Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    139
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Losing out on efficiency/performance with a one size smaller bike?

    I 5'11-6' and 155 lbs. I ride a 56cm bike but I recently found a 54 that is a super sweet deal. I do road riding and race. Is it a big mistake to go for the 54? I can get a longer stem and of course seat height is adjustable. My main concern is if I am giving away efficiency or handling performance since I do race. Comfrot is not a big deal, it's a road race bike and I have a flexible body so I can adjust well.

  2. #2
    Senior Member gfrance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,757
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You might be fine. But you may not be.

    Last season I rode a frame that was way too small (5'9.5" on 50cm frame). And while a set back seatpost, and 140mm stem got me relatively close, the problem was weight distribution over the frame. Too much weight was too far forward. Out of the saddle climbing just felt weird. On steep grades, the back wheel lost all traction when climbing hard out of the saddle.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Brian Ratliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Near Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
    Posts
    9,324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm surprised that a 56 fits you. I've 5' 11" and I ride 58cm bikes. I think that 54cm will be much too small.
    Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
    "If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,918
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff View Post
    I'm surprised that a 56 fits you. I've 5' 11" and I ride 58cm bikes. I think that 54cm will be much too small.

    Theres more to it than the seat tube size. I am 5'11 and ride a 54 Cervelo Soloist. The next size up is just a tad too big. Its better to go a little small than a little big (thats what she said). TT length is more important IMHO.
    Please remember that all statements unless quoted, are strictly my opinion of what happened. That there are as many opinions as there are spectators attending. I just choose to publish mine on this forum. And would NEVER intend to purposely hurt or discredit any other cyclist.... With that said... HTFU!

  5. #5
    SLJ 6/8/65-5/2/07 Walter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    SE Florida, USA aka the Treasure Coast
    Posts
    5,248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm similar height but with a short inseam so I've "always" rode 56 (C-C). However I just built up a 58cm frame and seem to be riding more efficiently. My wife who has a better spin than I comments that I'm harder to keep up with.

    Of course there are some real geometry difference between the bikes as well so it's hard to say. However, I'd rather go a size bigger than a size smaller.


    “Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.”
    Edna St. Vincent Millay

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    No Va but ride also in So Md
    My Bikes
    Cervelo SLC-SL, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
    Posts
    8,002
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'11" and also ride 56's. I've got a track bike that's effectively a 54 (it's a 56 measured to the top of the seat tube). It fits but has a lot of seat post showing.

    The big think you need to look for it the top tube length and the cockpit. I wouldn't want to go with a stem longer that 120mm because the handling starts to be impacted with a 125-130 stem. You also don't want a saddle too far back on the rails either because you end up with less that efficient pedalling and potential knee problems.

    But if the top tube and stem is fine, you should be okay. In fact, may pro's at 5'11 - 6'00" ride 54's.
    You're just trying to start an argument to show how smart you are.

  7. #7
    Giving you the business. Cypress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Corvallis, Oregon
    My Bikes
    Ridley Noah, Giant Trinity Advanced, Specialized Crux
    Posts
    4,441
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wfrogge View Post
    Its better to go a little small than a little big (thats what she said).
    *high five*
    Quote Originally Posted by Moderator
    Dear Cypress,

    You have received an infraction at Bike Forums.

  8. #8
    SLJ 6/8/65-5/2/07 Walter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    SE Florida, USA aka the Treasure Coast
    Posts
    5,248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thoughts on bicycle sizing has changed quite a bit over the decades. Many people would tell Coppi if he were around today that he rode too large a frame. OTOH I'd imagine he'd think today's racers are riding bikes too small.

    I'm in the minority older school when I say I'd rather ride a frame that is just to the large size rather than a smaller one but you're the one that has to determine what fits you best. (Does the last clause of that sentence qualify me for a "Mr. Obvious" award? )


    “Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.”
    Edna St. Vincent Millay

  9. #9
    CERVEL-LIZED! BHBiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you'll be fine!
    [SIGPIC]
    some people indeed have more money than sense...but they have enough sense to buy what makes them happy![/SIGPIC]

  10. #10
    WTF is that creak?! O.o sfrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter View Post
    Thoughts on bicycle sizing has changed quite a bit over the decades. Many people would tell Coppi if he were around today that he rode too large a frame.
    The bars have changed a bit since the 50s also, they've gotten wider with more reach and drop. This mandates a shorter frame.

  11. #11
    Senior Member thefatguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You'll be fine.

    As the stem gets longer the handling becomes more stable. The shorter wheelbase will decrease your turning radius but the bike will hold a line better at speed.

    There's a reason the pros ride bikes with 120-150mm stems.

    I'm 5'10 and I ride a bike with a 53.5cm tt- I run a 120 stem and Newton bars with lots of reach.

    The longer stem will also give you more leverage when climbing out of the saddle.

    Remember- It's easy to make a bike bigger but impossible to make it smaller.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •