Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Heel question

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Heel question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-09, 10:21 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dbikingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Spokane/Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,385

Bikes: mountain bike, road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Heel question

No, that isn't a typo I'm not talking about a hill, but a heel When pedaling when would you lower the heel below the pedal. I "think", I typically have my heel level or higher then the pedal.
dbikingman is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 07:40 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,227

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1097 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
It has been shown that attempts to alter the natural foot angle over different parts of the pedal stroke only wastes energy. It's most common for the heel to be positioned 2-3cm higher than the toes, but some people pedal with a more level foot than others. Those with a higher heel will have a taller saddle height, for a given cycling inseam.

There are several formulas and on-the-bike methods for ballparking saddle height and they all assume some significant heel rise. Those who pedal with a level foot seem to think that the formulas and methods are "wrong", but they are only starting points and those who don't raise the heel might have a 2cm lower saddle height. The whole idea is to maintain about a 30 degree bend in the knee at the bottom of the stroke.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 04-11-09 at 11:17 AM.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 07:58 AM
  #3  
Carpe Diem
 
bdcheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MABRA
Posts: 13,149

Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
just pedal naturally.
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
bdcheung is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 10:29 AM
  #4  
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
pdedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
also you must remember, ankling is a felony offense in the republic of lower dystopia
pdedes is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 10:48 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 894
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
It has been shown that attempts to alter the natural foot angle over different parts of the pedal stroke only waste energy. It's most common for the heel to be positioned 2-3cm higher than the toes, but some people pedal with a more level foot than others. Those with a higher heel will have a taller saddle height, for a given cycling inseam.

There are several formulas and on-the-bike methods for ballparking saddle height and they all assume some significant heel rise. Those who pedal with a level foot seem to think that the formulas and methods are "wrong", but they are only starting points and those who don't raise the heel might have a 2cm lower saddle height. The whole idea is to maintain about a 30 degree bend in the knee at the bottom of the stroke.
That's an excellent answer. My saddle height is all juked to go with my frame size and I was trying to learn to get my heel down when I was trying to be more intensive with trainer training this winter. I thought I was "learning" at first, but I think what I really did was better my power and form a bit, considering that I can get up the same hills as last year in a taller gear with the same cadence and smoother pedaling.

I love it when someone asks a question that has a technical answer and gets it, succinct and layered!
mascher is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 11:35 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
JonnyV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bellwood, Pa
Posts: 1,679

Bikes: 2012 Fuji Altamira 1.0. 2017 Lynskey R250

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
The whole idea is to maintain about a 30 degree bend in the knee at the bottom of the stroke.
I agree with everything you said except this last part. Personally I found this much bend causes knee pain. Of course this is one of those issues where advice is meant to merely be in the ballpark. I've found that about 5 degrees of bend at the bottom of the pedal stroke is most comfortable, more than that and my knees begin to ache after just a few miles. My 2 cents.

And I almost forgot to answer the OP's question. I usually pedal with my heel slightly higher than my toes on the downstroke. Again, it's a comfort thing.
JonnyV is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 12:01 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dbikingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Spokane/Tri-Cities WA
Posts: 1,385

Bikes: mountain bike, road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks. I just heard the comment the other day when watching a road race on TV. The commentator mentioned something about the riders pedals with their heels lower. I wasn't sure if this was going up a hill or not. I thought I might have picked up a new technique I guess not. Then again the Pros do a lot of things I don't
dbikingman is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 04:05 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,227

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1097 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
Originally Posted by JonnyV
I agree with everything you said except this last part. Personally I found this much bend causes knee pain. Of course this is one of those issues where advice is meant to merely be in the ballpark. I've found that about 5 degrees of bend at the bottom of the pedal stroke is most comfortable, more than that and my knees begin to ache after just a few miles. My 2 cents.

And I almost forgot to answer the OP's question. I usually pedal with my heel slightly higher than my toes on the downstroke. Again, it's a comfort thing.
Everyone is different, but the "experts" who have written books on the subject, like Andy Pruitt, say around 30 degrees. Watch the pros on TV. They don't have their legs at near full extension at the bottom of the stroke - much closer to 30 degrees than 15 or less.

You may have other issues, like incorrect saddle fore/aft position and/or foot alignment issues. For example, so your knees track straight up and down? If not, you have issures that need attention.

