Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Your Bar widths

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Your Bar widths

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-09, 05:08 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 70

Bikes: FBM Mastr Blastr

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Your Bar widths

So what are you guys running. I have only ever run 42cm myself being 184cm tall and wide in the shoulders im thinking of trying some 44s.

Are wider bars better for sprinting or is it "to each his own"

Any idea what the pros ride?
julz is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 05:15 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Take my response with a grain of salt as I am no expert, but I was always under the impression that you were supposed to match the width of your shoulders. I am only ~ 5' 9" (175 cm) and have narrower shoulders and have only run 40cm bars. They feel comfortable enough for me to never have really thought of changing. Reason suggests that if you are comfortable there is no need to change.
JeremiahW037 is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 05:20 PM
  #3  
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by julz
So what are you guys running. I have only ever run 42cm myself being 184cm tall and wide in the shoulders im thinking of trying some 44s.

Are wider bars better for sprinting or is it "to each his own"

Any idea what the pros ride?
my bar width is irrelevant to yours.
botto is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 05:20 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern NY...Brownville
Posts: 2,571

Bikes: Specialized Aethos, Specialized Diverge Comp E5

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked 454 Times in 265 Posts
I have 40cm shoulders and use 42cm bars.
Kai Winters is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 05:38 PM
  #5  
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I have pretty narrow shoulders and I'm currently on 42cm bars. I've used 40cm and probably like them better. I would like to try a cheap 36-38mm bar just to see what bringing the arms in that much feels like. Yeah, yeah...narrow bars, restricted breathing yada, yada...but I'd still like to try them.
khatfull is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 05:45 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
grolby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOSTON BABY
Posts: 9,788
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Originally Posted by khatfull
I have pretty narrow shoulders and I'm currently on 42cm bars. I've used 40cm and probably like them better. I would like to try a cheap 36-38mm bar just to see what bringing the arms in that much feels like. Yeah, yeah...narrow bars, restricted breathing yada, yada...but I'd still like to try them.
It's a load of crap. Use narrower bars without fear. I am much happier with 40cm bars on my road bike than 42s.

ETA: Earlier in my cycling life, I bought into the Rivendell Theory of Handlebar Width, that is, that Wider Is Better. It was exacerbated by the first set of drop bars that I ever used, which were a randonneur style bend that I found very uncomfortable (in case it's unclear, randonneur bars are effectively much narrower at the hoods than their measured width). So I was riding handlebars that were too wide until fairly recently. Ironically, my preferences have always gone the other way with MTB bars. I hate the tractor-wide bars that are so popular.

As for sprinting, wider bars are not any better. Any supposed leverage advantage that you would gain (which is nonsense, because your sprinting power comes from your legs) is counteracted by poor fit. The width differences aren't enough to matter. Some might find slightly wider bars a bit easier to use on, say, a 'cross bike, but for road riding it's a lot more comfortable to get a comfortable fit.

Last edited by grolby; 09-24-09 at 05:51 PM.
grolby is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 06:27 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Gatineau, Quebec
Posts: 347

Bikes: Rocky Mountain

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by khatfull
I have pretty narrow shoulders and I'm currently on 42cm bars. I've used 40cm and probably like them better. I would like to try a cheap 36-38mm bar just to see what bringing the arms in that much feels like. Yeah, yeah...narrow bars, restricted breathing yada, yada...but I'd still like to try them.
I ride a vintage bike with 38cm bars - you can certainly get used to them and I'm not sure I buy the restricted breathing theory. But I think slightly wider bars are more comfortable.
Jaeger is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 07:11 PM
  #8  
Mountain goat
 
go4gr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 368

Bikes: BMC Team Machine SLR01, (RIP) BMC Team Machine SLT01, CDale SuperV400, Cramerotti Genius Nivacrom, C'Dale R600

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'3", long arms, wide shoulders, using 44cm width.
go4gr8 is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 07:39 PM
  #9  
Number One
 
iareConfusE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Danville, CA
Posts: 536

Bikes: Scott CR1 Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You should be measuring from armpit to armpit. Once you get this measurement, add 2 cm to it. That is the length of bar you should ride. I'm currently riding 42cm.
iareConfusE is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 07:44 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
im 6 foot even and I ride 46 cm bars.
BMWdoc is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 07:46 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
I prefer wide, I like the leverage and stability when standing and hammering.

I have freakishly broad shoulders and run 46cm bars.
schnee is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 07:48 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Jakedatc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 3,054
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by iareConfusE
You should be measuring from armpit to armpit. Once you get this measurement, add 2 cm to it. That is the length of bar you should ride. I'm currently riding 42cm.
that's confusing.. the way i was measured at my fitting was AC joint to AC joint.. aka. where your shoulder meets your collar bone.


i ride 42's.. i could be on 40's
Jakedatc is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 07:49 PM
  #13  
FBoD Member at Large
 
khatfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,094
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by iareConfusE
You should be measuring from armpit to armpit. Once you get this measurement, add 2 cm to it. That is the length of bar you should ride. I'm currently riding 42cm.
Interesting, I've heard of the top of shoulders, the pointy things on the front of the shoulders, but not armpit to armpit. And, I assume you mean width of bar...and C-T-C or O-T-O on the bar measurement with your method?
khatfull is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 07:50 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6'1.5", long arms, wide shoulders, 44cm C-C width.
gbond is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 08:05 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Jakedatc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 3,054
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by khatfull
Interesting, I've heard of the top of shoulders, the pointy things on the front of the shoulders, but not armpit to armpit. And, I assume you mean width of bar...and C-T-C or O-T-O on the bar measurement with your method?
it doesn't make sense that way. muscle mass/fat or lack there of is way more variable. bony landmarks are consistent. AC joints mark where your shoulders will be straight forward.. where you want to be while riding.
Jakedatc is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 08:13 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
daxr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: K.F., Orygun
Posts: 905

Bikes: 08 Giant Boulder, 08 Scattante XLR

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I built my last road bike with 42 cm width bars, but after a lot of miles they didn't really feel right when out of the saddle climbing. On my MTB the bar ends are pretty wide-spaced and have a good strong and stable feel climbing. I switched to 44 cm bars on the road bike, and its a much better feel - a good compromise between aerodynamics and leverage.

All the stuff about breathing easier is nonsense, and I don't think the standard formula is worth much - its how you ride and how things work for you.
daxr is offline  
Old 09-24-09, 09:01 PM
  #17  
Number One
 
iareConfusE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Danville, CA
Posts: 536

Bikes: Scott CR1 Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by khatfull
Interesting, I've heard of the top of shoulders, the pointy things on the front of the shoulders, but not armpit to armpit. And, I assume you mean width of bar...and C-T-C or O-T-O on the bar measurement with your method?
Er, yeah width, not length. Center to center.

Also, when I said armpit to armpit that was kind of what I just said because I didn't know the names of the parts you actually had to measure. The correct parts are a bit further out from your armpits. What Jakedac said sounds about right.
iareConfusE is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.