Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Michelin Pro 2/3 Race vs Conti GP-4000

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Michelin Pro 2/3 Race vs Conti GP-4000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-08, 11:30 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Michelin Pro 2/3 Race vs Conti GP-4000

what are the differences? wear? pressure? grip? puncture resistance?
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 01:27 AM
  #2  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
everything.

I haven't ridden P3R or GP4000, but if you do a search... you can find comparisons between P2R vs. P3R and GP4000 vs. P2R

from what I've seen on this forum:
A lot of the wear and durability variances seem to be derived from your weight.
P3R grips better than P2R
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 04:12 AM
  #3  
Dropped myself
 
Lizzylou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I actually just did a search about this over the weekend. After my search I added the Contis to my Christmas list. But depending on what you want the Michelins might be better for you.
Lizzylou is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 04:31 AM
  #4  
...
 
Pablo.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nyc
Posts: 978
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my rear conti 4000 wore pretty fast.
Pablo. is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 05:52 AM
  #5  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
My rear PR3s have worn pretty fast too....it's all relative.

PR3s are a great race tire that can be ridden all the time as long as you don't mind the wear rate. Buy 3 at a time and swap the front to the rear and put the new on the front when needed.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 05:53 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times in 22 Posts
"my rear conti 4000 wore pretty fast. "


That is surprising. I have been getting close to 4000 miles per pair on GP4000's and then I use them on my trainer in the winter for another 1500 miles or so right down to the threads. I do rotate them front to back once in awhile to even out the wear. No flats now in my last 2 pair.
jrobe is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 06:57 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
azdroptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 548

Bikes: 03 Lemond, 08 S-works Tarmac SL

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've been using gp's for racing and TT's for the past year and a half with a switch to Pro 2's for one set. The 2's were fine, but feel wise I liked the GP's better. The one set of pro 2's I used wore out a bit quicker and seemed to pick up flats easier as well.
azdroptop is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 06:59 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jrobe
"my rear conti 4000 wore pretty fast. "


That is surprising. I have been getting close to 4000 miles per pair on GP4000's and then I use them on my trainer in the winter for another 1500 miles or so right down to the threads. I do rotate them front to back once in awhile to even out the wear. No flats now in my last 2 pair.
I weigh 200 lbs and get 2,500 miles and replace them using 4000S. I ride smooth pavement and significant chip and seal miles and the occasional recently chip and sealed road when I have to. Between last year and this year I have ridden 8,000 plus miles with only two flats and both of them were pieces of metal that would have flatted any tire.
dekindy is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 07:11 AM
  #9  
3 seconds
 
ColorChange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicago, NW burbs
Posts: 2,935
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
GP's last at least twice as long as the P3's, probably 3 times. They are not as grippy as the threes. I haven't had punctures in either but a lot more cuts on the 3's than the GP's. Smoother, grippier ride on the 3's but don't wear very well.
ColorChange is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 07:18 AM
  #10  
Carpe Diem
 
bdcheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MABRA
Posts: 13,149

Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Interesting... I have and do ride all three of these tires.

I raced/trained on P2R's

Race on P3R's

Winter train on GP4000's (not the black chili ones though).

My honest opinion?

Race on P3R's.

Train on P2R's.

Commute/junk/winter/rough road miles on GP4000's.
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
bdcheung is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 07:39 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 547

Bikes: c'dale six13, bobjackson

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dekindy
I weigh 200 lbs and get 2,500 miles and replace them using 4000S. I ride smooth pavement and significant chip and seal miles and the occasional recently chip and sealed road when I have to. Between last year and this year I have ridden 8,000 plus miles with only two flats and both of them were pieces of metal that would have flatted any tire.
i have experienced the same think. i am 220 # and on my third rear tire. first two were right around 2500 milews each down to the core all around. only one flat whicfh was a large staple that would have fattened any tire. i am absolutely sold on conti gp4000s.

for what it is worth, i stopped rotating tires about five years ago. now i buy four tires at a time and wear out three rear to one front. it just seems easier.
alancw3 is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 08:11 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 752
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pablo.
my rear conti 4000 wore pretty fast.
I have 3,657 miles on my rear Conti 4000 with zero flats, and there still may be a couple of hundred miles left. The P2s are grippier imo and remain supple at higher pressures than the 4000. For long distance races, I like a 4000 on the back for dependable flat resistance and a P2 on the front for grip and suppleness. I haven't tried the P3s.

