Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

My bike was photographed at a car forum meet.

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

My bike was photographed at a car forum meet.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-09, 07:55 AM
  #151  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Harrow, Middlesex
Posts: 267
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlantian
I enjoy all the attention, I love having people look twice at me on the road.

Btw, where are you from? I was born in Washington, but I went to Taiwan for school, then came back. Fluently trilingual.
lol..personally the kind of attention i'm wary of! but i wear a lot of my old jerseys and that draws interesting stares.
I'm from Africa originally, but have spent time in the USA(studied in California) and in Europe, where i now live..
monporn is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 03:58 PM
  #152  
Resident Car-Nut
Thread Starter
 
Atlantian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 77

Bikes: Kent GMC Denali 19"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dewaday
Never underestimilate BF inanity.
In*s*anity?

Originally Posted by RecceDG
No.

The key componant is the *tire*.

If the tire is sticky enough (think drag slick on a dragstrip coated with VHT and rubber) or the power low enough (think kart) then RWD > AWD > FWD.

If the car is in any way traction limited, due to hard tires, narrow tires, an abundance of power compared to the tire's grip level, or slippery surface conditions (wet, snow, gravel, etc) then AWD > RWD > FWD.

FWD is an advantage in three areas only:

1. Packaging. Having the drivetrain forward of the firewall means more room for occupants/cargo;

2. Cost - there's less parts, so it is cheaper; and

2. In the case of very loose or slippery surfaces (like snow) where maximum grip is surface limited, not weight transfer limited, FWD benefits from having the foward static weight distribution over the drive wheels. (Think driving a Trans-Am in the snow) In this case, AWD >FWD > RWD



Do you know how a clutch works?

DG
Yes, and I know first hand that AWD doesn't permit as much slippage as 2WD, and if the tires don't give, something has to, so the clutch will cook.

I personally think that AWD should only stay on roads with adverse conditions. And since RWD is so expensive new... I am going to stick with FWD, I understand which is faster, but I just think that it doesn't matter that much. And besides, if I decide to race, class racing is all stock and equal, it's all driver, and multi-class touring is more favorable to FF's.

If I really wanted performance for 30k new, I would get a cheap sports coupe like an RX8 or something or a car from the new class of "econo drift coupes" with the new Silvia, AE86, or the Genesis. Or I would get a Miata. But I don't like any of the new RWD coupes or the current Miata. And also there is the problem with insurance rates.

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
Plus, for the average driver, FWD is safer than RWD. Spinning the front wheels in a turn won't make the car swap ends, it'll just understeer really badly. Then, when they freak out and let off the gas, the tires will eventually (hopefully) regain their grip and start pointing the car where it needs to go.
Thus, insurance rates will be lower, but I am not that inexperienced...

Originally Posted by monporn
lol..personally the kind of attention i'm wary of! but i wear a lot of my old jerseys and that draws interesting stares.
I'm from Africa originally, but have spent time in the USA(studied in California) and in Europe, where i now live..
Sweet!
Atlantian is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 04:06 PM
  #153  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlantian
In*s*anity?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inanity


inanity
One entry found.


Main Entry:
inan·i·ty Listen to the pronunciation of inanity
Pronunciation:
\i-ˈna-nə-tē\
Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural inan·i·ties
Date:
1603

1: the quality or state of being inane: as a: lack of substance : emptiness b: vapid, pointless, or fatuous character : shallowness
2: something that is inane
Flatballer is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 04:29 PM
  #154  
Senior Member
 
rule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wylie, Texas
Posts: 1,922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You had me until the kickstand.
__________________
rule is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 07:00 PM
  #155  
Resident Car-Nut
Thread Starter
 
Atlantian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 77

Bikes: Kent GMC Denali 19"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flatballer
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inanity


inanity
One entry found.


Main Entry:
inan·i·ty Listen to the pronunciation of inanity
Pronunciation:
\i-ˈna-nə-tē\
Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural inan·i·ties
Date:
1603

1: the quality or state of being inane: as a: lack of substance : emptiness b: vapid, pointless, or fatuous character : shallowness
2: something that is inane
Ah, new word! Cool.

According to that definition, practically everything online is inane.

Originally Posted by rule
You had me until the kickstand.
Lol, so what did you think of the rest of the bike?
Atlantian is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 07:15 PM
  #156  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlantian
Yes, and I know first hand that AWD doesn't permit as much slippage as 2WD, and if the tires don't give, something has to, so the clutch will cook.
When something doesn't give while trying to apply power through the wheels of a vehicle, the vehicle accelerates which tends to be a good thing in a race of any kind.

If you are cooking your clutch with the clutch fully engaged, either your clutch is worn out or misadjusted or you've modded your engine to the point where it's exceeded the holding capacity of your stock clutch.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 09:45 PM
  #157  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
When something doesn't give while trying to apply power through the wheels of a vehicle, the vehicle accelerates which tends to be a good thing in a race of any kind.

If you are cooking your clutch with the clutch fully engaged, either your clutch is worn out or misadjusted or you've modded your engine to the point where it's exceeded the holding capacity of your stock clutch.
I think he's meaning to talk about slipping the clutch when launching the car.

