Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    528
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    700CX23 front/700CX25 rear?

    Pointless?

    Why do people do it?

  2. #2
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Because they put so much power to the rear wheel that they need the extra traction like a Top Fuel.

  3. #3
    Senior Member garysol1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Avon , Ohio
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have never seen that done...or at least I have never noticed.

  4. #4
    Run What 'Ya Brung bonechilling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wider tires distribute the load a little better. Since you have more weight in the back, you put a larger tire back there for some extra cushioning. At least that's the reasoning, I believe.
    Quote Originally Posted by doofo View Post
    the main cause of fit problems is riding your bike

    you should have just stopped riding so you could focus on color coordination

  5. #5
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, I'm thinking that it's a combo between mine and Bonechilling's ideas. Everyone wants to be a sprinter.

  6. #6
    Senior Member jaxgtr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Trek 7300, Trek CrossRip
    Posts
    3,940
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've seen it and never really thought anything about it. In the big scheme of things, it a pretty minor difference since true tire size is a wag at best.
    Brian | 2013 Cannondale SuperSix 5 | 2014 Trek CrossRip Comp | 2003 Trek 7300
    Quote Originally Posted by AEO View Post
    you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.

  7. #7
    Bicycle Repair Man !!! Sixty Fiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    YEG
    My Bikes
    See my sig...
    Posts
    26,106
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I run a 28/25 front rear on my fixed road bike... it doesn't really affect my top speed and makes for a better ride.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    687
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I do it on one of my bikes simply because the fork doesn't tolerate a 25 tire (otherwise I'd have the 25 on the front too). Not sure the 25 in back provides a noticeable difference in ride quality, but I've been riding 25's for a while and they are working well for me.

  9. #9
    In beaurocratic limbo urbanknight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez, K2 Razorback
    Posts
    22,457
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bonechilling View Post
    Wider tires distribute the load a little better. Since you have more weight in the back, you put a larger tire back there for some extra cushioning. At least that's the reasoning, I believe.
    That's the reason my father did it. Worked great as well. As a heavier person, it arguably had LESS rolling resistance than if he had gone with 23s all around. Run a search if you don't know what I'm talking about.

  10. #10
    Banned. timmyquest's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Woodstock
    Posts
    5,761
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21 View Post
    Because they put so much power to the rear wheel that they need the extra traction like a Top Fuel.
    You've been talking to some real ego's huh?

  11. #11
    Senior Member djbowen1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Cervelo Soliost
    Posts
    2,283
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    conti attack & force s tires come like that this year

  12. #12
    Mitcholo CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
    My Bikes
    2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
    Posts
    8,851
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by timmyquest View Post
    You've been talking to some real ego's huh?
    Thinly veiled sarcasm, bub

  13. #13
    Senior Member sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NorCal - bay area
    My Bikes
    giant, trek, peugeots, friday
    Posts
    1,304
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bonechilling View Post
    Wider tires distribute the load a little better. Since you have more weight in the back, you put a larger tire back there for some extra cushioning. At least that's the reasoning, I believe.
    Well, I've got a 25 up front, with 28 in the rear! Both conti gatorskins. I was trying to turn my 20yo short-wheelbase Trek into a semi-plush bike and thought I read in Bicycling to buy this tire in 25. After buying one, I re-read and they said use 28 for plush, or all-day riding, or centuries, whatever. So I went back and bought a 28. I needed another tire anyway (or told myself I did!). It looks frickin' huge! But it works, and I'm not racing anyone anyway, so if it slowed me down a bit, who cares.

    Btw, it did not magically make the Trek a plush bike. It cannot begin to compare to my new Giant OCR C1. Giant put 25s (Michelin Pro2) on it, and so far, I like those tires quite a bit. Don't know how much they contribute to the feel of the bike, but on my first ride, it really felt like the tires themselves were especially compliant.

