Oakley
#27
.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: "The Woo", MA
Posts: 4,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't have Jawbones or Radars. I do have two pairs of Flak Jackets, which I like quite a bit. They fit just right, the optics are excellent, no fogging, and they stay in place most of the time. However, I bought a pair of Tifosi Stelvio's, and they are all I wear on the bike now. All the benefits of the Oakleys I have, at 1/3rd the price. And I don't care of they get busted. Win-Win.
#28
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just got some Radar Paths, and they're great. When looking up there is no obstruction from the top bar, and these things don't fog up at all either.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,344
Bikes: '17 Trek Emonda, '16 Yeti ASR5, '14 Cdale F29 '08 Orbea Orca.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have both the Half Jacket (Ice Iridium and Persimmon lenses) and the Jawbone (Black Iridium Polarized VR28 and Persimmon). I love them both. You get what you pay for.
I almost purchased the Tifosi Dolomite with the Fototec lens but it felt a bit too small and a bit cheap/flimsy. The price savings would've been awesome but I opted for the Jawbone instead. Oakley's are overpriced though. The Jawbone was over twice as much as the Tifosi...
I almost purchased the Tifosi Dolomite with the Fototec lens but it felt a bit too small and a bit cheap/flimsy. The price savings would've been awesome but I opted for the Jawbone instead. Oakley's are overpriced though. The Jawbone was over twice as much as the Tifosi...
#32
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,468
Bikes: 2011 Cervelo S2, 2001Trek USPS 5200, 06 Cervelo P3 Alum, 1999 Schwinn Pro Stock BMX, 1987 Schwinn Traveler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have Flak Jackets now, and I like them. Much lighter than my old Juliets I lost, and probably the easiest, quickest to change lens with. I've owned probably 15-20 pairs of Oakleys in my life. I like these better than most. The Radars, and Jawbones, are just too flashy for me.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 276
Bikes: A few Scotts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
so OP, how do you get the Tifosi's for a tenth of the cost of the Oakley's??
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chester County, PA
Posts: 2,365
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 5.5 CAAD9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Tifosi was a sponsor for my team this past year, I got two pairs at a pretty low cost, the lenses are very good, the glasses are pretty light, but I too had the fogging problem, the dolomite's I wear even have little vents in the lenses, but they fog pretty bad. I have the Ventoux's as well, they fog up easily as well. In just about every race I ended up taking off my tifosi's because they would fog and not vent too well. A few others on my team had the same issue.
I just bought a pair of oakley half jacket's from some dude for $50, one lense has a small scratch, still the optics are soooo nice. I just can't get myself to spend $$$ for a pair of glasses that could get ruined very easily, but I am weakening, I want a new pair of flak jackets or radars so bad.
I just bought a pair of oakley half jacket's from some dude for $50, one lense has a small scratch, still the optics are soooo nice. I just can't get myself to spend $$$ for a pair of glasses that could get ruined very easily, but I am weakening, I want a new pair of flak jackets or radars so bad.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I cannot say whether or not the Oakleys are worth it, it all comes down to budget and personal preference. I will say that they stand behind their warranty, and I have had several pairs of new lenses sent to me for free for different frames over the years. Oddly enough, none of the damage was cycling related, but it was good stuff nonetheless. Also, if you happen to be in the military and don't mind black, you can more or less get them for free.
#38
Mr. Sparkle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 534
Bikes: 08 Specialized Allez Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Oakley is also one of the few companies to take REALLY good care of federal agents as well as military personnel. For that I'll always be loyal to them, even when I'm paying full price like my Jawbones.
#39
Mitcholo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think I'm just oging to stay with Tifosi for now. Our Tifosi rep came in today and showed off a new frame from Tifosi that looks a lot like the Radar, and then our Giro rep came in and showed off some of their cool new stuff.
#41
Senior Member
Oakley Radat fit me perfectly and are so comfortable. However I didn't wanna spend £130 on them so bught Specialized San Something for £80 instead. They fit me almost as comfortably. I cant compare performance though as I never rode Radar on the bike.
#42
What?
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South-West, CT
Posts: 78
Bikes: CAAD9 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I bought myself a pair of ebay glasses and a brand new saddle for less than a pair of Oakleys. I'm far to clumsy to trust myself with >$150 glasses but I certainly wouldn't decline if I was given a pair.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,875
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpy, Schwinn 974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oakleys are totally overrated. They do this subversive brand-loyalty thing, pay pros to make their shades "I wanna be like the pros" and people line up like sheep to buy their latest and greatest.
#44
Big Mac and No hills.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ontario
Posts: 245
Bikes: Trek 1500, Raleigh Tarantula
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chester County, PA
Posts: 2,365
Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 5.5 CAAD9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That's your opinion and no one can argue with you about your opinion. I disagree, I don't think they are overrated. Over priced, yes but not overrated.
#47
grilled cheesus
Tifosi was a sponsor for my team this past year, I got two pairs at a pretty low cost, the lenses are very good, the glasses are pretty light, but I too had the fogging problem, the dolomite's I wear even have little vents in the lenses, but they fog pretty bad. I have the Ventoux's as well, they fog up easily as well. In just about every race I ended up taking off my tifosi's because they would fog and not vent too well. A few others on my team had the same issue.
I just bought a pair of oakley half jacket's from some dude for $50, one lense has a small scratch, still the optics are soooo nice. I just can't get myself to spend $$$ for a pair of glasses that could get ruined very easily, but I am weakening, I want a new pair of flak jackets or radars so bad.
I just bought a pair of oakley half jacket's from some dude for $50, one lense has a small scratch, still the optics are soooo nice. I just can't get myself to spend $$$ for a pair of glasses that could get ruined very easily, but I am weakening, I want a new pair of flak jackets or radars so bad.
this was my experience. the fogging up with the Tifosi's becomes a real pain when flying mid pack of an aggressive ride on a wet day.
i also agree that Oakley's may be over priced, but in no way are overrated. later.
__________________
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,875
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpy, Schwinn 974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm old school. As long as Oakley makes replacement lenses for my M frames (I started with Razor?--you know the LeMond ones-- 1989) I'm happy. My wife has a half-jacket, two kids have Oakleys (the third loves my heirloom 1974 B & L aviators for their ultra-cool retro factor.) I would sort of like to get a polarized lens, but I don't think it is worth an extra 50 bucks and particularly since I've noticed that my polarized Revos and LCD displays have incompatibility issues.
#49
Mitcholo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850
Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sometimes they fog up on long, slow climbs, but I use RainX on my glasses, so I don't get much fogging a all in the rain.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I like my Radars over my tifosis, but those ones you posted are looking pretty cool.
Oakley> I like the optics. they're totally ballin. They sometimes give me pain over the ears
Tifosi> Cheap, comes with other lenses, Useless in the rain for me, Frame impairs my sight a bit. not so ballin
Oakley> I like the optics. they're totally ballin. They sometimes give me pain over the ears
Tifosi> Cheap, comes with other lenses, Useless in the rain for me, Frame impairs my sight a bit. not so ballin