I need to do it with my Civic, especially at the dragstrip. Keep the revs high, pedal the gas & clutch just a bit to keep the tires from breaking traction completely while also keeping them from hooking up and bogging down the motor. If I dump the clutch, I get horrendous wheelhop, which can only really be solved with more solid engine mounts; but I don't want to live with a vibrating cabin on the street, either.

So, yeah, the clutch takes a lot of abuse, even in my car. Adding AWD grip will end up putting more abuse on the clutch.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 09:58 PM
  #158  
Senior Member
 
Bluetick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Great bike dude!! Have fun and enjoy it.
Bluetick is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 10:06 PM
  #159  
Resident Car-Nut
Thread Starter
 
Atlantian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 77

Bikes: Kent GMC Denali 19"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
When something doesn't give while trying to apply power through the wheels of a vehicle, the vehicle accelerates which tends to be a good thing in a race of any kind.

If you are cooking your clutch with the clutch fully engaged, either your clutch is worn out or misadjusted or you've modded your engine to the point where it's exceeded the holding capacity of your stock clutch.
Right, I laugh at your perception that "nothing giving" is an option... If nothing gives, you are going too slow.

Originally Posted by BarracksSi
I think he's meaning to talk about slipping the clutch when launching the car.

I need to do it with my Civic, especially at the dragstrip. Keep the revs high, pedal the gas & clutch just a bit to keep the tires from breaking traction completely while also keeping them from hooking up and bogging down the motor. If I dump the clutch, I get horrendous wheelhop, which can only really be solved with more solid engine mounts; but I don't want to live with a vibrating cabin on the street, either.

So, yeah, the clutch takes a lot of abuse, even in my car. Adding AWD grip will end up putting more abuse on the clutch.
Yup, and 2wd is more fun.

Great bike dude!! Have fun and enjoy it.
thanks
Atlantian is offline  
Old 02-01-09, 10:27 PM
  #160  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlantian
Right, I laugh at your perception that "nothing giving" is an option... If nothing gives, you are going too slow.
Right...smoky burnouts FTW!
joejack951 is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 12:24 AM
  #161  
TRAIN HARDER.
 
TONYKART125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 494

Bikes: Federal. Scott S50.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rwd all day
TONYKART125 is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 01:14 AM
  #162  
Despite all my rage, I am
 
rooftest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,613

Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
If I dump the clutch, I get horrendous wheelhop, which can only really be solved with more solid engine mounts; but I don't want to live with a vibrating cabin on the street, either.
Not sure that engine mounts have anything to do with your traction, but I'm just having trouble getting over "Civic" and "dragstrip" in the same sentance.
rooftest is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 03:02 AM
  #163  
Token Canadian
 
RecceDG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gagetown, New Brunswick
Posts: 1,555

Bikes: Cervelo S1, Norco Faze 1 SL, Surly Big Dummy, Moose Fatbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 200 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Right, I laugh at your perception that "nothing giving" is an option... If nothing gives, you are going too slow.
*snort*

Our ProSolo car - an AWD talon - would do low 1.6 second 60' times on unprepared concrete. 0-60 times in 3.2-3.4 seconds. And it could got WOT without wheelspin pretty much at will - this with 350 HP and nearly 400 ft-lb of torque.

It took a lot, and I do mean a LOT of work to get it that way. Working out the interaction between three differentials was quite the challenge. But it got us to the point where the driver could stop on the gas and the only thing that happened was the car accelerated.

That car won a metric assload of races. It was many things, but "slow" was not one of them.

Oh, and the clutch in that car lasted 7 seasons and as far as I know is still in the car. Notwithstanding 5500 rpm stutterbox clutchdrop launches (a minimum of 12 per event, and 16 was the average) the car was very kind to clutches. Centre diffs, not so much.

DG
RecceDG is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 06:31 AM
  #164  
Monkey in Training
 
mooxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 325

Bikes: IRO Mark V

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlantian
Right, I laugh at your perception that "nothing giving" is an option... If nothing gives, you are going too slow.



Yup, and 2wd is more fun.


thanks
IOW you no nothing about cars. You should stick to your Walmart bike.
mooxster is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 06:59 AM
  #165  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by mooxster
IOW you no nothing about cars. You should stick to your Walmart bike.
Correct.

What kind of car forum is this anyway? Do any of them actually know anything? I hope it isn't where you learned all your drivel from.
Flatballer is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 08:18 AM
  #166  
Senior Member
 
gabdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,485

Bikes: Trek, Giant, PoS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pi}{ie
What the hell kind of POS is that? GMC should stick to their day job of making crappy cars.
Tell us what you really think
gabdy is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 08:20 AM
  #167  
Monkey in Training
 
mooxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 325

Bikes: IRO Mark V

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flatballer
Correct.

What kind of car forum is this anyway? Do any of them actually know anything? I hope it isn't where you learned all your drivel from.
I learned my drivel over at the Bicycling Love Forum.

Whats your excuse?

oops...where you talking to me?
mooxster is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 08:40 AM
  #168  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by mooxster
I learned my drivel over at the Bicycling Love Forum.

