Power
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Modesto
Posts: 190
Bikes: bianchi san jose
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Power
I want a crank based powermeter. I just built my new bike up with SR11 so I'm hesitant to get rid of the crank but...
So Quarq looks cool but there isn't a compact yet- when will that happen?
Srm looks like the other option=more money?
I already have a 705 so that part is done. I do wonder if the interface, etc is better with the srm headunit than with the 705?
I guess I also wonder because I'm at a loss when I read threads on training with power. FTP, LT, LGBS, etc - I'm not sure if I'm even smart enough to get it..
So Quarq looks cool but there isn't a compact yet- when will that happen?
Srm looks like the other option=more money?
I already have a 705 so that part is done. I do wonder if the interface, etc is better with the srm headunit than with the 705?
I guess I also wonder because I'm at a loss when I read threads on training with power. FTP, LT, LGBS, etc - I'm not sure if I'm even smart enough to get it..
#2
bf is my facebook.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1,156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
https://www.amazon.com/Training-Racin.../dp/1931382794
Also,
https://67.201.16.77/showthread.php?t=488667
#3
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
Just having looked at SRM displays, I would be the 705 is at least as good, if not better than the SRM head unit with regard to displaying the data you want, and customizing the display, and you get GPS to boot.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 548
Bikes: 03 Lemond, 08 S-works Tarmac SL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Racing and training with a power meter my Hunter Allen. <-------Everything you need to know. Why do you want to go crank based when the powertap is just as, or more acurate? Sure it measures actual power to the road and not at the crank, but so what? Just wondering.
#5
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't know when compacts will be out... sorry can't help you there. As far as the Garmin as a head unit vs. the SRM's, there are a few things that Garmin doesn't "get" because it is still thinking of the Edge as a bike computer/navigation device more than a training tool, so some concepts are lost on them, such as not being able to separate the option for cadence and power averaging, and not having the ability to smooth the power display so that it is not as jumpy. A few people have had issues with file corruption but I do not believe that it is as widespread as it seems (internet forums can be an echo chamber in that regard).
Quarq is certainly cheaper than a SRM and more than a PT. That's just the way it is. A crank PM is nice for standard reasons of not having to be wheel dependent, which is especially nice if you switch between a training and racing wheel. So if that is more important that the price difference, then a crank PM is the way to go. If getting power as cheaply as possible is the priority, then a PT is probably the way to go. A PT is not more accurate because it measures power to the road (actually just to the hub, there are still rolling resitance losses to the road), it is just measuring slightly differently. For training purposes, knowing what you are actually putting out is more useful than knowing what is being applies to the road, but in practice I don't think it really matters at all.
Quarq is certainly cheaper than a SRM and more than a PT. That's just the way it is. A crank PM is nice for standard reasons of not having to be wheel dependent, which is especially nice if you switch between a training and racing wheel. So if that is more important that the price difference, then a crank PM is the way to go. If getting power as cheaply as possible is the priority, then a PT is probably the way to go. A PT is not more accurate because it measures power to the road (actually just to the hub, there are still rolling resitance losses to the road), it is just measuring slightly differently. For training purposes, knowing what you are actually putting out is more useful than knowing what is being applies to the road, but in practice I don't think it really matters at all.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,917
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Because you are stuck with whatever wheel you build up. Between my training rear wheel (32h Mavic), race wheel (Easton EC90 Aero), and my rear disk (Renn) Im not getting the full power picture everytime I ride.
#7
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
When I used a powertap, I could only use one rear wheel, and you had the problem of compromising on what wheel you used, or not racing with the power meter.
Also, I believe there is a bit of a weight advantage with a Quarq, or SRM compared to a PT hub, but the newer PT's may have narrowed that.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#9
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
As long as you have a compatible BB installed on your TT bike, it is a less than 5 minute operation to move a crank based power meter from your road bike to your TT bike.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.