Is this bike to small for me?
#1
TRAIN HARDER.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 494
Bikes: Federal. Scott S50.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is this bike to small for me?
I am looking at a 51 cm soloist used. This was my recommended stuff from wrenchscience.com What you guys think. Seems to fall right in the middle! let me know,
pat c.
WS Recommended Sizes
Frame Size center-to-center: 50 cm
Frame Size center-to-top: 52 cm
Overall Reach: 65.91 cm
Saddle Height: 68.41 cm
Handlebar Width: 46 cm
Your Measurements
Height: 68.50 in
Sternum Notch: 55.75 in
Inseam Length: 30.50 in
Arm Length: 23.50 in
Shoulder Width: 18.00 in
Flexiblity: 6
Weight: 180.00 lbs
Foot Size: 10.00 USMens
pat c.
WS Recommended Sizes
Frame Size center-to-center: 50 cm
Frame Size center-to-top: 52 cm
Overall Reach: 65.91 cm
Saddle Height: 68.41 cm
Handlebar Width: 46 cm
Your Measurements
Height: 68.50 in
Sternum Notch: 55.75 in
Inseam Length: 30.50 in
Arm Length: 23.50 in
Shoulder Width: 18.00 in
Flexiblity: 6
Weight: 180.00 lbs
Foot Size: 10.00 USMens
#2
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Too be sure, the only way too really know if the bike is to small is too take it too an LBS too be fitted too you. Be sure too take your shorts and shoes too the LBS to.
* Note: This is my first attempt at BF satire.
* Note: This is my first attempt at BF satire.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times
in
289 Posts
Definitely not too small. In my book its probably too big although you don't have much choice in smaller bikes.
EDIT: going through your sizes again you seem to have quite short legs for your height. Your probably going to have difficulties getting a good fit on an off the shelf frame. Its always a good idea to ride them first and in your case I think it would be essential.
Anthony
EDIT: going through your sizes again you seem to have quite short legs for your height. Your probably going to have difficulties getting a good fit on an off the shelf frame. Its always a good idea to ride them first and in your case I think it would be essential.
Anthony
Last edited by AnthonyG; 09-28-08 at 06:08 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,331
Bikes: 19 Look 765 Gravel RS, 18 Cervelo C5, 13 Niner Jet9 RDO, 08 Surly Crosscheck, 05 Serotta Fierte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do the competitive cyclist fitting thingy - gives you tt length. Makes it easier to scan what fits and what doesn't. But 5'6" - 51cm sounds fine. I'm 5'5", but very inflexible, and rode the Soloist 51cm for a few days. I found it a little too streched out for me - guess that can always be adjusted by the stem.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
There are a zillion "formulas", but there is one test that is rather easy. Simply stand over the bike flat-footed with your belt buckle up against the stem. The top of the top tube should be lightly brushing the crotch of your jeans. If the top tube is pressing uncomfortably against your crotch, the frame is too tall. Set up the bike with your "ideal" saddle height and cockpit length, and take it for a test ride. If you have perfect fore/aft weight balance, the bike is the correct size.
Buying a new bike is easy if you know two measurements: the saddle height of the bike that fits you perfectly, and the cockpit length of the bike that fits you perfectly (from the back edge of the saddle to the front of the stem). I know my saddle height is 30 inches and my cockpit length is 31 inches. So, if I'm looking at a bike, and I can dial in my perfect saddle height and perfect cockpit length using a standard seatpost and stem, the bike is in my size range.
Buying a new bike is easy if you know two measurements: the saddle height of the bike that fits you perfectly, and the cockpit length of the bike that fits you perfectly (from the back edge of the saddle to the front of the stem). I know my saddle height is 30 inches and my cockpit length is 31 inches. So, if I'm looking at a bike, and I can dial in my perfect saddle height and perfect cockpit length using a standard seatpost and stem, the bike is in my size range.
#12
No matches
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647
Bikes: two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times
in
250 Posts
There are a zillion "formulas", but there is one test that is rather easy. Simply stand over the bike flat-footed with your belt buckle up against the stem. The top of the top tube should be lightly brushing the crotch of your jeans. If the top tube is pressing uncomfortably against your crotch, the frame is too tall.
