Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

70mm stem too short for a small bike?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

70mm stem too short for a small bike?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-08, 02:17 PM
  #1  
Freakishly Small
Thread Starter
 
BiciPiccola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 18

Bikes: Aegis Swift

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
70mm stem too short for a small bike?

Hi all,

I've been riding for a little over a year and I'm extremely small at 4' 11.5" tall, 100 pounds. I'm currently riding a C'dale Synapse SL 1 47cm that I now realize is too big. So, I've decided on selling that and buying an Aegis Swift 43cm, which has a short 48cm TT and 650c wheels. To keep the handlebars as close as possible, I'm looking at an Oval Concepts 70mm (or it even comes in 60mm) carbon stem. From what I've read so far, short stems can cause handling problems... BUT since the bike is small will the short stem still cause twitchy handling? Thanks for any wisdom on this....
BiciPiccola is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 02:20 PM
  #2  
Hey let's ride.
 
pathdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,002

Bikes: Torelli road bike, Tsunami tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm short 5'5" and use an 80mm stem. I bet a 60mm would fit you fine.
pathdoc is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 02:20 PM
  #3  
Cue
Banned.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 604
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 477 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
No.
Cue is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 02:26 PM
  #4  
hello
 
roadfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 18,694
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 193 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 52 Posts
A lot of people will tell you that a short stem will result in twitchy handling. It won't. You *may* feel a slight increase in responsiveness if you are going from long to short but after one ride you won't even notice a thing.
roadfix is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 02:33 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
I've used a 65mm stem and a 110mm stem and an 80mm stem. I feel that the twitchy issue is not a big deal at all. I don't race though just road biking.
ptle is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 02:45 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 8,546
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I've got 70's on both my road bikes, no problem.
valygrl is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 02:49 PM
  #7  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Piney Flats, TN
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride a 47cm Synapse SL 2 and am looking for a shorter stem as well. The 90mm that is on mine just seems about 15-20mm too long. BTW if you are going to sell your Synapse let me know. I am looking for one for my son.
kc4ixi is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 03:07 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a 120mm stem.
firereign is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 03:09 PM
  #9  
Freakishly Small
Thread Starter
 
BiciPiccola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 18

Bikes: Aegis Swift

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wow, thanks for all the quick replies so far!

kc4ixi, I will let you know when I get the Synapse up for sale... I need to put the original Dura Ace crankset back on. I had switched it out for a Specialites TA with super short crankarms. The bike is 2007, is black and has about 1200 miles on it. Pretty bike...
BiciPiccola is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 03:51 PM
  #10  
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Stem length will not affect you too much and I doubt you would notice it. Bar width on the other hand and you would feel. I once rode a bike with 52cm wide bars and that was twitchy.(Custom bars for a rather large lad)

On the stem length- I ride a tandem and it did have a 120mm stem fitted. I changed this over to 80mm to get a shorter reach and did not notice the difference.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 04:23 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
I'm currently riding with a 50mm stem. Yes it can be a little twitchy but its noting you don't get used to. When cornering its a non issue its just on the straights you need to be a fraction more aware of how you push the bar but again, its nothing you don't get used to. I was using a 60mm stem for a while and it felt quite stable.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 04:38 PM
  #12  
Domestic Domestique
 
UnsafeAlpine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,742

Bikes: Brand New Old Catamount! Schwinn Homegrown, Specialized FSR, Salsa Vaya, Salsa Chile Con Crosso

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
I'm 6 feet and use a 70mm stem.
UnsafeAlpine is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 05:20 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
daintonj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 372
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Look at the stems mountain bikers use. 150mm is considered to be ridiculously long and 80-100mm is considered normal for most riders. I switched from 150mm to 80mm and immediately noticed an improvement in handling and position.

This will be different for road bike geometry but my MTB has a surprisingly steep head angle and the saddle to bar drop is lower than my road bike. I think the change will be similar to a road bike.
daintonj is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 05:50 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
nikoncmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use a 80cm stem, but i got a fork with 2mm + rake to make up for the "twitchiness"
nikoncmk is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 07:55 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by daintonj
Look at the stems mountain bikers use. 150mm is considered to be ridiculously long and 80-100mm is considered normal for most riders. I switched from 150mm to 80mm and immediately noticed an improvement in handling and position.

This will be different for road bike geometry but my MTB has a surprisingly steep head angle and the saddle to bar drop is lower than my road bike. I think the change will be similar to a road bike.
Indeed, a long stem is actually a liability on a MTB. Shorter stems are much preferred for descending singletrack. I think if you were to examine stem lengths along the continuum of MTB styles, from XC---->DH, you would notice a definite trend of decreasing stem length.
grolby is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 07:56 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by nikoncmk
I use a 80cm stem, but i got a fork with 2mm + rake to make up for the "twitchiness"
Actually, a fork with more rake will result in more responsive, twitchier handling, not less.
grolby is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 09:08 PM
  #17  
The Recycled Cycler
 
markwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,399

Bikes: Real Steel. Really. Ti is cool, too !

