Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Survey: What's Your Height & Frame Size?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Survey: What's Your Height & Frame Size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-09, 11:56 AM
  #101  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'2"
60 Trek Madone 5.2
sjohnson999 is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 12:09 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
DigitalRJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Greensburg, PA
Posts: 1,203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5'11.5"

58 Trek 2300 P1

What are we trying to achieve with this survey....just curious?
DigitalRJH is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 12:23 PM
  #103  
climber has-been
Thread Starter
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,106

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 1,790 Posts
Originally Posted by DigitalRJH
What are we trying to achieve with this survey....just curious?
My selfish reason:

I regularly need to select a bike for someone who's coming on a tour, and all I know about him is his height. I usually get it right, but it sure will be nice to have some statistics to back up the guesswork.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is online now  
Old 04-17-09, 12:27 PM
  #104  
Embracing my inner Fred
 
shuffles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pretty far west of Alpe d'Huez
Posts: 360

Bikes: Early 90s Specialized Epic Pro carbon/DA

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'
58cm
shuffles is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 12:32 PM
  #105  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,174 Times in 1,465 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay-W
6'1" and 56cm. Tried 58's before, felt like I was driving a truck.
Exactly my feeling. My first road bike was a 58 - that's what the LBS employee told me to get. It felt like a truck. I since learned a 56 (c-c) is perfect for me at 6'0"
StanSeven is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 12:45 PM
  #106  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5' 10.5"

56 cm on classic geometry
Arrowtalon is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 12:52 PM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
My selfish reason:

I regularly need to select a bike for someone who's coming on a tour, and all I know about him is his height. I usually get it right, but it sure will be nice to have some statistics to back up the guesswork.
This won't help you much since all you know is the rider's height beforehand, but my guess is that a simple ratio of toptube/seat tube against the rider's height/inseam would give you a very good idea. It would certainly be a better approximation than simply guessing based on height.

I've recommended sizes to about a dozen friends, often opposing what bike shop folks will say. So far, I've never gotten it wrong for classic geometry bikes. My wife, for example is the same height as me, 5' 10" and has a 34" inseam. I have a 32-33" inseam. Not only does this mean she needs the seat a bit higher, it also means she needs the reach a bit shorter. An inch of seat post is easy to adjust for, but an inch of reach can be damned uncomfortable. The result is my wife needs a 54 cm frame with a higher seat (she also likes higher handlebars to account for this) even though we are the same height.
Arrowtalon is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 12:54 PM
  #108  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5'8" ...
54 trek..
51 kestrel
crydee is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 01:08 PM
  #109  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Alabaster, AL
Posts: 33

Bikes: 2008 Specialized S-Works Roubaix 2007/04 Specialized Allez

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'4" - 34" inseam
61cm Specialized Roubaix
dallen is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 01:49 PM
  #110  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5'9" and a smidge
54.5cm ctc flat top tube
grid256 is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 01:55 PM
  #111  
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
6' 0"
54cm (09 CAAD9-5)

I have a long (32") inseam and short torso and arms. At the LBS at which I ordered the bike two guys did fits separately. The computer told them both 56cm. Once they set the 56cm bike up it was obviously too long. We setup a 54cm and much, much better. Guess computers don't know it all. I would have had to resort to a 80-90mm stem on a 56cm...blech.
khatfull is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 02:08 PM
  #112  
Cycling Skier
 
songfta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 620

Bikes: 2019 Moots Vamoots DR, 2008 Pedal Force ZX3, 2006 Jamis Eclipse, 1997 Marin Indian Fire Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1. 6' 4" (37.5" true inseam [crotch-to-floor])
2. 61cm
songfta is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 02:51 PM
  #113  
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 26

Bikes: Waterford RS-12 Basso Gap road bikes, Fat Chance mtn bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
6'1" 59cm c-c steel frame
horsepowered is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 02:58 PM
  #114  
slowest!
 
dsellinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NW WA
Posts: 628

Bikes: Felt, Atala, Kona

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by terrymorse
I'll start:

1. 5'11"
2. 56 cm

Thanks!
Ditto.
dsellinger is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 03:12 PM
  #115  
Senior Member
 
MulliganAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hot-Lanta
Posts: 769

Bikes: 2007 Specialized Tarmac with Mavic ES wheels, 2009 Specialized Hardrock, 2014 Rivendell Sam Hillborne

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddy88
1. 5' 10"
2. 56cm Specialized Tarmac
Ditto!
MulliganAl is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 06:01 PM
  #116  
Senior Member
 
FrederickH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chambersburg, PA
Posts: 163

Bikes: Litespeed Classic- Full Campy 10 Speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5-10"

53 cm.
FrederickH is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 06:06 PM
  #117  
Senior Member
 
longbeachgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beautiful Long Beach California
Posts: 3,589

Bikes: Eddy Merckx San Remo 76, Eddy Merckx San Remo 76 - Black Silver and Red, Eddy Merckx Sallanches 64 (2); Eddy Merckx MXL;

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
5 foot 7

55 cm
longbeachgary is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 06:11 PM
  #118  
Senior Member
 
gfrance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5' 10" (177cm): Size 57cm Look KX Light, very slightly sloping top tube with 120mm stem.

Size 59cm IRO but that has whacky measurements...57 top tube though. 110 stem.
gfrance is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 06:27 PM
  #119  
Slogging along
 
rubic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Fernando Valley, SoCal
Posts: 1,148

Bikes: Cannondale Synapse '06, Mongoose titanium road bike '00--my commuter. Yes, Mongoose once made a decent ti road bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'2"
60cm
rubic is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 06:31 PM
  #120  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'
58 cm virtual top tube
eminefes is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 07:05 PM
  #121  
Senior Member
 
Paul Y.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kennett sq. pa
Posts: 912

Bikes: 2008 Lynskey R220 2005 Lemond

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5'8"
53cm Lynskey
Paul Y. is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 07:32 PM
  #122  
hobo
 
grahny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CO
Posts: 3,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'
57.3cmTT, 11cm stem
grahny is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 07:50 PM
  #123  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 252
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
Sloping TTs might allow the use of a larger frame, but read my comments regarding frame size. If you don't specify c-c, c-t or oddball Trek sizing, your info is incomplete. A 56cm Trek is more like a 52cm in some other brands, at least vertically. With the new 30mm taller head tubes on some models, there's a big difference between the pro and non-pro models.

A frame's true size is defined by the head tube length, with the headset and it's reach. A stack height is an even better indicator of vertial frame size, but that measure is not used by many brands. Cervelo was the first brand I know of to use stack and reach. Trek has followed their lead.

People are often guided to a specific frame size by well meaning but poorly educated local shop employees. When I first started riding seriously in 1985, several stores wanted to sell me a 23 inch or 58cm frame, back in the days when many frames came in huge 2-inch increments. I'm only 5'-6.5" tall, but I could straddle that size with my 83cm inseam. Of course it was too large, but I rode the thing for a year or so before figuring out that I really need a 21 inch or 53-55cm size.
By the looks of all the "helpful" posts following your point made above, obviously seems like no one really cares about trivial, specific details like c-c, c-t, virtual, st angle, ht angle, inseam vs height, bla-bla-bla...
Why ya wanna go and complicate things?
Now back to the OP's topic: "Survey: What's Your Height & Frame Size?"

Last edited by ezee; 04-18-09 at 05:35 AM.
ezee is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 08:03 PM
  #124  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1. 5'6" (but very long legs)
2. 21" ct = 53.3 cm ('85 Trek)
New Yorker is offline  
Old 04-17-09, 08:05 PM
  #125  
Too Fat for This Sport
 
Diegomayra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 698

Bikes: 2011 Cannondale Supersix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5'7"
52cm
Diegomayra is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.