#13
BOATS AND HOES!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 666
Bikes: Madone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm also thinking about getting a soloist and I can't decide between the 51 and 54.
If your measurements are correct I'd say you are closer to a 54. I'm 67.7" w/ 32" inseam. So that would mean your torso is 3 inches longer making a 51 too short. For myself, if I get a 54 (54.5cm tt) I'd probably need a 90mm stem with no spacers. If I get a 51 (53cm tt) I'd probably need a 100-110mm stem with a 20mm spacer. In the end I'll most likely go with a 54 and with you having a longer torso, I'd recommend the 54.
Oh and the bars seem a little wide too, but sometimes people go wider or more narrow just based on personal preference. I measure 44cm but prefer a 42cm handlebar width.
Cheers
If your measurements are correct I'd say you are closer to a 54. I'm 67.7" w/ 32" inseam. So that would mean your torso is 3 inches longer making a 51 too short. For myself, if I get a 54 (54.5cm tt) I'd probably need a 90mm stem with no spacers. If I get a 51 (53cm tt) I'd probably need a 100-110mm stem with a 20mm spacer. In the end I'll most likely go with a 54 and with you having a longer torso, I'd recommend the 54.
Oh and the bars seem a little wide too, but sometimes people go wider or more narrow just based on personal preference. I measure 44cm but prefer a 42cm handlebar width.
Cheers
#14
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
13 Posts
He's 5' 8.5" And his measurements are very close to mine; I'm a bit longer in the inseam. I ride a 54cm Orbea, stem of 80 or 90mm. And a 52cm Bianchi.
I would say the 50cm top tube measurement is too small for you unless you are getting a 120-140mm stem.
I would say the 50cm top tube measurement is too small for you unless you are getting a 120-140mm stem.
#16
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
You are close to my measurements... I have ridden 50cm, 52cm, 54cm, and Giant "S" frames....I have to say that I usually tend to err on the side of a smaller frame.
I have been changing my mind about that recently. I NEVER ride that 50 anymore...WAY too small even with a 140 stem on it. 52 frames work for me, but I almost always end up with a long stem that I can never really get to a height (less than a 2 1/2"-3" saddle to bar drop) that works when I am out of shape (read "too fat to stay in the drops").
I have a 54 now that is awesome. Perfect sizing. A tad big at times, but overall a better fitting bike.
I would say based on the measurements....knowing that everything could change if I saw you in person....that you would be much more comfortable in a 53 or 54 - mainly for reach (TT length) and bar height (head tube length affecting saddle to bar drop).
I have been changing my mind about that recently. I NEVER ride that 50 anymore...WAY too small even with a 140 stem on it. 52 frames work for me, but I almost always end up with a long stem that I can never really get to a height (less than a 2 1/2"-3" saddle to bar drop) that works when I am out of shape (read "too fat to stay in the drops").
I have a 54 now that is awesome. Perfect sizing. A tad big at times, but overall a better fitting bike.
I would say based on the measurements....knowing that everything could change if I saw you in person....that you would be much more comfortable in a 53 or 54 - mainly for reach (TT length) and bar height (head tube length affecting saddle to bar drop).
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#17
TRAIN HARDER.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 494
Bikes: Federal. Scott S50.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my only argument is that I have ridden bmx for 10 years so i really prefer smaller bikes... idk
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589
Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Let me start with, I'm no expert. I was reading a artcle from Grant Peterson about bike sizing and he says that 98% of riders ride bikes that are too small. Not sure about the % but I have to agree with him that many ride bikes that are too small. If you're not racing, you don't need such a tiny bike. A gentleman who is 5' 8.5" tall needs a bigger bike.
Last edited by longbeachgary; 09-30-08 at 02:54 PM. Reason: Forgot somethng
#20
NYC
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times
in
62 Posts
If your bike is too small, raise the seat, and move it back 1cm for eacm cm of stem you add.
That won't be a perfect fit, but it's a starting point from which you can tweak seat position and bar position (raise / lower / flip / change of stem).
Once your too small bike has been FITTED larger, it will no longer be too small for you.