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A shorter stem really does compromise steering. I'd stay away from anyting shorter than 90. If you need something shorter than a 90, you need a bigger bike with longer TT.
markwebb is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 09:10 PM
  #18  
Domestic Domestique
 
UnsafeAlpine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,742

Bikes: Brand New Old Catamount! Schwinn Homegrown, Specialized FSR, Salsa Vaya, Salsa Chile Con Crosso

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by markwebb
A shorter stem really does compromise steering. I'd stay away from anyting shorter than 90. If you need something shorter than a 90, you need a bigger bike with longer TT.
huh? wouldn't that push the stem even further away thus requiring an even short stem?
UnsafeAlpine is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 09:17 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,457

Bikes: Cervelo R3 (Force)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by markwebb
A shorter stem really does compromise steering. I'd stay away from anyting shorter than 90. If you need something shorter than a 90, you need a bigger bike with longer TT.
fail
Val23708 is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 09:22 PM
  #20  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Burbs of So.Jersey
Posts: 42

Bikes: LeMond Reno 23lbs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Don't know as much about MTB, but on a roadie, a longer stem helps with climbs. (your able to leverage pulling on the handlebars and the longer stem gets you leaning a little more forward)
PhilaRider is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 09:58 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Being comfortable on a bike is the most important thing ever, I am one of the few people "blessed" with long femurs and a short torso, so my stems on both of my bikes are 50mm and the stack heights are 10-9cm,(from the top of the head-set to the center of the handlebars). And despite that, my torso angle is about 30-35 degrees.

Any handling differences that you feel from going to a shorter stem, you should get used to in less than a day's ride.
arakhnidef is offline  
Old 11-10-08, 10:28 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,331

Bikes: 19 Look 765 Gravel RS, 18 Cervelo C5, 13 Niner Jet9 RDO, 08 Surly Crosscheck, 05 Serotta Fierte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'5" and ride a 70mm stem on a 51cm Look 555. Another thing to remember about shortening the reach is the handlebar. A short reach bar at 75mm is much shorter than the regular one's at 85-90mm.
Unagidon is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 07:10 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
AnthonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Posts: 4,135
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3450 Post(s)
Liked 420 Times in 289 Posts
BiciPiccola,

Its good to hear your using shorter cranks and looking at a 650c wheeled bike, especially since I harp on about these things so often. I was curious about the Aegis Swift so I had a look at it on their website. Its a good looking bike and MUCH smaller than a 700c wheeled Canondale but I still don't think its going to fit you properly and at the price of a new one you would be MUCH better off going custom.

The wheelbase on the Swift is about 93cm which tells me it is genuinely smaller than 700c wheeled bikes but its still not as small as my custom 650c wheeled Hillbrick (Australian builder) which has a wheelbase of 89.5cm. Now the top tube length may sound short at 48cm but its still 48cm with a 75º seat tube angle which isn't that much smaller than what you already have. My custom frame has a top tube length of 49.5 cm which may not seem short on paper but thats with a seat tube angle of only 71º which makes a radical difference. My custom frame is significantly smaller than the Swift, specifically the reach is shorter and I think you are going to need something smaller than the Swift too.

Now this is all the more important since you are using shorter cranks. Out of curiosity what length cranks are you using. The shorter cranks means you need a far more relaxed seat tube angle than 75º. Maybe not the 71º that I'm using but much more relaxed nonetheless. When you have your legs positioned correctly for the short cranks then you will need to have the reach shortened to suit.

So for the price of a new Aegis Swift you would be MUCH better off going to a custom builder. Ideally, no essentially the builder will need to have a fitting rig to which they can attach your short cranks and work from there.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 08:08 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Coyote2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by markwebb
A shorter stem really does compromise steering. I'd stay away from anyting shorter than 90. If you need something shorter than a 90, you need a bigger bike with longer TT.
I can hardly believe that you made this ridiculous claim in not one, but TWO threads, which suggests that this is not a typo. Fortunately, I think most people will immediately recognize this as bogus information.
Coyote2 is offline  
Old 11-11-08, 08:33 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by Coyote2
I can hardly believe that you made this ridiculous claim in not one, but TWO threads, which suggests that this is not a typo. Fortunately, I think most people will immediately recognize this as bogus information.
It might be a typo, since it's word for word the same statement. Copy-and-paste, FTF (For The Fail)! Wrong AND lazy.
grolby is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.