FWIW, if the saddle is set so the foot is horizontal at the bottom of the stroke, it only takes a 2-3cm rise of the heel to create that 30 degree included angle. Others have posted that they think this starting point is too high and you post the opposite. It's not a matter of right or wrong but a pro like Andy Pruitt would not likely set a saddle that high.
DaveSSS is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 04:27 PM
  #9  
meow
 
bostongarden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hint: check out my BF name
Posts: 5,831

Bikes: 2016 Parlee Altum, 2013 Cannondale Super Six Evo Hi Mod Di2 only, 2011 Cannondale Super Six, Dura Ace 7800, 2007 Cannondale System Six Dura Ace 7800, 1992 Bridgestone RB-1, MB-2, MB-3, MB-5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Ringo said it best, just ride naturally...
bostongarden is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 04:28 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152

Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
It has been shown that attempts to alter the natural foot angle over different parts of the pedal stroke only wastes energy. It's most common for the heel to be positioned 2-3cm higher than the toes, but some people pedal with a more level foot than others. Those with a higher heel will have a taller saddle height, for a given cycling inseam.

There are several formulas and on-the-bike methods for ballparking saddle height and they all assume some significant heel rise. Those who pedal with a level foot seem to think that the formulas and methods are "wrong", but they are only starting points and those who don't raise the heel might have a 2cm lower saddle height. The whole idea is to maintain about a 30 degree bend in the knee at the bottom of the stroke.
I would be interested to find out if the people used for these studies were cyclists who employ ankling and dropping of the heel into their pedal stroke, or, if like most of these studies, they are on untrained populations so that it is hard to say if the results will hold for a trained population.

I can say from personal experience that when I ankle and drop my heel I feel little or no change in RPE, but I get a noticeable, and positive, change in the watts I am putting out.

Also, where are you measuring this 30deg angle from? Any normal pedal stroke will have an obtuse angle between the femur and thigh near the bottom of the pedal stroke, which seems to me would be the important angle to measure, so I dont understand where this 30deg angle is being referenced from.
jonestr is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 04:40 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
bhkyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: York UK
Posts: 3,027

Bikes: 2X dualdrive Mezzo folder,plus others

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Peddling with heels down effective? is it to do with the closed pack postion of the ankle joint .ie fully doriflexied means that less effort is reguired from lateral stabilising muscles of the ankle? This is due to the ankle being most fixed against any lateral movement in the heel down postion.
bhkyte is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 04:53 PM
  #12  
SmackTalk'rExtraordinaire
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: So. Jersey
Posts: 293

Bikes: LeMond Reno

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jonestr
I can say from personal experience that when I ankle and drop my heel I feel little or no change in RPE, but I get a noticeable, and positive, change in the watts I am putting out.
I notice that also.
I think the reason has to do with working a different set of muscles that are more rested. (sort of like how sliding back on your seat for a minute or two seems "easier" - When more likely it's just giving different muscle "locations" a break)
I know I can't "conciously" ankle for long periods of time but it helps when climbing up a steep hill. I prefer ankling to getting out of the saddle.
FreddyBoy is offline  
Old 04-11-09, 05:58 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ABQ, NM
Posts: 1,152

Bikes: Neuvation F100, Surly Cross Check, Van Dessel Holeshot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FreddyBoy
I notice that also.
I think the reason has to do with working a different set of muscles that are more rested. (sort of like how sliding back on your seat for a minute or two seems "easier" - When more likely it's just giving different muscle "locations" a break)
I know I can't "conciously" ankle for long periods of time but it helps when climbing up a steep hill. I prefer ankling to getting out of the saddle.
It could be recruitment of different muscles or it could be a more efficient use of currently used muscle groups. I dont have great evidence to say it is more efficient use, but sliding to the back of the saddle definitely recruits different muscle groups, i.e. more glutes and hamstrings.

as an aside, It seems that riding toe down uses mostly quads, but as I pull through the pedal stroke by dropping my heel, then I am aware that I am using my hamstrings. By lowering my seat to allow for better heel drop I was able to really transform myself into a better all around cyclist. I understand that this only anecdotal, but I have many anecdotes of this same kind from when I used to do a lot of fitting.
jonestr is offline  
Old 04-12-09, 02:33 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
bhkyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: York UK
Posts: 3,027

Bikes: 2X dualdrive Mezzo folder,plus others

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 107 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Along time ago I read a book dedicated just to the pedalling action. I remember that the hamstring were active for the lomgest period ,followed by the calfs and the quads were pretty low down on the list.However this was the amount of time active ,not the total force during the pedal stroke.

I would guess that putting the ankle in to closed pack postion would "fix" the ankle allowing the stronger knee and hip joint moving muscles to better provide the power.
bhkyte is offline  
Old 04-12-09, 07:38 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 7,227

Bikes: Cinelli superstar disc, two Yoeleo R12

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1097 Post(s)
Liked 559 Times in 446 Posts
The 30 degree angle is the angle between the upper and lower leg. A totally straight leg would be zero. That same angle could be called 150 degrees when bent and 180 when straight.

Andy Pruitt's "Complete Medical Guide for Cyclists" has lots of good info on bike fit.

Last edited by DaveSSS; 04-12-09 at 07:45 AM.
DaveSSS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.