Buying first bike - Torn b/t two Specialized
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12
Bikes: 2008 Specialized Tarmac Expert Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Buying first bike - Torn b/t two Specialized
I am just getting into cycling and really excited about it. I have only ridden a road bike once before, but loved it despite the bike not fitting. I live across the street from a very nice bike shop with knowledgeable people who have basically recommended I get started on either a Kona, Specialized, or Scott with shimano 105 group components. I don't plan to enter any competitions, at least not until I get into the sport for a while, and my job that I start soon will have me working 60-80 hours a week. I plan to be cycling on a stationary trainer most of the time, and hopefully get out on the road once a week probably on Saturdays. I'm in great shape, but just really green in cycling.
I'm serious and know that this is something I want to get into for the long-term. I've basically decided to get a Specialized and the bike shop ordered me the 09 Allez Sport Compact Double for $1,300 (no obligation to buy and I am trialing it tomorrow). Budget isn't really a constraint, but I don't want to get ripped off or buy something out of my skill level. However, I don't want to go cheap and then have to upgrade in a year when I get some experience. The other option for me is to go with the regular Allez Double or Triple in the $850-900 range. The bike shop seems to think the 105 components are worth it if I am really serious about getting into the sport (which I am). The frames are identical I believe. Any advice on whether I should shell out the extra $400 to get into the 105 level or should I stick with an intro bike and save some cash? Also for a beginner with moderate leg strength and intentions to build much more strength, should I be looking at a double or triple? Triple is easier for climbs right? I am moving to San Fran soon, so I will be climbing a lot of hills...
Thanks so much for helping out a newbie like me.
I'm serious and know that this is something I want to get into for the long-term. I've basically decided to get a Specialized and the bike shop ordered me the 09 Allez Sport Compact Double for $1,300 (no obligation to buy and I am trialing it tomorrow). Budget isn't really a constraint, but I don't want to get ripped off or buy something out of my skill level. However, I don't want to go cheap and then have to upgrade in a year when I get some experience. The other option for me is to go with the regular Allez Double or Triple in the $850-900 range. The bike shop seems to think the 105 components are worth it if I am really serious about getting into the sport (which I am). The frames are identical I believe. Any advice on whether I should shell out the extra $400 to get into the 105 level or should I stick with an intro bike and save some cash? Also for a beginner with moderate leg strength and intentions to build much more strength, should I be looking at a double or triple? Triple is easier for climbs right? I am moving to San Fran soon, so I will be climbing a lot of hills...
Thanks so much for helping out a newbie like me.
#2
Farmer tan
I bought the Allez Triple last year, being very much in a similar situation as you are now. It works well enough, and I'll probably stick with it for another year or two. BUT, I wish now I had purchased 105 level with a road double. The compact crankset will work fine in San Fran. You can always swap out the cassette to change to higher or lower ratios as needed (unlikely though).
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,415
Bikes: 2010 Litespeed Icon, 1987 Nishiki Olympic 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How soon are you moving? You might want to wait and buy the bike once you move, as many shops give you a year's free maintenance. But if you need it now, go for the 105. Upgraditis can get expensive.
#4
Hills hurt.. Couches kill
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brazil, IN
Posts: 3,370
Bikes: 1991 Specialized Sirrus Triple, 2010 Trek Madone 6.5 Project One, 2012 Cannondale Caad10, 2013 Trek Crockett
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Go for the 105 if you can, you won't be disappointed.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alabama, boy !
Posts: 863
Bikes: FUJI Nevada 1.0 2009
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So if budget is not a concern why not go for the Allez Elite Compact Double, for about $1600. You get a lighter frame, E5 aluminum, as opposed to A1 aluminum on the Allez Sport, which is the same material they use to make the Hardrock.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
The Allez Sport is much better for the long term. It's 105 components are *definitely* better than the Sora components the base level bike comes with. Components above 105 are much higher priced with little to no performance difference. And if for some reason you want to upgrade to better components, you can mix and match 105 with Ultegra and Dura-Ace, whereas it's *much* more difficult to do so with Sora components (for one thing, 105 and above are all 10 speed while Sora is...8 speed I believe?).
Another factor is the wheels - the base Allez comes with "Alex S500" rims which I've never heard of, while the Allez Sport comes with "Mavic CXP22" rims which are reputed to be very reliable.
If someone wanted to start biking and really really wanted to get into it the Allez Sport is what I'd recommend. Bikes below that point are to crappy, bikes above that point have severelly diminishing returns.
P.S. Most of the threads I've read from people who rode the Allez Sport vs. the Allez Elite seem to agree that there's no difference in ride quality, and a very marginal difference in weight between the two. I think that was mostly just from test riding, but...fyi.
Another factor is the wheels - the base Allez comes with "Alex S500" rims which I've never heard of, while the Allez Sport comes with "Mavic CXP22" rims which are reputed to be very reliable.
If someone wanted to start biking and really really wanted to get into it the Allez Sport is what I'd recommend. Bikes below that point are to crappy, bikes above that point have severelly diminishing returns.
P.S. Most of the threads I've read from people who rode the Allez Sport vs. the Allez Elite seem to agree that there's no difference in ride quality, and a very marginal difference in weight between the two. I think that was mostly just from test riding, but...fyi.
#7
Goathead magnet
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 524
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, definitely wait until you move. If you have issues with the bike, your new LBS won't be able to help you out without $$$. Plus, for any warranty issues with the bike, it's much easier to go through the place where you bought it from (in my experience).
I say for right now, buy some cheap singlespeed and get trained for those SF hills!
I say for right now, buy some cheap singlespeed and get trained for those SF hills!
#8
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,557
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,171 Times
in
1,462 Posts
I bought the Allez Triple last year, being very much in a similar situation as you are now. It works well enough, and I'll probably stick with it for another year or two. BUT, I wish now I had purchased 105 level with a road double. The compact crankset will work fine in San Fran. You can always swap out the cassette to change to higher or lower ratios as needed (unlikely though).
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12
Bikes: 2008 Specialized Tarmac Expert Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for all the help guys. Only 7 posts and I'm already sold on the sport compact. palu mentioned buying out in SF, but I don't move til August and I really don't think I can wait that long. If I buy now I will have about a month and a half with my current LBS who is sure to get me in the right fit and help if any issues right away. What kind of issues should I be concerned about, that having an LBS you bought from would take care of, but not having one would get you in deep water. Other than minor maintenance or tune ups that don't cost that much?
#10
Farmer tan
I'd be concerned about any factory defects and typical break-in wear, such as wheels needing to be retensioned a bit. Get it now, ride it a lot, and have it re-checked before you move.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12
Bikes: 2008 Specialized Tarmac Expert Ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for all your help f4rrest, much appreciated.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,415
Bikes: 2010 Litespeed Icon, 1987 Nishiki Olympic 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for all the help guys. Only 7 posts and I'm already sold on the sport compact. YOJiMBO20 mentioned buying out in SF, but I don't move til August and I really don't think I can wait that long. If I buy now I will have about a month and a half with my current LBS who is sure to get me in the right fit and help if any issues right away. What kind of issues should I be concerned about, that having an LBS you bought from would take care of, but not having one would get you in deep water. Other than minor maintenance or tune ups that don't cost that much?
I'm not egotistical at all.