Last edited by Skewer; 09-24-08 at 08:15 AM.
Skewer is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 08:28 AM
  #13  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
Originally Posted by Skewer
I have 3,657 miles on my rear Conti 4000 with zero flats, and there still may be a couple of hundred miles left. The P2s are grippier imo and remain supple at higher pressures than the 4000. For long distance races, I like a 4000 on the back for dependable flat resistance and a P2 on the front for grip and suppleness. I haven't tried the P3s.
Better performing tire than p2s at the cost of durability. Still....I have had 2 flats in the last 4 years using p2 and p3s. Just notice that the p3s wear much faster than the p2s.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 08:30 AM
  #14  
Former Hoarder
 
55/Rad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland & Yachats, OR
Posts: 11,734

Bikes: Seven Axiom, Felt Z1, Dave Moulton Fuso

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Night and day...

I won't ride the PR3's at night for fear of hitting something I can't see and destroying the tire. Don't have that fear with the 4000's.

55/Rad
__________________
55/Rad is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 10:45 AM
  #15  
Guadzilla
 
JayC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dialing it up to 400W
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: Pinarello F4:13 W/Campy Reecord & Blue RC6 W/SRAM Force

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I rode the PR2s for a while and switched to the 4000S.. I prefer the 4000S.. they last longer. Im heavier than most everyone that posted in this thread and I get 2500-3000 out of a rear and just swap it out.
JayC is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 10:55 AM
  #16  
Flatland hack
 
Flak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nowhere near the mountains :/
Posts: 3,228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
May i throw a 3rd option at you?

Vittoria Rubino pro slicks. I recently gave them a try after running PR2s for a long time, and quite frankly....they feel the same to me, only they have a slightly narrower profile for a 23mm tire.
__________________
My shop - www.spinbikeshop.com
My team - www.teampanther.com
Flak is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 12:26 PM
  #17  
elitist jerk
 
daytonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blow - hio
Posts: 4,187

Bikes: CAAD9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dubbayoo
what are the differences? wear? pressure? grip? puncture resistance?
the biggest diff between them is ride. pr2/3 are more supple in sidewalls and filter out edginess in a road. chili gp's are firmer and you'll feel the road more. I personally always felt like the pr2's needed air even when fully inflated.
daytonian is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 01:15 PM
  #18  
Mmmmm Donuts!
 
FatguyRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Crownsville, MD
Posts: 2,069

Bikes: 1998 IF Crown Jewel

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Contis for me. They have the edge when it comes to taking them on and off the rim easily. I've never had a Michelien tire i've liked except the set of Pilot Powers I had on my motorcycle before I went to Conti Sport Attacks.

I also like the predicable handling of Contis. The GP Supersonics are a great race tire. The GP4000 is a great all around tire and i've gotten fewer flats with them than I did with a set of Gatorskins.

I run Contis on my Ducati and my VW Jetta too.
__________________
John

'09 Cannondale CAAD9 - Team Latitude/ABRT Special.
'04 Lemond Victorie Ti
'98 IF Crown Jewel (dead)
'92 Trek2100 (TT)
'50 something Gino Bartali (fixer)
'02 Ducati ST4s (Moto-Ref mount)

My Blog
FatguyRacer is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 05:13 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 494

Bikes: Titus Modena

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dubbayoo
what are the differences? wear? pressure? grip? puncture resistance?
i've used the pr3, conti 4000, and conti 4000s this year. I ride a lot of miles.

fyi, I weigh 165lb.

My opinion is, I'll never buy the pr3's again. They are far too easy to cut, get damaged, etc. I went through two rears before I gave up and went back to the conti 4000s. I don't trust them.

First rear got a slash from some glass on the road, second one got a tear in the sidewall from I've no idea what. I had five flats - all in the rear - with the pr3's this year.

I've have zero flats and significantly more miles on the conti 4000s model this year. It may be all in the head, but I think the 4000s ride slightly better than the 4000.
Spookykinkajou is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 05:20 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
sojourn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 826

Bikes: Domane 9.0 sl

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I liked the PR2's, tried the 4000S and had a flat after 2 days, then a sidewall failure with under 1k, I really like the Rubino Pro Slicks. I'm a big guy (6'3" 216 lbs) so I get about 1200-1600 miles per set.......
sojourn is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 06:03 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Dubbayoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,681

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've been using Pro 2's this past year. I like them but all i have to compare to is my Vredestein Fortezza SEs and the Sprinter's on my Zipps, which I really haven't ridden enough. I was just wondering if there is some overwhelming reason to try something else. Sounds like there's no need to try Pro 3's since I don't race and I'm a Clyde by a good margin.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Old 09-24-08, 09:04 PM
  #22  
Asleep at the bars
 
sfrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times in 135 Posts
Originally Posted by Pablo.
my rear conti 4000 wore pretty fast.
Yeah, the rear seems to last only about 750-1000mi, at least that's what I have on the current GP4000S and it's due for replacement soon. But I can live with that.

My rear P2R lasted 10mi before the sidewall got ripped open by a loose rock. Haven't tried my luck with them again, or the P3R. I can live without the hassle of a busted tire in the middle of nowhere - or bad batches, or poor quality control, or fragile gear, depending on perspective.
sfrider is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.