  14. #14
    meow bostongarden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hint: check out my BF name
    My Bikes
    2011 Cannondale Super Six, Dura Ace 7800, 2007 Cannondale System Six Dura Ace 7800, 1992 Bridgestone RB-1, MB-2, MB-3, MB-5
    Posts
    5,579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Until about one month ago -- when I needed new tires -- I ran a 28 (Conti) on the back and a 25 (Michelin) on the front...I raced with this setup through the mid-1990s and it worked great...I decided to try a 25 on the back and a 23 on the front...feels good too...to my eyes there is a noticeable difference between the 23 and the 25 for Michelin...the 25 Michelin looks like the old 28 Conti I had on before....if indeed I race again -- just back into it since October 2007 -- I'll go with this setup with confidence....

  15. #15
    AEO
    AEO is offline
    Senior Member AEO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
    My Bikes
    Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
    Posts
    12,245
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you can get a slightly taller gear with a bigger tyre on the back.... not even a 0.3mph increase though.
    Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
    http://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm

  16. #16
    Banned. timmyquest's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Woodstock
    Posts
    5,761
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CrimsonKarter21 View Post
    Thinly veiled sarcasm, bub
    That's what makes it sarcastic, bub

  17. #17
    Run What 'Ya Brung bonechilling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I should also add that I run a 23c on the rear of my track bike, and a 21c in front, since the clearance is too tight to fit anything larger.
    Quote Originally Posted by doofo View Post
    the main cause of fit problems is riding your bike

    you should have just stopped riding so you could focus on color coordination

  18. #18
    Senior Member Silvercivic27's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    My Bikes
    Scott addict, Colnago asso, Cervelo S5
    Posts
    1,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Was wondering if anyone has tried this since this post. I recently bought a 25 to replace my rear tire, so I'm running a GP4000s in 23/25, similar to the attack/force 22/24 combo. Anyone else tried this? Opinions?

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Haunchyville
    Posts
    6,010
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's just plain cool to have a secret little trick like that.

  20. #20
    Crispy Member ahsposo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Open the Bag and Eat Me.
    My Bikes
    A Home Built All Rounder, Bianchi 928, Specialized Langster, Dahon Folder
    Posts
    6,382
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    <cough>

    How about 21/38?

    Puhleeze! It's crap like this that gives the 41 it's rep for stupid.

    That and Addiction.
    Quote Originally Posted by toddles View Post
    If I gotta look up words, it's not worth my time.

  21. #21
    just ride
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    North Idaho
    My Bikes
    '12 Felt Z5
    Posts
    425
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not pointless.

    I have previously run (road slicks) 28back/23front and 28back/25front on my old cross bike before I went 23/23. It's not going to/never did hurt performance. Theoretically it might reduce rolling resistance, make a smoother ride, and be less flat prone for the rear tire where more of your weight is. My current road bike came with Vittoria Zaffiro Pro 25's but I am running 23 Conti Hardshells right now. Earlier this month for a dirt road ride I used 25back/28front because that was the maximum clearance.
    what is this 'road tax' you speak of?

  22. #22
    Senior Member escarpment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    chicago
    My Bikes
    cannondale crit 3.0, specialized allez, old giant mtb/hybrid
    Posts
    744
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I do it. Maybe it makes a difference, form of habit for myself.

  23. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I run 23/25 with gatorskins because the roads are pretty rough here...

  24. #24
    Packfodding 3 caloso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California, USA
    My Bikes
    Ridley Excalibur, Gazelle Champion Mondial, On-One Pompino, Specialized Rock Hopper
    Posts
    29,828
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've done it. Works fine. More cushioning on the tire that supports the most weight.
    Cyclists of the world, unite! You have nothing to lube but your chains!

  25. #25
    Senior Member Slaninar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Novi Sad
    My Bikes
    Custom assembled on Polar Forrester frame. :)
    Posts
    1,150
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    23 tyre needs to be above 7 bars for my weight. It is very prone to collecting broken glass (hard, doesn't give in, so glass cuts through it). 28 mm in the back would be pumped at 5.5 - 6 bars, so much softer and less prone to cuts it should be. My next tyres will be 28 mm wide conti 4 seasons. I now ride 23 mm wide Specialized All Cond. Elites.
    Evviva il comunismo e la libertÓ.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •