Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Other sites like Test Rider ?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Other sites like Test Rider ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-10, 12:41 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zeo_max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alabama, boy !
Posts: 863

Bikes: FUJI Nevada 1.0 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Other sites like Test Rider ?

Just discovered this site a couple of days ago when one of you posted their review on the 2010 Fuji SST 1.0. I was really amazed with the quality of the reviews and that they took the time to do it all on video. Unfortunately their video reviews are of limited quantity, and they haven't covered as much stuff as I would've liked to have seen.

So I'm left craving for other sites that make quality video reviews like Test Rider. Any suggestions ?
zeo_max is offline  
Old 02-07-10, 01:16 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I like how all their reviews start to sound exactly the same after you've watched two or three of them... Competitive Cyclist has some ads... I mean "reviews"... on their site. Personally, I gave up on video reviews, learned to read, and have been using BF (when search is working) and, occasionally, RoadBikeReview.
sstorkel is offline  
Old 02-07-10, 01:49 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
mustang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,719

Bikes: 2006 road bike, 2012 cx bike, 2012 carbon rb, 2014 hardtail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sstorkel
I like how all their reviews start to sound exactly the same after you've watched two or three of them... Competitive Cyclist has some ads... I mean "reviews"... on their site. Personally, I gave up on video reviews, learned to read, and have been using BF (when search is working) and, occasionally, RoadBikeReview.
Thats why I stopped reading magazines. They make vast majority of their money from advertisers so how can their reviews possibly be without bias?
mustang1 is offline  
Old 02-07-10, 02:22 PM
  #4  
Should Be More Popular
 
datlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,045

Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22592 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times in 4,158 Posts
^^ +1. Since when have you seen a less-than-glowing review in a magazine? Sometimes it's hard to tell the reviews/articles from the advertisements.
datlas is offline  
Old 02-07-10, 02:26 PM
  #5  
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
I like Test Rider. I particularly like the 'what bikes really weigh' video. Spot-on. As I keep telling you clowns, once you get down in the 16 lb range, give or take, you are there.
patentcad is offline  
Old 02-09-10, 09:44 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
zeo_max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Alabama, boy !
Posts: 863

Bikes: FUJI Nevada 1.0 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ok I've been watching some more video reviews. It seems like every product they test is "The best product of it's kind they've ever seen". It gets to the point of a Deja Vu feeling. Plus so far I've seen they've used the same video of a guy riding the Fuji SST 1.0 to review the bike itself, the Shimano Di2 system, and some Dura-Ace carbon wheels. I'm a little disappointed now.
zeo_max is offline  
Old 02-09-10, 09:52 PM
  #7  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
I like Test Rider. I particularly like the 'what bikes really weigh' video. Spot-on. As I keep telling you clowns, once you get down in the 16 lb range, give or take, you are there.
I know the guys who do testrider, and I was in the shop when they were weighing the bikes for that article. They don't like everything that they review, but they pretty much only review things that they would probably like anyway.
umd is offline  
Old 02-09-10, 11:46 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
I know the guys who do testrider, and I was in the shop when they were weighing the bikes for that article. They don't like everything that they review, but they pretty much only review things that they would probably like anyway.
I love every bike I own. But I can also point out at least a dozen flaws or places where each bike has room for improvement. When a website, like TestRider, raves about every product they test I begin to think that they don't have a clue about what they're doing...
sstorkel is offline  
Old 02-09-10, 11:55 PM
  #9  
Live to ride ride to live
 
Carbon Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896

Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sstorkel
I love every bike I own. But I can also point out at least a dozen flaws or places where each bike has room for improvement. When a website, like TestRider, raves about every product they test I begin to think that they don't have a clue about what they're doing...
I have wondered about this too. I haven't watched Testrider in a while, but every bike they ride is the best bike they have ever riden. Just once I would like to hear them say, "This bike is not worth the money; or you could get a better bike with your $$$$".
Carbon Unit is offline  
Old 02-09-10, 11:56 PM
  #10  
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
My bikes are all flawless. Except for the motor.
patentcad is offline  
Old 02-09-10, 11:57 PM
  #11  
moth -----> flame
 
Beaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,916

Bikes: 11 CAAD 10-4, 07 Specialized Roubaix Comp, 98 Peugeot Horizon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The R-sys review was a good alternative to the "best ever" trend.

https://testrider.com/fly.aspx?layout...axid=81&cid=91
__________________
BF, in a nutshell
Beaker is offline  
Old 02-10-10, 12:08 AM
  #12  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by sstorkel
I love every bike I own. But I can also point out at least a dozen flaws or places where each bike has room for improvement. When a website, like TestRider, raves about every product they test I begin to think that they don't have a clue about what they're doing...
On the other hand I know that the tester that did the Isaac Aerotic and the Campy 11 absolutely loved them, no review shlling going on there. I've seen them point out a few minor nits in some of their pieces, not sure what else you really could expect. They generally don't test the stuff that's crap, but as was pointed out above, they weren't in love with the R-SYS.
umd is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cyclelogue
General Cycling Discussion
2
05-21-16 06:59 AM
cyclelogue
General Cycling Discussion
0
05-16-16 07:59 PM
JJsuton
Road Cycling
3
05-13-15 10:08 AM
pathlesspedaled
Touring
2
04-20-12 03:46 AM
norskagent
Commuting
3
07-19-10 03:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.