Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Is this bike to small for me?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Is this bike to small for me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-08, 04:16 PM
  #1  
TRAIN HARDER.
Thread Starter
 
TONYKART125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 494

Bikes: Federal. Scott S50.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is this bike to small for me?

I am looking at a 51 cm soloist used. This was my recommended stuff from wrenchscience.com What you guys think. Seems to fall right in the middle! let me know,
pat c.

WS Recommended Sizes
Frame Size center-to-center: 50 cm
Frame Size center-to-top: 52 cm
Overall Reach: 65.91 cm
Saddle Height: 68.41 cm
Handlebar Width: 46 cm



Your Measurements
Height: 68.50 in
Sternum Notch: 55.75 in
Inseam Length: 30.50 in
Arm Length: 23.50 in
Shoulder Width: 18.00 in
Flexiblity: 6
Weight: 180.00 lbs
Foot Size: 10.00 USMens
TONYKART125 is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 04:37 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Too be sure, the only way too really know if the bike is to small is too take it too an LBS too be fitted too you. Be sure too take your shorts and shoes too the LBS to.

* Note: This is my first attempt at BF satire.
DaBeRep is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 05:23 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Point Lookout, NY
Posts: 1,210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Definitely not too small. Not saying it's Goldie locks (just right) but it's pretty close. Bars seem way wide though. Stem length?
MadeInItaly is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 06:04 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
Definitely not too small. In my book its probably too big although you don't have much choice in smaller bikes.

EDIT: going through your sizes again you seem to have quite short legs for your height. Your probably going to have difficulties getting a good fit on an off the shelf frame. Its always a good idea to ride them first and in your case I think it would be essential.

Anthony

Last edited by AnthonyG; 09-28-08 at 06:08 PM.
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 07:16 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Point Lookout, NY
Posts: 1,210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A 30 inch inseem is short for someone 5 feet 6 inchs**********
MadeInItaly is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 07:33 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,331

Bikes: 19 Look 765 Gravel RS, 18 Cervelo C5, 13 Niner Jet9 RDO, 08 Surly Crosscheck, 05 Serotta Fierte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Do the competitive cyclist fitting thingy - gives you tt length. Makes it easier to scan what fits and what doesn't. But 5'6" - 51cm sounds fine. I'm 5'5", but very inflexible, and rode the Soloist 51cm for a few days. I found it a little too streched out for me - guess that can always be adjusted by the stem.
Unagidon is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 09:11 PM
  #7  
TRAIN HARDER.
Thread Starter
 
TONYKART125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 494

Bikes: Federal. Scott S50.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
haha damn my small legs!
TONYKART125 is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 09:12 PM
  #8  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by DaBeRep
Too be sure, the only way too really know if the bike is to small is too take it too an LBS too be fitted too you. Be sure too take your shorts and shoes too the LBS to.

* Note: This is my first attempt at BF satire.
Well done. I enjoyed it.
Flatballer is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 09:24 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5.6 feet is not 5' 6".
68.5 inches is 5' 8.5".
Mr.BoJingles is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 09:24 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by TONYKART125
haha damn my small legs!
Is your actual inseam really 30 1/2" or is that your pant inseam?

Its your actual inseam standing on the floor barefoot to the hard pelvic bone that's required.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 09-28-08, 09:46 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
There are a zillion "formulas", but there is one test that is rather easy. Simply stand over the bike flat-footed with your belt buckle up against the stem. The top of the top tube should be lightly brushing the crotch of your jeans. If the top tube is pressing uncomfortably against your crotch, the frame is too tall. Set up the bike with your "ideal" saddle height and cockpit length, and take it for a test ride. If you have perfect fore/aft weight balance, the bike is the correct size.

Buying a new bike is easy if you know two measurements: the saddle height of the bike that fits you perfectly, and the cockpit length of the bike that fits you perfectly (from the back edge of the saddle to the front of the stem). I know my saddle height is 30 inches and my cockpit length is 31 inches. So, if I'm looking at a bike, and I can dial in my perfect saddle height and perfect cockpit length using a standard seatpost and stem, the bike is in my size range.
alanbikehouston is offline  
Old 09-29-08, 05:48 AM
  #12  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
There are a zillion "formulas", but there is one test that is rather easy. Simply stand over the bike flat-footed with your belt buckle up against the stem. The top of the top tube should be lightly brushing the crotch of your jeans. If the top tube is pressing uncomfortably against your crotch, the frame is too tall.
incorrect.
Flatballer is offline  
Old 09-29-08, 12:14 PM
  #13  
BOATS AND HOES!
 
Medpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 666

Bikes: Madone

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm also thinking about getting a soloist and I can't decide between the 51 and 54.

If your measurements are correct I'd say you are closer to a 54. I'm 67.7" w/ 32" inseam. So that would mean your torso is 3 inches longer making a 51 too short. For myself, if I get a 54 (54.5cm tt) I'd probably need a 90mm stem with no spacers. If I get a 51 (53cm tt) I'd probably need a 100-110mm stem with a 20mm spacer. In the end I'll most likely go with a 54 and with you having a longer torso, I'd recommend the 54.

Oh and the bars seem a little wide too, but sometimes people go wider or more narrow just based on personal preference. I measure 44cm but prefer a 42cm handlebar width.

Cheers
Medpilot is offline  
Old 09-29-08, 12:21 PM
  #14  
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by MadeInItaly
A 30 inch inseem is short for someone 5 feet 6 inchs**********
He's 5' 8.5" And his measurements are very close to mine; I'm a bit longer in the inseam. I ride a 54cm Orbea, stem of 80 or 90mm. And a 52cm Bianchi.

I would say the 50cm top tube measurement is too small for you unless you are getting a 120-140mm stem.
bbattle is offline  
Old 09-29-08, 02:08 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Point Lookout, NY
Posts: 1,210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I agree. My pinarello is 51cm w/ a top tube of 53.7
MadeInItaly is offline  
Old 09-29-08, 02:53 PM
  #16  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times in 560 Posts
You are close to my measurements... I have ridden 50cm, 52cm, 54cm, and Giant "S" frames....I have to say that I usually tend to err on the side of a smaller frame.

I have been changing my mind about that recently. I NEVER ride that 50 anymore...WAY too small even with a 140 stem on it. 52 frames work for me, but I almost always end up with a long stem that I can never really get to a height (less than a 2 1/2"-3" saddle to bar drop) that works when I am out of shape (read "too fat to stay in the drops").

I have a 54 now that is awesome. Perfect sizing. A tad big at times, but overall a better fitting bike.

I would say based on the measurements....knowing that everything could change if I saw you in person....that you would be much more comfortable in a 53 or 54 - mainly for reach (TT length) and bar height (head tube length affecting saddle to bar drop).
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 11:54 AM
  #17  
TRAIN HARDER.
Thread Starter
 
TONYKART125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 494

Bikes: Federal. Scott S50.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my only argument is that I have ridden bmx for 10 years so i really prefer smaller bikes... idk
TONYKART125 is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 02:19 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Point Lookout, NY
Posts: 1,210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It's not just BMX people. My favorite and best fitting ride is 49cm . Thats 2 CM smaller then my largest and a much smaller Top Tube...
MadeInItaly is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 02:50 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
longbeachgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589

Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Let me start with, I'm no expert. I was reading a artcle from Grant Peterson about bike sizing and he says that 98% of riders ride bikes that are too small. Not sure about the % but I have to agree with him that many ride bikes that are too small. If you're not racing, you don't need such a tiny bike. A gentleman who is 5' 8.5" tall needs a bigger bike.

Last edited by longbeachgary; 09-30-08 at 02:54 PM. Reason: Forgot somethng
longbeachgary is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 04:20 PM
  #20  
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by longbeachgary
Let me start with, I'm no expert. I was reading a artcle from Grant Peterson about bike sizing and he says that 98% of riders ride bikes that are FITTED too small.
Fixed.

If your bike is too small, raise the seat, and move it back 1cm for eacm cm of stem you add.

That won't be a perfect fit, but it's a starting point from which you can tweak seat position and bar position (raise / lower / flip / change of stem).

Once your too small bike has been FITTED larger, it will no longer be too small for you.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 04:30 PM
  #21  
uke
it's easy if you let it.
 
uke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: indoors and out.
Posts: 4,124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Smaller bikes weigh less. That's reason enough to toughen up and ride that clownbike.
uke is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 07:02 PM
  #22  
Member
 
softlysoftly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Second the competitive cyclist fit, it'll give you a range of fittings depending on your riding style.
softlysoftly is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.