Better to have your computer sensor on the front or rear?
#2
Super Modest
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times
in
2,123 Posts
Front, because the electrons have a shorter distance to travel. Another reason is because the front wheel gets to wherever you are going before the back wheel.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,711
Bikes: S-Works SL3 Tarmac, Allez E5, Leader 735TT, others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
Prefers Aluminum
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 2,669
Bikes: Wife: Trek 5200, C'dale Rush Feminine, Vitus 979 Me: Felt S25, Cervelo Soloist, C'dale Killer V500, Miyata Pro (fixie)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
If you like to count trainer miles, you need a rear sensor. If it's a wired computer, the installation tends to look a bit messier because you have to run the wire down the frame to the sensor.
Counting trainer miles is another topic unto itself, so I won't expound on this.
Counting trainer miles is another topic unto itself, so I won't expound on this.
#5
Somewhat Older Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Florida and the Midwest
Posts: 40
Bikes: Colnago, Eddy Merckx, LeMond, Litespeed, Schwinn
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 643
Bikes: 2005 Scattante R660 Triple, 2006 Specialized Rockhopper Comp Disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Front: Less wiring mess if it's wired.
Rear: Can use on trainer. Can be hard to find wireless units that can transmit that distance. Messy wiring otherwise.
Rear: Can use on trainer. Can be hard to find wireless units that can transmit that distance. Messy wiring otherwise.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 52
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD5, Gary Fisher Montare
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've had it both ways and can't really tell a difference. I prefer the the sensor on the back. I mounted the speed sensor and cadence sensor with the same zipp ties and put the magnet on the back of the pedal on the inside of the crank arm, which made it look much cleaner.
By the way, do you race in the ama or wera or is your avatar from a track day? I used to race until the kids came along tried to get back into it but my wife wouldn't let me have my balls back on weekends.
By the way, do you race in the ama or wera or is your avatar from a track day? I used to race until the kids came along tried to get back into it but my wife wouldn't let me have my balls back on weekends.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
If you pull a lot of wheelies, then the rear.
If you pull a lot of stoppies, then the front.
If you pull a lot of stoppies, then the front.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,711
Bikes: S-Works SL3 Tarmac, Allez E5, Leader 735TT, others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 848
Bikes: 07 Cannondale Six13 (9 speed Ultegra) + 19?? Lugged Steel Specialized Allez Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have mine on the front. I don't use my computer on the trainer because my trainer has its own screen, which is nice.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,407
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mine's wired and installed on the front. Wired cadence obviously works while on the trainer without adding "trainer miles" to my computer log. That kinda thing would piss me off, whether I "counted" trainer miles or not. Just having them all jumbled together wouldn't work for me. Cadence is absolutely necessary for trainer time, as it gives one of the few sure reference points that you have while riding stationary, plus most if not all of the spinerval workouts are based on cadence reference to some degree. But of course I digress...this cadence talk is all off topic.
-Jeremy
-Jeremy
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 526
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mine's wired and installed on the front. Wired cadence obviously works while on the trainer without adding "trainer miles" to my computer log. That kinda thing would piss me off, whether I "counted" trainer miles or not. Just having them all jumbled together wouldn't work for me. Cadence is absolutely necessary for trainer time, as it gives one of the few sure reference points that you have while riding stationary, plus most if not all of the spinerval workouts are based on cadence reference to some degree. But of course I digress...this cadence talk is all off topic.
-Jeremy
-Jeremy
My sigma wireless allows me to switch bikes. I keep track of trainer miles, and road miles, and they are not jumbled together.
#16
Custom User Title
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 1,913
Bikes: 2006 Marin Stelvio, 1990s Steve Bauer, Marin Palisades Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I moved mine to the rear, partally for trainer time, also because i catch myself looking at it too often when it's in front of me, so I'm gonna try putting it in my pocket and see how I like that. So far, I like the clean look on the bars again.
Benefits of going without a computer while still tracking mileage I guess.
Benefits of going without a computer while still tracking mileage I guess.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kanata, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 80
Bikes: Stevens SLC Road, Seven Ti SS MTB, Titus Ti FS-XC MTB, Empella Bonfire CX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For winter training on a trainer, I've moved the speed sensor from the front fork to the rear seatstay. I've also moved the stem/bar mount for the computer to the mid-point along my top tube. Now, I get both speed and cadence while on the trainer. This has been great for the last 2 months. But today, I get my new PowerTap! Oh, the humiliation!
M.
#18
Senior Member
Most of my bikes have the sensor on the front - cleaner setup with the wires. The good bike gets a lot of trainer miles this time of year so it has the sensor on the rear. Not to track "trainer miles" but to get a sense for my power output and to keep my cadence and power output constant during an interval.
It's the $15 poor man's version of training using power. I don't have $4-600 lying around to spend on a power meter of any sort. I have a fluid trainer, so power increases by velocity cubed. This means that for every 10% increase in speed registered by my computer, there is about a 33% (1/3) increase in power. If I use my warmup as a baseline, I can do intervals by upping the speed during the interval to increase my power output on a relative basis.
It's the $15 poor man's version of training using power. I don't have $4-600 lying around to spend on a power meter of any sort. I have a fluid trainer, so power increases by velocity cubed. This means that for every 10% increase in speed registered by my computer, there is about a 33% (1/3) increase in power. If I use my warmup as a baseline, I can do intervals by upping the speed during the interval to increase my power output on a relative basis.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 01-10-08 at 09:08 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 736
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
With wired cadence sensor, better to put the speed pickup in the back as well since you have wires going that way anyway - cleaner wiring. That's the classic CatEye Astrale 8 setup.
Without wired cadence (i.e. either no cadence or wireless), front install is cleaner, and better signal if speed sensor is wireless.
Without wired cadence (i.e. either no cadence or wireless), front install is cleaner, and better signal if speed sensor is wireless.