Whats your excuse?

oops...where you talking to me?
I was talking to the OP, and using your quote to do it.

But I learned my drivel right here on BF.net, where else?
Flatballer is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 09:34 AM
  #169  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by rooftest
Not sure that engine mounts have anything to do with your traction, but I'm just having trouble getting over "Civic" and "dragstrip" in the same sentance.
Hey, I'd rather drive like an ass at the strip than do it on the street. Besides, bracket racing doesn't need speed, just consistency -- that's how a 22-sec Pinto station wagon was usually the car to beat at Friday night races.

*add-on* And besides, if the dragstrip was only good for driving faster than the other guy, it's immediately useless for 99.9999% of the people who drive there. Because, no matter how fast they are, somebody else is going to be faster. That remaining .0001% is probably going to be faster than everyone else... at least as long as they have a good run that day.

What the stock engine mounts do is absorb vibrations from the engine. The side effect is that the mounts' rubber bushings, along with the inboard mounts of the A-arms, let the whole engine-drivetrain-suspension combo move around.

Basically, the whole drivetrain will rock until the tires break traction, then wheels flick back and bounce off the pavement, regain grip, and do it all again. The whole front of the car shakes violently, and there's a risk of breaking stuff off the car.

Going all the way to solid engine & suspension mounts keeps the drivetrain from shaking around and keeps the wheels planted. But, they transmit every vibration to the rest of the car, so you'll feel it pretty badly in the passenger compartment. That's fine when you're racing, but it sucks when you're crawling along the beltway.

There are also urethane mounts of various hardnesses which balance between wheelhop and cabin vibrations however you'd like. But, they can wear out after a while, because urethane doesn't spring back to its shape very well. There are also mounts made with harder rubber that are more useful for daily use and better wheelhop control than stock mounts.

Last edited by BarracksSi; 02-02-09 at 09:38 AM.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 02-02-09, 11:50 PM
  #170  
Resident Car-Nut
Thread Starter
 
Atlantian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 77

Bikes: Kent GMC Denali 19"

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IOW you no nothing about cars. You should stick to your Walmart bike.
Right, and you know more? two wheel drive is more nimble and handle faster. That's all I have to say.

Mmmm hmmm... Right, I learned it somewhere else, and through some experience, if your tires don't chirp, you didn't start hard enough.

Last edited by Atlantian; 02-02-09 at 11:54 PM.
Atlantian is offline  
Old 02-03-09, 12:12 AM
  #171  
Token Canadian
 
RecceDG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gagetown, New Brunswick
Posts: 1,555

Bikes: Cervelo S1, Norco Faze 1 SL, Surly Big Dummy, Moose Fatbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 200 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Right, I learned it somewhere else, and through some experience
What you haven't seemed to figure out is that at least one (and possibly two) of the people responding in this thread built and drove race cars, and for sure one of them did so professionally.

As well, there are a number of respondants who are pro bike mechanics, and a couple of serious (if not pro, for sure upper level amatuer) road bike racers.

These people have FAR more experience than you do. Some may have been doing what they do longer than you have been alive.

Rather than arguing with them, you should be listening to them. You benefit in the long run.

DG
RecceDG is offline  
Old 02-03-09, 12:28 AM
  #172  
Despite all my rage, I am
 
rooftest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,613

Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BarracksSi

What the stock engine mounts do is absorb vibrations from the engine. The side effect is that the mounts' rubber bushings, along with the inboard mounts of the A-arms, let the whole engine-drivetrain-suspension combo move around.

.
That makes sense - who'da thunk?

I would think that your largest hurdle on fwd drag cars would be torque-steer. My car (stock) is FWD and is a V6 with 275 hp at the crank - If I stomp on the gas with my hand off the wheel, I'll end up in the lane to my left instantly.
rooftest is offline  
Old 02-03-09, 05:44 AM
  #173  
ride, paint, ride
 
simplify's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,204

Bikes: Cannondale R300 Caad2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by bonechilling
Cassette? That's generous. More likely a freewheel.

Originally Posted by Atlantian

No, there are 7 cogs in the back.
https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/freewheels.html#7
simplify is offline  
Old 02-03-09, 06:01 AM
  #174  
.....
 
Jynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,816

Bikes: 2006 Cannondale CAAD8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by rooftest
Not sure that engine mounts have anything to do with your traction, but I'm just having trouble getting over "Civic" and "dragstrip" in the same sentance.

I'm having trouble getting over your ignorance. My civic at the dragstrip ran a 10.4@122 and was daily driven.
__________________
Weight Listing Index (Feel Free to add to it!)

Buy your bike parts here
Jynx is offline  
Old 02-03-09, 09:58 AM
  #175  
Light-Weight by Design
 
Pi}{ie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 711

Bikes: TCR Carbon Limited

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlantian
Right, and you know more? two wheel drive is more nimble and handle faster. That's all I have to say.

Mmmm hmmm... Right, I learned it somewhere else, and through some experience, if your tires don't chirp, you didn't start hard enough.
He used to be a car mechanic I'm sure he knows more about cars than you realise . He and I talk about cars all the time.
Pi}{ie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.