making his bike about twenty pounds heavier.
According to the "legend", he hit a pothole, and his "water" bottles fell off his bike and began bouncing down the road, making very loud "BONK, BONK, BONK" noises each time they landed on the pavement.
And so ended the "heavier is better" approach to bike racing.
#23
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I ride a 20lb bike and a 15lb one. Both set up to fit the same but The lighter bike climbs better- accelerates better- corners better. So why do I ride the 20lb so much- the lighter components are also more fragile and do wear out quicker- and I still like the ride of my first road bike.
And on the wheels- providing there is not a vast difference in weight- Lighter wheels do not work a great deal better- What makes them work is keeping them in perfect true- bearings run smooth and tyres that roll better.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Posts: 3,959
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
By plugging the numbers in here, I conclude that the it takes 196 watts to push my 205 lb butt down the road at 19mph on a 20 pound bike. It takes 195.4 watts to push the same butt down the road on a 17 pound bike.
The speed difference at the same wattage is .023 mph on flat ground. That translates to about 4 seconds over a distance of 20 miles.
Going up a 6% grade, the differences are a little more profound, but not much. The speed difference is about .09 mph. The difference in wattage to climb at a steady 7 mph is about 3 watts. That would mean about a minute and a half longer to get to the top of Mt. Diablo while cranking a steady 222 watts.
So how much money is that minute and a half worth to you?
The speed difference at the same wattage is .023 mph on flat ground. That translates to about 4 seconds over a distance of 20 miles.
Going up a 6% grade, the differences are a little more profound, but not much. The speed difference is about .09 mph. The difference in wattage to climb at a steady 7 mph is about 3 watts. That would mean about a minute and a half longer to get to the top of Mt. Diablo while cranking a steady 222 watts.
So how much money is that minute and a half worth to you?
#25
slow up hills
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,931
Bikes: Giant TCR, Redline CX, Ritchey Breakaway, Spec S-works epic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
By plugging the numbers in here, I conclude that the it takes 196 watts to push my 205 lb butt down the road at 19mph on a 20 pound bike. It takes 195.4 watts to push the same butt down the road on a 17 pound bike.
The speed difference at the same wattage is .023 mph on flat ground. That translates to about 4 seconds over a distance of 20 miles.
Going up a 6% grade, the differences are a little more profound, but not much. The speed difference is about .09 mph. The difference in wattage to climb at a steady 7 mph is about 3 watts. That would mean about a minute and a half longer to get to the top of Mt. Diablo while cranking a steady 222 watts.
So how much money is that minute and a half worth to you?
The speed difference at the same wattage is .023 mph on flat ground. That translates to about 4 seconds over a distance of 20 miles.
Going up a 6% grade, the differences are a little more profound, but not much. The speed difference is about .09 mph. The difference in wattage to climb at a steady 7 mph is about 3 watts. That would mean about a minute and a half longer to get to the top of Mt. Diablo while cranking a steady 222 watts.
So how much money is that minute and a half worth to you?